Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid

I really don't know how you mess up this movie; just have snakes killing people the whole time. Boom. Great movie. I mean, I went into this movie expecting to see AT LEAST 25 snake-related deaths.

Watch the first one.

A masterpiece. Of crap.

This movie is mistake.

I hate myself for watching this

They said everything they needed to with the Jennifer Lopez/Ice Cube epic Anaconda. Totally unnecessary.

I hate those most disgusting reptile and such terror animal flicks without any point on them.

A giant snake attacks people. The end.

the whole story based on a giant anaconda is a bit stupid

Did we really need a sequel of this?

was this any different than the first one?

crap

There's "so bad they're good" movies, there's "so bad they're bad" movies and then there's "so bad they're brain meltingly bad." Leading the brain meltingly bad pack is Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid. The plot is contrived and retarded, all the characters are walking movie stereotypes (in a bad way) and the acting is, at it's finest in this film, mediocre. This is a cesspool of how to bore your audience and how to not make a movie.

One of the worst films I've ever seen.

Pretty terrible and not even as good as the first one.

As bad as the first one.

lol snakes

You could do worse. Much worse. Bonus points for giant snake orgy!

four out of five, wait ... no I meant four out of one hundred and five

Take the horrible movie of Anaconda and get rid of its good cast and you end up with this piece of crap.

What has this world come to where giant snakes are scary?

I'm being generous.

Seriously shocking... the only movie I've seen where pawpaws grow on mangrove trees, and you reach the top of a waterfall by sailing up-stream! Pathetic.

This movie sucked chronic, mucho tundra extreme, pussyfilled ASS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Shitty acting, shitty CGI, Sucked Ass, stop making snake movies you fucking amature film makers and leave it to the pros like peter jackson, guerillo del toro, james cameron, steven spielberg, and Chris Nolan.

Don;'t waste your time.

Is Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid worth seeing? Sure. I had some fun with it. No more or no less than the original, but for different reasons. This one looked better and it was kind of nice to not have to listen to artificial feeling squabble for the majority of the time, but on the other hand, it didn't have Jon Voight and it wasn't as creative in its kills. Still, it attempted to establish a tone and Johnny Messner has a lot of screen presence and I think it's worth a watch.

Passes the time as a boring dubbed hotel flick to fall asleep to. There's nothing to it. As formulaic as it gets with the ultra annoying comic relief black guy, the non-threatening villain, the pre-establishment of tropes that you see how they are going to turn out from miles away, boring kills and bland CGI, no gratuitous content, an poor camera work. The best parts are the monkey and the snake shot among the unsuspecting humans walking in the pond.

Dull, tedious attempt at a “monster movie” has hardly a genuine scare in sight – it doesn’t help that the titular villain is rarely used, with most of the conflict coming from the bland and colourless explorer team; it feels like a poor adventure script that was doing the rounds, until someone thought dumping an Anaconda in the middle of it would help. Performance-wise, Marsden has a nice line in steely, venal bastardry, but everyone else sort of fades away and seem more or less interchangeable.

The blood orchids of the film's title arise every seven years and grant those who partake of them a chance at everlasting life. Coincidentally, Anacondas has come out seven years after the first entry, but the only result is that you're 90 minutes closer to the end of your own life with absolutely nothing to show for your time spent. Let's hope that the year 2011 passes with no resurrection of this stinker of a franchise to drain away any more of it.

A cheesy monster B-movie.

Good premise, but turned out to be very predictable and anti-climatic. Still, it was worth watching

not interested.

Everything with the monkey sucked. A surprisingly fun adventure film that's stupid but made all the better because of that fact.

If it is supposed to be a sequel to Anaconda, it isn't as good as the original. The best actor in the movie is a monkey named Kong. However the movie does have it's spots that are fun to watch, aside from that there isn't much there.

good film

Um...Has a few ok moments, but the characters are poor for the most part, the CG is poor mainly from sheer overuse. Unoriginal follows the by the book horror structure. Ok for a watch but the original was way better.

A horror sequel that is more about making fun of old horror cliches and less about actually trying to scare you. While there is some really neat snake action, the characters are dumb and the dialogue is just plain terrible. This is too annoying to be scary. Thumbs down.

I've seen this film. I know I have. I can't remember a single thing about it.

The most surprising thing about this sequel is that it isn't that much worse than it predecessor actually. It use every "animal attack movie" cliché ever and the characters are walking stereotypes, but I was entertained nonetheless

Predictable horror fare.

Adventure flicks about trying to survive sharks and spiders (or even extinct beasts like dinosaurs), and natural disasters such as tornadoes and earthquakes, are in a different class, at least in my mind. With these, I'm open to the idea that the film may have merit. I point this out, because a movie about snakes eating people doesn't immediately send me scrambling to raise the red flag. (pluggedin.com)

Hey where's the Amazonas?

There is nothing good to say about this movie. They should have stopped after the first horrible Anacondas movie. I only give it a 50/100 for Johnny Messner's perfect body in this movie. Just watch it on mute and enjoy the view.

This film boring. It had shit characters, and the actors were...Really, who were they? I didn't know them at all. It wasn't scary, and it was too predictable.

Only watch this if its on basic cable, all the other channels won't work, it's raining and your drunk. Then it's fine. Still what do you expect from the sequel to a J-Lo movie? Still, this is better than the first one. While the premis is bollocks they actually make it well rounded bollocks and it all makes sense in its own little universe. If Dean Caine had been the tough guy This might have been over 3 stars for me.

"Who will the snake kill off first: the African-American comic relief guy, the nerves-of-steel heroine, or the treacherous British professor? Take a wild guess." - Jeremiah Kipp

This film has no interesting characters the closest it comes to one is the monkey. ,The script is bad, it is full of uninteresting dialogue. Overall this film is really bad.

Mostly stupid and with zero characterization, but there are a few cool moments.

Has you wishing Ice Cube hadn't died in the first one.

Cheerfully cheesy B-movie delivers what it promises as well as some bonus laughs.

Amazingly bad, amazingly funny, ripe for riffing.

It's still funny

hahaha

Decent....when you consider what it is a sequel too. Still, it's not as fun as the original. It takes itself too seriously.