Anger Sees Red

Oh, nice to meet you, Red.. Redward? I am Tom and I don't understand contemporary art.

Completely worthless, so worthless--in fact--that it's not even worth the twenty eight words i wrote about it, nor the period at the end of this sentence-->.

hhhahaahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhhahahahahaha haahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhhahahahahahahahahaha ahahahhahahahahahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahh hahahahahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha ahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahaha ahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhha hahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahaahahahahahhhahaha ahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhhahahahaha ahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhhahahahahahah hahahahahahahhahahahahaha epic fail

The plot summary sounded interesting, but this absolutely ham-handed attempt at artistry isn't worth the film it's shot on. As a home video (which is all this is), it's certainly unique (although still uselessly bad) but rating it as a movie.. Come on, this isn't a movie. It's a steaming pile of ass. Anger seems to think that one can just heap some crap together and call it art. Its one noteworthy aspect is how thoroughly it manages to waste less than 4 minutes.

Didn't think something could be this worthless. I was wrong.

Anger = cancer

pretty bad joke huh

I demand my four minutes back.

He put this in the Museum of Modern Art? Wow, fuck you. Literally any asshole with a video camera, even one who didn't know how to edit a movie, could have made this. And in fact, that's what I would have believed happened, if Anger weren't apparently a respected filmmaker.

why?!

"Hi, I'm Red." WTF There's no reason for whatever this is.

Not very interesting.