You've ignored this film. It will no longer appear as a recommendation. View ignored films.
You've decided to remember Meetin' WA for later. You can see all your remembered films here.
Summary: Two of cinema's leading lights meet.
|
Ratings
 Loading Products from Amazon and Ebay
Loading... 
Loading... 
| TCI | |
User |
Score |
| na |
|
onetwothree |
40 |
T2 |
| na |
 |
vsls |
60 |
T5 |
| na |
 |
arif |
90 |
T8 |
| na |
|
guppy |
60 |
T5 |
| na |
 |
macumbalove |
50 |
T6 |
| na |
 |
SirRobbie |
70 |
T6 |
| na |
 |
TreyAtwood |
70 |
T5 |
| na |
 |
Coredor |
65 |
T5 |
| na |
 |
Carlospro |
70 |
T4 |
| na |
|
wilbur |
60 |
T6 |
| na |
|
theguest |
49 |
T4 |
| na |
|
Seftref |
50 |
T4 |
| na |
 |
murkuo |
57 |
T2 |
| na |
|
Aliboron |
86 |
T6 |
| na |
|
ColonelTigh |
88 |
T4 |
| na |
 |
TalkShowH |
50 |
T2 |
| na |
 |
fabiovisnadi |
80 |
T5 |
| na |
 |
micmac• |
56 |
T3 |
| na |
 |
IMDb-byvotes |
65 |
T4 |
| na |
 |
Jos |
60 |
T2 |
| na |
 |
Magmadiver |
18 |
T1 |
| na |
 |
JangoB |
45 |
T1 |
|
I wish Godard didn't have to inflict his enormous ego on us by cutting Allen's answers in his typical annoying style, but I'm not giving this a lower score because we were blessed with at least some input from one of the best American filmmakers. I wish the French one would just stop his shtick.
|
| na |
|
peekay505 |
41 |
T2 |
| na |
|
guilhermetc |
59 |
T3 |
| na |
 |
Lone Wolf |
65 |
T5 |
| na |
 |
___ |
65 |
T6 |
| na |
 |
kyle.loomis |
8 |
T9 |
| na |
 |
pedro . |
65 |
T3 |
| na |
 |
KMcNeil |
70 |
T7 |
|
Light style, fittingly heavier-ish on substance. The whimsical editing of Godard - which would seem out of place anywhere else - just matches the mood and tone of the interview. And what a refreshlingly intelligent, low-key, chatty interview it is.
|
| na |
 |
FitFortDanga |
79 |
T7 |
| na |
 |
QVT |
60 |
T7 |
|
Not an easy thing to put a number on. Certainly worth watching.
|
| na |
 |
Pickpocket |
55 |
T5 |
|
Would've liked it to have been longer with less terrible editing. Just let the man speak!
|
| na |
|
Starecase |
60 |
T1 |
| na |
|
coltrane |
3 |
T3 |
| na |
 |
carolgesser |
75 |
T8 |
| na |
 |
cinema_hell |
50 |
T1 |
|
Not good, not bad. Not long.
|
| na |
|
Mango |
4 |
T5 |
| na |
 |
PeaceAnarchy |
88 |
T9 |
|
Godard is such and obnoxious pretentious asshole with his questions and the editing, but it gives the film a wonderful whimsy. On top of that the interview itself is quite interesting as they discuss editing and the influences of TV on cinema. It's pretty good and a lot of fun.
|
| na |
 |
boxgod |
55 |
T3 |
| na |
 |
flowing |
25 |
T1 |
| na |
 |
b4con |
80 |
T6 |
| na |
 |
winds |
4 |
T3 |
| na |
 |
manonwire |
80 |
T8 |
| na |
|
col. dax |
70 |
T6 |
| na |
|
Tic! |
85 |
T9 |
| na |
 |
JooJoo |
4 |
T3 |
|
Crappy editing of a conversation that had to be more interesting.
|
| na |
|
negative |
2 |
T6 |
| na |
 |
JJJames |
70 |
T5 |
| na |
 |
imdb |
63 |
T5 |
| na |
 |
Johnny Case |
67 |
T7 |
| na |
|
dreammaniac |
30 |
T2 |
| na |
 |
Scottathon |
46 |
T2 |
|
The interview with Woody is rather interesting, although I'm sure I've heard him asked similar questions. Godard did too much stupid shit throughout; so much that it comes across as obnoxious.
|
|