Frogs

Kermit is a more threatening movie monster than these frogs.

Some recent personal tragedy has kept me from the two things I love doing: watching movies and writing snarky reviews. Grief is one of those things that changes you immediately and profoundly. Honestly I feel like I have a more mature and experienced worldview because of it. Changed or enlightened or colossally self-unaware, whatever it may be, I'm going to keep watching movies so here I am. Thought I'd return with a takedown of an established emotional classic...I have no idea what I'm doing.

Terrible. The frogs in this movie do none of the killing.

Stock footage of frogs jumping around NOOOOO!!!!

People are offed by a variety of wildlife in this little clunker, but the titular frogs don't even get one confirmed kill. I can't see Hitchcock pulling this shit: "Yeah, I'm going to make a movie called The Birds. It's basically going to be about this small, California town that's attacked by huge hordes of motherfuckin' BATS AND POSSUMS! ROOOOAAAARRRRR!!!!!"

Boring low budget horror flick with a better poster than a premise. No kills in the movie come from frogs, though we do get mediocre death by snakes, gators and even geckos. Watching this movie you get the idea that the filmmakers ended up with a sixty minute film and inserted cutaways of Frogs in order to make their movie feature-length. A complete waste of time.

All they really had to do was walk at a slow pace, and they wouldn't have been in any real danger. Even the guy in the wheelchair could've outpaced these things. Frogs really isn't even that funny. I was hoping to be entertained somehow. Not impressed.

If someone told you to list the least intimidating in the world, frogs would probably be pretty high. This might make you think this movie is ridiculous because obviously these are sinister frogs that kill humans. You would be wrong, they don't do shit.

One of the stupidest movies I've ever seen, it's not even laughably bad. Never before I felt like I was wasting my time while watching a movie. And what's up with that GODAWFUL music and the endless random frog/other reptile footage?

Spoiler: The frogs actually do very little in this movie.

50 because it is one of my favorite bad movies. It is comedic gold.

Outside of Milland and Elliott the acting is mediocre at best, and the premise is so ludicrous I don't think it could be successfully played as straight as this movie tries to. Those hurdles are too high to overcome, but the film does try. The menace of the situation is built up really well and the film manages to be creepy, though not scary. The internal dynamics of this rich family don't amount to much, but provide some interesting moments. It's camp without the sense of humour.

While nearly the whole cast croaks, this doesn't quite fulfill the promise of its inspired tag line: "Today the pond, tomorrow the world!"

God bless the '70s where even the silliest of ideas were taken seriously.

When B-roll attacks!!

Dumb but enjoyable

The title lied, there are no killer frogs in this at all. But even with a correct title this would still be a poor movie. The built up of the menace at the start, with constant intercutting of scenes of lots of toads, snakes and other reptiles is decent and promising. But alas it never fulfills this promise, with the kills being only the result of frustratingly stupid decisions by every human. Character very often act very stupid and self-interested in these kind of movies, but this took it too

Pre-mustache Sam Elliot just not cool enough to save this flick. Perhaps the power is in the mustache. Further research required.

While seeing grandpa Ray Milland & young stud Sam Elliott was fun on its own, there's really not much fun to be had with this movie. The frogs do not kill a single person & are just shown to be hanging around quite a bit, but the effort put into making them seem menacing was kind of hilarious. What's also hilarious is how the other animals are portrayed as clever murderers who do things like poison people. Still, this is boring, forgettable low-budget schlock that never justifies its existence.

Surprisingly boring for a supposed horror film. The makers seemed to be under the illusion that repeated closeups of frogs were a substitute for a plot. The only redeeming thing about the film is getting to see young Sam Elliott and Joan Van Ark; they are easy on the eyes and do a respectable job acting as best as the writing will allow. But even Ray Milland falters; not even he could make his character believable.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

27.875

bad movie

Really dumb. But somehow cool. A little. Inexplicably so. Frogs seem to be the masterminds of the reptile world. :D And what the fuck was up with those random children, who just appeared at the end?