A case of "like father, like son"; too bad director Walas isn't like David Cronenberg. Alternately dull and messy but mostly dull; can Stoltz still move his neck muscles after having shlepped all that cranial makeup here and in _Mask_?

Mediocre at best, utterly inessential. Too corny and sentimental, never frightening, nothing unexpected. The story of Seth Brundle's son is a great hook, but the execution is stale and the style is bland.

Pretty good sequal. It starts where the first one did end. You can't compare this to first one 'cause it's a totally different kind of movie. This one is a very brutal. There's a lot of gore and even today I can feel bad for the dying characters. The story could be better but then again it could be a lot worse.

Got 20 extra points because it's HILARIOUSLY bad; probably great for drinking and/or stoner games. Feels like they realized it at some point and just went full-on camp. Still, I'd rather watch the perfect Cronenberg version another 50 times before watching this again.

And after a pretty good stretch, the franchise splats on the last windscreen. The story borrows liberally from Return and Curse, but it's directed by a special effects designer who mostly replaces both the old B movies' gothic darkness and Cronenberg's body horror with ordinary (and not even very well-done) gore and a drawn-out by-the-numbers revenge story. But hey, at least there's a railing kill.

Some of the special effects are neat I guess. Stoltz sounds like he's about to cry the entire movie.

Interesting well done film. Kinda gross, though.

Decent special effects, but a bit too dull.

Much better than it has any right to be

Passes the time.