sign in
register
Watch
Apple TV Google Play Movies Vudu
+7
My Bloody Valentine 3-D
Apple TV Google Play Movies Vudu
+7
JustWatch
Remove ads

My Bloody Valentine 3-D

2009
Suspense/Thriller
Horror
1h 41m
Tom (Ackles) returns to his hometown on the tenth anniversary of the Valentine's night massacre that claimed the lives of 22 people. Instead of a homecoming, however, Tom finds himself suspected of committing the murders, and it seems like his old flame (King) is the only one will believes he's innocent.
Directed by:
Patrick Lussier Patrick Lussier
Written by:
Todd Farmer Todd Farmer John Beaird Stephen A. Miller Zane Smith
+3 more
Starring:
Kerr Smith Kerr Smith Todd Farmer Todd Farmer Marc Macaulay Marc Macaulay Jaime King Jaime King Tom Atkins Tom Atkins Kevin Tighe Kevin Tighe Bingo O'Malley Edi Gathegi Edi Gathegi Jensen Ackles Jensen Ackles Betsy Rue Betsy Rue Megan Boone Megan Boone Jeff Hochendoner
More
Genres:
Suspense/Thriller, Horror
AKA:
My Bloody Valentine 3 D
Country:
USA
Language:
English
imdb More information at IMDb
See title update history
Suggest an edit
Show Less
Your probable score
?

My Bloody Valentine 3-D

2009
Suspense/Thriller
Horror
1h 41m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 25.35% from 853 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(853)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
doctor7doctor7
Rated 27 May 2009
21
12th
I never saw the 3D version of this but the 2D DVD version instead and I can assure you that the only thing this movie has going for it would be the 3D because damn is it a bad movie. Unless you're a horror fan there's nothing for you here. It's full of absurd plots, bad acting, mediocre production values and over-the-top kills. I think that describes the movie perfectly and you should be able to tell if you'll enjoy the movie or not.
Rated 27 May 2009
kasperlKasperL
Rated 17 Jan 2010
30
10th
Pretty bad in 2D.
Rated 17 Jan 2010
teddedonTedDedon
Rated 17 Jan 2009
79
57th
I'm just going to say it like this: My Bloody Valentine 3D is in 3D. That's really all you need to know. Really though, practically from the minute the film starts you'll realize just what a treat you're in store for. Not only is this great as a dumb horror movie, as it has good kills, lots of funny lines, and a relatively interesting story, but the 3D gimmick works in its favor greatly making some of the scenes more entertaining than just about any movie out there.
Rated 17 Jan 2009
ytadelYtadel
Rated 18 Feb 2009
4
43rd
Watchable in a dumb fun kind of way, just an endless succession of pickaxes to the heads of half the people in this sleepy little town. Dumbass ending. A super-long full frontal nude scene from Betsy Rue; she must have spent days in a row on set in her altogether, singlehandedly boosts my score a little.
Rated 18 Feb 2009
saucyjacksaucyjack
Rated 27 Jan 2009
79
65th
Really, really fun time at the movies. Not scary at all, but a really great rollercoaster ride and date movie. Frankly, that's all it sets out to be and does a hell of a job at doing so. Plus the appearances of Tom Atkins and Kevin Tighe from Road House made me grin from ear to ear.
Rated 27 Jan 2009
adoubleadouble
Rated 26 Oct 2012
60
31st
Certainly not a good movie, but miles ahead of the garbage that passes for horror remakes a lot of the time. A fun way to pass 2 hours, which is enough for me with horror movies.
Rated 26 Oct 2012
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 07 Nov 2022
78
55th
Of course, you always have to be susceptible to, and in the mood for, these sort of grisly slashers, but this is a better than decent one; uses its 3D gimmick effectively and imaginatively and moves at a fast enough clip to forget about pondering the absurdities of the premise and screenplay (“We’ve got Valentine’s Day and we got… mines. Mash ‘em up!”) Well performed under the circumstances, with stalwart Atkins fun to have around as the elder statesman; overall better than it has a right to be.
