sign in
register
Watch
Apple TV Google Play Movies Vudu
+4
Multiplicity
Apple TV Google Play Movies Vudu
+4
JustWatch
Remove ads

Multiplicity

1996
Romance
Comedy
1h 57m
A man who never has enough time for the things he wants to do is offered the opportunity to have himself duplicated. (imdb)
Directed by:
Harold Ramis Harold Ramis
Written by:
Chris Miller Lowell Ganz Babaloo Mandel Mary Hale
+3 more
Starring:
Eugene Levy Eugene Levy Michael Keaton Michael Keaton Harris Yulin Harris Yulin Andie MacDowell Andie MacDowell Brian Doyle-Murray Brian Doyle-Murray John de Lancie John de Lancie Richard Masur Richard Masur Zack Duhame Katie Schlossberg Ann Cusack Ann Cusack
More
Genres:
Romance, Comedy, Sci-fi, Fantasy
Country:
USA
Language:
English
imdb More information at IMDb
See title update history
Suggest an edit
Show Less
Your probable score
?

Multiplicity

1996
Romance
Comedy
1h 57m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 31.65% from 1707 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(1707)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
jstryjstry
Rated 08 Feb 2008
29
11th
The only thing I don't get is why they didn't keep making sequels to this movie, each time with more and more Michael Keatons. Multiplicity Part 5: There are 878 of them and his wife still hasn't found out!! Could have been a huge money maker. Oh god.
Rated 08 Feb 2008
gtown1479gtown1479
Rated 20 Feb 2008
40
2nd
This movie is horrible multiplied by excrutiatingly boring.
Rated 20 Feb 2008
marnieMarnie
Rated 24 Jan 2014
92
79th
I WANT PIZZA!!!
Rated 24 Jan 2014
spleenspleen
Rated 13 Feb 2014
79
65th
I think if there were one more Michael Keaton, it would've been Adam Sandler.
Rated 13 Feb 2014
thedenizenTheDenizen
Rated 14 Aug 2007
20
6th
At this stage in his career, one Michael Keaton is bad enough.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
gravymaximusGravyMaximus
Rated 14 Aug 2007
50
31st
I love the part where Andie MacDowell fucks the retarded Michael Keaton.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
davidblastDavidBlast
Rated 04 Jun 2011
40
28th
Not so much a movie as a mad science experiment prooving what the world has always secretly been wondering: Yes, it is possible to have too much Michael Keaton in a film.
Rated 04 Jun 2011
irvinejumpirvinejump
Rated 14 Aug 2007
30
17th
sometimes I think Michael keaton is underatted as an actor, this time is not one of them. Best avoided, all of him
Rated 14 Aug 2007
boobjuiceBoobjuice
Rated 24 Jul 2007
19
18th
I liked the retarded Michael Keaton. He should play retards more often.
Rated 24 Jul 2007
jellyscudsJellyscuds
Rated 08 Feb 2010
40
24th
Still look back at Michael Keaton and think either Batman or Mr Mom. Unfortunately, his acting in this stupid movie angles more towards the terrible performance from Batman rather than his funnier 80's stuff.
Rated 08 Feb 2010
sellissellis
Rated 27 Jul 2009
36
9th
Good peet-tha shteve.
Rated 27 Jul 2009
joojooJooJoo
Rated 14 Jun 2010
3
31st
guilty michael keaton pleasure that cannot help but annoy.
Rated 14 Jun 2010
mrbeckmrbeck
Rated 13 Jun 2007
70
58th
Haha... I really enjoyed this. Give it a spin.
Rated 13 Jun 2007
heandhishairheandhishair
Rated 14 Aug 2007
39
17th
Not my favorite Ramis flick. Not anyone's favorite Ramis flick.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
recklessmessrecklessmess
Rated 20 Feb 2008
60
37th
I don't remember - did they have an orgy in this one?
Rated 20 Feb 2008
kavkav
Rated 12 Jul 2008
30
7th
Lol!!
Rated 12 Jul 2008
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 09 Oct 2010
56
20th
I guess this is perfect for those members of the Michael Keaton fan club.
Rated 09 Oct 2010
burnmp3sburnmp3s
Rated 05 Sep 2009
48
20th
Tried to recreate Groundhog Day's comedy with a fantasy twist starring Andie MacDowell formula. Failed.
Rated 05 Sep 2009
muutanetmuutanet
Rated 01 Mar 2008
16
12th
Splendid idea, but the story stumbles in feet of special effect group. Maybe this kind of effect was cool at the time, but nowadays it is a piece of cake. Even I've done with home video a scene with two same guy (i.e. me) who interact each other.
Rated 01 Mar 2008
hotsakehotsake
Rated 11 Jul 2012
70
75th
A fun quick paced comedy with great performances from Michael Keaton.
Rated 11 Jul 2012
luna6ixLuna6ix
Rated 03 Dec 2021
68
30th
Not as good as I remembered it being, but still a perfectly watchable 90's comedy. Not classic, but it's aged marginally better than some, that's not to say it hasn't aged. Basically all of the laughs come from the fourth, half-wit clone.
Rated 03 Dec 2021
tripleshTripleSH
Rated 14 Aug 2007
20
13th
Just ridiculous...a poor concept doomed to failure from the second screenwriters put pencil to paper.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
braddad68braddad68
Rated 29 Jan 2019
72
1st
