sign in
register
Watch
Apple TV Google Play Movies Vudu
+5
Angels & Demons
Apple TV Google Play Movies Vudu
+5
JustWatch
Remove ads

Angels & Demons

2009
Drama
Suspense/Thriller
2h 18m
Harvard symbologist Robert Langdon works to solve a murder and prevent a terrorist act against the Vatican.
Directed by:
Ron Howard Ron Howard
Written by:
David Koepp David Koepp Akiva Goldsman Akiva Goldsman
+1 more
Starring:
Stellan Skarsgård Stellan Skarsgård Tom Hanks Tom Hanks Ewan McGregor Ewan McGregor Nikolaj Lie Kaas Nikolaj Lie Kaas Armin Mueller-Stahl Armin Mueller-Stahl Pierfrancesco Favino Pierfrancesco Favino Ayelet Zurer Ayelet Zurer Thure Lindhardt Thure Lindhardt David Pasquesi David Pasquesi Cosimo Fusco Victor Alfieri Franklin Amobi
More
Franchise:
Robert Langdon
Genres:
Drama, Suspense/Thriller, Crime, Mystery
AKA:
Angels and Demons
Countries:
Italy, USA
Languages:
English, Spanish, French, Italian, Latin, German, Polish, Chinese, Swiss German
imdb More information at IMDb
See title update history
Suggest an edit
Show Less
Your probable score
?

Angels & Demons

2009
Drama
Suspense/Thriller
2h 18m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 36.24% from 4913 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(4913)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 01 Aug 2009
5
4th
This film is based on the ungood book by Dan Brown. As the book is written in a style that is not good I thought I would write my review about this bad film & its badness in the same style Mr Brown does his books when he writes his books. In short the silly film is not a good film, as the silly film is boring and dull and is not a good film. Even a competent director as Ron Howard can't make the silly film unsilly, as its based on the poorly written book which resulted in the film being ungood.
Rated 01 Aug 2009
cagedwisdomcagedwisdom
Rated 20 May 2009
25
17th
Tom Hanks runs around and explains the plot to his female sidekick. Haven't I seen this film before? Actually, it's not Hanks' fault, Dan Brown is just stupid and Ron Howard really needs to try harder. The plot & plot twists are dumb and predictable and the characters are all great big stereotypes. I'd predict this to be the dumbest film of 2009 if I didn't know Transformers 2 is coming out. Better than Da Vinci Code the same way a kick in the shin is better than in the balls.
Rated 20 May 2009
sellissellis
Rated 03 Jul 2009
32
8th
Tom Hanks knows a lot about a lot of old shit. Everyone else is hesitant to believe. Ewan McGregor is a hero. But not really. I don't care. Just kill some damn Catholics or something. Or not. Whatever.
Rated 03 Jul 2009
weirdyodaweirdyoda
Rated 19 May 2009
44
5th
Kind of like Frank Llyod Wright designing a port a potty, it may look good but its still just a place to shit. The mythology stuff can be interesting, but the plot is entirely predictable and Robert Langdon remains the most boring, characterless hero of all time. Actually I take that back, there is no way Ron Howard can be compared to Frank Lloyd Wright.
Rated 19 May 2009
sirstuckeySirStuckey
Rated 09 Dec 2009
55
28th
I imagined it would be hard to fit all the stuff from the novel into a movie but they did an acceptable job. The plot is nothing that will blow your mind and at times it can be predictable and quite convenient for the main characters to figure out a clue. Fortunately, the fast-paced plot keeps you from noticing too much and they wisely left out the terribly forced romantic angle from the book as well. Some good looking scenery and a strong performance by McGregor make this worth at least a watch
Rated 09 Dec 2009
nadihNadiH
Rated 17 May 2009
73
25th
National Treasure and Seven have a love child. Once you overcome the unbelievability of some of the plot turns and some special Ron Howard touches that add that sugary, hollywood, chris columbus-esque vibe to the film you get a pretty decent thriller. I enjoyed, it's a nice, middle of the road summer blockbuster. Not as good as Star Trek.
