Watch
Insidious
Your probable score
?

Insidious

2010
Suspense/Thriller, Horror
1h 43m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 42.21% from 3080 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(3080)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 21 Oct 2012
30
39th
So your wife says she saw someone in the house? Front door is open? Alarm going off? You maybe wanna call the cops? No? Just gonna shut the door and go back to sleep? Okay then. SCREW YOU, MOVIE
Rated 22 Aug 2019
75
80th
I'm the kind of idiot that likes Dead Silence so feel free to ignore, but James Wan understands and excels in my favorite aspect of horror: atmosphere. It was a novel approach to have the family move houses which seems like the most logical and least utilized reaction (unless you've seen Sinister). BUT THE HOUSE ISN'T HAUNTED, THE BOY IS! It should write itself after you've got that, which is exactly why the atmosphere is so important.
Rated 04 May 2011
50
29th
Wilson is cool. Byrne is very attractive but she really shouldn't try to stretch her acting capabilities further (ahahaha... oh wait, you haven't seen the movie yet? Nevermind) than looking horrified which she does often and quite well. To Wan's credit he doesn't rely solely on jump scares. The building of tension is undermined, however, by the sillyness of the haunting spirits. Lin Shaye is great as the medium. Made me remember how awesome she was in 'Dead End'. Now that's a horror film.
Rated 20 May 2011
55
25th
It's heartening to see that Wan has sort of improved since his horrible debut, Saw, but this still wasn't exactly great. We get some nice haunted-house-thrills early on, with some genuinely creepy moments, but things get kinda goofy later. The first glimpse of the demon's face was actually scary, but later on, as someone else mentioned, I realized it was a nekkid Darth Maul. Basically it should've been scarier or sillier and it could've worked either way. Ah, well, not awful.
Rated 05 Feb 2014
3
38th
There's a certain old-school charm to Insidious; it's scary, but it's also FUN, and not in the campy way that something like Evil Dead is. Instead, it's fun in the way that telling ghost stories as a kid is fun, where you're smart enough to know that ghosts don't exist but emotionally vulnerable enough to still feel the need to look over your shoulder. The Poltergeist influence is major.
Rated 15 Jul 2011
66
51st
Some well done scares when you catch little glimpses of the baddies, falls further and further from scary the more you see. Downfall of the genre. Really felt the big scary demon was scarier, when you only saw peeks. Still , well made and worth a watch.
Rated 07 May 2012
35
19th
Works hard to build suspense and defy the most obvious expectations, but falters in its attempt to create an otherworldly place with nightmare logic: too much wandering about in the fog with a lantern, and too many very similar iterations of the same few thrills, to the point that the mechanics become so transparent that even the most willing audiences are likely to disengage from the onscreen events. The filmmakers were clearly trying, and often skilful, but in the end lacked imaginative power.
Rated 22 Sep 2019
47
12th
A safe, lukewarm affair that didn't go far enough in any stylistic direction. Not serious enough to be chilling, not camp enough to be entertaining. a familiar ghost tale that's more 'basic' than 'classic'. Wilson is decent and Lin Shaye is always a hoot but there are Goosebumps books with more inventive, gripping stories than this.
Rated 15 Sep 2011
70
56th
Great first half slows down a bit in the second half. I thought the idea of the astral projection finale was creepy and great (in a Silent Hill kinda way), but like others have said, seeing too much of Mr. Spookedy Demonman became laughable. Bonus points for a nice horror ending!
Rated 18 Sep 2011
79
58th
The first half was scary as fuck, very atmospheric and jumpy then the main entity was revealed a little too much and it dragged on a little and it lost some of it's mystery. The paranormal experts trying to be funny fell way flat and at times it felt like it was going on forever. I did like the ending a lot but there was about 30 minutes towards the end where I felt it was getting a little too silly. Nice ideas though, with the astral projection and the Further.
