Sandman ruined this film.

Not as good as the first two ones, which were excellent. It felt a bit longish, aand I was a bit bored during the fight scenes.

Not in the same league as I and II...

The worst of the Spiderman movies. But it has it's moments. Like the pie that's soooooooooooo goooooooood.

Too many crooks.

may 2010

They made it just too complex. Again the movie suffers over dramatic dialogue that makes me wonder is Spider-Man gay when he says "you came". They also ruined Venom's costyme and the story doesn't handle his character at all. In this movie they have everything but it's too much and they miss all the way.

Topher Grace is the only good thing about this movie.

A good action movie. But the movie give the sensation that there are too much things put toghether...like that don't like to make another movies.

Peter Parker/Spidey acquires a suit that turns him into a cokehead in what's arguably the pick of the trilogy (although that's not saying much). The characters are now fully-developed, leaving room for lots of sub-plots to keep the action moving. I never understood the fuss about the previous two instalments: average, cheesy summer blockbusters, nothing more, so wasn't offended by the faster, more chaotic piece here. Somewhere mixed-up amongst the three there's a really good movie.

Emo Parker?.. garbage.

Good sci fi with really nice special effect and well mixed with serious philosophy

In a vain attempt to please all the people begging for Venom they throw him in among two other "villains" and further clutter the already incongruous mess that was this script. No one was done well, acting-wise or story-wise. It almost feels like they were forced by some executive to put Venom in the movie so everyone involved in the making of the movie said, "Fuck it. If the only thing that will sell tickets is the inclusion of Venom we might as well not try."

Remember it, don't remember it being particularly good.