Rated 17 May 2009
indyatmnINDYATMN
Rated 26 May 2009
72
29th
Last 40 minutes r briskly entertaining, unlike the first 80. There's also a great scene where Hanks tries 2 save a cardinal from forced drowning that actually thrills & has u on the edge of ur seat, so y's the rest so unrelentingly dull? Like the entirety of the 1st film, this 1 rushes thru far 2 many riddles that completely forego the "Oh, yeah, that's right!" moments in its audience any good riddle provides, unless they majored in Vatican Arcana. Surely the novels provide more colorful detail.
Rated 26 May 2009
stewballStewball
Rated 15 May 2009
70
54th
Combination of good and weak areas (on a couple of occasions, absurd--e.g. what the crowd didn't do at the end) but fairly good entertainment overall. Pretty good recruitment film for the Catholic Church, and as with the first one, there's no way to find out how accurate the portrayal of many of the facts concerning the Vatican are. Ewan McGregor a high point.
Rated 15 May 2009
omgfridgeomgfridge
Rated 02 Oct 2009
3
27th
Ewan McGregor was a positive but as far as the rest of the movie went, not so much. Plays like a religious "National Treasure" but all the same is just as ridiculous. Despite the story also being ridiculous, it was too busy falling down its own plot holes to notice.
Rated 02 Oct 2009
filliganFilligan
Rated 24 May 2009
81
44th
Solid entertainment. I enjoy this franchise, I don't care about the whiners who can't. Just because Hanks and Howard are involved doesn't mean it has to be the best thing since sliced bread. A dark, suspenseful thriller. I expect no more, thus I am rewarded.
Rated 24 May 2009
doctor7doctor7
Rated 20 May 2009
51
30th
I'll definitely admit that this is better than The Da Vinci Code but honestly that's not a tall bar to surpass. By the end of this film you'll be completely motion sick of the camera CONSTANTLY rotating around something to setup what feels like every single scene. However, Ewan McGregor really shines in this, for the majority of the movie at least. In the end this is a missable film unless you loved the first, and really you shouldn't because it wasn't very good either.
Rated 20 May 2009
jebJeb
Rated 17 May 2009
66
48th
Leagues above the Da Vinci Code in many functions, Angels and Demons is indubitably the paramount over its far inconsistent and contradictory predecessor. Tom Hanks has a superior acting role though a bit exaggerated and Ewan McGregor truly shines above the other deliquents. But as usual, you can't find any remotely accurate facts concerning the idea, a staggering flaw in the novels as well. Oh well, Someone will get it right eventually.
Rated 17 May 2009
sumanaustinsuman.austin
Rated 03 Jan 2010
73
40th
I read the book recently and I admit it was way better than the movie. The usual problem with screenplays of movies like these is that one always ends up wishing for a bigger car with more room.
Rated 03 Jan 2010
frederikaFrederikA
Rated 09 Dec 2009
50
33rd
After accepting the fact, that the secret society puzzles at the center of the story can be boiled down to "statues pointing at clues",I found this to be a better popcorn movie than it's predecessor.
Rated 09 Dec 2009
delirium9Delirium9
Rated 05 Jul 2009
0
1st
I knew it was going to be bad, I really knew it, and I just couldn't keep myself from watching the train wreck. It's even worse than The DaVinci Code. Wooden acting, *even* by Ewan (he should've just run like hell from this stinker!), preposterous plot (I *hate* it when authors/writers/directors/creators treat us the readers/spectators as idiots!), the whole nine yards of awful.
Rated 05 Jul 2009
peyrinpeyrin
Rated 08 Jul 2020
25
7th
How is this 2 hours. Tom Hanks is just like "this is a pizzeria mamma mia" and everyone starts panicking for some reason. Also Stellan Skarsgard is just in the background vibing. I dunno.
