Watch
Twilight

Twilight

2008
Romance
Drama
2h 2m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 19.24% from 8824 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(8824)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 16 Dec 2008
1
10th
I nearly died of ennui. Boring, vaguely sexist crap for fat girls and morons. Here is a list of things that are terrible: the writing, the direction, the special effects, the cinematography, the bulk of the acting, the premise, etc. Fuck you, movie.
Rated 03 Sep 2011
8
2nd
Despite the score, I have learned something very valuable from Twilight. Bitches love it when you sneak in their house and watch them sleep. DO I HEAR WEDDING BELLS IN MY NEAR FUTURE!!!!
Rated 13 Dec 2009
0
1st
If you're an angry twinker who hates his dad and wears garbage bags to school with black mascara, and skips on exams to meet "the locals" at the old IHOP for a 2pm triple blow in the Men's room, I'll like you better than this. I'll accept you into my home on Thanksgiving and ask you back for Christmas before I allow the son of a bitch who is responsible for this. This is unacceptable and needs to stop immediately. They're coming out with sequels for this shit, hopefully rapture gets us first.
Rated 05 Dec 2010
36
10th
Vampires playing softball whilst softly sparkling.
Rated 20 Apr 2009
0
1st
Wooden performances, laughable dialogue, your generic girl loves boy story and the most random baseball game you'll ever witness. The "villains" were introduced and presented terribly. It was hard to take serious and it just never peaks. Painful to watch and with the lame conflicts, its just "omg how good looking is Edward?" Seriously avoid this like the fucking plague.
Rated 26 Feb 2020
10
4th
LET ME MAKE ONE THING CLEAR; I DON'T DO MOVIES WITH " SPARKLING VAMPIRES ".... AND I NEVER WOULD HAVE WATCHED THIS PIECE OF CRAP IF I'D KNOWN PRIOR TO WATCHING IT
Rated 27 Aug 2009
67
0th
If you like sparkling vampires that don't drink human blood and like dating human girls, this movie is for you. Based on the popular series that makes teenage girls go wild because of the "perfect" Edward Cullen, this movie is as laughable as the book. While the movie is made to be a romance/drama, I laughed at the ridiculous behavior of the main characters. There are some fun scenes based on super vampire speed, but for the most part the movie is choppy and full of awkward acting.
Rated 27 Feb 2017
34
5th
Not hyperbolically bad but it's hampered by syfy channel production value and two of the most stoic, unlikeable leads in recent memory - now maybe that's the point (think Heathers) but it doesn't do this film any favors. Watching it nearly ten years on it's kind of funny how much Kristen Stewart is made to seem like the most desirable girl in the world when Anna Kendrick is standing right behind her. If they had switched roles this would have been a lot more charming.
Rated 22 Nov 2008
3
28th
Basically boils down to being pseudosexual gothic erotica for tween girls and lonely goth teenagers to masturbate to for the first and five thousandth times, respectively. That said, it has definite kitsch value; I laughed plenty at the hysterically overblown melodrama and the mind-raping ludicrousness of vampire baseball.
Rated 04 Jul 2015
65
11th
Line? Line? Line? Line? Line? Line? Line? Line? Line? Line? Line? Line? Line? Line? Line? Line? Line? Line? Line? Line?
Rated 08 Mar 2009
16
8th
Prepare yourself for the most "aimed at teenage girls" movie you've ever seen in your entire God damn life. Even the most generic musicals can't hold a candle to this homeroom bad boy. Full of "dark and brooding" characters, some of the worst awkward dialog and acting you've ever seen Twilight is painful experience for every sense. The only redeeming feature is a bit of visual flare, that's obviously copied, ripped, stolen, what-have-you, from Interview with the Vampire.
Rated 03 Apr 2009
6
5th
All I could think about was: "wtf, a shining vampire"
Rated 06 Jul 2010
0
8th
A 16 mm pornographic movie has more plot and development than this toxic garbage presented to the uneducated rubes. Wood posts have better acting skills than the walking sticks called actors, whereas waiting for the grass to grow in Antarctica over wintertime is a more engaging prospect than suffer through this crap. Women will like this if they're fat, permanently single or on their menopause; and everyone else who is unforgivably cretinous. Other than that, it was quite significunt.
