Criticker.com - Film Recommendations and Community
currently at ...
the Forum Star Trek Into Darkness...
the Blog Server Upgrade
login | register
0 films ranked
You Explore Interact Resources
Search
Profile All Your Rankings Starred Reviews Your Best TCIs PSIs Kumpels Wishlist
Random Film

General Discussion : Jason Statham: great, horrible, or in between?

Return to Board index
Introduce yourself to the community or chat with other users about whatever is on your mind

Jason Statham: great, horrible, or in between?

Postby nauru on Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:56 pm

Here we debate whether Jason Statham's work as an actor and action movie lead is excellent, horrible, or in between. (This is to prevent another thread from going off track.)

nauru
 
Posts: 392
Member Since: Apr 18, 2009 9:41 pm
Num Rankings: 1189
Location: Earth

Re: Jason Statham: great, horrible, or in between?

Postby TheDenizen on Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:07 pm

lol, sorry for derailing your other thread.

ShogunRua wrote:
TheDenizen wrote:
ShogunRua wrote:I think Statham is the greatest action star today and the second greatest ever, after the legendary Charlie Bronson.

wow. I think you must be the only guy who likes Statham more than me. I think he's a decent actor and a great action movie tough guy...but second greatest ever? I don't think I could go quite that far, and I'm prone to hyperbole.

I'm totally with you on Bronson though.


There's an argument to be made for Tomisaburo Wakayama and Jean Reno, yes. And there are better actors that have played action roles, although I don't consider them strictly action stars. (Shintaro Katsu, Toshiro Mifune, arguably Alain Delon)

But among strictly English-language action stars, Statham is the undisputed number two after Bronson. I'm curious who you would put ahead of him.


Ah, I didn't realize we were limiting things to English speaking stars.

I'd probably still put Arnold and Sly ahead of Statham...but mostly because I was raised on a steady diet of 80's action cheese.

TheDenizen
 
Posts: 1471
Member Since: Apr 13, 2006 8:51 am
Num Rankings: 2784
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: Jason Statham: great, horrible, or in between?

Postby movieboy on Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:52 pm

nauru wrote:Here we debate whether Jason Statham's work as an actor and action movie lead is excellent, horrible, or in between. (This is to prevent another thread from going off track.)


I liked him in the Guy Ritchie movies and found him adequate in the other movies.


TheDenizen wrote:I'd probably still put Arnold and Sly ahead of Statham...but mostly because I was raised on a steady diet of 80's action cheese.


I don't think I can put Sly ahead of anyone :-)
I like Arnold - he isn't the greatest actor, but I rather like his style, accent & attempts at acting.
movieboy
 
Posts: 553
Member Since: Sep 03, 2009 7:08 am
Num Rankings: 737

Re: Jason Statham: great, horrible, or in between?

Postby Jehan on Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:14 pm

movieboy wrote:I don't think I can put Sly ahead of anyone :-)

come on
Image Image

Jehan
 
Posts: 76
Member Since: Jan 04, 2009 9:47 am
Num Rankings: 1975
Location: Bulgaria

Re: Jason Statham: great, horrible, or in between?

Postby ShogunRua on Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:14 pm

TheDenizen wrote:
Ah, I didn't realize we were limiting things to English speaking stars.

I'd probably still put Arnold and Sly ahead of Statham...but mostly because I was raised on a steady diet of 80's action cheese.


Thing is, Statham is a much better actor than either Arnie or Sly (and I love both of them, too), and he's a more interesting, unique action star than the generic "big guy with muscles" those two so often played.

Statham has actual range; can you imagine Stallone or Schwarzenegger in a Guy Ritchie film? Or pulling off Transporter 1-2 and Crank 1-2? Most times when those two have tried something different, it's rarely been successful. I'll at least give credit to Arnie for quality funny roles in "Kindergarten Cop" and especially "Twins", but Stallone? He tried and failed in "Stop! Or my Mom will Shoot", and was completely out-shined by Kurt Russell (a way better actor, too) in "Tango and Cash". (Very good film)

No, Statham definitely receives the nod over both of those two, much as I like them.



Yeah, if we're talking

ShogunRua
 
Posts: 2052
Member Since: May 16, 2009 11:18 pm
Num Rankings: 1904
Location: Sunnyvale, California, USA

Re: Jason Statham: great, horrible, or in between?

Postby TheDenizen on Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:25 pm

Statham is definitely a better actor than Arnie, no argument there (Sly was pretty good early in his career, but stopped trying after a while). And I can appreciate Statham's quickness/screen fighting ability is also more appealing than the lumbering, musclebound types popular in the past.

But Statham has never been in anything as overwhelmingly awesome as Conan/Terminator/Predator or Rocky/Rambo. My fave Statham film is the first Crank (tie with Snatch) but as good as it is, it's no Terminator.

Thus, I have to give the slight edge to Sly and Arnie due to their appearances in a bunch of iconic 80's action films. But it is very slight.

Worldwide, though, I don't think there's any action star better than Jet Li. Jackie Chan has been well past it for a decade, but Li still seems to be able to produce the goods and has an incredible body of work behind him.

TheDenizen
 
Posts: 1471
Member Since: Apr 13, 2006 8:51 am
Num Rankings: 2784
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: Jason Statham: great, horrible, or in between?

Postby paulofilmo on Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:12 pm

I'll stick to John Wayne. . . and Kung Fu Hustle :D

paulofilmo
 
Posts: 1350
Member Since: Apr 07, 2008 11:40 am
Num Rankings: 1858

Re: Jason Statham: great, horrible, or in between?

Postby tef on Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:41 pm

I think he's in between. He's charismatic enough, believable enough, but nothing about him draws me in. Stallone has a kind of working class shmuck thing going for him, or had when he was coming up. That final scene in Rambo where he falls apart because of his past is a beautiful thing to watch. I don't recall anything similar with Statham representing dramatic range, though he can be funny.
tef
 
Posts: 447
Member Since: Jan 20, 2009 8:57 pm
Num Rankings: 1065
Location: USA

Re: Jason Statham: great, horrible, or in between?

Postby Pickpocket on Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:53 pm

ShogunRua wrote:Statham has actual range; can you imagine Schwarzenegger in a Guy Ritchie film?

No, but only because Arnie could never pull off an English accent. On the same vain I could never imagine Statham as The Terminator

Pickpocket
 
Posts: 1345
Member Since: May 27, 2006 10:20 am
Num Rankings: 2631
Location: Denver, CO, USA

Re: Jason Statham: great, horrible, or in between?

Postby hellboy76 on Fri Jan 06, 2012 12:02 am

I think Statham is charming and way more talented than 99 percent of other action stars. That being said, he or his agent need to be banned from choosing movie roles cause they pick some stupid ones.

hellboy76
 
Posts: 162
Member Since: Sep 19, 2010 9:53 pm
Num Rankings: 3737
Location: Des Moines, Iowa, USA

Next

Return to General Discussion