Rated 07 Sep 2019
27
7th
I know I'm a minority opinion on this but, since these super modern horrors don't truly have any foundation in a defined spirituality or religion, the metaphysics end up bupkis and there are zero stakes. This was about as scary and made as much sense as a ride on the Haunted Mansion set to a recording of a herd of rhinos running over the string section.
Rated 24 Apr 2011
78
59th
The first half was very well done. It was creepy, oozed atmosphere, etc. The second half I still liked but not quite as much. I enjoyed that they took it in a different route (sort of) by going into The Further, and I liked that there was a story about astral projection because every other movie explains hauntings differently (and generically). Feeling a bit different than a lot of horrors, just like Saw 1 did, this movie rarely falls to stupid cheap scares, and uses its elements wisely.
Rated 29 Apr 2011
53
42nd
In Roman Polanski's Tenant the most horrific effect was people the opposite window staring at you and doing nothing. Here, in the beginning they exploited the very same effect and got more or less a good mood of haunting house. The reason was nicely altered from the usual. The latter half of the story was more expected storytelling and the shocking end you could smell from miles away. The acting was mediocre and I did not like the pacing of the story.
Rated 22 Jun 2011
6
55th
"Insidious" is way better than the sum of its parts. It somehow manages to unashamedly mix ghost story, jump scares and silly B-movie camp comic relief without losing momentum. The jump scares actually made me jump, the frantic editing in the second half actually made me, well, frantic. I had a blast. This would make an awesome double bill with Raimi's "Drag Me To Hell". A small resurgence for old-school B-movie horror? You betcha.
Rated 12 Aug 2011
39
19th
What the hell was this nonsense? I saw scarier things in my toilet bowl this morning. Clumsy, predictable and thoroughly unnecessary. The editing and camerawork were subpar most of the time as well. If this frightened you I hope you're 10 years old, else there is no excuse.
Rated 10 Mar 2012
40
7th
This is why I pretty much stay away from horror films, especially new ones, because they can never seem to contain new ideas. Why must most new horrors become amalgams of better movies from decades past? When Hershey said she knew who to call, I was praying for a resurrection of the medium from Poltergeist to exorcise the demons. After that the film got a little bit better with the faux-science stuff, but still nothing remarkable.
Rated 16 Mar 2012
83
43rd
One of the first movies that genuinely scared me (I was thirteen when it came out) so it has a bit of a soft spot for me. Some of its effect has worn off by now with all of these copycats, but this was a very original take on the “haunting” sub-genre. Like most Wan horror movies, it’s gets a bit less scary toward the end, but it’s still effectively done and well acted. I loved the astral projection world in the last act.
Rated 06 Aug 2014
85
63rd
Goofball homage to Poltergeist that throws everything and the kitchen sink at you. Surprisingly good natured, unlike a lot of snotty horror-comedy.
Rated 12 Mar 2018
55
21st
The unnatural "natural shots" early on of family life with unsteady cam made this feel pretty rehashed, and the rest of the movie didn't dispel the feeling. I liked how they brought in a platitude-muttering priest for 5 seconds just to show we are NOT *snicker* a church-going family.
Rated 31 Mar 2011
25
61st
"Less film than funhouse ride, but it's a frequently scary funhouse ride that presents itself as such." - Ed Gonzalez
Rated 16 Apr 2011
60
15th
This Poltergeist remake is slow to get going and slows down again when the family moves. Slowly revealed scares combined with the father's poor acting and the terrible demon design (yeah it doesn't look any better in the movie than the trailer) really hurt this movie that had a lot of potential. However, there are some genuine scares in the film and some interesting scenes that reminded me of The Cell. The crew they find to come in to help is great too. I'm going to go watch Poltergeist now.
Rated 23 Apr 2011
75
41st
The 1st half's pretty effective at doling out creepiness & scares, but once the ghost assessors show up things start feeling a little 2 familiar, a little 2 much like an updated Poltergeist. Perhaps it's b/c 2 much is revealed (& shown) about the ghosts in question that the scares lose their punch, but what starts out as a horror film becomes half Dr. Strange comic book fantasy. Certainly 1 can't expect 2 be 2 frightened when ghosts r reduced 2 literally wrestling their victims 2 the ground.
