Mini-Review: Oh the delightful 70's, era of campyness, feminism and bad haircuts. There are plenty of these and many other things that belong to the 70's in this film. I saw remake prior to this, but from what I remember it wasn't nearly as ballsy, entertaining or simply good. I like stories of Ira Levin.

Mini-Review: One of the oddest films I have seen. If not for all the talent involved with the making of this film it might have been just another campy 70's flick. But Schaffner seems to have had different plans - and ambitions. Some old Hollywood stars in a very unusual roles. Honestly, I loved this film.

Mini-Review: John Carter reminded me of Emmerich's Stargate in both, plot and how dated it feels. There is nothing substantial in this film and expensive CGI doesn't make anything worthwhile in my opinion. I just didn't have any fun watching this.

Mini-Review: It sure feels dated (way too much jolly singing), but it was way more entertaining than I expected it to be. Unlike big time adventure movies of today this movie focuses on story and characters (loved James Mason as misogynist professor) and in this regard it feels closer to Verne book than any adaptation I have previously seen. Set design is great. best use of painted lizzards I have ever seen.

Mini-Review: Very fun and well made movie, considering that it was nothing but a cheap small project between bigger b-movie productions. Story is classic by now (even though remake by Frank Oz is more responsible for that), but even acting from many actors is memorable. Snappy, smart dialogs are very funny. This must be the best horror farce, and not only because it's the only one I know.