Rated 08 Jul 2020
13ncucuma13ncuCuma
Rated 09 Oct 2009
65
31st
Having read the book and marked it as Dan Brown's best novel, I was really curious about this movie. I saw the extended version. Even it was 2 and a half hours, lots of details were missing, some of the characters that I really liked in the book were cut out, there were some changes which made the movie dull. Not a bad movie, better than the Da Vinci Code, but I'm disappointed.
Rated 09 Oct 2009
peaceanarchyPeaceAnarchy
Rated 03 Sep 2009
66
18th
Decently fun, but absolutely absurd. It's all so obviously crafted for maximum suspense that it becomes rather laughable and predictable. The acting is over the top and all the other technical aspects, camerawork, music etc. are way too blatant even if technically proficient.
Rated 03 Sep 2009
mini_tMini-T
Rated 16 May 2009
83
41st
Decent movie. Better than Da Vinci Code. Story is stupid and very hard to belief but in a way you still want to know how it ends. Has some stupid parts , but was fun to watch and see a driven Tom Hanks playing Robert Langdon. And a bit predicatble aswel but because of the high speed of the movie it won't bother you. Really Really loved the musical score by Hans Zimmer. He really deserves the credit for it , makes it a better movie !
Rated 16 May 2009
scurryscurry
Rated 05 Sep 2009
35
23rd
I love Rome, the city, but this is a dark mess. It is neither exciting nor intellectually stimulating, but pretty to look at (and dark). It reminds me of somebody I lost interest in.
Rated 05 Sep 2009
muutanetmuutanet
Rated 09 Jul 2009
52
41st
Improvement of action from Da Vinci Code is a lot. Haven't read the book, but the story does not give much new for the idea. Even religion is a fight for a power. I hated the needlessly extented ending which was evident from the start. And a constant run, church per an hour. I do not want to make a sightseen like that in Vatican.
Rated 09 Jul 2009
kavuKavu
Rated 17 Sep 2009
24
9th
Antimatter? More like anti-movie. Make enough of these and the world will end. Well, at least we'd get rid of Dan Brown.
Rated 17 Sep 2009
supergloosupergloo
Rated 21 Jun 2009
3
9th
Ron Howard's constantly moving cameras run amok in a movie morbidly obese with names, dates, and uninteresting facts. Thank God Smartest-Man-in-the-World Tom Hanks is there to make convoluted but accurate deductions and do the heavy lifting.
Rated 21 Jun 2009
wicheWiche
Rated 12 Aug 2009
79
79th
I was really shocked when I watched this.. The Da Vinci Code was a disaster, but this one is really good! Now I belief Hanks as Robert Langdon. I really love all the little details and the cameramovements. The scenes are exciting, but maybe at times a bit too fast. I have only one huge remark: what the hell happenned with Maximilian Kohler? One of the most intruiging persons of the book is simply missing in the film... What a pitty
Rated 12 Aug 2009
luna6ixLuna6ix
Rated 21 May 2009
78
66th
spends far too much time explaining what the hell they're talking about every time they make a referance to history or religion--which is quite often. apart from the obligatory ten second back story every three minutes it fills the remainder with exciting suspense and some quite interesting action.
Rated 21 May 2009
melvin_smifMelvin Smif
Rated 25 May 2009
35
37th
While the novel was an interesting fictional adventure that delves into the ideas of science and religion both being right, the movie just kindof glosses over that part to get to the meat of the thriller. What ends up on screen is basically a grim "National Treasure" which fails because "National Treasure" is at least suppose to be fun.
Rated 25 May 2009
klausglenskiKlausGlenski
Rated 05 Jun 2009
60
28th
The good thing first, the writers managed to take a step aside from the awful ending of the book. But his alone doesn't make A & D a good movie. It moves at an exeggerated pace, the story is predictable even without knowing the book and the acting is mostly pathetic.
Rated 05 Jun 2009
ytadelYtadel
Rated 20 May 2009
3
28th
Biblically mediocre.
