It's interesting, and it's hard to deny Poitier's acting talent, but there are better films about racism, better thrillers, and better characters studies out there. In short, it's entertaining, but it could have -- and should have -- been so much more.
An intelligent and important piece, although the evolution of Gillespie is a bit odd and comes across as a bit contrived. In conclusion, Sidney Poitier is really cool.
It works well as both a murder mystery and as a social critique of the racism of the day. However, while both aspects are well done, neither is done superbly. And of course Poitier is incredible.
Pretty good thriller, which is more about racism than the crime itself. Tense and infuriating moments, but the revealing didn't blow me away unfortunately. But still pretty good overall
cinayet, dedektiflik, zenci polis, irkcilik, polis, polisiye, (ABD'nin güneyindeki Saprta kasabasinda Mr. Colbert isimli bir girisimci isadami öldürülür. İstasyonda bekleyen Virgil Tibbs, polis trafindan göz altina alinir. Fakat kendisi de ülkenin kuzeyinde çalisan bir polistir ve cinayet konusunda uzmandir. Kendisini bu cinayeti çözmek durumunda bulur. Bu arada kasabali bu zenci polise pek iyi davranmayacaktir.) Finalde bir iki hata var. Film boyunca önden darbe deniyordu arkadamn cikti. P
Hasn't aged well; the plot is like a bad episode of CSI. Acting is great and the themes were cutting-edge at the time, but they can't fully redeem the poorly thought out mystery elements.
Surprisingly tight direction. Though the narrative hasn't aged awfully well, it speaks volumes about the direction that it never gets old or uintentionally hilarious.
Revolutionary only in its depictions of race--everything else is bland or cliche or both. The movie is filled with halfhearted action scenes and mystery elements which only serve to dull the punch of the theme and bury the real draw of Sidney Poitier. An average procedural in almost every conceivable way; Poitier is the one saving grace.
somewhat an artifact of its time, but a dramatically sound one. Jewison makes his points with care, always grounding conflicts in believable situations populated by well-drawn characters. What it lacks in subtlety, it makes up for in gripping storytelling. Steiger consistently plays the material a step or two off expectations, relaxed when others would bring heat, forceful when it seems that a quieter approach is called for. It's an exciting unpredictability that flows over to the entire film.
It definitely reminded me of Guess Whos Coming to Dinner (1967) because they both deal with racial prejudice, star Poitier and were even released in the same year. Poitier is fantastic again, and the film is a pretty good murder mystery.
Entertaining. Like others have said, it doesn't have as much of an impact today as it would have back then, but it still is an interesting film. Poitier gives a confident performance and Steiger is good. I also agree with others that the murder wasn't all that great.
Displaying 1 to 250 of 875 total rankings: Prev | Next