Rated 07 Nov 2022
luna6ixLuna6ix
Rated 19 Jan 2009
75
52nd
it is a big steaming pile of horror movie cliches and does nothing to raise the bar. however, it proves a point, even a cookie-cutter movie looks real purdy in dat dar 3-D.
Rated 19 Jan 2009
helfen419helfen419
Rated 03 Feb 2009
40
7th
Probably the best 3-D I've ever seen, but one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Worth seeing in theatres
Rated 03 Feb 2009
mjvmoviemanMJVmovieMan
Rated 18 Jan 2009
37
9th
Making it a 3D experience only makes a steaming pile of crap jump out at you sporadically. There's a lot of decapitations - every death is exploited beyond belief - but there's not one scary moment here. It's meant to be humorous I guess, and provide a splatter-fest for horror fans, but this isn't 'Freddy vs. Jason' where I felt like I was in on the joke. The storyline, the characters, dialogue and seen-it-before ending sucked. I know there's an intended audience for this, but I'm not it.
Rated 18 Jan 2009
monstergearMonsterGear
Rated 06 Feb 2009
55
15th
The movie is nothing special, but I will say that the 3D (gimmicky though it truly was) elevated the experience greatly. And, I will admit that it kept me guessing about the killer's identity, which shames me a little
Rated 06 Feb 2009
fleetfoxfleet_fox
Rated 18 Jan 2009
10
1st
Saw it out of irony. Anyone giving it a high score should be ashamed. This film is a total disaster in every respect.
Rated 18 Jan 2009
lupisterlupister
Rated 10 Jan 2012
61
70th
Best 3D usage I've ever seen
Rated 10 Jan 2012
jackdurdenJackDurden
Rated 16 Feb 2009
5
14th
The 3-D is the only reason to see this. Everything else about it made me feel like I was watching a really bad STV horror movie.
Rated 16 Feb 2009
fenixdownfenixdown
Rated 26 Oct 2017
62
19th
Fast paced with a ridiculous body count.
Rated 26 Oct 2017
micahmicah
Rated 14 Aug 2010
65
50th
A generic slasher that uses the 3D gimmick to make it stand out. Worth a watch for horror fans.
Rated 14 Aug 2010
easydiffeasydiff
Rated 03 Jun 2011
64
66th
Underrated, grisly flick. True grindhouse, and if you're gonna do 3-D, there better goddamn well be tits and fire axes flying at the camera, and this film does both.
Rated 03 Jun 2011
chemical404chemical404
Rated 27 Aug 2009
10
1st
I saw it in 3D and that didn't help much. This film uses a very simple formula - take a script of old genre classic, use all cliches you can think of, add 3D gimmick, and pray for good profit. Middle-aged worn-out naked ladies running and screaming isn't really my cup of tea. No thrills this valentine's day.
Rated 27 Aug 2009
sandwichlordSandwichlord
Rated 24 May 2009
1
0th
Watched it in 3D and the effects were pretty good; however, everything else from the plot to the actors was utter shit.
Rated 24 May 2009
stradivariusStradivarius
Rated 31 Jan 2009
68
32nd
Gets a lot of extra points for fun gore and the great 3D work. Otherwise, its a typical horror flick full of pretty people making incredibly stupid decisions until they're impaled in the face by a pick-axe.
Rated 31 Jan 2009
katelynkatelyn
Rated 07 Jun 2011
75
34th
I've never seen the original, but I found it to be a pretty predictable story line. I guessed who the killer was within 15 to 20 minutes.The gore helped make up for that, though.
Rated 07 Jun 2011
rihreyrihrey
Rated 16 Aug 2019
16
7th
body parts soaring towards you in an astounding and groundbreaking new way of using 3D, truly remarkable and a turning point in the history of cinema.