Rated 20 May 2009
snakefood89SNAKEFOOD89
Rated 02 Jan 2010
75
12th
greasy twist ending, makes me glad I never read the book
Rated 02 Jan 2010
kdog311kdog311
Rated 23 Dec 2009
91
89th
Not as good as it's predecessor the Da Vinci Code, but almost identical plot lines. I'm a little disappointed with how much they changed from the book . . . taking out Vittoria Vetra's father really ruined a great emotional pull.
Rated 23 Dec 2009
max22max22
Rated 24 May 2009
75
50th
Not a lot better than the first, but at least it's less ponderous -- certainly Langdon's exposi-thons are less grating here, thanks to the ticking time bomb element of the plot (literally a ticking time bomb). There still really isn't anything to Langdon himself, but never mind. The movie's "Die Hard: With a Vengeance" by way of Dan Brown. If that sounds like something you'd want to see, I can't imagine you'd be disappointed, but I won't exactly set up a statue pointing to the theater.
Rated 24 May 2009
bharathbharath
Rated 18 Dec 2009
60
29th
I have not read the book, but this movie was similar to the Da Vinci Code. Not sure if the movie is the true representation of the book. The movie is extremely predictable never kept you on the edge. The only reason I saw this movie in a stretch was because it was freezing outside. Its a movie that one can pass. The only reason I gave it higher score than what I should was for the visuals of the Vatican.
Rated 18 Dec 2009
jarmannJarmann
Rated 08 Dec 2009
45
13th
Robert Langdon runs around the Vatican and sweats a lot for over two hours and that's about it. The plot both lacks imagination and realism.
Rated 08 Dec 2009
sarahg1988SarahG1988
Rated 19 May 2009
59
10th
I was a little disappointed as there's something missing from A and D which was there in The Da Vinci Code. Perhaps its because the film isn't so faithful to the book or just because everything is such at an unnesscarily pace it's just ridiculous. Asides that, it's you're average pop-corn film that paces the time. I did enjoy it though, just not as much as I thought I would. Highlight of the film is Ewen McGregor....watch out for him!
Rated 19 May 2009
tvfilm_hubTV+Film-Hub
Rated 23 May 2009
15
71st
As a reader of the book: I felt the movie was an improvement on the book. It made the film feel a bit more epic, plus it removed a few idiocies in the original story, unfortunately it didn't get them all. So where I'd rate the book "Entertaining," I'd rate the movie "Enjoyable."
Rated 23 May 2009
stradivariusStradivarius
Rated 26 May 2009
66
30th
Tries hard to stay interesting but ultimately the plot ends up being convoluted for the twist's sake. There aren't really any puzzles, which you'd expect from a movie about a symbologist chasing illuminati. Really all he does is look for angel statues pointing in certain directions. Yawn.
Rated 26 May 2009
lockstocklockstock
Rated 08 Oct 2009
45
26th
verander hanks door cage en hij zou 40 krijgen... niet toevallig de score van national treasure.. tier9 mannekes das wel HEEL veel hé :)
Rated 08 Oct 2009
nandorizzinandorizzi
Rated 02 Jul 2009
45
31st
I read the book, not bad, but nothing special. The film is disappointing. Compared with the Da Vinci Code, has more action and this is good, but still is superficial, not very deep in its story.
Rated 02 Jul 2009
timmotimmo
Rated 23 Jun 2009
50
10th
Entertaining for its entire runtime, then ready, able, and willing to drop out of one's memory entirely.
Rated 23 Jun 2009
foobekahFoobekah
Rated 14 Dec 2009
85
38th
Surprisingly violent. And the female lead was a non-entity.
Rated 14 Dec 2009
jellyscudsJellyscuds
Rated 15 May 2010
50
46th
Nothing special here. Good story, direction, art, acting. You couldn't call any of it groundbreaking or stunning in any way. There are worse ways to pass a couple of hours.
Rated 15 May 2010
tsvetetsvete
Rated 14 Jul 2016
100
96th
1
Rated 14 Jul 2016
fuckeroofuckeroo
Rated 22 Jun 2010
50
15th
so disappointing. Leaving out details is one thing. but changing completely is another. A better attempt though than the Da Vinci Code.