Rated 31 Dec 2008
30
3rd
While as a film I feel compelled to give this a bad score (terrible acting, directing, sfx, and more abound) I can also say that I was pretty entertained at the theater. Though I regret paying to see this, it's a good movie to watch with friends when you're in a silly mood because it tries so hard to be serious, and fails so miserably every step of the way. Oh, and there's sparkling. Much sparkling.
Rated 14 Jul 2009
30
9th
I'm pretty sure that the only people who even wanted this movie made in the first place were 15-year-old scene girls and fat goths, and even then, if they have any taste at all they'll find this appalling. The script is awkward and painful, the special effects are awful, and why do the characters always stand around just staring at each other during pivotal, dramatic moments in the film? Oh, I know - because it's a lot easier to write about a stare than write good dialog.
Rated 03 Nov 2009
0
4th
Truly disasterously awful. This is so, so bad. The script is pathetic, the whole film makes no sense, the dialog is painful, the acting is abysmal (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIcuRP86lhE) and the whole film is generally a jumbled mess of teenage romance and a misunderstanding of what vampires are. Absolutely awful. I'd sooner watch Dracula 2000 than this travesty again. It doesn't even have a plot. The fact that this is what's popular these days makes me want to cry. Or punch someone.
Rated 17 Dec 2008
32
18th
Gothic, lukewarm and sexual vampiric crapfest fair for little teenage girls and fat chicks. I have never seen a movie this overrated in a long time. It's destined to become the next Titanic in the box office.
Rated 22 Nov 2008
48
15th
exaggerated vampire image with ridiculous color scheme, very poor establishment of the story, this movie would only rock virgin/horny minds of teenagers, with a love story that's supposed to develop between the main characters, which not likely would convince nor satisfy any sensible viewer.
Rated 26 Mar 2009
80
72nd
Vampire baseball. Beautiful, sparkling vampire baseball.
Rated 28 Mar 2009
30
4th
Hahaha, what do I give this? It was unintentionally hilarious. I wanted to like this, I really did, because haters can be dumb. But this movie was awful. Bad acting, bad script (no character development... people just say shit), horrible special effects, lameness galore, some awkward choices of music, etc. What has Twilight contributed to the world? The song Decode, and even that took too long to arrive. I give this a 30 for it's hilarity though, me and my girl cracked up.
Rated 04 Feb 2009
0
3rd
I cut, I bleed, I cry. Save me, dear Mr. Sparkly-Ass Vampire. You complete me.
Rated 10 Feb 2009
10
14th
Twilight's story is a fan-fiction that somehow got published I feel I could read the book/script on some vamp love website where vampires are no longer evil creatures of the night but are instead glittery lovepires.
Rated 06 Dec 2010
8
1st
Things from Twilight that make me laugh: lighting, staging, screenwriting, pining, awkward pauses, pasty makeup, jump cuts, the tree scene, running, Taylor Lautner's hair, Kristen Stewert's O Face during the glistening moment, the glistening moment, baseball, blue lighting, "Oh no I'm hurt the camera's all wonky!", pretentious end credit sequence, bare-chested werewolf men.
Rated 18 Jul 2010
2
21st
one of the best bestiality movies of all time
Rated 19 May 2020
24
8th
I'd heard of the baseball scene but seeing it in context....my wife got annoyed at my excited prattling: these vampires are so gleefully excited to play baseball because they love baseball SO much but they hit the ball too darn loud so have to wait for the cover of a thunderstorm to DROP EVERYTHING and go play baseball!? This may be the single greatest concept of the entire series! And it ends with some other vampires showing up and everybody hissing at each other! I love a hissing vampire!
Rated 29 Nov 2008
2
10th
The special effects are abysmal, the plot is cheeky, and the suggestion of a sequel is terrible.
