Stewball wrote:Suture Self wrote:You didn't answer my question about Trump.
Because I haven't decided yet. In any case, even Jeb Bush would be light years better than any of the three corrupt idiot loosers the Democrats are capitulating with.
What I do like about Trump:
Pushback against the leftist media.
Total rejection of political correctness.
Not beholding to the sources of campaign contributions.
All of that needs to happen to empower any overhaul of the elite, out-of-touch, graft accepting,
political class doing business as usual in Washington without regard to the will of the people except for lip service during elections.
I'm not sure how Trump is pushing back against "leftist media," conservative media is pretty prominent in America and continues to be so for better or worse. I don't think some "pushback" against it is somehow going to make things better, even if a lot of liberals do spout some completely idiotic things{which is no worse than the conservatives in that regard}. When it comes to the media, all Trump is doing is acting in a way that brings a ton of attention himself, which I personally view as a negative trait about him. Not to mention he has had quarrels with conservative outlets like Fox News for example.
I don't think Trump rejects political correctness so much as he just doesn't act politically correct. In my eyes, I think there's a difference between an idiot who poorly words everything he says and someone who thinks people need to be less overly sensitive about everything. I don't think someone who thinks we should build a "Great Wall of Mexico" and says demeaning things to women rather openly isn't what I call pushing against political correctness. I call that being an asshole. Not to mention that when you're dealing with international politics, some degree of political correctness is necessary. I really don't get how this is a necessity to make things better for America's politics.
Donald Trump is not beholding to the sources of campaign contributions because he's entirely self-financed, which I honestly don't think is necessarily a good thing. To me all this tells me is that anyone who has the money can enter politics and even be successful in it, even someone as vacuous as Kanye West. I agree that politics shouldn't be so confined by monetary contributions {which is definitely a huge liability in Bernie's Sanders run for president}, but I don't think Trump not being reliant on them is making anything better either.
I honestly can't find much reason to support Trump as a politician - running a corporation is not the same as running a government. It baffles me that people like Justin Trudeau and Obama, for all the faults that they have, get a lot of flak for supposedly not having "political experience" whereas Trump seems to get a pass on that just on virtue of owning a massive corporation. I'd have more respect for him if he was running for mayor of a city and accumulated enough experience to run for office.
In comparison to Hillary, at least I can say she has a lot more experience than Trump and I can be assured that she'll run the nation as a president rather than a CEO even if I don't agree with a lot her politics.
Pickpocket wrote:Who gives a shit if anyone likes Trump or not? The presidency is just a figurehead and if you like him or don't like him...great, your vote literally means nothing. If you live in a red state, voting blue is as worthless as voting red. If you live in a blue state, voting red is as useless as voting blue. If you live in a swing state, you'll need to gather ~100,000 of your closest friends and all vote the same way to have any impact, and even then you may not have the electoral votes needed. It's a scam and a waste of energy to spend so much time arguing about it, especially to a guy who can barely form a coherent thought like Stewball. Also, voter fraud is incredibly easy to do.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/3 ... -john-fund http://hubpages.com/hub/4-Reasons-Why-Y ... snt-Matter http://americablog.com/2015/08/mathemat ... icans.html“If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it.” - Mark Twain
I think this is an exaggeration. Historically speaking, a lot of American presidents have had influence over their nation's politics and their position in office has had undoubted influence over their nation. Even Obama, for as much as congress undermines his decisions, has had influence over many foreign matters such as in the recent normalization of relations with Cuba and the American response to ISIS.
I don't think I'll bother arguing the legitimacy of voting, though. That one is a bit icky and ultimately irrelevant to me anyway since I'm not even allowed to vote.