Watch
Fifty Shades of Grey
Your probable score
?

Fifty Shades of Grey

2015
Romance, Drama
2h 5m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 11.49% from 1969 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(1969)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 17 Feb 2015
2
13th
"So no means yes?" I asked. "Yes," he said. "Does that mean no?" I asked. "No," he replied. "So, yes?" I asked again. "No." "Yes?" "Yes, but no. What I mean is yes-yes." "To no-yes or yes-no?" I had a lot to learn about sex.
Rated 17 Feb 2015
55
12th
Christian Grey put his thumb in my mouth. And then the other one. And then two more. "Wider," he said as he put in one more. "I bet you've never had this many thumbs in your mouth." I hadn't.
Rated 13 Feb 2015
30
15th
Makes me want to go buy a blindfold ;-) And maybe some ear plugs, so I can go back and sleep through this movie.
Rated 20 Oct 2016
5
5th
About as carnally enticing as that smell that hits you when you enter a particularly low rent bird shop.
Rated 03 Jul 2015
1
5th
I take little pleasure from diving into a pile-on, but this movie really IS that bad. And not a sleazy kind of bad either; a BORING kind. A whole movie talking about that fucking contract?! I didn't pop even a 2% boner at a single one of the tepid-ass sex scenes. Sam Taylor-Wood managed to make boobs (from a brand-new-to-nudity actress!) dull. I've read she abdicated the director's chair for the sequels. If the producers want said sequels to not be such shit, the answer is clear: Paul Verhoeven.
Rated 27 Feb 2015
5
4th
Unlike Anastasia Steele, I didn't sign a contract for endless punishment. And yet I still get the cinematic equivalent of being face-fucked by a horny Doberman and being told I should be grateful for the experience of gulping down ribbons of steaming hot dog jizz.
Rated 18 Sep 2015
15
4th
I heard this is the sexiest movie ever made. Well... my dick still has no clue! Can't wait for the sequel.
Rated 12 Feb 2015
0
0th
Pro-rape, pro-domestic violence propaganda film.
Rated 10 Mar 2015
0
0th
This is the kind of shit that results when all the girls who grew up on TWILIGHT and its message of how Sex Is Gross go off to college and have sex anyway. Doesn't really even qualify as a movie, in my view. I don't wanna have anything else to do with it. Get it away from me.
Rated 16 Nov 2015
25
3rd
Hobbies of a Sociopath
Rated 30 May 2015
20
7th
What a weird boring film. It definitely needed to be seedier than it was. Jamie Dornan looks like he was being held prisoner to appear in this film (go watch the mini-series "The Fall", he plays a psychosexual killer and he's really good). I am not sure what the conflict of this film was supposed to be. Also, why does Steele own a flip phone in 2015? Her family appears well-off, yet she still has a piece of outdated technology.
Rated 02 Aug 2015
10
3rd
This was tough for me. Just to lay my eyes on it for the whole two hours was tough. The acting, line delivery, and dialogue was all vomit-inducing, and the directing and cinematography was not much better. There's nothing mysterious about everything that you know is going to happen. Dear lord. Just what.
Rated 15 Feb 2015
6
0th
The best part was when it ended and the entire audience just laughed. The sex scenes were very tame, the dialogue was excruciating, and the plot didn't make any sense. I expected nothing but was still disappointed by the lack of style.
Rated 19 Apr 2015
30
6th
ok, i was curios. sue me. so here's what i got after 2 hours of bored shuffling in my seat: judging by the success of the material, it seems a lot of women out there are prone to delusions of "saving" that incredibly hot, rich guy with the troubled past, who's surrounded by beautiful women, but somehow ends up only wanting them. as a "tradeoff", he may even spank them around a bit, because that's actually nice! not too hard, though, because then they'll just leave and the movie is over.