Rated 30 Mar 2020
20
4th
RiffTrax 50. Stephanie Meyer's fantasy doesn't translate well onscreen because Bella's the average (or below) girl who would just love you so much if you paid her any attention, so she deserves a brooding superhero who obsesses over her despite their age difference, but Stewart's too pretty. Good thing KS + RP turn out decent. I liked the high school stuff but ultimately vampires are central. Stupid baseball. Fav scene: Anna Kendrick in foreground for no reason other than to steal the scene.
Rated 01 Apr 2010
75
53rd
I am ashamed. Although I didn't love it, it is a mini-guilty pleasure.
Rated 05 Jul 2010
22
5th
Good god this is horrible. Bad acting, horrible editing, and a terrible script. The vampires look like heroin addicts and no one can muster any display of emotion. At least the Rifftrax for it is hilarious. Should only be viewed with the aforementioned Rifftrax and/or under the influence of massive amounts of psychotropics. Line? ...Line?
Rated 13 May 2009
30
5th
should get nominated for some razzies on the acting end. some of the scenes are badly acted itll make you lol. there is so much extra lip bitting its insane. the best thing about this movie was the ending credits playing 15 steps-radiohead. ohh forgot to mention the baseball scene. youtube it and have a laugh.
Rated 14 Mar 2015
60
24th
Not really "good" on any level but nowhere near as terrible as some people claim. Shoddy production is easy to laugh at and the acting ranged from lousy to terrible but it's completely harmless and has a passable story that actually means something to its target audience. Compare this to Transformers and it's Citizen Kane.
Rated 29 Nov 2009
17
6th
This movie uses a fascinating technique: make all of the minor characters annoying, so the mediocre leads seem interesting in comparison. To be fair, the villain was sort of interesting. Too bad he was only on screen for 10 minutes, leaving 2 hours without an actual conflict.
Rated 24 Mar 2009
55
11th
Points for a good soundtrack (at least until the credits--screw Linkin Park and Paramore.) Points for the retarded-ness of vampires playing baseball, and the people flying around on obvious wires, on second thought--was this movie actually supposed to be serious? Anyway...crappy vampire flick, awesome romance for fourteen year old girls, did I mention I'm twenty-something and male?
Rated 30 Mar 2016
35
5th
Watching movies with my girlfriend, chapter 'fuck this shit': This movie is terrible for all the obvious reasons, but also rather amusing to watch as it is often ridiculously funny. This review is rather mild because on the same weekend I have seen much worse (Charlie's Angels, 2000) and also much more boring (The Assassin, 2015). The depressing conclusion is that Twilight was the most pleasant viewing experience during those 24 hours. Fuck my life.
Rated 07 May 2009
65
46th
If the rest of the series can deliver scenes like VAMPIRE BASEBALL, then I'm in for the long run. Robert Pattinson literally shines here.
Rated 18 Jan 2009
20
8th
Even 20 should be too much. But we were a large company that went to watch this and some of the lines were so hilarious that we did have a lot of laugh with this :P Too bad it wasn't meant to be a comedy!
Rated 06 Apr 2009
11
1st
Senseless and pointless.
Rated 25 Mar 2009
20
21st
The book is anti-feminist, prolife, conservative, poorly-written romance novel trash. I wouldn't let my daughters anywhere near them if I wanted them to be self-assured, wholly realized women. The movie is all of that, hilariously brought to life with bad acting and production. It's the first time in my life I think the movie is better than the book, simply because the movie doesn't subject you to Bella's awful personality quite so thoroughly.
Rated 17 Jan 2010
35
3rd
Apparently Twilight vampires can frolick around in daylight as long as it's overcast. If they stand in the sunlight they glitter like a disco ball. Other than that they are gifted with the usual super strength and apparently are great at romancing living girls. To demonstrate this our loverboy vampire shimmies up a tree like a monkey in one scene with the girl on his back. There's lots of mopey emo acting too and a romance without any chemistry. I laughed enough at the movie to almost enjoy it.
Rated 04 Jan 2009
0
2nd
I was dragged to see this shit. I mean it, I was kicking and scratching and fighting all the way, but I lost. This is the lamest attempt at gothic erotica I've ever come across. It's pathetic that girls all over the country are loving this tasteless trash. Also, the lead character is fugly. ...Say something...