Rated 27 Apr 2011
88
87th
This is the best, most original horror movie that's been released in quite some time. The third act will turn some fans off, but those that are able to open their minds will thoroughly enjoy it. This one will have you clinging to your seat the whole way though, I can promise that much.
Rated 03 May 2011
70
56th
I loved the first half of the movie, made me jump just enough, and actually creeped me out a little. It reminded me a lot of Poltergeist with a little Paranormal Activity. However, the second half started off quite well but then declined to a mushy chase scene that wasn't as exciting as the director supposedly intended it to be. The end was something I enjoyed again, and I would recommend this one as a creepy but not at all gory film.
Rated 30 May 2011
40
27th
Wan staggers into supernatural horror just as clumsily as he did into torture-gore a few years back. Insidiously derivative, this is costlier than Paranormal Activity and has more modern effects than The Exorcist and Poltergeist, but it's cheesy like Saw and really just an extravagant mishmash of the oldest conventions. Brief glimpses of "non-malevolent" spirits are closer to being frightening than the Sith-lord-chic of the "insidious" one. Tiny Tim is sullied by his inclusion in the soundtrack.
Rated 25 Jun 2011
62
37th
Seriously!? That was the ending?!? Seriously?!? I mean from Saw and Dead Silence we all know these two guys loves surprise endings but this was very dissapointing. It wasn't a surprise at all! Actually the whole movie was very predictable. Yeah some times it was cool, very tense but Wilson killed the whole movie. The script,well at least the pilot had the potential but the expectations from the previous films (saw, paranormal, dead silence) the bad acting, darth maul!! etc. killed it.
Rated 03 Jul 2011
85
96th
This is how horror movies are done!! I have a theory that if movie producers really wanted to give us heart attacks they would do so.. They are always holding back because if the movie it's too scary many people won't dare to watch it and then they loose money. They will loose some money on this;) Scary as hell. Probably the best horror flick I have seen in terms of excitement! I was at the edge of my seat nearly pissing my pants throughout the whole movie :) story not perfect but pretty good!
Rated 05 Jul 2011
74
79th
Solid thriller that incites a few jumps, a few laughs, and while sometimes treading the line between serious and silly, it manages to stay on the former, saving it from being filed away with all the other horror drivel pumped out of Hollywood these days.
Rated 06 Jul 2011
50
40th
Made me wet my pants - way better than poltergeist.
Rated 09 Jul 2011
50
21st
The Crow and an 8 year old boy terrorize a young family. There's some fun lil parts in this but overall it's pretty retarded and not scary at all. I DONT FIND LIL DEMON KIDS SCARY EVEN WHEN YOU DRESSEM UP IN OLD CLOTHES. *SMASH LOUD NOISE * Oh same with doors going ajar." This is basically Poltergeist but instead of the kid being trapped in a tv set/purgatory thingy, fuck it, just have him sleep the entire movie om the next room." I wish that lil squeaky voiced Poltergeist lady was still around
Rated 24 Jul 2011
30
6th
Sudden cut to a close-up of a ghostly figure followed by the orchestra's reaction of the conductor being taken out by a sniper -- American horror movies in a nutshell.
Rated 09 Aug 2011
71
38th
One more failed horror movie in recent memory that toys around with an idea for an hour and then finally pulls a decent last twenty minutes out of it's ass. Once he's actually into "The Further" it cranks up the creepy, churning out some scares. Unfortunately, the preceding hour is garbage at best. Also, I was shaking my head so badly it almost twisted off every time someone said "The Further".
Rated 02 Oct 2011
2
21st
At first it comes off as a parody of every horror movie ever, and then it becomes a parody of itself. I mean... are they serious or what?
Rated 22 Oct 2011
60
40th
Pretty good for a low budget horror flick. Maintains a tense atmosphere and has a few scares. It's instantly forgettable but at least it doesn't pretend to be something more than what it actually is.
