Mini-Review: Boring film. Should not have been based on a true story, really. Oh, btw, that Charley Butt guy was so ugly. Where did they get him from???

Mini-Review: Has some good scenes, and it has an happy ending. But it doesn't have emotional scenes, and that maid was annoying as hell.

Mini-Review: Films of the pre-60s are bad. They are sexist, the men are always ugly (why?) and annoying, they have torturing long talking scenes, cheesy music and a boring storyline. The only best thing about is the women -- Most are quite pretty. Btw, why is that the films in that age are always boring? I thank them, cos without them, there would've been no modern films.

Mini-Review: Would've been a really crap film if it was about a NORMAL guy, you know, fictional biographical films where they tell a story of a guy and they show every single event of his life (birth, sex, death, etc), just like Forrest Gump and Big Fish -- Nothing special about them. What made this film so good was that the main character was de-aging (gettin' younger). It was a very long film, but it was neatly paced. Though I wouldn't mind if some scenes were cut, but most were necessary. A great film!

Mini-Review: I don't review films that I partially view because, 1, most of them aren't mainstream films, 2, I hated them (obviously) so I won't waste time on them, and 3, I haven't seen them fully and it's not fair. Hellboy II was the film I reviewed on. Now it's this. This film just sucks so bad, it's nauseating. The camera movements, the digital effects, the editing, the characters (except for that Aussie woman, the black man--Mahalik from SCM4 and Jon Voight). It was a torture to continue watching it.