Watch
Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
Your probable score
?

Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle

2003
Comedy, Action
1h 46m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 18.68% from 6592 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(6591)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 15 Apr 2019
68
17th
It's the T&A-Team!
Rated 14 Aug 2007
16
0th
Hollywood blockbuster recipe: Take three sassy, spunky girls (acting talent optional). Pour into spandex with selection of stale one-liners. Sprinkle generously with hip cameos and anachronistic pop culture references (why a mostly 80's and 90's soundtrack for a 00's movie based on a 70's TV show?). Half-bake for 2 hours with at least 6 or 7 Matrix-esque slo-mo action sequences. Top it off with one jive-talkin' minority and serve.
Rated 25 Mar 2007
40
11th
This one gets too stupid to become a guilty pleasure like the first.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
35
2nd
Why not just rent porn?
Rated 19 Jul 2010
65
17th
I can't complain too much because it delivers what you'd expect girls fighting in a variety of outfits, absurd amounts of innuendo and bad puns, and many many cameos. As stupid as the whole thing is it at least makes a minimal amount of sense and the fight choreography is pretty good most of the time, so it's kind of enjoyable.
Rated 16 Nov 2019
75
41st
Deliberate camp & parody are exceedingly tough to pull off. Especially when its also trying to incorporate genuine suspense & excitement. There's a VERY fine line between "so silly it's fun" & "so silly it's dumb" and that line is different for everyone. It worked brilliantly for me the first time, so I'm not surprised I rarely grinned this time. Bosley's also a character I don't need. I still enjoy the over-the-top action, watching these 3 hotties have a ball again & Moore's a perfect villain.
Rated 29 Mar 2021
17
6th
Shows little girls they can grow up to be action stars too! As long as they're a perfect 10, and willing to dress like a Spice Girl in heat while they ass-wiggle through every scene.
Rated 17 Jan 2007
30
7th
Mindless T&A does not make a movie. This one threw away all of the sensibility that the first one barely had a grip on. It goes nowhere, and it gets there faster than you can say, "I paid to see this?" Total crap.
Rated 24 Feb 2007
18
10th
Mildly entertaining due to the Angels being attractive but that's about it. The action isn't entertaining, the acting is nothing special and there's no real plot to speak of.
Rated 27 Feb 2007
70
51st
Ridiculously over the top, which is the only way this would have worked.
Rated 13 Jul 2007
65
12th
Not as good as the first one, which wasn't exactly a masterpiece itself. Verging on unwatchable.
Rated 21 Jul 2007
13
10th
A hot, blistering fart from Hollywood.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
15
2nd
I had no idea what was going on during this movie.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
26
7th
Half the score of the first movie, and not even half the movie. What was it I said about McG? Double that! A movie so bad that it may be carrer shredding. Thankfully Bill Murray wasn't involved in this fiasco. And George McFly is still trying to kill people? Huh? ...and don't get me started on Demi Moore... That was 106 minutes I'll never get back.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
5
3rd
About 10 minutes of this movie are worth watching.
Rated 08 Oct 2007
10
6th
The first movie was a bad movie and they can to leave the second one worse still. Very bad written, bad interpreted.
Rated 09 Aug 2008
25
16th
Blistering fart in the face from McG.
Rated 01 Mar 2009
70
59th
i do enjoy this
Rated 19 Jul 2009
85
0th
It's cheesy and impossible not to laugh at, but still a fun ride from beginning to end. Cameron Diaz is bubbly, Crispin Glover is creepy, Lucy Liu is sexy and Drew Barrymore is...well...Drew Barrymore: the chick you wanna get high with while dropping water balloons over a freeway overpass. The anonymous "Charlie" assigns the angels to guard a software bigwig, while uncovering a plot to kill their boss. If you take the movie seriously AT ALL, then you wont enjoy it (and you might need some help)
Rated 28 Aug 2009
69
35th
I like the parts where Cameron Diaz is in her underwear
Rated 19 Feb 2010
71
70th
A spectacle of the highest frivolity, where image means everything. It verges on the abstract --I wonder if this might be the first avant-garde film in Summer blockbuster clothing. This is a movie about the way sex is rhapsodized in popular culture. It's satirizing Hollywood excess and substance deficiency. All the accoutrements of style, the symbols which refer endlessly back upon themselves like a roomful of mirrors. A gaze into the abyss of pop culture.
