the good is, it was put together with enough skill that you can watch it without hating it. the main character here is miscast and he just cant pull off vengence the way i would have expected, although that is mostly the fault of the writers and director. kirsten dunst's character is pointless, and there isnt enough guiltless horrifyingly gory killing to keep with the spirit of the comic book.

Shitty comic written by a junkie turns into shitty movie franchise. The first was moderately interesting and visually appealing, this is neither.

I haven't seen any other crow films, not sure wht Kirsten Dunst was doing in this.

It's better than Crow: City of Angels, but it's still pretty bad.

The story line is basically a reproduction of the first. So no points there. There first was good, but it was already made. Problem is this film didn't do any better than the first so it doesn't have that much reason to exist. That said I did enjoy it.

Has it's flaws but this is a million times better than City of Angels. Not as good as the original obviously, see my comment about flaws, but not a cheap carbon copy either