Rated 03 Jan 2012
55
25th
By the numbers horror film - OH GOD LOOK OVER THERE IT'S oh nothing. It plays out exactly how you think it's going to. Some parts are tense, but during the second half - WHAT WAS THAT YOU HAVE TO BELIEVE ME I SAW SOMETHING! Sorry, during the 2nd half, it gets silly. Almost a paint-by-numbers Poltergeist.
Rated 09 Jan 2012
70
91st
Insidious is definitely one of the best horror films of 2010. It lures you into a comfortable place by emulating familiar horror formulas and eventually goes someplace new, memorable and terrifying. Its the first horror film in a long while where a repeat viewing makes it even better. Ignore the people balking at the film for daring to take risks in a genre plagued with cliches.
Rated 16 Jan 2012
72
30th
This movie is pretty bad. A little spooky, but also pretty silly.
Rated 16 Jan 2012
61
31st
I like that it tried to do something a bit different, but it kept getting ridiculous. In fact, the entire thing would be improved with some more subtlety. Much better than Saw, at least. And Tiny Tim will never, ever be scary, don't even try it, movie.
Rated 13 Mar 2012
80
46th
The first 2/3rds of this are scary as hell, then it kind of goes to crazy town in the last third, but it doesn't become ad just...different. It kind of changes from a haunted house movie to a Carpenter movie and I don't see how that can be seen as a bad thing.
Rated 10 Apr 2012
75
34th
Somehow made what would normally be cheesy and lame rather creepy.
Rated 23 Sep 2012
35
16th
Yet another derivative contemporary horror film that eschews atmosphere and genuine terror in favor of loud noises. Just watch Poltergeist instead.
Rated 09 Dec 2012
77
57th
Builds up really well and then falls flat as it forgets it is a horror movie and not a speculative paranormal science film.
Rated 08 May 2013
41
30th
The beginning was tense and creepy, even if the character reactions were far from realistic, building strongly up to the revealing shot of the demon's face, and the paranormal investigation. However, the second half (despite the astral projection concept) dragged it down from good to barely mediocre. The dumb, inconclusive ending was the final touch, but just seeing the demon up close ruined all the horror. Oh, you have a Darth Maul face and claw gloves and you make dolls in your free time? Huh.
Rated 08 Sep 2013
50
52nd
Pretty much Paranormal Activity but with movable cameras. However it does what it does effectively. Not a bad choice for a beer-filled B-movie evening.
Rated 01 Oct 2013
66
52nd
Very well-made adult horror that seems to have been reverse-engineered from where Wan and Whannell wanted to go with it: a climactic showdown on the astral plane. Conceptually, that's brilliant, and the execution is about as strong as you could hope for, thanks in part to Wilson and Byrne being terrific actors, and Wan having learned a thing or to about what works over the last decade. It loses steam in a few places, but is ultimately redeemed by a strong finish.
Rated 23 Feb 2014
80
67th
It grabs you by the balls and pulls you in so deep that you can't bare being so disappointed at the second half of the movie. Very anticlimatic. They could have done so much more with the demon and the envirronment that your spirit traverses.
Rated 11 Apr 2014
35
13th
I now know the reason that I was able to avoid this film for the first three years of it's existence. Fifteen minutes of good film stretched unbelievably thinly. It's hard to believe the final act is actually happening... as it's happening. The tone shifts so quickly it's confusing and annoying. In the end you don't really care though because the intrigue was lost a long time ago.
Rated 22 Nov 2014
67
43rd
Not a huge fan of horror films, but this one was decent. The last half an hour was actually pretty interesting and I was surprised, but it's still just a generic horror film.
Rated 24 Jan 2015
60
40th
What pisses me off about Insidious is that it could have been so much more. The first half of the movie was a tonal masterpiece setting up some great stuff, which is unfortunately shut down in the second half. The first half was creepy and well-thought only to be followed by a jump-scare ridden third act, with a horrible ending. However, I really respect Patrick Wilson; I think he is a great actor. If the second half was more like the first half we would have had a winner.