Rated 21 Sep 2010
42
12th
Missing what little charm and spirit of fun the first film had.
Rated 13 Jun 2012
7
5th
You know something's wrong when I'd rather see more shots of Crispin Glover than of the Angels' asses.
Rated 28 Sep 2012
15
0th
It's never fully explained why Lucy Liu's father is a white man. McG should be tied up and repeatedly throttled with a bag of dicks.
Rated 21 Feb 2013
2
22nd
I know I gave this a "2", but in the end I am incredibly pleased with this hallmark movie, because it marks the first time Hollywood manufactured a film that is just as effective medicinally as Xanax. Now when I have a panic attack, I pop this sucker in the ol' DVD tray, and my brain is immediately numbed by the lack of content of any kind whatsoever. It's a 2 and not a 0 only because of Drew Barrymore, the most adorable ex(?)-cocaine addict I've ever seen.
Rated 17 Nov 2014
8
55th
Goofy fun.
Rated 25 Apr 2018
20
3rd
"Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle" would make me so very sad, if it weren't too preoccupied with making me laugh. Every aspect of the first that didn't work is played up even more this time around, held together by a narrative that somehow has even less surprises than its predecessor, with another secret villain, more wire-faux action, and character drama sourced from the most banal and trivial conflicts imaginable. Points for the Angels themselves though, who seem to be having a blast together.
Rated 19 Sep 2018
67
35th
Full Throttle is everything that made the first movie fun. Except for the simple plot structure. There a few too many twists and turns this time around. The main actors are all fantastic and there is still a lot of charm baked into the script.
Rated 06 Jul 2020
70
29th
This film has a number of fun action scenes and sequences. The cast seem to be having a blast. The script has some weak moments. Overall this is fun, mindless entertainment but not as good as the first in the series.
Rated 12 Dec 2006
40
13th
Hot chicks. Worse than the first one, which also wasn't very good.
Rated 12 Dec 2006
1
0th
haha!
Rated 12 Dec 2006
50
11th
again, if i wanted to watch porn then i would buy porn.
Rated 23 Dec 2006
71
23rd
So stupid it's good. Only out to have fun. Doesn't take itself seriously at all so you can't be expected to, either. In fact, you're probably stupider than the movie if you do.
Rated 09 Jan 2007
10
15th
at least it had some silly martial arts stuff....
Rated 16 Feb 2007
38
4th
Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle worse than first movie and worse than the other tv adaptations.
Rated 03 Apr 2007
40
6th
pretty rubbishy
Rated 26 May 2007
35
12th
Dear god why?
Rated 07 Aug 2007
35
4th
There is one funny part in this movie, where Demi Moore's character shoots Bruce Willis's character in the head. Ah, Hollywood divorces. That's about it, nothing else good about it.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
93
66th
Loved it, Cameron, lucy, drew and demi!
Rated 14 Aug 2007
30
11th
More of the same shit.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
28
16th
Well, at least the girls are hot in this sequel retread.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
35
22nd
points for hot girls.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
20
31st
All the ladies looked good, but that's where the praise really stops. The film fails to capitalize on such talented actors as Luke Wilson, Crispin Glover and Demi Moore.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
35
10th
Trash. Pretty girls only take a film so far.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
55
7th
Fun, action-packed chick flick.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
70
77th
hilarious movie.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
64
26th
Loud and shrill, and as fast-paced but not as cleverly fun as the original.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
30
3rd
An underperdormance from a talented cast. But then, with a storyline like this, what's there to improve?
Rated 14 Aug 2007
22
13th
I'm being generous with the 22. Not nearly as funny or exciting as the first. This one almost seems like a joke- especially with the "new" Bosley (???)
Rated 14 Aug 2007
0
0th
crap!
Rated 14 Aug 2007
50
25th
Goofy and over the top, which saves it from awfulness.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
40
30th
Crispin Glover dies.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
5
8th
Diguisting and dum, stupid and numb...
Rated 14 Aug 2007
30
0th
It was better the TV movie.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
40
16th
I don't get it, stop making crap please.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