Rated 16 Aug 2019
timmotimmo
Rated 02 Aug 2010
40
6th
Really stupid. Probably best enjoyed in 3-D on a big screen. Fans of bad horror are the only people who should bother seeing this.
Rated 02 Aug 2010
mjoc0723mjoc0723
Rated 18 Jul 2022
70
78th
Everything a good slasher flick should be.
Rated 18 Jul 2022
damildamil
Rated 05 Jan 2018
45
17th
I had a good time with the original, but this remake was pretty joyless. It changed enough things so that it wasn't a carbon copy, but didn't do much better. There were some dumb twists. The shameless 3D shots were very obnoxious, as they often are. The kills were ok, but again, designed for 3D, and there was too much CGI. The acting wasn't very impressive overall, and I'd say Jensen Ackles sucked. Yeah, I didn't like it.
Rated 05 Jan 2018
jonnyboyjonny_boy
Rated 12 May 2009
40
21st
This would've been fun to watch in 3-D but without it was just another holiday massacre. Not the worst of the kind though.
Rated 12 May 2009
tritwo1tritwo1
Rated 07 Aug 2010
98
72nd
AMAZING if you can watch it in 3D. Better than the original.
Rated 07 Aug 2010
indyatmnINDYATMN
Rated 26 Jan 2009
75
41st
GRADING ON A CURVE since it's tough 2 complain after choosing 2 sit through a modern teen horror flick. They're targeted 2 teens 4 a reason: they don't need much-a few scares & "hot" "actors". This does little more than fulfill those requirments. Some thought was put into makng the most of 3D & crafting effective scares, but little else. It's all weakened by 1/2 dimensional characters, "actors" whose looks distract from playing anything other than actors & a serious lack of fun or wit.
Rated 26 Jan 2009
sophiesophie
Rated 23 May 2009
60
38th
3D is so awesome! Although the movie itself was nothing super special, but it was alright. However in 3D, it's a blast! I love it
Rated 23 May 2009
solomonburrrSolomonBurrr
Rated 28 Jul 2020
50
13th
49.5.
Rated 28 Jul 2020
spokowapSpokoWap
Rated 01 Nov 2010
60
33rd
W 3D ciekawszy, ale z braku mozliwosci mozna obejrzec i zwykla wersje - to calkiem przyzwoity horror.
Rated 01 Nov 2010
meatMeat
Rated 18 Aug 2009
8
25th
Rather then birthing a sequel I'm going to plead for the producers to consider casting the same people in a much more rewarding concept: How about a tv show where the bit part actors from a dosen shit 90210 clones have to fight it off Big Brother style for a minimum wage job on an imitation QVC channel, selling porcelain cats to old women? The twist is each week the loser of the phone poll has to be eaten alivee by the other contestants The ball's in your court dudes, you know my number.
Rated 18 Aug 2009
johnsandwichJohnSandwich
Rated 07 Dec 2010
20
5th
boring
Rated 07 Dec 2010
boogiemanBOOGIEMAN
Rated 07 Sep 2011
72
71st
the end ruined whole movie ... could have been cult modern slasher
Rated 07 Sep 2011
erikstronkserikstronks
Rated 30 May 2009
68
12th
Over the top and cheesy, so only watch it if you like that kind of thing. It's a slasher, nothing more, nothing less.
Rated 30 May 2009
kmcneilKMcNeil
Rated 19 Aug 2009
4
33rd
Ridiculous dialogue, plot and acting - and even more ridiculous waaaay-over-the-top-killings. In other words: Good fun! But probably only in 3D.
Rated 19 Aug 2009
johnnyzombieJohnnyZombie
Rated 05 Jul 2010
83
47th
A fun bloody throwback that nearly equals the original.
