Criticker.com - Film Recommendations and Community
currently at ...
the Forum Guess the movie from th...
the Blog DVD Report - May 22nd
login | register
0 films ranked
You Explore Interact Resources
Search
Profile All Your Rankings Starred Reviews Your Best TCIs PSIs Kumpels Wishlist
Random Film
The Fall of the Roman Empire (1964)

Probable Score
Not Enough Info
Rank It
500 characters left
Summary: Action-packed look at the beginnings of the fall of the Roman Empire. Here is the glory, the greed and grandeur that was Rome. Here is the story of personal lust for power, and the shattering effects of that power's loss. Here is the tale of the plight of a people living on the brink of a political abyss.
Poster submitted by Gauntlet
Genre: Drama
Country: USA
Directed By: Anthony Mann
More information at the Internet Movie Database
Trailer
Invalid Trailer
If you want, give us a new one!
Ratings
Loading Products from Amazon and Ebay
Loading...
Loading...
Show:All Rankings | With Reviews
Order by:TCI | Tier | Date Ranked | # Stars (Reviews)
TCI User Score
na OkkCoCa
50
T4
Filled with grand scenes and massive set pieces, "The Fall..." is laced with much of the polish and sheen expected from these type of Golden Age epics. That said, although the scale is admirable, this is a largly souless affair. The three hours drag awfully at times. A movie to watch once and enjoy, but no more than that.
na Bavafreak
75
T5
na luc
68
T6
na DougCollins
80
T5
na shebang
42
T4
Everything besides Plummer is as boring as a cinderblock. Nice sets as you would expect.
na cluster
4
T2
na NightGoat72
80
T7
na pmpfe
75
T4
na onetwothree
50
T5
na sobored
60
T4
na seventy
69
T4
na screentime
74
T7
na bad_juice
45
T7
na BaalMan
60
T2
na heavennhell
68
T3
na CMQuinn
74
T7
na Dunstan-x
5
T5
na jalanb
48
T3
na pinematr
60
T4
na dbentien
70
T7
na julibu
85
T6
na daviddevries
83
T4
na avgcrtckr
51
T4
na SlantMag
35
T10
"Put bluntly, the difference between El Cid and Fall is the difference between faith in a concept of heroism that can transcend even death." - Fernando F. Croce
na Squin
82
T7
na sirphibes
72
T6
na glumpy_99
87
T6
Excellent, robust epic with a fine cast; unfortunately Loren and Boyd make for bland leads but are more than compensated for by Guinness and Mason (superb as always) and an especially wonderful early performance from Plummer. Occassional slugishness (especially in the first half) is outweighed by an intelligent screenplay, and the sheer muscularity of the production, with some scenes still unequalled in the epic genre for pure spectacle. Rivals BEN HUR for most exciting chariot race sequence!
na KTP
50
T6
na IMDb-byvotes
66
T4
na chemical404
59
T6
It is a movie of grand proportions. At the runtime of over 3 hours it consists of a few big scenes, and a very little real emotions between them. What I liked about this movie, that it keeps fair share of focus on politics, not only on love storyline and action scenes. Plummer was very good in this. Due to the lack of heart film gets boring, and I wouldn't recommend it to someone who has no interest in roman history.
na Gody85
47
T5
na Mine filmer
56
T1
na JooJoo
6
T6
na dwhee
56
T6
na hythlodaeus
55
T4
na Rey
59
T1
na Zoltan
65
T5
na scurry
60
T8
na TroyAnderson
65
T6
na Cianeto
86
T6
Excellent epic for those who love the history of Rome. "Gladiator" was undoubtelly inspired on this as it follows the same story line (minus the gladiator thing, that is). This one is more historically credible.
na Heer
70
T6
na welike
30
T7
na Vegard
50
T3
na okidude
3
T6
Candidate for the weakest of the Golden Age of Epics for Hollywood. The casting was passable with Alec Guinness the best of show. The script seemed rough and the budget lower thanks to the spectacular meltdown of Cleopatra a year earlier. The spiritual successor, Gladiator, had a much more succinct story
na horatio5
63
T7
na Fetsch
71
T6
na Bevo52
75
T4
na jeff_v
61
T4
If you're the type of person whose pulse races when he hears the phrase, "shot in Ultra Panavision by Robert Krasker," then maybe this film's for you. Otherwise, it's rough going. A stiff, bloated epic, typical of the era. Anthony Mann is unable to make it move, though there are highlights (a chariot race, Aurelius' funeral), and the sheer scope of the thing is occasionally breathtaking. Too often I found myself clinging to Christopher Plummer's hammy Commodus as the only sign of life onscreen.
na Hagbard
69
T4
na zurrenarh
75
T8
na cinebaixar
71
T3
na billkerwin
75
T3
A lot of wonderful spectacle here, and it is certainly better than Gladiator--a film that stole much from it--but it never really comes together. It is worth a look, though, for the memorable homoerotic scene of Boyd and Plummer each drinking from the other's wineskin!
na eggbeater
83
T9
Intelligent scripting, good direction, and fine acting place this far above the usual empty-headed spectacle. Mason and Guinness are superb; several action sequences are outstanding. A winner all the way.
na filmaffinity
67
T6
na imdb
66
T6
na Stain
90
T9
na dagda2
67
T2
na lebasi
3
T5
na dharmabum
44
T3
Average Tier 5.14 from 59 Rankings rss