Mini-Review: I'll never understand how this became a classic. This trite, ultra-didactic what-if-documentary, tries to show the aftermath of a nuclear attack on britain, with the ridiculous archaic voice-over that docs had these days telling us the facts while the images do nothing but illustrate it. That's the whole movie. It wouldn't be so enraging if there wasn't a film made 20 years later (by the same BBC) called Threads, made with roughly the same premise, but infinitely more real and harrowing.
Mini-Review: If all the "quality" french films from the 40's-50's were like this one, then Truffaut, Godard et al would really have nothing to revolt against. This is a superbly written, engaging, unique look into the life of children under war. Though its premise sounds melodramtic at the very least, it's infused with enough comic and realist touches to avoid sentimental pitfalls. The direction may be indistinguished, but the striking visuals and the light touch bring out the best of the masterful script.
Mini-Review: Great music, lousy film.
Mini-Review: A charming, free-spirited allegory about freedom, truth and political repression, made in the very first year of the Czechoslovakian film renaissance. What's great about it is that unlike other allegories (mostly from communist countries) that preach about freedom, this one really expresses it, through its visual and narrative style. There isn't too much plot to speak of, but its sheer imagination and deep compassion for people (and children in particular) really compensate for it.
Mini-Review: A conservative, visually timid and almost fascist revenge film, representing america's paranoia and hysteria concerning pedophiles with a superficial "indie" style. I'll give it credit that it does makes you wonder at times where its sympathy lies (and keeps you interested even when it goes off track), but by the end it becomes all too clear, and infuriating. This is no "Audition" to say the least (most notably lacking Miike's manic glee and black humor).
Mini-Review: As racist propagandas go, this film's claims are probably the most valid ones, but it's still nauseating in its demonizing of an entire religion. It only goes to show that Muslims have a poor sense of timing - if there was television in the days of the inquisition, there would probably be cries for banishing christianity. I'd agree with the message of this film, if it would only go further as to ask to abolish all religions, instead of tarnishing only one culture.
Mini-Review: Most of the film is a pretty standard whodunit as it chronicles the investigation of several leads, trying to find the strangler and in the process revealing the many weirdos and perverts in boston (which has a disturbing effect when it seems to demonize these people a bit). But in the last act, it suddenly turns into a taut, claustrophobic, psychological drama with Curtis giving a rather good performance as a schizophreniac, and that kicks the whole film up a notch.
Mini-Review: It's like almost every aspect of this film is great, except the ones that truly matter. It's captivating all through its 2 1/2 hours, well shot, thought-provoking, has a good soundtrack and builds a great mood, but the core of the film feels like an early, unfinished sketch. The chararcters are so bland (especially the lead) and there are more montages than actual scenes. It does ultimately have an emotional punch, but it's so lacking, it feels like Penn has swallowed more than he could chew.
Mini-Review: Fascinating and highly entertaining, it gives a detailed and rich look into the mechanics of con-men, and when it turns into a multiple-twists movie, it still remains believable and well thought out.