And interesting experiment that sadly does not work. It makes for a very dull film

An exagerated and pretentious film.

There's a scene in which a young filmmaker delivers a wordy pitch for a movie using Timecode's continuous four-image system. It's made to be exaggeratedly pretentious, but it still touches on several legitimate artistic concerns the format addresses, and the joke rings hollow because Timecode clearly did not have as much thought put into it. It operates not on an idea, but a technical choice. The making-of showed 15 days of blind improv, and that's what you get, however logistically impressive.

"One has to admire its visual chutzpah." - Ed Gonzalez

#, hype, (casting)

The story really isn't anything great, but the experience of following all four screens at once makes it worth watching. I really think a few other movies with overlapping narrators could pull this off, like Elephant.

Messy and pointless film following insufferable unlikeables in the 24 split screen fashion as they carry out their banal lives.

Creative, but wholly dull.

One big gimmick that just doesn't pay off at all.

Interesting and mostly successful experiment.

With a title like that i think, sci-fi thriller. Wrong-o. A great concept for a movie, and not uninteresting. I would have preferred if the volume had not been edited to direct my attention. The real disappointment is that aside from the gimmick, there isn't much here in terms of interesting story and remember, four times nothing interesting is still zero. One wonders what could be, and this alone may make the film worth seeing.

An interesting experiment, but unfortunately one wholly betrayed by the sound, which simply can't be at the same volume levels for all screens at the same time.

This movie is intresting only in the manner in which it is shot, everything else basically sucks. If you're looking for actual content, it almost torturous.

Awful gimicky movie with no direction or compelling story.