Rated 08 Mar 2015
79
51st
Suffers the same fate as all recent horror by selling out 60-90 minutes of creepy atmospheric buildup with a 20-30 minute goofy circus ending, which is no better than going all out 90 minute circus like the Worst(best?) 80s slashers. That said, it's a step above its peers, and I liked Poltergeist so I found this retelling of it to be surprisingly OK
Rated 10 Apr 2015
65
42nd
Wan and Whannell are experts at horror 2.0 They take all the workable scenes and effects from classic horror and recreate it with their films. It's certainly more derivative than copying a single premise or putting it in as an homage. This is a guilty pleasure. There's something unmistakably nostalgic and familiar about all of it. It's fun even if there's nothing original going on here. It still manages to drum up some surprises here and there. Wan's direction is well suited for low budget film.
Rated 26 Jun 2015
44
23rd
Hilariously bad. My favourite part was when Patrick Wilson started punching ghosts AND THE DEVIL
Rated 28 Jun 2015
55
11th
Bland. None of the characters seem to have any personality, and that includes the traveler creature that is purposefully obscured so we don't laugh. The kids fade out of the story and it does not matter much. The last few "action" pieces are formless and almost comical. Some early creepiness saves it from failure. Works better as hysteria to a stressful situation.
Rated 18 Sep 2015
91
70th
A surprisingly imaginative and sometimes visually nifty spin on an all too familiar genre.
Rated 25 Jun 2016
30
10th
A whole lot of cheap scare tricks and cheap sound effects.
Rated 03 Jan 2018
75
50th
James Wan's near perfectly honed direction brings the film to higher levels than it probably deserved. Considering the iffy script and somewhat disappointing ending. Lin Shaye also breathes life into the mostly dead on arrival story line with her charming delivery.
Rated 12 Jan 2018
67
59th
After entering with low expectations I found this modern"B-lumhouse" movie ghost story watchable enough. Although full of plenty of the expected generic jump scares and stupid characters, the movie manages to build some genuine tension at times while also playing with some fun tweaks on a "haunted house" story. Lin Shaye as the medium was wonderful, plus I enjoyed the corny ghost hunter sidekicks, but despite wanting to like some of the ideas, the PG-13 spooky startles weren't for me.
Rated 24 Jan 2018
58
84th
I don't like having my picture taken either.
Rated 06 Oct 2020
72
63rd
Really enjoyed this first time around and still enjoy it overall in subsequent rewatches. Byrne, Wilson and Shaye along with top notch direction from Wan are the reasons why this creepy horror works well. Insidious does rely a lot on Jump Scares but Wan directs them well so that they never feel cheap like so many other horrors. However Samson and Whannell's comic relief is probably a little too much, and the stuff in the Further in the climax doesn't work as effectively as what came before it.
Rated 25 Apr 2021
70
82nd
Elevated by Whannell's script & a stellar, star-studded cast who give their best, this is a shockingly watchable 2010's horror movie & one of the better possession movies of recent times. It's clever, well-paced, & packed with eerie atmosphere. Unfortunately, most of its spooks are of the jumpscare variety, which doesn't work for me at all, & while the final few minutes make for a legitimately great twist I'm just not a big fan of needlessly bitter endings. Still, definitely worth watching.
Rated 06 Jan 2022
68
43rd
not my fav look from Darth Maul
Rated 31 Mar 2011
1
0th
Its plot, ripped off from The Amityville Horror, shows so little psychological or occult logic that it exposes its own sheer dumbness as just a series of spookings.
Rated 18 Apr 2011
75
55th
75.250
Rated 23 Apr 2011
35
32nd
Well, that was the hardest I laughed this year.
Rated 23 Apr 2011
72
85th
Effective until the 3rd act.
Rated 25 Apr 2011
80
80th
Really effective in its scary moments and well acted by Wilson. The last part is different from what you would expect but it's still as creepy as the rest of the movie.
