A good movie, but a disappointment given the source material. Needed more David Tennant. Pattinson was a great Cedric.

Despite being like the Harry Potter sports day it's pretty good mainly because it has David Tennant in it doing evil stuff!

I think this is one of the ones I saw. I don't recall. They're getting 75's across the board. Blah.

Decent. Inferior to Azkaban. Lacks that film's visual flair. Often feels disjointed; plot points are introduced suddenly or are dropped abruptly. Feels like a highlights reel of a much better and less fragmented movie. Needs longer running time, and a better use of it.

I wish I could like this...

It was good with tri wizard tournament and the cup being a port key excetra but it just lacked something else. It never realy got going until right near the end. so yeah, it was average.

All of the Potter films have some serious shortcomings in the areas of directing, casting, acting, effects and beyond. The other thing they all have in common is a show-stealing performance by a character actor - in this case it's Brendan Gleeson. On the whole this is one of the better films in the series - the humour is sharper, the effects less central, and the basic story underlying the whole shebang is a good one. I just wish they didn't always have to cram so many big name actors into it.

Worst of the saga. Though the story goes darker and darker, this one is much lighter than 2nd-3rd, specially Cuarón's. Probably direction has a lot to do with that, both Columbus and Yates reach a reasonable quality, Cuarón made the best, but Newell does just a mediocre unispired work. The story still has its points, but everything good about it is just a shadow of Rowling's book, made flat and without spirit by Newell. Watched in order, it's specially bad the worst one follows the best one.