Rated 24 Apr 2010
69
58th
Fucking hilarious. For a braindread vampire blockbuster for angsty tweens, every frame is dripping with such a unusual and pathetic awkwardness that its almost endearing. Bella is one astonishingly boring and unlikeable bitch but all her co-stars' campy angsty theatrics made this movie endlessly entertaining to me. I laughed my ass off. Its lovably and uniquely retarded.
Rated 27 Sep 2010
10
1st
This series has taken everything erotic out of vampires. Vampires equal sex and this film preaches chastity. It just doesn't work. Everything we _know_ about vampires (die in sunlight/impaled on stick etc.) is dismissed (glittery skin!?!?). Rhe dialogue and acting makes me cringe. The scenes in the forest had lovely colors though, therefore the 10 points.
Rated 12 Mar 2009
45
41st
Pretty unambitious as genre crossers go. As a high school romance its pure cheese, characters straight out of a Hollister catalog and a script written like a chat log. As a horror movie, its barely there, with Vampirism treated like an awesome super power with few consequences. But if you're only along for the ride, with the right attitude there's really nothing here that offends. The plot sticks to its formula rails and doesn't aim for much depth, something a casual viewer might even enjoy.
Rated 26 Aug 2010
10
2nd
Girl is in love with a 90 year old man? And old man is immortal and decides to do school over and over..? Mind is blown
Rated 18 Dec 2008
10
2nd
The only thing that spares this movie from a 0 was the unfortunate fact that the crew had to suffer through filming this even more than audiences had to suffer through viewing this.
Rated 21 Mar 2011
25
6th
When vampires get hit by sunlight they should fucking burn, NOT sparkle like diamonds! Twilight needed a Van Helsing, Buffy the Vampire Slayer or Blade like no movie has ever needed it before...
Rated 07 Jun 2023
2
1st
Dives headfirst (well, more like belly flops) into all the awkwardness and melodrama of a teenage crush: See the science class convo where all background noise disappears, and then the rest of the unnecessary voiceovers, stilted dialogue, eye-rolling romantic gestures on swirling cameras, slow motion looks of lust, moody music, all of it dripping with hormones and PNW rain. It's bad, but the way it blurs the line between its content and its craft makes it a singular vision at the very least.
Rated 02 Nov 2020
20
1st
On a scale of deplorably bad to legitimately disturbing, this film lands solidly at the extreme end of the former, to my great relief (but in no universe could its content be found on a different scale). Amateur, nonsensical, often shockingly funny. Kristen Stewart does better with the script than I was led to believe, but Apollo himself could not have given the story any semblance of meaning or substance.
Rated 21 May 2009
50
17th
It's so uniquely bad that I feel like everyone should watch it. Female demographic, I'm sorry that Hollywood is now seeking to heave bowel movements like this upon your intellect too.
Rated 20 Dec 2009
4
0th
I don't recommend seeing this movie unless you have the RiffTrax for it. It was the only way I could stomach it - some hilarious stuff... Really, really excellent comedy movie. Bad in any other genre. What the Summary should say is "A teenage girl risks everything when she falls head over heels for a wannabe vampire who sparkles and is somehow sexy despite looking like he's been hit in the face with the entire ugly tree, several million times. Not to mention the creepy faces he makes. Yeah."
Rated 29 Nov 2008
63
15th
Surely the books reveal a depth of character&insight that make them far surperior2 this lukewarm vampire flick that at times edges on parody(Hi, Vamp family!) Oh the stares&longing glances!4ever on simmer, it's a lethally dull build-up 2 discovering that Edward's a vampire! (Is Bella the ONLY girl who needs to google all these hints-and-a-half 2 figure this out?). Efx aren't special& for1 second when the vampires face off u hope 4 real conflict, but alas, tis but mostly more simmering, my love!
Rated 13 Apr 2009
75
54th
No high point in this movie, although the sexual tension between Bella and Edward does cut like a knife.