Rated 13 Feb 2015
80
80th
Since I was afraid I'd be assaulted with an overdose of estrogen in the form of a romance novel/soap opera, I was pleasantly surprised with the intensity of the script. It's the romantic vs the control freak who's coming from a very dark place; but she's in spiritual control, countering and submitting as required in what turns out to be a very complex (mating?) ritual. [spoiler]When he finds out she's a virgin, he's hooked, but not by the fact itself, rather in her response when he says to her
Rated 23 Feb 2015
65
17th
Not as bad as its reactionary IMDb rating would suggest (way down at 3.3, at one point). It's slow-moving, but that's not a problem in and of itself; the real issue here is a lack of depth, an absence of anything approaching intellectual stimulation. On the surface I actually thought it was a surprisingly well-made film, but beneath the glossy veneer, it's not really as exciting as everyone wants it to be.
Rated 21 Feb 2015
20
1st
For all the hype and marketing, the end result is a terrible rom-com with the worst male romantic interest ever conceived. The author and screenwriter should both be shot into the sun for this dialogue.
Rated 13 Feb 2015
25
11th
It was maybe foolish to assume that Fifty Shades of Grey would have a plot, themes, and deep characters. It doesn't have any of those. It doesn't build toward a conclusion; it just sort of ends. It doesn't hope that you'll get anything out of it other than some "kinky" sex scenes, which only at times even begin to push the R-rated boundaries. The dialogue is laughable, the characters are so shallow, and the film somehow takes over two hours to tell its tale. Fifty Shades of Grey is bad.
Rated 18 Feb 2015
55
27th
What vile disgusting filth I can't believe they let this in the theater (*looks around*) "Enjoy boobarama, sir"
Rated 11 Apr 2015
20
3rd
What do you get when you take a cheesy source text, soap-opera script, two out-of-their-depth leads with no chemistry whatsoever, budget direction of the worst kind, an ill-fitting soundtrack, and the tamest, most softcore treatment of a story that sold millions based on its alleged edgy sexiness? Exactly what you expect, that's what. A truly terrible film where even laughing at its awfulness wears thin quickly. Makes 9 1/2 Weeks look like a masterpiece.
Rated 01 Mar 2015
9
6th
The S&M part was only a catch. The movie itself was a wannabe female dream story. A shiny prince picked up a common neighbour girl and showed the sexual heaven for her. But she was not pleased.
Rated 01 Mar 2016
15
4th
Rarely do I use score/rating to convey more than just my enjoyment of a movie or piece of media; For 50 shades it also serves as an indicator for many minutes I could endure of the really bland acting and pacing before I completely lost interesting everything on screen
Rated 13 Feb 2015
45
21st
It's trash. You KNOW it's trash. And yet, it's entertaining, well-executed trash, with a terrific leading performance by Dakota Johnson, who actually has a lot of fun with the role and some (intentionally!) funny moments. The same can't be said for Jamie Dornan, who's pretty enough for the role, but seemingly can't really act. Still, is it worth seeing if you're curious? Yeah, sure, go ahead.
Rated 30 Mar 2015
10
3rd
Okay, I mean I knew the book was shit, but sometimes a movie can do better, right? HA. This was the most awfully boring movie I have seen in a long time. NOTHING EVEN HAPPENS. It's a two hour long movie about a creepy dude and a doe-eyed idiot weirdly eye-fucking each other and then when the real sex finally happens, it's... mediocre, to say it generously. Torture for the viewer, but not of the pleasant kind the franchise promises. Ugh!
Rated 17 Oct 2015
50
14th
More like In The Realm of The Room.
Rated 27 Apr 2015
35
9th
It's not incompetent, but it is pretty bad & plain boring. There's very little story, which hurts when the film is stretched over 2 hours. The dialogue is pretty basic & occasionally laughably bad. Johnson & Dornan are completely without charisma or any real acting strength & have absolutely no chemistry with each other. And the whole thing's pretty creepy & has some really problematic ideas about women & men & sex. The sex scenes just feel restrained, despite the subject matter.
Rated 20 Jan 2016
2
0th
Actually the worst writing I have ever witnessed.
Rated 14 Feb 2015
1
2nd
Fifty Shades of Grey is an entirely punishing experience. And I do not use the term punishing figuratively, I mean completely literal. As film adaptions go, this feels completely rushed but somehow it's still spread across a grueling 2 hour run time. Dakota Johnson is tolerable. And that's being extremely generous. But second, third, maybe even fourth pick casting choice Jamie Dornan is absolutely woeful. Both fans of the book and newcomers will be underwhelmed and left feeling short changed.