Rated 22 Jun 2010
petrvyletaPetr.vyleta
Rated 01 Jun 2009
65
25th
First two minutes in CERN were the best part of the movie for me.
Rated 01 Jun 2009
maartenmaarten
Rated 14 Nov 2010
57
47th
Pretty decent film, but way too many errors to make it a good watch.
Rated 14 Nov 2010
damildamil
Rated 15 Mar 2013
60
43rd
I can't comment on the adaptation of the one because I haven't read the book, but it was an alright film. Tom Hanks is fine, but they don't exactly make his character very interesting. His female counterpart in this one was dull too. Ewan McGregor was better, I guess. I liked the elements of symbolism and the dark side of religion. The story was just all a bit too formulaic and pretty predictable.
Rated 15 Mar 2013
citizenxCitizenX
Rated 05 Jul 2009
50
44th
havent read the book and didnt know who stared in this one besides tom hanks, and i gotta say i'm disappointed, the story would have been better if they changed the CERN-antimatter thing to something else and the ending of/with ewan mcgregor was lame, for some reason it reminded me more of national treasure than the davinci code (which is a good thing)
Rated 05 Jul 2009
matthew_parkinsonMatthew Parkinson
Rated 17 Dec 2011
50
47th
Angels & Demons is for those of you who liked the puzzle solving in The Da Vinci Code, but otherwise thought the story required too much thought. This one is easy to follow, requires almost no explanation, but also isn't as interesting to me because of that. It's a film where characters go from locale to locale with little more purpose than "the stature pointed that way." But it's tightly paced and kind of exciting, even if it needed more depth to its plot and characters.
Rated 17 Dec 2011
buggz79buggz79
Rated 13 Jul 2009
78
67th
Another Dan Brown spinoff. The clips of CERN were awesome! The rest of it was pretty ok
Rated 13 Jul 2009
3names3Names
Rated 14 Jun 2009
71
25th
I wish the THE DaVINCI CODE was made as well as this one, (pacing, music) and co-starred Ayelet Zurer! I missed Opus Dei...
Rated 14 Jun 2009
darkmandarkman
Rated 09 Sep 2010
67
26th
What happend to Tom Hanks' german dubbing artist? Totaly annoying...
Rated 09 Sep 2010
slweeslwee
Rated 13 Oct 2009
74
40th
Ewan McGregor turned out a sterling performance. That's about it.
Rated 13 Oct 2009
sopachuco13sopachuco13
Rated 14 Oct 2012
70
36th
Angels & Demons is a straight-forward suspense movie just like the Da Vinci Code. I really like the smart, Indiana Jones type character. Tom Hanks and Ewan McGregor do a good job in this movie as the main characters and the rest of the cast is pretty well casted. The guy who played the main villain did a really good job too. My second time watching the movie allowed me to watch it without thinking about the twists and turns and focus on how the movie set up those twists and turns.
Rated 14 Oct 2012
herbert_ederHerbert Eder
Rated 25 May 2009
50
26th
What's missing is the feeling of the weight of the centuries, the depth of ancient mysteries and conspiracies, the monstrous scope of the events - instead Angels & Demons falls flat and is at most two-dimensional.
Rated 25 May 2009
pampaPampa
Rated 03 Nov 2009
50
21st
Regular
Rated 03 Nov 2009
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 15 Apr 2012
84
73rd
Deliriously entertaining mystery thriller potboiler makes considerable stylistic changes to put itself streets ahead of the disappointing DA VINCI - including investing the whole enterprise with a delightful tongue in cheek tone, and for the most part ditching the over reverent style. While it does slow down in the last 20 minutes for its fairly predictable climax, it overall succeeds in being an excellent boys own adventure with tons of fun (if imbued with questionable logic).
