Watch
FlixFling FlixFling
Alice in Wonderland

Alice in Wonderland

1903
Fantasy
Short Film
8m
A 1903 silent film directed by Cecil Hepworth and starring May Clark in this more twisted version of Wonderland. It has a total of eight minutes in length but it was the longest movie to date. There are good special effects for the early 1900s of Alice shrinking and growing in the doll house... (Wikipedia.org)
Your probable score
?

Alice in Wonderland

1903
Fantasy
Short Film
8m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 37.97% from 233 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(232)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 04 Nov 2008
65
76th
The ambition of early filmmakers trying to animate the major bits of the novel is worth an applaud. Eerie and raw. Come on, you can't get bored in 8 minutes film watched for historical value. For a better alternative just go for Svankmajer version. Next year Burton is also coming with an adaptation.
Rated 17 Apr 2010
25
17th
Actually pretty good fun considering how old it is and some of the effects are really ambitious. Also, the executioner (clearly a fairly young child) plays his role with gusto and venom!
Rated 05 Mar 2010
7
70th
Creepy. Think the White Rabbit just made me doo-doo all the way down to my shoe-uh. Eerie stuff. I'll never forget you, remarkably well-dressed White Rabbit with potbelly. For better or for worse. Loved the Cheshire Cat too. An intertitle announces: "The Cheshire Cat leads Alice to the Mad Hatter". Cut to an insert of a random housecat looking idly left and right and doing absolutely nothing. That Cheshire Cat ain't leading no one nowhere. It's just sitting and staring, Hepworth.
Rated 22 Nov 2008
3
61st
An impressive adaptation for its time. The attention paid to props and costuming is particularly remarkable. Mostly a curiosity, but worth checking out if you have time.
Rated 23 Nov 2007
40
16th
Kind of boring actually. This wonderful book needs a definitive film adaptation.
Rated 20 Apr 2012
62
32nd
Another landmark film in the development of plot, although it's obvious constructive and driving use of editing didn't come around until Griffith started filming. It's really more funny than impressive nowadays.
Rated 26 Apr 2008
73
36th
This is actually pretty cool, though a little slow.
Rated 19 Jun 2010
60
10th
A bit difficult to understand, but very interesting to watch.
Rated 20 Mar 2012
63
34th
Obviously easy to pick apart now but this was probably a hell of an undertaking for early cinema. Still it is difficult to follow and not very good.
Rated 19 Nov 2016
40
19th
The film doesn't bother with following a real narrative, it's more just certain scenes from the book acted out with little to connect them. And they don't bother with any type of characterization but the effects are well done and impressive for the time period. The costumes are really well done as well.
Rated 18 Oct 2010
70
40th
Definitely a groundbreaking film; considering it's three times as long as the then current films.
Rated 23 Apr 2017
72
77th
There's something incredibly soothing about these older flicks. First off: everybody in it is now dead. Second, the obliviousness of those in it to our watching them, more than 100 years later, makes for an alienated viewing pespective. As if we are watching a civilization on a different planet without them knowing it. As for the film itself: I can't imagine the book not having had massive impact, or even making possible, the ideas of Freud, surrealism, etc.
Rated 08 Sep 2015
3
30th
the first version of ALICE IN WONDERLAND is pretty mundane, although i liked the card people.
Rated 22 Mar 2015
65
41st
Fun enough for the 10 or so minutes it lasts. I love Alice films for the challenges the work poses at all stages of production, and Hepworth rises to the occasion with aplomb. The highlight is a rather convincing shrinking effect, though perhaps it's aided by the rattiness of the only surviving print.
Rated 28 Mar 2010
63
60th
Impressive for its time, but they screwed up the pacing.
Rated 19 Aug 2012
60
48th
Very old film that attempts to be a silent film adaptation of a book that is to a large part based on games with words. It tries to cram the whole story into it's too short eight minute runtime (No room! No room!) and so obviously ends up very fragmented and feels more like a collection of unrelated scenes than as a coherent whole. Some individual scenes are well done and appropriately eerie yet playful, but I miss the verbal logic games of the book.
Rated 24 May 2014
29
35th
Pre-Griffith narrative short. p.s. pro tip: when you get bored with the fucking awful piano, ragtime, etc. soundtracks people pretty much invariably insist on accompany early silent shorts with, mute, and play Throbbing Gristle instead. TG goes with like fucking everything, it's amazing.
Rated 09 Mar 2009
50
36th
Very interesting but good only historically.
Rated 06 Jan 2014
41
15th
For the animation and narrative to be a bit clunky and clumsy is to be expected considered when it is made, but this is still not a very good film. It's way to short, and the narrative makes practically no sense, and the more the text boards try to make up for it, the more amateurish it looks.
Rated 24 Dec 2012
77
87th
Cheshire Cat sux:)

Collections

(10)
Compact view
Showing 1 - 10 of 10 results

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...