I want to see a baby blade or a baby teen wolf.

It's crap, but in Rosenberg and Condon's defense it has to be said; the first half of author Meyer's final book in this franchise... is the least interesting... to put it mildly.

Awful, awful, terrible, bad plot, shitty plot, worse characters, bad everything, all things are bad, don't, don't watch this, terrible, bad music, don't listen, don't pay money, don't give money to creators, all the problems here, everything bad, color scheme looks lifeless, go away movie, now, not enough hate, never enough pain, too much pain, and also

2- avoid at all costs, bad :: Spoilers ahead: an hour of wedding, 15 minutes of honeymoon, another hour of "oh no!" ...lame.

By a wide margin the worst and most boring installment of this series, mainly because it focuses so much on Bella -- on Bella's emaciated body and on Bella's absurd irrational romantic fantasies. And for me, because Lautner gets his shirt off exactly once.

Not quite as good as Eclipse, but better then Twilight and New Moon. Less melodrama, more crazy. Of course you have the "unfilmable" scene, which I think they did an alright job with. The cinematography is quite a bit better then the other movies. The wedding and the honeymoon stuff specifically. The movie does get a bit weird, but I guess you have to blame the source material for that. the acting is an improvement from the other films. The ending really make me excited to see the next one.

Can't tell if this movie is serious or the greatest troll of all time. Has possibly the worst bestiality scenes ever filmed and Kristen Stewart's teeth have grown exponentially, still wouldn't mind it. The gay kid that plays the werewolf could be the worst actor since the guy who plays the vampire in this movie. If Stephanie Meyer wasn't a billionaire from these crappy books I would legitimately feel sorry for her because clearly she has a brain tumor, so goddamn stupid.

If it wasn't for my wife, I would have no reason to sit down and watch this franchise. Really, nothing worth applauding, these all seem to blend together with similar acting, themes, and overly dramatic facial expressions. I can dig the music, though.

It's up there among the worst in the series, constantly lingering on tiny and utterly indifferent details, ridiculous acting and a strikingly boring finale. Bah.

Endlessly terrible. It has no idea of what it wants to be. Everything from story, effects, performances and especially tone and pace could be the worst ever for an A-list Hollywood movie. And I even like part I and III...

waiting for the next one to come to thearters.

They should have just made this into one movie. I felt like I was forced to watch someone's wedding video and honeymoon video for a whole hour of the film. They just spent way too much time on the lead up to the wedding, the wedding, the super-long honeymoon and then finally they were like "HEY, LET'S ADD SOME ACTION FINALLY"! Sadly the action was Bella getting pregnant with a demon child and now everyone wants to kill it. Except Jacob who should kill it but I guess loves it instead. Bad movie

What would you get if you'd cut out all the emo expressions of 'Bella' and 'Edward'? Not that much: shitty CGI wolves, lots of forrest shots, the statue of Christ the Redeemer, emo moustache dad and a CGI baby. Would cut the movie to 10 minutes or something

Hey look a vampire wedding and an intensely lame honeymoon and some wolves doing stuff and hey why is that razor in my hand and why is all that blood gushing down the front of my shirt

I had the tiniest glimmer of hope for this because I thought New Moon was better than Twilight and Eclipse was better than both of them. But no. It was just plain awful. Most of the film was spent showing close-ups of the characters looking ‘emotional’. Splitting the last book up into two films was completely unnecessary. The basically misogynistic messages throughout all these films is despicable. The pro-life agenda that this one had was especially tragic. It has no redeeming features. [Full Review]

omg, worst one yet

On a filmmaking level, I'm not sure it's any worse than previous films in the saga, but there's a disturbing right-wing, puritanical vein running through this film that makes it for me the worst one yet: far beyond the abstinence parable of the first three, Breaking Dawn is all about punishing women for having sex (even within the bounds of wedlock!) and didactic anti-abortion cheerleading. Morally speaking, it's pretty gross.

Probably the best made Twilight of them all, but still not that great.

Wow, never have I been so disturbed and amused by a skeleton being given a c-section by an anne-rice-vampire-wannabe in my life...Stephanie Meyer's wet dream just gets more fucked up as we go along!

Honestly, Twilight gets more hate than it really deserves, it should be given credit for bringing vampires and werewolves into the mainstream, its only real downfall is its plot and characters. This time around we are treated to a special edition of narrative breakdown wherein the story is mercilessly butchered for the purposes of stretching an already lacklustre fourth novel into two blockbuster films.

Same old, same old. But I had to watch it, thought it was better than New Moon.

I have given this 20 points out of 100 because the little time I spent watching the film gave me such a laugh! An utter joke of a film; garbage, mahogany dialogue, pish music and some actors, apparently, though they must have been in the second half, as I walked out half way through. Bum Suction of the Highest Density.

This was a really great comedy. My friend and I enjoyed it immensely - especially when their bed breaks during the sex scene. Laughs all round! Only thing better: the end of this ridiculous saga.

Couldn't even laugh at this one, it felt like it went for 3 hours, completely unnecessarily. A wedding can be filmed in less than 45 minutes. The worst thing though is the blatant social conservative propaganda.

This is the best of the Twilight films, mostly due to improvements in the cinematography (especially the wedding and the honeymoon). But the acting is still pretty dreadful, although Lautner's ability to express believable anger has improved, as has Pattinson's ability to convey his character's emotional suffering. Stewart is now the weakest link of the three, her delivery so bland (excepting the pro-life stuff) its difficult to care at all for her even as she spends most of the movie dying.

really good 10 out of 10

Horrible in every sense. The dialogue, the CGI, the music, the plot; it is all exceedingly mediocre, creating a very tedious experience. The filmmakers know that they need to invest very little effort into these films to attract their built-in young female audience (as well as their unfortunate male companions). Do not be surprised when the next entry attempts to artificially extend this highly-commercialized franchise even further: Breaking Dawn: Part 2: Part 1.

Breaking Dawn Pt 1 should be commended for one thing: It's not the misogynistic garbage we've come to expect from Twilight, though it easily could've been. For once, I cared a little. For once, the characters were not entirely unlikable. For once, the series completely jumps the shark to the point where it didn't seem like it expected to be taken seriously any more; so at least I was able to take it at all. It's bad, but I think it's the best we'll get from Meyer's bafflingly poor fiction.

Twilight represents the worst series of sequels since Harry Potter and had a lot more to lose: an audience of sentient readers eager to see their romantic fantasies realized on the big screen.

Another lackluster entry in the series that will leave fans pleased but everyone else underwhelmed.