55
5th
Vomit on celluloid with pretty girls dancing in it.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
8
16th
Even dubbed in German, it was complete crap
Rated 14 Aug 2007
0
4th
The special effects in this movie are really something.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
64
47th
A film for stupid, uneducated and VERY SIMPLE people...Bring it on!
Rated 14 Aug 2007
19
13th
Ass and tits can only get you so far, eventually you have to have some level of story, right?
Rated 14 Aug 2007
90
72nd
Fuck all y'all. I liked it.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
81
71st
guilty pleasure
Rated 14 Aug 2007
4
0th
Plain Stupid!
Rated 14 Aug 2007
85
67th
It was great comedy
Rated 14 Aug 2007
50
19th
As pure entertainment, it has its moments, but this kind of filmmaking is much easier to take in small doses. Watching this on video is best, where you can pause or stop the movie at any time and return to it whenever you feel the need for another shot of mindless, high-energy entertainment. Don't worry about not remembering what's going on. Like it really matters...
Rated 14 Aug 2007
40
3rd
crap
Rated 14 Aug 2007
20
10th
A waste of film. Action sequences were laughable. That's about it. Ridiculous feats of action. So bad it made the first movie almost suck...and I enjoyed the first movie.
Rated 15 Aug 2007
36
14th
Extremely disappointing. I enjoyed the first one because they didn't seem like sex objects but this movie had three scantily clad women dancing around--not what I pay my ten bucks for.
Rated 18 Aug 2007
40
9th
Watchable on a slow day, amusing in places. At least it has three things going for it - shame its not the story, acting or supporting cast
Rated 19 Aug 2007
75
12th
Was it a comedy or an action film?
Rated 20 Aug 2007
45
4th
This is why people who direct music videos should not direct movies!
Rated 20 Aug 2007
70
30th
Entertaining.
Rated 21 Aug 2007
1
5th
Crap
Rated 15 Sep 2007
50
22nd
Dull and repetitive, and I enjoyed the first one. Crispin Glover was so wasted in this.
Rated 17 Oct 2007
85
79th
ok
Rated 21 Oct 2007
25
8th
This took everything that was decent about the first one and re-did it all.
Rated 08 Nov 2007
30
6th
Turkey and turd at the same time. Still not turkey enough to be funny.
Rated 13 Nov 2007
80
9th
I love Charlie's Angels from the dark ages when they were a television show. I loved the first film, and this second one was also very good. But, in the sort of curse of the sequel, this movie just didn't have the same great writing and plotting. Of course, how could they possibly do better than the first movie? There was NO WAY.
Rated 30 Nov 2007
22
17th
Boring. Old Demi Moore tries to be young.
Rated 11 Jan 2008
50
22nd
Farah Fawcett Majors it's not ! Still to the 70's series and forget the film.
Rated 24 Jan 2008
55
12th
Silly, silly, silly. There are some fun parts worth hanging around for but please turn you brain off (no reason to injure it watching this).
Rated 11 Feb 2008
90
73rd
I don't know why exactly but this movie had me and my friends in tears laughing so hard!! Better than the first Angel's movie by far!
Rated 14 Feb 2008
67
16th
Not that good, but love the action
Rated 18 Feb 2008
90
81st
The plot was non-existent, but damn if they weren't really really hot.
Rated 26 Feb 2008
65
6th
So-so action movie. I didn't love the cast and thought they were sort of unbelievable together. Bill Murray is outstanding.
Rated 19 Mar 2008
65
22nd
Fun, mind-numbing fun.
Rated 01 Apr 2008
10
1st
A little over the top in my opinion, the dancing, the Matrix type film angles... not too impressed by it.
Rated 01 Apr 2008
54
19th
alleen voor de schoon vrullie
Rated 15 May 2008
50
26th
I don't need to see Cameron Diaz dancing around in her underwear any more, thanks. The funniest thing about this movie was Letterman's mockery.
Rated 10 Jun 2008
58
16th
First one was better.
Rated 20 Jun 2008
18
3rd
Let's have fun making a crap movie and then make a ton of money. McG directs this McCrap. So sad to see John Cleese in this.
Rated 21 Jun 2008
75
18th
Like some kind of blissful Nyquil-induced fantsy. Might rot your brain.
Rated 24 Jun 2008
46
42nd
i wanted so much more from this movie. quality actors, great history on which to build and a decent script just weren't brought together well.
Rated 26 Jun 2008
10
4th
bad movie
Rated 04 Jul 2008
50
16th
average
Rated 31 Jul 2008
68
26th
Hot ass...
Rated 29 Aug 2008
20
6th
I own this?!
Rated 18 Sep 2008
44
61st
action-comedy-girliestuff
Rated 14 Oct 2008
91
70th
hot
Rated 24 Oct 2008
70
28th
Liked the first one better.

Collections

(14)
Compact view
Showing 1 - 14 of 14 results

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...