Rated 15 Apr 2012
dorothyozDorothyOz
Rated 23 Aug 2015
60
26th
Not too good
Rated 23 Aug 2015
icybrianIcyBrian
Rated 21 Feb 2011
71
45th
Not as intense as The Da Vinci Code, but it's got a badass assassin and a great performance from Ewan McGregor.
Rated 21 Feb 2011
aliyaliy
Rated 01 Oct 2010
88
63rd
great
Rated 01 Oct 2010
gsbgsb
Rated 16 Aug 2009
73
53rd
The only reason to watch is for Ewan McGregor.
Rated 16 Aug 2009
vanaVana
Rated 29 Jul 2012
5
43rd
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0795351/
Rated 29 Jul 2012
rttntomatoesrttntomatoes
Rated 20 Dec 2013
37
15th
Angels and Demons is a fast-paced thrill ride, and an improvement on the last Dan Brown adaptation, but the storyline too often wavers between implausible and ridiculous, and does not translate effectively to the big screen.
Rated 20 Dec 2013
videoetronVideoetron
Rated 15 Oct 2020
60
42nd
More action than the first one overall, but a lot of silliness and ridiculous parts, a lot barely hanging by a thread of sense. The bomb is absolutely stupid, and some reveal one can see from miles away, even when they try to make you look elsewhere. I guess one needs to put away their critical sense to enjoy it more.
Rated 15 Oct 2020
paraguay1001Paraguay1001
Rated 28 Sep 2013
60
11th
Competently made and acted but that ending. Really?
Rated 28 Sep 2013
neonmanNeonman
Rated 14 Sep 2010
41
3rd
Slightly better than The DaVinci Code, but it's still unworthy as a thriller race-against-the-clock film.
Rated 14 Sep 2010
cmonsterCMonster
Rated 09 Mar 2012
41
19th
Fuck it, I'll say it, Dan Brown is a good author. Not the highest quality literature, but they are fun and cleverly conceived. And even the bullshit conspiracy stuff is enough to peak an interest so that you may actually look up the Illuminati or anti-matter. This movie did a poor job of peaking any interest in anything, including itself.
Rated 09 Mar 2012
jwlietajwlieta
Rated 11 Jun 2009
85
43rd
Qué no se casaban o algo asi en el libro???
Rated 11 Jun 2009
nick_hamdenNick Hamden
Rated 06 Jun 2013
60
47th
Strangely, I actually read this book and thought it was only slightly ridiculous. McGregor was great though.
Rated 06 Jun 2013
ffoxffox
Rated 29 Jun 2009
55
73rd
entertaining, although nothing special
Rated 29 Jun 2009
captainjonnyCaptainJonny
Rated 16 Apr 2010
71
62nd
Being a sequel I was worried that I wouldn't quite get this film as I hadn't seen the first. Not so, it supports itself and has it's own self contained plot. The best thing is, it's clever, it works, a film about thinking but then not always winning. The location work is excellent capturing the necessary details. Ewan McGregor's character is perhaps overly misleading but a satisfying twist to the tale.
Rated 16 Apr 2010
sebbysebby
Rated 27 Jun 2009
50
27th
Very stupid in many ways, but it kept me fairly entertained for 2 hours.
Rated 27 Jun 2009
hakkanarejohakkanarejo
Rated 22 May 2017
85
29th
It's definitely the only movie about a conclave held while Vatican City is threatened with imminent annihilation from an antimatter bomb, and four kidnapped papabile -- sorry, preferiti -- face gruesome executions, ostensibly from an ancient enemy of the Church calling itself the Illuminati.
Rated 22 May 2017
mausMaus
Rated 10 Mar 2010
40
4th
Cliche. Boring.
Rated 10 Mar 2010
erikstronkserikstronks
Rated 29 May 2009
72
18th
matige film naar een matig boek. Een boek dat overigens heerlijk weg leest als je niets anders te doen hebt. De film is zelf ook een popcornknabbelaar, waar je niet te veel van moet verwachten.