Rated 26 Apr 2011
40
26th
So this is what an episode of Supernatural would be like without Sam and Dean. Are we sure McG had nothing to do with this film? Any demon who loves Tiny Tim is a friend of mine. The first bit was effective and made me hopeful that it wasn't going to be a shit storm of the movie..The second half was not redeeming. I'm not saying to stay away from this film, it's viewer friendly just don't go in expecting much.
Rated 26 Apr 2011
50
5th
Did not have any real thrills, they were all cheap and predictable, this film is straight up boring, there is nothing else to be really be said other than it offers up nothing. The storyline drags on way too long, it could have been resolved after about 45 minutes, the ending was boring as hell and pointless. Like I said before it is atleast supposed to make you jumo just a little bit, but not this film, it was simply boring.
Rated 27 Apr 2011
72
45th
f off, darth maul.
Rated 01 May 2011
70
72nd
The director fom Saw, James Wan receives some good help from the man behind Oren Peli, and this is what you have: a horror-comedy in a familiar shape -- with some bad editing in crucial points --, that manages to be truly terrifying and truly funny, almost a crossover between Paranormal Activity and The Evil Dead.
Rated 10 May 2011
73
36th
Really scary! Good end! Thumbs up.
Rated 03 Jun 2011
75
48th
One of the better horror movies in a while when it's actually trying. A little too Raimi-ish at times.
Rated 20 Jun 2011
50
24th
if i am correct, this is done by most of the 'paranormal activity'-crew. this story evolves in a very similar way. the first glitches, the unbelieving husband etc. this movie is quite inferior however, even though the makers seem to understand the genre. some images and moments are disturbing, but they don't stick with you like in paranormal. however, it might suffice to scare most of the viewers, but not me, tough nut that i am :)
Rated 22 Jun 2011
62
45th
Shockingly unoriginal, I didn't know what to expect but I at least thought it'd be original. The storyline is all to similar to a classic from the early 80's and it steals a lot from that film. It relies way too much on cheap scares and if you're a horror fan there won't be a lot of surprises. The ending was unexpected and very good though, but that wasn't enough to save this. It's well made, don't get me wrong, but don't expect anything that hasn't already been done. Disappointing.
Rated 25 Jun 2011
80
80th
Very Good. A decent horror film has become a very rare thing now. Insidious manages to throw some new spins on an old formula while keeping its eyes on the prize and it wins big. Well directed with very creative execution and subtle effects, though they could have done with a more credible male lead . Features plenty of jump-out-of-your-seat scares and the coolest team of Exorcists I've ever seen on film. Highly recommended for a weekend scare.
Rated 25 Jun 2011
40
3rd
I'm seriously sick of paranormal activities. Come on! Don't we have different things to scare people?
Rated 26 Jun 2011
85
92nd
perili ev, astral seyehat, uyuyan cocuk (yeni evlerine tasinan ailenin cocugu cati katinda merdivenden düser ve sonrasinda daldigi uykudan uyanmaz evde ruhlar dolanmaktadir aile bunu fark edince evden tasinir. ama olaylar farklidir cocuk astral seyehat yapmaktadir ve geri dönememektedir. tüm yetenek cocuga babasindan gecmistir. baba bu durumdan bihaberdir. bu gercegi öğrenince o da oglunun pesinden astral seyehat yapar. benzerlerine göre iyi buldum. biraz poltergeisti hatirlatiyor.)
Rated 27 Jun 2011
86
63rd
There's one reason for me that I decided to rank Inscidious with the highest possible tear: The flick scared the shit out of me. The first half of the film is very tense with some great thrilling moments, and the song that's been played by the grammophon over and over again stayed in my mind for a long time. Pretty awesome horror movie.
Rated 27 Jun 2011
50
37th
I hate horror movies, because they never seem to do the trick for me. And while the mrs. hides her face behind a pillow, I'm thinking: Why? You can always tell the scary stuff a mile away, and they always end in a fucked up way, where no one have really thought it through. With that said, Insidious almost made me jump a cuople of times and hooray for that, but it doesn't change the fact that it's still a silly genre, and boy did they lend more than a little from Poltergeist...
