You've ignored this film. It will no longer appear as a recommendation. View ignored films.
You've decided to remember Pusher III: I'm the Angel of Death for later. You can see all your remembered films here.
Summary: In this third installment of the 'Pusher' trilogy, we follow Milo ('Zlatko Buric'), the drug lord from the two first films. He is aging, he is planning his daughter's 25th birthday and his shipment of heroin turns out to be 10.000 pills of ecstasy. When Milo tries to sell the pills anyway, all Hell breaks loose and his only chance is to ask for help from his ex-henchman and old friend Radovan (Slavko Labovic). (imdb)
The same premise as the previous two, but in it's own right an interesting, grungy peak into a the Copenhagen underworld. It's always a pleasure (of sorts) to revisit Buric's Milo character, but unfortunately the story feels too amputated to be as engaging as the previous chapters. Speaking of amputated: Bonus-points for being uncompromisingly graphic.
Who would have expected a film with as juvenile a name as "Pusher III: I'm the Angel of Death" to be so good? If Tarantino is still a clear influence on Refn, it doesn't matter because Refn has far, far surpassed him. This is a character drama of excellent realist writing and acting. Constant tension rises from the sense that violence looms, but there is relatively little of that.
Intense, gritty, and made me feel dirty afterwards. Funny how Milo's horrible cooking mentioned in the first movie becomes a critical plot point here. Leaves a few more plot threads hanging than the previous 2, which might make it less satisfying.
The third entry seems somewhat slower and more subdued than the previous two, not that it's a bad thing. Not much else to say other than more of the same very solid filmmaking all-around.
Perfect cap to a great trilogy. Things are tough at the top for Milo, but by the end of the movie you see why he got where he is, though no telling how much longer he'll be able to stay there.
In my view comfortably the best of the Pusher trilogy (followed by I then II). The Milo character is played to perfection, with a simple but effective plot line to keep you both engaged and sympathising/dispising the characters at the same time. Good Cinema.
Just as good as - if not better than - the first two films in the series. Milo is a more engaging and, at least in some ways, a more sympathetic character than Frank and Tonny of the previous entries. A stellar film that rounds out the trilogy far better than is usually expected for the third film in a series.
Loading Products from Amazon and Ebay
Privacy Policy |
Abuse Policy |
Contact |
About Us |
APIs |
Advertising & Press |
RSS