Criticker.com - Film Recommendations and Community
currently at ...
the Forum → UK TV Film Recommendations
the Blog → Top Ten War Flicks of th...
login | register
0 films ranked
You Explore Interact Resources
Search
Profile All Your Rankings Your Best TCIs PSIs Kumpels Starred Reviews Wishlist
Random Film
TripleSH
Cinema Addict - 1195 Films Ranked
Member Since: Mar 21, 2006
Location: Elmwood Park, NJ, USA
Message Sent!
500 characters left
Recent Rankings
55 One-Eyed Monster - Mar 20, 2010
Mini-Review: Oh, come on everybody...you knew it wasn't going to be "The Exorcist." Everything bad about this was done on purpose, and so expertly on purpose. Bravo to all. On the other hand, it still could have been light years better. I hope the sequel outshines this.
67 Strangeland - Mar 20, 2010
Mini-Review: I will grant that Dee Snider isn't going to win any acting awards...ever. That being said, this movie wasn't as bad as people make it out to be. It definitely could have been a lot better, but it tackles the whole "modern primitive shock value" horror genre niche pretty well. I'd recommend that someone watch it.
30 Pathology - Mar 20, 2010
Mini-Review: Such a good concept...such poor execution. Why should I care about a protagonist who is complicit in all the horrible stuff the antagonist does? Because the "bad guy" has crazy eyes and the "good guy" doesn't? Give me a break. Oh, and you can't distract me with a sex scene every 15 minutes either. I'm onto you.
0 The Telling - Mar 20, 2010
Mini-Review: Even if this movie ended as a snuff film killing everyone involved, I still would feel a sense of injustice for having watched it. This couldn't even be deemed enjoyable if you were trying to watch a bad film for the sake of watching a bad film. It is that bad.
41 Choke - Jan 26, 2010
Mini-Review: A Chuck Palahniuk story stripped of everything that makes it a Chuck Palahniuk story makes it a story about next to nothing. This is like if you watched Fight Club without any of Ed Norton's narration or any pieces of dialogue that run over twenty words.
74 Taken - Jan 26, 2010
Mini-Review: Liam Neeson just maiming and killing people for 2/3 of the movie is a pretty good movie. It's not going to go down in the annals of film history as a cinematic masterpiece, but it's still fun to watch.
58 The Gravedancers - Jan 26, 2010
Mini-Review: I didn't totally dislike it. I think it was pretty tightly packaged story and character-wise. There were some decent effects, and the undead characters were well-crafted. Given all that, it did seem like more could have definitely been done with the premise.
71 The Washingtonians - Jan 26, 2010
Mini-Review: Definitely one of the more fun episodes of Masters of Horror. A bit overacted in parts by "The Washingtonians," but it really doesn't detract too much from an interesting premise.
30 Unrest - Jan 26, 2010
Mini-Review: It was billed as "the first horror film to use real human corpses." And that's about all that there is to talk about with regards to this film.
91 The Pianist - Jan 26, 2010
Your Films in Common
You don't have any film rankings in common with TripleSH. Why not go rank more films, then come back and check it out again?