Rated 07 Nov 2009
0
0th
I haven't seen this movie but I'm giving it a zero because all my friends are doing it.
Rated 05 Sep 2009
5
2nd
This put such a bummer on the vampire films
Rated 07 Oct 2009
55
32nd
I had a serious laughing attack at the sparkling scene. Seriously? Apart from that... it kills time - although he could just make her a vampire already and they could stop whining altogether. I liked the pictures though, nice colors... And I haven't read the book (and I'm never going to) but I can't think of anything that could be in the books that would make this better. It's a very simple plot. And I'm afraid I'll watch the sequels... why do I always have finish things I've started...
Rated 14 May 2011
32
4th
Dreary, superficial and irritatingly chaste vampire film, with Stewart and Pattinson leading a cast of uniformly drab, colorless performances. Not scary enough, romantic enough or thrilling enough to qualify in any category of entertainment; leaden direction and clumsy exposition at every turn practically sinks it.
Rated 26 Nov 2008
45
7th
Sad and asexual.
Rated 03 Apr 2022
60
46th
this absolutely deserves the camp re-evaluation it's receiving
Rated 07 Sep 2009
45
4th
The first 10 minutes are pretty good, as is some of the other non-vampire stuff. Sadly, the vampire stuff is the core of the film and it's when the writing gets sillest and melodramatic, where the cheesiness ramps up, and most importantly, where the film's terrible messages show their face. The film strips away the horrors of vampirism, yet keeps the angst, and celebrates Bella's willing victimization.
Rated 22 Jan 2009
5
1st
You NEED to read the book to enjoy this movie, if not then you will notice the total lack of character introduction, staring, sparkling (WTF), poor plot, laughable (literally) dialogue, poor acting and poor effects. Its only (slight) redeeming factor is that Kristen Stewart is vaguely hot, and I think I only started thinking that because I couldn't leave midway through the film and was trying to find something to like. Only go if you have read the book are already in love with Edward (Pattinson)
Rated 06 Feb 2009
30
2nd
It terrifies me to live in a world where this little piece of bat guano is a massive hit. Everything about the [thing that bears vague resemblance to a] plot and its execution scream "AWKWARD!", the female protagonist suffers from a severe case of the Mary Sues, and don't even get me started on the friendly vampires who sparkle in the sunlight/play baseball/jump around like Spider-Man on steroids.
Rated 07 Nov 2012
89
85th
Outstanding vampire fantasy love story told from the young woman's point of view. The material hits all the plot points needed for a love story, but it's the themes of personal danger, restraint, celibacy, and internal agony that elevates it to something else - a gothic love story set in the modern day. Filters and scene lighting help create a film that looks hushed, sombre and morose - beautifully done.
Rated 30 Jun 2009
10
3rd
Bad acting, ugly effects and a god awful screenplay. I don't remember hearing dialogue this stiff since the Star Wars prequels.
Rated 05 Jun 2016
5
4th
With the exception of the father none of the characters ever seems to have any motivation for anything they do. The script fails to compensate for this with any sort of drama or tension. The SFX would be sub-par for the 80s. Even with all of that, however, this movie wouldn't be *that* bad. It's the awful acting that really kills it: It is pretty close to the worst acting I have ever seen in any movie ever.
Rated 25 Aug 2009
64
45th
I thought it was very entertaining and I didn't think it would be this good. I thought it would be some sort of Harry Potter lookalike film but this one is more mature. Maybe I enjoyed it so much because it's actually a film by teenagers for teenagers, imo. Too bad it misses somewhat a story, this is more just a lead-in to more.
Rated 01 Dec 2008
59
26th
There are some parts about Twilight that I really enjoyed. For one, Edward Cullin as a character is, or at least will be, a very impressive leading role for the series. For two, the setting and backstory of the Cullin family versus the wolf tribe serves as a good backdrop. And three, the actors set for the parts are good enough. The problems, however, are by and large because of the terrible action sequences, fast-paced story telling and the relative amount of cheese. Okay start.
Rated 13 Mar 2011
30
1st
Beyond a doubt rubbish.
