Antichrist

i'd run into traffic to avoid gainsbourg on the street.

Graphic,gory,full of strange symbolism. Great first date movie, or family night movie.

Pretentious crap. After the second time I watched it there was no doubt in my mind this movie means a whole lot less than Trier wants it to.

Despite the fact Antichrist raped my soul, it is brilliant and powerful.

A difficult film for mainstream audiences, and for that matter the faint of heart. Von Trier here effectively mixes Tarkovsky's use of surrealism with the art and philosophy of the middle ages. A complex and unnerving look at morality and gender relationships plays out in some of the most pressing and disturbing final acts of modern film.

Prologue and Epilogue we're good enough to be a 90 but everything in between brought it way down. If you have to watch it, skip the middle

I would like to give this film a higher rating but can't because to me the storyline became weaker in the last 1/3 of the film. By then it felt more about the shock value than the plot. Aesthetically it was perfect. I especially loved the 3 animals in Eden.

Passion - Love - Grieving - Guilt - Distress - Sorrow -Numbness - Desperation - Hate - Life - Survival - Agony -Torment - Death -

sick ! But has good story, unlike most newer films

One of the few films I refuse to rewatch. I saw it years ago and loved it, but it's intimately horrifying to the point that I can't experience it again, despite being so interesting and beautiful that I wish I could.

What does the fox say? Also: penis.

Pervert and sick... Blah! And sexist as well! Women as a symbol of the evil... Definitely a NO GO for me.

IMHO In an actual way, it says and defines a lot about human nature which is still fragile, alone and weak no matter who you are. A very solid flick with some blood and gore.

a bad one, but really impressive!

I did not finish this- a 65 for the outstanding visuals.

Stupid.

I will never watch this again but it is great.

This is beautiful visually, and one of the most disturbing and fucked up things I've ever watched. It starts creepy; the relationship between the husband and wife is simply unnerving and clinical after the loss of a child. Things become more and more despairing until it is truly horrifying. This is a horror film if I've ever saw one. Unfortunately, it ended poorly, I think the director didn't really know what to do, or he hates women or something. Nature will fuck you up.

I didn't understand it. If von Trier really meant something, it completely escaped me. I rate performances. I should watch it again, but I really don't feel like it.

It's hard to review critically acclaimed films poorly without seeming like an uncultured peon but I stand by my opinion that this film is largely a clusterfuck of gross-out shock tactics, implausibility and obscurity for obscurity's sake. I simply didn't enjoy the experience of watching the film and, for the aforementioned reasons, couldn't even take the film seriously as a work of art. However, the does film has great cinematography with some awe-inspiring slow motion sequences but that is all.

It's gruesome, uniquely difficult to stomach. It opens with a married couple fucking, unaware that their son is dying in the next room. This terrible juxtaposition is hardly unique among the film's scenes; Von Trier seems to cherish tormenting the audience with images you'll never be able to extricate from your head. But it's artistic and so well-made. It's a movie that demands respect. You should watch it once, if you imagine you could handle it. But probably not more than that.

I have to watch it again before I can really see how much I 'liked' it...

Well, it's von Trier.

disturbing