Rated 05 Jul 2010
ryan_luedersRyan Lueders
Rated 05 Oct 2016
66
23rd
I was hoping for a bloody good time, but this Valentine had some stale chocolates in it. It was strange seeing Jensen Ackles outside of the show Supernatural. He did a pretty decent job. I wouldn't say any of the acting threw me off in this film, it was more about the writing. A lot of the violence didn't make much sense and although the look of the killer was pretty cool (A scary guy in mining equipment) it just didn't have the scary feel of like a Jason or Michael Meyers...
Rated 05 Oct 2016
mwgerbmwgerb
Rated 02 Mar 2016
26
12th
How quickly did the 3D in this get old and become a crappy gimmick? 5 years? 1 year? 1 week? Really poor twists, unscary jump-scares, and bad writing make this a bad movie in any dimension.
Rated 02 Mar 2016
murravenerMurravener
Rated 20 Jan 2009
85
80th
This is a film you need to see in theaters. Its fun to watch in large groups and the 3D is taken full advantage of. See it now if you like horror.
Rated 20 Jan 2009
zealot185Zealot185
Rated 21 Jan 2009
24
6th
I wish my glasses would add some dimensions to this poorly cliched plot. The 3D novelty wore off for me after the initial major killing scene (there's only so many ways you can kill someone with a pickaxe), and the whole "mystery" of who the killer is is literally thrown in your face within the first 15-20 minutes of the movie. It doesn't help that I was surrounded by high school chicks in the theater who went "omg AHH" at every single scene. But I guess that's who this movie was made for.
Rated 21 Jan 2009
jdelbalzo99jdelbalzo99
Rated 08 Feb 2010
80
55th
This was just straight up a fun experience.
Rated 08 Feb 2010
gokcanzgokcanz
Rated 26 Oct 2012
38
10th
* Casting, Acting : 3 * Script : 3 * Directing, Aura : 4 * Ease of Viewing : 5 * Naked Eye : 4
Rated 26 Oct 2012
adoomoot3a_doomoot3
Rated 29 May 2009
69
24th
Here we have it, folks: THE GREATEST 3-D HOOROR MOVIE EVER!
Rated 29 May 2009
lrampartllrampartl
Rated 05 Feb 2009
46
23rd
What a pleasant surprise. Corny, over the top, tons of blood, and a whole lotta fun.
Rated 05 Feb 2009
mangoluver4umangoluver4u
Rated 20 Dec 2009
0
5th
guy with a pick axe i'm scared
Rated 20 Dec 2009
madmanMadMan
Rated 25 Apr 2019
30
3rd
Lifeless, blah color schemed lame remake that has Tom Atkins and hardly uses him. See the original instead.
Rated 25 Apr 2019
zombiebuffetZombieBuffet
Rated 11 Jun 2009
60
50th
Not great, by any means... but fun... and funny. Ultra-cliche with some over-the-top gore.
Rated 11 Jun 2009
bizortbizort
Rated 03 Feb 2010
20
6th
The 3D is only reason to see it. Since it's not in theaters anymore, there really is no reason to watch this thing.
Rated 03 Feb 2010
picklemanPickle_Man
Rated 23 Jan 2019
30
5th
Are we absolutely certain that this isn't an episode of spn?
Rated 23 Jan 2019
moviejunkie5Moviejunkie5
Rated 05 Feb 2009
68
15th
The 3D is so effective and the colors and camera shots are crisp and life-like. The setting is perfect and very reminiscent of the town from the original. The acting is decent from all involved and the script and dialogue are not bad either. My Bloody Valentine delivers exactly what your looking for if you see this movie: plenty of gore in the tradition of 70s/80s slasher pics. The gore effects are brought to us in glorious 3D, which makes it all that more great.
Rated 05 Feb 2009
tinythedoggtinythedogg
Rated 12 Sep 2009
80
83rd
A pretty fun movie that is pretty fast paced and is not all that boring. It gets right into the action and it doesn't really stop.
Rated 12 Sep 2009
storchcomStorchcom
Rated 17 Aug 2009
90
84th
Haven't laughed that hard since my hamster died. Hey, guys, have you heard? The serial killer miner who kills teens down his mine on Valetine's Day is back. On an unrelated note, today's Valentine's Day - anyone fancy bringing their teen mates down the mine for a party? Genius.