Rated 26 Nov 2008
75
67th
The film's flaws are obvious - it's somewhat cheaply made featuring a few tacky special effects shots (luckily there's only a few), and the ultimate conflict from competing vampires proves uninspired and unmoving; the plot doesn't really explore it. "Twilight" has light humor and mostly wraps itself around its two leads in an absorbing romance story, and thank goodness that Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson are great here and have real chemistry, elevating the movie beyond its shortcomings.
Rated 06 Jun 2012
51
7th
Okay, so this isn't THE WORST THING EVER like so many people say. Unfortunately, it's still pretty fuckin' bad, and not even in a fun way where you can rip into it. Outside of two really well-shot sequences, everything was just extraordinarily dull. The only thing that lived up to my shittiness expectations was the baseball game. Also, while I get what you're going for, Hardwicke, sex and becoming a vampire are not at all the same thing. They're not even in the same ballpark (lolol)
Rated 25 Mar 2009
95
68th
I give this movie a high score for the romance and darkness of the vampire characters.
Rated 23 Mar 2009
70
14th
This movie was highly entertaining, though NOT because it is a great movie. Rather, I was so amused with how they adapted it from the book that I found myself laughing most of the way through. Still, it had its good moments and I felt it captured the "feel" of the book pretty well. I think more careful editing, attention to the special effects, and more even character portrayal would have helped.
Rated 12 Dec 2010
35
11th
Y'know what, fuck it, the cultural significance for better or for worse compels you to see this movie and those that follow it. Do I like it? I can't really say that I do. There are some truly awful, fall-flat-on-your-face moments - and then there are some moments that make you think "Hey, y'know what, fuck the haters." I think it's important to remember that, as silly as their "love story" is, Romeo & Juliet is, too. There's some cool lines, some okay scenes, not enough to totally condemn. Ugh.
Rated 09 Dec 2009
24
10th
Really couldn't understand what the fuss was... the acting was terrible, effects bad... and the story... well there just wasn't one or anything remotely keeping my interest. I really thought I was going to like it as like Vampire movies (even the bad ones) but this was just bad.
Rated 23 Nov 2008
17
1st
This movie was a trainwreck. It was awkward and a little bit creepy. Though the idea is supposed to be romantic, I found it to be incredibly odd and uncomfortable.
Rated 06 Jun 2011
5
1st
I almost can't believe that I actually watched this.
Rated 24 Sep 2009
45
17th
Sometimes so bad it's good. Usually just bad.
Rated 23 Mar 2009
75
20th
Not bad, but not great. I thought this film could have been a lot better & perhaps excelled where the book didn't. However, a combination of confusing editing, odd filming, undeveloped relationships & not-so-special special effects, left me laughing more than I was supposed to. Still, it was still an interesting story. Some aspects of the story were well portrayed, and for what it's worth I did want to finish the film. I'm not going to watch it again immediately, but I am glad I watched it.
Rated 02 Feb 2009
45
7th
I can't believe there are 3 more to come. Utter crap.
Rated 18 Apr 2009
80
70th
A movie you love to hate; worth seeing it just to laugh
Rated 02 Jun 2009
30
18th
The only way how to make this movie interesting would be to replace those pathetic vampires with Nosferatu.
Rated 26 Aug 2011
60
25th
Not nearly as terrible as people make it out to be, and has some genuinely funny moments (the scene where Bella meets Edwards family), although some other scenes (baseball) are unbelievably bad.
Rated 30 May 2019
100
94th
A wonderfully enjoyable film because it's seemingly incognizant of its own ineptitude. Absent of any criticism of the script and it's weird fetishization of abusive relationships, the utterly misguided ugliness of everything - the color grading, costumes, makeup, cinematography and even the blocking - is uproariously funny to watch. The sheer autism and unfamiliarity with human interaction which the actors display is priceless. It blows my mind that there are not just one but four sequels.
