You've ignored this film. It will no longer appear as a recommendation. View ignored films.
You've decided to remember Smokin' Aces 2: Assassins' Ball for later. You can see all your remembered films here.
Summary: Walter Weed is an unassuming desk jockey at the FBI when the Bureau uncovers a plot to assassinate him. A team of degenerate, psychotic assassins dispatched by mystery man Hal Leuco to win a huge bounty includes a resourceful beauty who has a unique method of killing her prey, a power-tool wielding psychopath and a deadly master of disguise. (Universal Home Video)
Well I'm pissed. SA1 was good action comedy about assassins and was nice to see. But this movie isn't anything. It's supposed to be funny but it isn't. It wants to be something with "real" references, assassin romance and big conspiracy. All that is too absurd to have any weight. FBI agents are even less convincing than Steven Seagal's emotions. Most of assassins are recycled versions of SA1(nazis,whore). Still being bad isn't same as being the worst. But it isn't far behind.
Worst. Explosions. EVER! One of the worst sequels ever too (yes, I am aware it is supposed to be a prequel to the original movie). I feel sad for Vinnie Jones.
The film makes to attempt to draw the viewer into any of the characters. By the time the film had ended I had no idea who I was intended to root for and was interested in none of the characters.
Well, the movie included some brainless shooting that was also trademark of the first movie, but the plot is too obvious even for such a movie. The same can be said about some "trying to be serious action movie" scenes that just don't fit in. The babes were hotter in this one though. Oh, and cliche characters, I approve.
Smokin' Aces 2 is supposedly a prequel to Smokin' Aces but it's connections with the second film are tentative at best. Two characters from Smokin' Aces make appearances here but you are given no further insight into them or their characters. The fight scenes are absurd and over the top, just like the first film, but this has a distinctly low budget. Making a lot of the larger elements of the film feel poorly done. I thought the first was a decent film but, even so, I couldn't enjoy this.