Only advisable to wtach if you are a huge Costner-Fan...

Kevin Costner isn't so bad here, but the movie itself is really bad. Talk about a confused, hindered, unexciting thriller that ultimately leads to a depressing outcome after all is said and done. Besides, our lead character barely gets his 'revenge,' and it takes over half the movie to even get anywhere. A major bore. If you're not asleep by the forty-minute mark, I commend you.

What was the point?

Remarkably dull for a movie that had this much potential. Overlong and with way too much of Tony Scott's patented visual goop

Slow 90's style beginning but the meat of the story was good...UNTIL THE END!

If it wasn't such a simple formula revenge story, it would be confusing as heck.

Brutal, shallow thriller that is too predictable to be enjoyable.

Gaab

Not bad.

Basic pulp-novel passion and torment, swathed in Scott's patented visual goop, as if he were under the impression he was making "Tristan and Isolde". Show-stopping turn by James Gammon as a substance-abusing old cowpoke. Clock-stopping turn by Sally Kirkland as an over-the-hill rock-and-roller. And then some steady support from Miguel Ferrer, barely identifiable in the goop.