The camera started moving clockwise at 7:00. Whoa.

In essence a moving still life, and, well, why not? Not terribly exciting, but the idea is interesting and admirable on its face, and it actually feels substantially shorter than its 11 minutes, which surprised me.

Yup, that sure is a room.

An exercise in the relationship between camera and subject that makes sort of a stepping stone between Akerman's Michael Snow influence and her own Jeanne Dielman. I could probably come up with some fairly good bullshit about how this short emphasizes the role of the spectator and the blah blah blah but my honest impression is that it's not that deep, pretty damn boring and not even worth the 11 minutes.