Not bad, but not in the same realm as Hitchcock's classics. One of his many "wrong man" films, it suffers mostly from a lead actor who lacks the charisma of a Jimmy Stewart, Cary Grant or Robert Donat. And there's a lot of clumsy inspirational speeches. Still, the story clips along at a brisk pace with some great scenes.

Terrific fun. Who can forget the climax on the Statue of Liberty?

Both as a comparison to later, greater Hitch movies like North by Northwest and as an example of wartime movie-making, Saboteur is an interesting -if uneven- watch.

Overall not a top shelf Hitch film, however it is underrated and it contains several memorable scenes including a fantastic ending!

75.250

Has some excellent scenes, for example the fire creeping slowly across the factory floor in the beginning. And the ending on top of the Statue of Liberty has Hitch written all over it. But, overall, very uneven and somewhat bloodless.

Very offbeat thriller (even for Hitch's standards) assembles many magical ingredients (including an array of fascinating supporting characters) and well executed set pieces, but unfortunately never quite comes together as well as it should; Lane and Cummings in the lead roles are annoyingly bland and uncharismatic, but Kruger makes a wonderfully urbane villian, and there is a great bit for Vaughn Glaser as a blind man. Feels at least 10 years ahead of its time.

a bit too much of the patriotic chest-thumping and some rather stiff acting from lead man Robert Cummings, but still a solid Hitchcock "wrong man" film. And who can forget the ending on the Statue of Liberty.

Somewhere between a rehash of The 39 Steps and a dry run for North by Northwest. Even if it feels like you've seen this all before, it's still an entertaining adventure film with some stand-out scenes - the fire creeping across the factory floor, the cinema shootout-within-a-shootout and the surreal travelling circus sequence amongst them. Surprisingly, the finalé on the Statue of Liberty feels a little anticlimactic, but otherwise it's pretty good.

A bit over-the-top at times, but enjoyable Hitchcock nonetheless.

Stagey dialogued wrong man thriller with a couple of good moments.

So forgettable, I literally can't remember a thing about (I'm not kidding) and am not even going to attempt to try and hit the character limit. Easily the lamest Hitchcock I've yet to see and I'm really surprised that there aren't more negative reviews up here. We all know Hitch is great people, but come on now, he's not above reproach.

Even if you're a huge Hitchcock fan, you can't deny that whilst okay, this is far from his best. If the at times, wooden, acting doesn't get you, then the propaganda will...