Rated 17 Aug 2009
iyisinekiyisinek
Rated 24 Aug 2011
72
54th
katil kim, slasher, tunel, maden, yer alti, kazmali katil, seri katil, kan, vahset, (Harry Warden adinda bir psikopat katil kasabada büyük bir katliam yaptiktan sonra öldürülür fakat 10 yil sonra ayni olaylar cereyan etmeye baslayacaktir. Olaydan kurtulan 4 arkadas ve tüm kasaba katilin yada katillerin yeniden dönüsünden etkilenecektir.) Müstehcen sahneler var. Asiri kan var.
Rated 24 Aug 2011
daesanyeDaeSanye
Rated 31 May 2009
4
15th
predictable and without 3D not very entertaining... 3D update: even with 3D not very entertaining
Rated 31 May 2009
wolfgangbWolfgangB
Rated 21 May 2009
76
69th
Nice use of 3D without overdoing the "just for show" shots.
Rated 21 May 2009
barthalenBarthalen
Rated 11 Jun 2009
69
51st
Really not that bad at all. The original was a bit weak, but the kills in this remake are amusingly gory and make up for a lot. And hell, isn't that the main reason to watch it in the first place?
Rated 11 Jun 2009
kevinflinttnkevinflinttn
Rated 08 Feb 2009
82
22nd
It was great to see a 3D horror movie. The storyline was a little week, but all and all good. Think Friday the 13th. The ending left it wide-open for a part two.
Rated 08 Feb 2009
luciusgoreluciusgore
Rated 18 Feb 2009
35
65th
"... the best slasher movie in years"
Rated 18 Feb 2009
realmacgyverRealMacgyver
Rated 16 Mar 2010
60
30th
View in 2D it probably loses a lot. Pretty standard slasher fair, made me want a Supernatural movie
Rated 16 Mar 2010
mr_rigardmr rigard
Rated 05 Jul 2009
66
67th
Sometimes the 3-D is "okay"; sometime it's spot-on. Either way, My Bloody Valentine is a pretty fun ride. Yes, it's gory, and you'll discover there's many different ways to bludgeon and impale a head with a pick-axe. But, that's all a part of the genre, and you know it going in to it. With so many lame entries in the horror genre, at least this one has a bit of heart. . ., and a halfway descent storyline.
Rated 05 Jul 2009
sweinbergs.weinberg
Rated 19 Apr 2009
80
70th
"On par with Chainsaw '03 and Dawn '04. No pretense, no delusions, just slick, basic stalk & shock mayhem with a 3-D coating that works unexpectedly well."
Rated 19 Apr 2009
slantmagSlantMag
Rated 21 Oct 2010
25
61st
"Mildly proficient as far as throwbacks go." - Nick Schager
Rated 21 Oct 2010
pianosamaPianoSama
Rated 26 Aug 2019
65
45th
It has a few clever moments, including well-placed callbacks to the original and a few new twists that add a little something to the plot, but beyond those small victories it fails to be anything special. Fine performances from a cast who are trying to make it work are muddled by a messy script and cheesy 3D effects, and the intrigue of the final twist is brought down by a ridiculous last-minute second twist that has no business existing. Overall, it's decent for what it is, but little more.
Rated 26 Aug 2019
jebJeb
Rated 15 Jan 2009
83
68th
I was luckily invited to the premiere of this. With a huge bowl of popcorn and dished out with new 3-D shades, My Bloody Valentine is a blast. It feels like your right in the middle of what's going on, and it's the most fun I've had in theaters in a long time. The glasses have been modified, which looks a lot cooler than the original red-blue combination. With unlimited buckets of blood, nice cheer-worthy screams, many upsetting moments and a gas-mask wielder, this is a hoot. Go ahead, kill me.
