It was a pretty easy film to watch. It was only just over an hour long, for one. West was very likeable, and her dialogue especially was quite witty. It’s very much a 1930s film, and, frankly, a little racist. Overall, I enjoyed it.

Amusing, but not great. I'd never seen West in anything before, so that part of it was entertaining. But the story is a little slow and the novelty of watching yesteryear's version of a sexpot doesn't make up for it.

Cary Grant is nothing more than window dressing in this top-of-the-line Mae West vehicle. The only problem with SHE DONE HIM WRONG is . . . once you've seen MY LITTLE CHICKADEE you have seen the Best of West and all of her other movies suffer by comparison.

Amusing, but the comic timing isn't quite there and while Mae West is appealing, it's hard to buy the huge fuss made for her.

Pop movies usually have short lifetimes and after that they become hopelessly outdated. Hopelessly? How will they look like after, say, 70 years when most part of frame of reference has disappeared? As I have very little idea what vaudeville has actually looked like and most moral issues of the movie look very different to me, this movie has got a certain surrealistic glow, like it was made in another planet.

I know I've only seen two of Mae West's movies, but does she always play the same kind of character? Although she ends up with Grant in, i believe, both movies (I'm no angel is the other one i saw), there isn't any chemistry between them at all. You really don't expect them to get together in the end ever because of that. Sure, the story is interesting, but it's no different from the other movies she did.

There it is. Mae West's ego on screen for an entire hour. Thankfully, it isn't any longer and Cary Grant makes things a bit more tolerable, but overall, pretty brutal to sit through.