You've ignored this film. It will no longer appear as a recommendation. View ignored films.
You've decided to remember My Brilliant Career for later. You can see all your remembered films here.
Summary: The heroine, Sybylla (Davis), a headstrong girl growing up in early 20th century Australia, has the opportunity of marriage to a wealthy young man (Harry played by Niel) whom she loves, but rejects it in order to maintain her independence, preferring to take a job as governess/housekeeper to the family of an illiterate neighbor to whom her father owes money. (imdb)
|
Buy
 Loading Products from Amazon and Ebay
Loading... 
Loading... 
| TCI | |
User |
Score |
| na |
|
screentime |
73 |
T7 |
| na |
 |
Spunkie |
55 |
T5 |
|
Gorgeous cinematography (especially in detail shots) and Judy Davis' naturalistic acting are the highlights of this period piece.
|
| na |
 |
DavidKahane |
81 |
T7 |
|
It's always fun to watch Judy Davis lead with her chin, and sharp, distinctive onscreen personality was basically in place from the beginning. Armstrong balances the storytelling nicely, evoking the period without letting the film become needlessly smothered by its trappings. It emphasizes the story's universal qualities rather than its sterling credentials as a piece of the revered, solemn past.
|
| na |
|
Hkit |
70 |
T1 |
| na |
 |
IMDb-byvotes |
74 |
T7 |
| na |
 |
jeff_v |
77 |
T9 |
|
Judy Davis is terrific --she gives the right blend of coltish independence and narcissism that keeps her character from being one of those modern types whose smarter than the all the yahoos, which you see so often in historical films. Gillian Anderson's direction is assured and her work with DP Donald McAlpine results in an image of a wilderness streaked with fissures of encroaching modernity.
|
| na |
 |
jacobb1313 |
74 |
T7 |
|
A surprisingly magnetic period piece, which manages to outclass many of its peers through its gorgeous costume/makeup, some brilliant naturally-lit outdoor shots and the caliber of its actors. I'm a dude and I enjoyed this entirely too much. It manages to pack a bigger punch than its Jane Austen breatheren, too, by adding ambiguity and resisting the clean narrative finish.
|
| na |
|
daystron7 |
39 |
T4 |
| na |
|
Jazzaloha |
62 |
T4 |
| na |
 |
lineuphere |
81 |
T7 |
| na |
 |
avb |
83 |
T6 |
| na |
|
Bondo |
72 |
T5 |
| na |
|
pzingg |
88 |
T6 |
| na |
 |
themadelf66 |
64 |
T3 |
| na |
|
filmcricket |
74 |
T9 |
| na |
 |
Enygma |
85 |
T9 |
| na |
|
gabeh |
85 |
T6 |
| na |
|
DLawrence |
77 |
T6 |
| na |
 |
Timon88 |
69 |
T6 |
| na |
|
rsinparis |
94 |
T7 |
| na |
|
filmaffinity |
63 |
T5 |
| na |
|
Mango |
3 |
T3 |
| na |
 |
kangadoodoo |
50 |
T4 |
| na |
 |
Stain |
50 |
T4 |
|
One of those movies that has made absolutely no impression on me. I don't think I can recall a single shot
|
| na |
|
welike |
30 |
T7 |
| na |
 |
imdb |
76 |
T9 |
| na |
 |
Crazy Jack |
84 |
T9 |
| na |
|
Marigold |
77 |
T8 |
| na |
|
eggbeater |
83 |
T9 |
|
Armstrong's eye for detail and Davis's performance dominate this fine import.
|
| na |
 |
Cherish |
60 |
T4 |
| na |
|
dagda2 |
85 |
T7 |
| na |
 |
Tds4a |
67 |
T5 |
| na |
 |
LordofDance |
65 |
T10 |
| na |
|
Theyshootpic |
14 |
T4 |
|