Rated 07 Jul 2011
69
54th
Not a bad movie overall. Reminded me of a 90's horror flick made up of several sub-genres. Bit lame in some parts but a makes up for having a few good scares.
Rated 10 Jul 2011
65
53rd
tiene partes de cagazo!
Rated 15 Jul 2011
35
10th
It started out so well, with the eerie music and setting. I was thinking, "I might actually be seeing a halfway decent movie here." Then it took a really weird turn where it seemed like they were trying to be funny instead of scary. The three paranormal experts were ridiculous and the stupid demon was a Darth Maul look-a-like with Freddy-esque finger blades that really liked the song 'Tip Toe Through the Tulips.' What the fuck were they thinking with that? Totally ruined it for me.
Rated 15 Jul 2011
70
31st
69.500
Rated 15 Jul 2011
40
13th
I dont do ghost films
Rated 17 Jul 2011
53
55th
Okay Movie
Rated 28 Jul 2011
70
64th
James Wan knows how to make some very good horror scenes, but doesn't really know how to make the whole film to work. It's quite creepy right from the beginning, but with every minute it's starting to be more grotesque to the point where in "The Further" it's just hilarious (where everybody would expect it to be most intense there). But overally good fun.
Rated 29 Jul 2011
10
0th
Total shyt
Rated 29 Jul 2011
72
50th
A good mix of pacing and scares.James wan perfects his ghost/dollface style and delivers with this creepy, well acted, well paced, thriller horror. Some original ideas and some others taken from myth make the story half believable, which adds. Overall a fine thriller/horror for anyone fan of the genre.
Rated 02 Aug 2011
50
10th
This one was quite creepy in the beginning or at least until the medium and those "scientists" came on, afterwards it was really boring and not thrilling at all.
Rated 03 Aug 2011
55
40th
I hate, hate, hate, HATE the turn this movie took for the worse.
Rated 07 Aug 2011
60
49th
A film of two parts. The first part was great. A wonderfully creepy, scary film it was surely going to be. Even if they did resort to the 'loud volume' tactic to elicit some frights, it was not the sole reason for the jumps. The second half was crap. Gone were the parts that gave you goosebumps and what was left was a boring 30 minutes. Could have been one of the better scary film in the past 10-20 years.
Rated 08 Aug 2011
80
25th
From the creators of Paranormal Activity, this film gives you more of an edge of your seat feel since the ghosts actually appear. There was a corny twist, but I enjoyed it for the unexpected.
Rated 12 Aug 2011
72
55th
As far as horror flicks go, this is one of the more enjoyable ones.
Rated 27 Aug 2011
55
36th
Incredibly overrated. Slightly unique, but not that interesting and chock full of jump scares instead of actual fear.
Rated 27 Aug 2011
5
1st
I've never seen Paranormal Activity but it can't be worse than this.
Rated 19 Sep 2011
70
40th
It's somewhat original and I really liked the atmosphere created by the filmmakers. I don't typically care for the "jumpy" scare movies because they are just too predictable and, frankly, not truly scary, but Insidious had some other good things going for it besides just jumpy scares.
Rated 20 Sep 2011
75
79th
Truly classic horror. Relies on story-telling, suspense, and general creepiness instead of gore and cheap "gotcha!" type gags. Reminiscent of 80s horror films, and a real pleasure to watch.
Rated 20 Sep 2011
80
83rd
Porzadnie zrealizowany, potrafi wystraszyc (muzyka! jump scene!) i do samego konca trzyma przed ekranem w zainteresowaniu. Jeden z ciekawszych horrorow tego lata.
Rated 21 Sep 2011
55
31st
lol. while it's nice to see something so innocently ridiculous from the makers of the quite appalling Saw-franchise - and I do like that it recognizes its ridiculousness without getting overly meta and ruining it (much like Sam Raimi's excellent Drag me to Hell) - it's unfortunately just not that scary or exciting. An okay timewaster.
Rated 24 Sep 2011
84
72nd
Scary.

Collections

(32)
Compact view
Showing 1 - 24 of 32 results

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

No Trailer