Rated 15 Jan 2009
bitch_alertBitch Alert
Rated 29 May 2009
40
25th
A mediocre thrill ride with a couple of cool 3D effects. Not a real movie, though. Betsy Rue has the best performance, good call Patrick!
Rated 29 May 2009
krankstakranksta
Rated 06 Feb 2009
45
8th
The 3d experience was awesome. Other than that, the movie is terrible. terrible script, terrible acting and not enough boobs.
Rated 06 Feb 2009
glmglm
Rated 10 Oct 2011
50
15th
49.750
Rated 10 Oct 2011
guy_piranhaguy piranha
Rated 02 Feb 2014
40
12th
Somebody obviously thought a pickaxe would make for some great 3-d killing shots. And that is the only reason this was made. Millions of dollars for a 3-d pickaxe. Thank you, world. And also fuck you.
Rated 02 Feb 2014
vandelay1Vandelay1
Rated 17 Aug 2009
35
28th
Worth a watch
Rated 17 Aug 2009
mikebrackenmikebracken
Rated 24 Apr 2009
80
79th
"My Bloody Valentine is a fun throwback to the golden era of slasher movies--packed with gore, nudity, and the classic gimmick of 3D."
Rated 24 Apr 2009
brutalbrianBrutalBrian
Rated 18 Jan 2009
76
50th
This release is huge in a sense. When I say huge, I mean the fact that a horror movie gets shown in 3D in the 21st century is an impressive feat. I never would have guessed it would have happened. And they chose to remake a early 80s gory slasher flick. I normally despise remakes, but this one isn't that bad, I would say is on par with the remake of The Hills Have Eyes. The 3D, or REAL-D aspect makes this thing fucking amazing. Has a decent plot and I hope there is another REAL-D film
Rated 18 Jan 2009
ribcageribcage
Rated 23 Jul 2015
42
17th
Pretty standard slasher that stands out for having very good 3d and cool gore. Acting was worse than normal for this type of movie. Also characters behaved worse than normal...standing and staring when shooting the gun in their hand would have been the more realistic behavior
Rated 23 Jul 2015
freakfreak
Rated 31 May 2009
55
17th
It reminded me of all those CD-ROM interactive games that were around in the 90's. Dull & entertaining at the same time. Michael Meyers should also consider transfer to the 3D universe.
Rated 31 May 2009
billyshearsBillyShears
Rated 17 Jan 2009
50
21st
Tom Atkins mustache picture.
Rated 17 Jan 2009
stacilaynestacilayne
Rated 04 Mar 2009
1
0th
"...this remake is definitely one best seen for yourself (twice!)."
Rated 04 Mar 2009
reiveReive
Rated 08 Feb 2009
40
15th
Pretty bad movie. Extremely cheesy, cliché. Would've been a lower rating had it not been 3D.
Rated 08 Feb 2009
lennyneroLennyNero
Rated 25 Feb 2012
60
42nd
Kevin Tighe, Tom Atkins and the nice 3D effect make it worthwhile.
Rated 25 Feb 2012
kgbelliveaukgbelliveau
Rated 04 May 2023
65
17th
The 2-D version basically throws it in your face that this movie was meant for 3-D. It is not a bad movie overall some with some gore and a serviceable horror movie plot. It is paper thin but a good movie to riff on with your friends while watching the events unfold.
Rated 04 May 2023
logiccureLogicCure
Rated 09 Jan 2011
50
13th
Oh Jensen... I only watched this for you...
Rated 09 Jan 2011
jkendrickj.kendrick
Rated 19 Mar 2009
30
61st
"...undeniably hokey, but also giddily effective, with the 3-D turning what might otherwise be a routine slash-and-hack job into a ridiculously gory theme park ride."
Rated 19 Mar 2009
riverbelleRiverbelle
Rated 05 Jun 2009
88
75th
It wouldn't have been half as good had it not been in 3D
Rated 05 Jun 2009

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...