Rated 29 May 2009
x_humanx-human
Rated 20 Apr 2010
75
45th
Takes an edge over the original, but ends up being more comical. Hanks does seem more awake in this outing though and less cranky. Don't even know where to begin with the science behind anti-matter; now even physicists are offended.
Rated 20 Apr 2010
funkyfilmsfunkyfilms
Rated 07 Aug 2010
75
12th
Very decent thriller.
Rated 07 Aug 2010
backwardsuitbackwardsuit
Rated 18 Nov 2014
60
24th
Hilariously stupid.
Rated 18 Nov 2014
capetownkgCapetownkg
Rated 19 Dec 2011
70
7th
Entertaining but didn't live up to the book.
Rated 19 Dec 2011
cclzaCCLZA
Rated 28 Aug 2010
35
7th
Astonishingly bad.
Rated 28 Aug 2010
hotsakehotsake
Rated 14 Oct 2018
56
44th
Much like the Da Vinci Code this was extremely bland and supremely average in just about every way.
Rated 14 Oct 2018
fmoraesfmoraes
Rated 16 Jul 2021
60
31st
2021/07/05
Rated 16 Jul 2021
elmakebabielmakebabi
Rated 12 Apr 2021
50
21st
I remember watching this recently but somehow forgot to rate. Now I don't know how to rate because I don't remember a damn thing about the film, so I assume it must be very bad.
Rated 12 Apr 2021
gatoquentegatoquente
Rated 30 Apr 2019
93
53rd
My SCORING: 99-96=Great; 95-90=Very good; 89-85=Good; 84-80=So-so; 79-70=Boring; Below 70=Forget it.
Rated 30 Apr 2019
biggerkevinbiggerkevin
Rated 28 Sep 2022
1
3rd
Stupid
Rated 28 Sep 2022
derekstarDerekstar
Rated 11 Apr 2011
30
12th
To be perfectly honest I can't remember the original that well. All I know is that both The DaVinci Code and Angels & Demons are kind of harmless low-brow conspiracy/mystery popcorn experiences. I don't really understand why Tom Hanks is in either of them though. All of his natural charm and charisma is completely missing from these films.
Rated 11 Apr 2011
mjvmoviemanMJVmovieMan
Rated 09 Dec 2009
64
36th
"Angels and Demons" ups the ante where "The Da Vinci Code" is concerned, and for that reason alone, this sequel feels more entertaining than it has any right to be. Tom Hanks and Ron Howard still deliver that "roll-your-eyes at every-clue-and-find" vibe that apparently made the National Treasure films so popular. At least this film has moments of excitement, tension, and suspense in light of its goofy plot, whereas "Da Vinci" had a goofy plot, but was duller than a doorknob.
Rated 09 Dec 2009
zapperlifeZapperLife
Rated 11 Jan 2017
28
22nd
Revisited (2)
Rated 11 Jan 2017
matjohmatjoh
Rated 29 Dec 2013
89
54th
Better than the Da Vinci Code. Just. The plot was technically impossible but entertaining anyway.
Rated 29 Dec 2013
nickk2nickk2
Rated 07 Jul 2010
70
17th
Not nearly as good as I had expected.
Rated 07 Jul 2010
gokcanzgokcanz
Rated 26 Oct 2012
72
63rd
* Casting, Acting : 5 * Script : 7 * Directing, Aura : 8 * Ease of Viewing : 8 * Naked Eye : 8
Rated 26 Oct 2012
jakefaceJakeFace
Rated 22 Dec 2010
1
18th
this movie needed a fist fight with the pope beneath the vatican to finish it off
Rated 22 Dec 2010
sieghardtSieghardt
Rated 03 Dec 2010
30
25th
A kaleidoscope of writers conveniences and the contrived.
Rated 03 Dec 2010
therealj_roTheRealJ-Ro
Rated 18 May 2009
80
71st
Definitely improves on Da Vinci Code, but still, while the material is a point of interest, the films pale against the books and the books are fraught with inaccuracies and implied premises. Like its predecessor, everything is too convenient and falls into place far too easily. But if you stop thinking, you can really enjoy this series.