Rated 26 May 2012
50
3rd
Rather than waste time and space enumerating on all anti-feminist, anti-girls, anti-human points the story operates on plus everything that is ghastly/laughable about the movie (makeup, costumes, just about anything)-let me clearly declare this is one of my guilty pleasures for 2 reasons-the earnestness with which the actors try to bring seriousness to their roles amidst the pitiful dialogues (come on, you can see them trying HARRRRRRDDDDDD) and the soundtrack-brilliant!
Rated 07 Apr 2009
25
20th
If Hardwicke hadn't taken the romance between a teenage girl and monster at face value, this could have been salvageable. Well... salvageable-ish. So basically, I just want this to be Let the Right One In. Kind of charming in its clumsy self-seriousness. Bonus: Worst use of foreshadowing ever?
Rated 21 Nov 2009
6
1st
Not going to lie, I could only stomach about half an hour of this garbage before I had to turn it off. Morbid curiosity only takes you so far. But it should be said that that half an hour was jam packed with some of the funniest shit I've ever seen (vampire baseball, what the...?). Are there really people who behave like these characters in reality? I'd like to meet them. Actually, scratch that, they'd be as unbearable as this film. Fuck this movie for shitting all over "real" vampire stories.
Rated 30 Mar 2009
41
7th
A film about a voulnerable young girl who falls in love with a controlling, overpossesive stalker who happens to be a vampire.
Rated 26 Jan 2009
98
99th
ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC. And Yes, I will proudly admit to being a "twi-hard" fan having read all 4 of the books more than once =) Can't wait for the others to be filmed
Rated 26 Nov 2013
2
15th
This is the best pop-culture insight into Mormon sexual repression I've ever seen. [BLINKING INTENSIFIES] Also, I'm really mad that RPattz didn't say "That's what I love about these high school girls; I get older, they stay the same age" at some point.
Rated 26 Jun 2010
10
4th
It took me five tries to get through this, but I finally made it. Now I'm up to speed and know what the emo/tweens-world is so hypnotized by. Knowing is not understanding, though. But hey, yeah me!
Rated 04 Sep 2010
0
0th
What a bunch of tossers.
Rated 16 Sep 2010
85
83rd
Just seen it to see what the hype is about and was actually a great movie, alot better then expected and considering its not my normal type of film.
Rated 29 Apr 2009
12
0th
Oh. This made millions in the box office. Stupid women being obsessed with Robert Pattinson.
Rated 26 Jan 2009
20
1st
I can't vouch for the best-selling book (having not read it), but being a slow, poorly acted and largely non-eventful (yet very long) film, "Twilight" doesn't offer the viewer a great deal of bang for you buck, especially when you factor in visual effects that belong in the last millennium. The film has its occasional moments for what it is: a tortured romance flick, but I'd give this one a skip.
Rated 05 Feb 2013
40
43rd
I'm not the demographic for this. I'm almost genetically hardwired not to like it. But having been forced to see it I'll admit it's nowhere near as bad as I feared. It seems like they did the best they could with the source material and I was moderately entertained. The teen drama/sparkly boyband vampires didn't appeal much though, and I'm going to have nightmares about that baseball scene for months.
Rated 22 Mar 2009
8
11th
Traumaticly bad
Rated 06 Jun 2010
100
81st
The best romantic movie that includes action and horror as well.
Rated 27 Jun 2011
3
46th
A better bro flick than you might think
Rated 19 Apr 2009
30
7th
19 Nisan 09. & http://sineofrenik.blogspot.com/2009/01/bir-vampire-gnl-verdim-twilight.html --- berbat oyunculuk, yonetmenlik, ozel effectler ve senaryo. muziklerde bir cok filmin muziklerini cagiristiriyor. baska the fountain olmak uzere...
Rated 18 May 2009
50
35th
Its like a feature length version of the Buffy the vampire slayer tv series, with a little more style and gloss.I found it not unpleasant to watch.
Rated 24 Oct 2009
0
2nd
this film was great! the glistening vampires that were.... this was one of the worst shit bags of an excuse for a "movie" i have ever seen. the entire production staff should be publicly stoned like pagans

Collections

(43)
Compact view
Showing 1 - 24 of 43 results

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...