Watch
Bride of the Monster
Your probable score
?

Bride of the Monster

1955
Sci-fi
Horror
1h 9m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 18.77% from 295 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(294)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 04 Mar 2016
62
6th
No-budget "horror" movie that fails on every conceiveable level, except as riff fodder for MST3K.
Rated 26 Mar 2007
10
7th
Even more entertainingly bad than Plan 9! What I like about Ed Wood's movies is that they're terrible, but you don't have to be a masochist to enjoy them.
Rated 16 Aug 2009
17
1st
A delightfully horrid movie, with just about 0 redeeming features except for the fact that it is hilarious.
Rated 12 Dec 2011
29
8th
If you laughed when Lugosi fought the octopus in Burton's Ed Wood, you'll laugh harder here. Even funnier is when Tor Johnson screams and Lugosi just starts shooting him. More naive terribleness from Ed Wood, recommended if you love B-movies.
Rated 19 Oct 2011
16
5th
So awful, and so awesome. Goes on my list of terrible movies that I secretly enjoy, if only because of the monster shots and the bizarre fires/explosions.
Rated 23 Dec 2009
15
0th
Bad without being amusing. Tor Johnson is very, very large.
Rated 18 Nov 2011
16
3rd
Hadn't actually watched the MST3K version before. Not one of their better efforts, but Wood's vision remains intact. That is, the vision of Bela Lugosi trying to strangle himself with a rubber octopus. Hilarious in itself.
Rated 27 Jan 2008
70
61st
I don't see what all the hate is about. People associate Ed Wood with crappy movies, but this one just doesn't seem to fit in. He did the absolute best with what he had, and I'd say that's pretty damn good. I'd watch this movie again.
Rated 03 Sep 2008
20
0th
terrible, but it's actually quiet funny if you have sene "Ed Wood" by Tim Burton before.
Rated 19 Feb 2009
40
17th
Wood directs Lugosi again as the mad scientist Eric Varnoff, out to create a race of atomic supermen by blasting rednecks in the face with radiation. Mostly pretty boring, though the laboratory and rubber octopus scenes are a scream. Plus, Lugosi actually gets to deliver a decent monologue before the end, showing us a brief glimpse of the great actor he once was.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
45
8th
I have to give it some creative credit, it's more enjoyable than most Hollywood trash. There's a certain magic about Ed Wood, no matter how terrible of a director he might have been. [MST3k almost tries too hard some times, but when Tor and Bela are up on that screen it all seems to come easily for our boys.]
Rated 12 Nov 2014
70
48th
Bela's ''I have no home'' speech is simultaneously hilarius, stupid, heartbreaking and genuine. The bits with him, Tor or the monster are great but everything else is really boring.
Rated 12 May 2019
40
19th
Charmingly inept is the best way I can describe this movie.
Rated 28 Apr 2019
58
42nd
N/A is more appropriate, but it isn't an option. Edward was obviously not a skilled film maker, but his work has endured because it's uniquely 'terrible', and the comedy of errors resembles a personal style. His use of stock footage was occasionally creative, and visually the film is decent despite the cheap sets and ill-matching shots. The strangely gripping atmosphere is hard to pinpoint. It's both a consequence of Edward's incompetence and his cockeyed worldview. Worst director ever? Nah.
Rated 24 Jul 2016
40
3rd
Half unintentionally funny campy B-movie, half boring exposition movie. At least Lugosi gives a pretty good performance.
Rated 19 Feb 2024
75
76th
This is really not such a bad film. The camera is often awkwardly placed, and the acting is hammy, but the film itself is quite busy with wonky shit and the editing is brisk. Lugosi and Johnson are both really fun villains too. I looked back and I am similarly defensive of Manos, but I'd say this one is better. You could honestly do so much worse.
Rated 22 Jul 2012
30
8th
Mostly sub-standard and boring when Lugosi isn't on the screen. His charisma and the graceful battle with the "monster" really make sitting through the poor parts worth it.
Rated 10 Feb 2015
30
8th
Sadly, it's just competent enough that there's nowhere near as much of the random insanity that makes Plan 9 such a classic.
Rated 10 Nov 2012
60
8th
Not good, but not entirely incompetent, like the legend of Ed Wood might suggest. Sometimes even clever in the way it uses stock footage to augment the lack of budget. Still mostly boring with some strange choices, but probably on the same level as other time-wasting b-movies of the era.
Rated 21 Oct 2007
33
26th
mst3k
Rated 12 Sep 2008
40
5th
I must say that I never would have watched that movie, if I had not seen Ed Wood, but it's funny if you have the circumstances in your mind that brought about this movie.
Rated 07 Dec 2023
32
11th
"Bride of the Monster," a classic '50s creature feature, embraces its low-budget roots with a blend of camp and kitsch, complete with unconvincing sets, comical creatures, and exaggerated performances, culminating in a spectacle of lightning and a mushroom cloud.
Rated 13 Mar 2011
43
22nd
One of the cheapest, funniest horrors ever made, with a photo enlarger and some kitchen appliances standing in for Bela's mad lab equipment, a supporting cast with all the talent of finger puppets. and some of the best bad dialogue you've ever heard.
Rated 13 Jul 2010
65
51st
Not as fun as the better known Plan 9, this still has the joy that is one of the most inept fight scenes ever. Bela fighting a (stolen from another movie) rubber octopus :-)
Rated 22 Mar 2009
100
94th
This is one of the BEST movies ever made. EVER.
Rated 17 Apr 2012
40
10th
I guess you shouldn't knock it until you've tried to make your own.
Rated 01 Aug 2012
20
22nd
Worth it for one of the most epic battles in movie history.
Rated 14 Mar 2008
30
2nd
The monster shots were always good for a laugh.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
35
7th
Deliriously awful.
Rated 29 Nov 2008
85
61st
yeah another great one by "awesome Eddy". Must have for all fans. He's the best of the worst. Love it or hate it :D
Rated 29 Jan 2009
0
4th
No.
Rated 27 Dec 2007
38
7th
Maybe, if he'd had talented actors, enough budget to create good sets and not rely on stock footage, this might have been a halfway decent horror flick. But Wood had none of those things.
Rated 18 Mar 2023
39
14th
That is the one nice thing about birds.
Rated 06 Jul 2008
5
0th
Some weak signs of actual acting in a few selected seconds, otherwise completely hopeless in everything it tries to display. I loved it.
Rated 03 Oct 2023
50
13th
Audiences like mad scientists and octopuses and and Bela Lugosi ... at least they did in the 1940's. If there's any real sense in which Wood was a little incompetent at what he was doing, it's that he was living in the past. He'd throw in UFO's and atomic energy as a nod to 1950's genre films, but his heart was in mad doctors and monsters. It's part of what makes him endearing.
Rated 18 Jun 2008
15
15th
Even at just around an hour, this movie still manages to be painfully boring. What saves it from complete failure is a hands-down excellent speech from the great Lugosi.
Rated 12 Jul 2010
4
38th
Mst3k score: 8/10
Rated 07 Nov 2014
85
87th
Unless one has an aversion this this genre or these performers, I really don't understand how anyone could think this is terrible. The elitists and MST3K crowd can screw themselves, this is a fun and charming movie.
Rated 16 Sep 2007
0
0th
terrible..as expected

Collections

(18)
Compact view
Showing 1 - 18 of 18 results

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...