Rated 18 May 2009
nutcrackrnutcrackr
Rated 08 Aug 2009
72
47th
Q. How many pointing statues does it take to find an Illuminati? A. Too many
Rated 08 Aug 2009
dmbbearcatdmbbearcat
Rated 07 Jun 2011
53
20th
Pretty much just as bad as the first.
Rated 07 Jun 2011
timon88Timon88
Rated 26 Jan 2016
25
12th
One must sit through over 2 HOURS of hokum--including a lot of disingenuous speeches about how the big, bad Illuminati have it in for Catholics, who are just a bunch of pious guys who want to do GOOD--until reaching the only remotely interesting or believable thing in the flick: the twist near the end. This mess is then capped off with a shameless "borrowing" of the "Tea and Sympathy" line, "Years from now, when you [write] about this--and you will--be kind!" Awful.
Rated 26 Jan 2016
shoranShoran
Rated 17 Oct 2009
65
40th
This is an okay movie...if you don't take it as a serious intellectual drama.
Rated 17 Oct 2009
mikeypaineMikeyPaine
Rated 02 Jul 2019
4
5th
The beginning of this movie makes it seem like it's going to be way worse than it is. Nothing great but it has some enjoyable parts, inoffensive in general.
Rated 02 Jul 2019
brando814brando814
Rated 25 Jun 2009
50
30th
Actually manages to be pretty engaging at times, something the first movie never was, but there are some moments that are genuinely bereft of any sort of tension (Vatican Library when airlocked, anyone) and then they end in such a way that they beg to be punctuated by some tenuous and nervous audience laughter. It's an odd choice and a mistake a movie you know is going to be mediocre can't afford to make. Ayelet Zurer, on the other hand, is a fucking pleasure to look at. I'd totally pee in her.
Rated 25 Jun 2009
kebramonekeb_ramone
Rated 10 Jan 2011
68
12th
Como eu gostaria que esse filme fosse bom como o livro, infelizmente não é. Assistível, mas não passa disso.
Rated 10 Jan 2011

Collections

(28)
Compact view
Show
Sort
iconogassed
Moderated by iconogassed
Last updated on with Ishura
kubricksucks
Moderated by kubricksucks
Last updated on with Dune: Part Two
td888
Moderated by td888
Last updated on with MaXXXine
beedub
Moderated by BeeDub
Last updated on with Civil War
peaceanarchy
Moderated by PeaceAnarchy
Last updated on with Faraway Downs
fanfic
Moderated by fanfic
Last updated on with The Last Witch Hunter
tathiel
Moderated by tathiel
Last updated on with Ishura
fanfic
Moderated by fanfic
Last updated on with Assassin's Creed
nauru
Moderated by nauru
Last updated on with Planet Earth III
livelove
Moderated by livelove
Last updated on with Lot 36
fanfic
Moderated by fanfic
Last updated on with Babylon A.D.
quickyapi
Moderated by QuickyAPI
Last updated on with Ice Age: Continental Drift
phantom_nook
Moderated by Phantom Nook
Last updated on with Batman: Assault on Arkham
monocle
Moderated by monocle
Last updated on with Close Your Eyes
livelove
Moderated by livelove
Last updated on with National Treasure: Book of Secrets
ross
Moderated by Ross
Last updated on with Eva
jakobostgren
Moderated by Jakobostgren
Last updated on with There Will Be Blood
bunt
Moderated by Bunt
Last updated on with Angels & Demons
sirstuckey
Moderated by SirStuckey
Last updated on with The Omega Man
majikat
Moderated by majikat
Last updated on with Jolson Sings Again
polanski28
Moderated by polanski28
Last updated on with The Unborn
notyou
Moderated by notyou
Last updated on with D-Day
beedub
Moderated by BeeDub
Last updated on with Zootopia
lesharle
Moderated by lesharle
Last updated on with Sully
Showing 1 - 24 of 28 results

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...