I turned it off at one point. I came back to it, and it got just a tad better. Very disappointing for the talented people involved. The effects are good but the laughs are very few. Michael Keaton delivered on his performance (as multiple characters) but the writing wasn't there.
Rated 29 Jan 2019
mjvmoviemanMJVmovieMan
Rated 19 Mar 2007
59
29th
An odd comedy possibly worth seeing due to Michael Keaton.
Rated 19 Mar 2007
whomperizewhomperize
Rated 29 Nov 2006
5
5th
The only thing worse than Michael Keaton seven times? That's right. Michael Keaton... eight times.
Rated 29 Nov 2006
tma1tma1
Rated 14 Aug 2007
60
41st
Harmless fun.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
svicciarellisvicciarelli
Rated 14 Aug 2007
88
68th
Starts out great, but ends in a whimper as the jokes and drama are ground to a halt.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
clark_novaClark Nova
Rated 27 Nov 2013
94
73rd
I'll have what she's having
Rated 27 Nov 2013
alidedealidede
Rated 29 Jan 2008
86
43rd
good
Rated 29 Jan 2008
andrandr
Rated 26 Jul 2018
84
33rd
stupid
Rated 26 Jul 2018
melvin_smifMelvin Smif
Rated 11 Feb 2009
5
11th
Michael Keaton plays an annoying character that is then multiplied why does Hollywood hate me.
Rated 11 Feb 2009
stflyst_fly
Rated 21 Aug 2007
5
12th
Crap
Rated 21 Aug 2007
martrynmartryn
Rated 18 May 2007
44
9th
Great premise, but it was only halfway executed in my opinion. I honestly don't know how they screwed this up, but they did.
Rated 18 May 2007
juicejuice
Rated 26 May 2007
50
36th
ok.
Rated 26 May 2007
tonyscaretonyscare
Rated 14 Aug 2007
0
2nd
0 multiplied is still 0
Rated 14 Aug 2007
rashbamrashbam
Rated 14 Aug 2007
80
30th
Fairly funny!
Rated 14 Aug 2007
gursuGursu
Rated 09 Jun 2008
3
38th
Watchable for Michael Keaton and Andie MacDowell.
Rated 09 Jun 2008
aaaaaaarrgggaaaaaaarrggg
Rated 14 Jun 2011
43
22nd
Great state-of-the-art FX seem to be the main reason this slight fantasy was made and they remain the main reason to watch this -- unless you just can't get enough Keaton, who made this weak fantasy-comedy rather than the third Batman movie.
Rated 14 Jun 2011
freqflyerfreqflyer
Rated 01 Aug 2009
80
55th
Good comedy. Original.
Rated 01 Aug 2009
biedronskiBiedronski
Rated 03 Jan 2009
76
56th
Cool concept. What was really bugging me was that unless I saw a bad version, the panning was absolutely out of control. The different personalities for the keaton clones were neat.
Rated 03 Jan 2009
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 31 Jul 2009
21
16th
I don't hate it I guess. But it is rubbish!
Rated 31 Jul 2009
imthatdingoImThatDingo
Rated 05 Jan 2009
36
38th
Clone gang bang anyone?
Rated 05 Jan 2009
bojanpopicbojanpopic
Rated 24 Feb 2008
73
44th
Good idea, and good performance by Michael Keaton.
Rated 24 Feb 2008
pickpocketPickpocket
Rated 20 Apr 2008
0
4th
needs less keaton
Rated 20 Apr 2008
thedicemanTheDiceman
Rated 26 Feb 2007
50
35th
Some good moments.
Rated 26 Feb 2007
walkenrollWalkenRoll
Rated 23 May 2012
70
43rd
I miss Michael Keaton. He was great in these screwball roles, hard to think that he actually a pretty decent Batman too.
Rated 23 May 2012
jixbyjixby
Rated 24 Sep 2012
60
29th
MULTIPLY THIS YOU SCUM
Rated 24 Sep 2012
chemtrailschemtrails
Rated 03 Oct 2009
30
13th
People in 1996 were really fucking stupid to make shit like this
Rated 03 Oct 2009
vorpalkittenVorpalKitten
Rated 21 Sep 2017
90
87th
Genuinely amusing, though it doesn't fully plumb the concept - this is the sort of thing I'd like to see a remake of.
Rated 21 Sep 2017
tvfilm_hubTV+Film-Hub
Rated 12 Sep 2010
1
9th
Couldn't bring myself to watch this.
Rated 12 Sep 2010
hound16HOUND16
Rated 24 Jan 2007
70
19th
Boring
Rated 24 Jan 2007
spookymaskSpookyMask
Rated 13 Feb 2009
60
34th
Batman becomes Jamie Madrox in this comedy about too many Keatons.
Rated 13 Feb 2009
fyngyrzfyngyrz
Rated 20 Aug 2007
9
62nd
I was all prepared to be bored. Instead, I was hugely, hugely entertained. From a weak premise, the movie goes on to a FABULOUS job of... well, watch, you'll see.
Rated 20 Aug 2007
chouinardChouinard
Rated 17 Aug 2008
20
10th
great concept, failed movie
Rated 17 Aug 2008
dustydDustyd
Rated 16 Sep 2007
60
39th
Decent comedy features a great set of performances by Keaton.
Rated 16 Sep 2007
matthagenmatthagen
Rated 22 Jan 2021
45
30th
It sports a ludicrous concept that is poorly handled. But if you remove your brain beforehand, you can have some laughs. I found a few.
Rated 22 Jan 2021
lachapellelachapelle
Rated 14 Aug 2007
68
29th
This movie is ok, but I get the feeling Ramis and Keaton were just there fo rthe check. The movie peters out near the end too. What's interesting is that the Simpsons did this concept was done better by the Simpsons in one of the Treehouse of Horror episodes.
Rated 14 Aug 2007

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...