Rated 29 Nov 2015
40
42nd
A cultural event - but pretty low grade entertainment. Some erotic tension - but not much else. If I wanted to read a stream of emails, I would not go to to a film. The worst thing about it is it seems set for a sequel.
Rated 04 Mar 2015
5
3rd
Terrible acting. Stupid dialogue. Redundant scenes. Awful as a movie. Pure garbage.
Rated 28 Jul 2015
19
2nd
Starting off with the worst version of "I Put a Spell on You" in the history of music, this movie just got worse from there. It was annoyinlgy indifferent: not subtle enough to be elegant (yeah, we get the tower-pencil-phallus in-your-face allegory), nor explicit enough to be exciting (come on: braiding her hair in the play room?!). The lame vanilla sex scenes also run contra to Christian's need for domination. Have I ever mentioned I hate logical flaws?!
Rated 27 Mar 2015
20
7th
Meh
Rated 26 Feb 2015
1
0th
Well, I did it, I fucking watched it. Fifty Shades of Grey, as per expected is a massive piece of shit and I have no idea how this ever got published or even adapted for that matter. The writing is that of a horny 14 year old white girl who writes fan fiction and there is no chemistry between the characters, everything is forced and the subtlety is anything but subtle. Dakota Johnson is pretty hot though but overall one of the worst movies I've ever seen.
Rated 17 Mar 2015
19
4th
Watch the Fido sequence in Nymphomaniac for a more authentic sadism experience, Johnson even walks around with a dishevelled version of Gainsbourg's bangs fronted hairstyle. 50 SoG is a basic film with basic dialogue, the mother character flutters in and out with similar character depth than the mother from 'The Room'. The sex scenes grind the plot to a halt (also similar to The Room), although the plot really finishes once the couple first fuck...hard.
Rated 14 Feb 2015
70
42nd
Many who won't like this movie didn't actually give it a chance, opting instead to make up their minds first and impose that mindset onto the movie. That's cool, that's their prerogative. I can't completely agree with ANY of the criticisms I've seen levied. I thought it was a slower-paced-but-entertaining adaptation of a bad novel (an accomplishment!), which should do enough to entertain most in the audience. As an adaptation, I feel the movie improves upon the source material significantly.
Rated 22 Feb 2015
92
68th
I'd eat her toast!
Rated 17 Nov 2015
0
3rd
Terrible, bland, non-characters make for a terrible, bland, non-movie.
Rated 10 Mar 2015
15
2nd
Oh my.
Rated 13 Feb 2015
55
22nd
Dornan wasn't good at being Grey, Dakota was better than I expected. Script is strictly written according to the book, we tend to criticize when script writers change things from books in adaptations but this time it doesn't work, doesn't feel natural. Sex scenes were esthetic and good but the playroom scenes were short. I don't and many people don't care about the bullshit romance, we want to read/see the playroom...
Rated 10 Apr 2017
15
5th
50 Shades wants to be an adult, kinky Twilight, but doesn't understand how. In Twilight, the audience stand-in is swept away by a powerful, dangerous man who knows what she wants and gives it without her having to ask, while she heals him and brings him into the light. But Christian Grey isn't thrillingly dangerous, he's just fucked up. He violates boundaries the protagonist didn't want violated. The indulgence doesn't work. There's so much better BDSM smut out there, if you're really looking.
Rated 26 Aug 2015
18
0th
Some of the worst dialogue to ever hit the big screen combines with terrible acting and an awful story in the truly abysmal Fifty Shades of Grey
Rated 10 Feb 2016
85
44th
I know ... I know. Any real movie buff wants to give this movie 1 star. BUT - I endured so much talk about this book from female friends and read maybe 20 pages myself I have to admit that the movie did a good job of not taking itself too seriously. I was actually entertained watching it, but much of that entertainment was at the movies expense rather than purposeful.
Rated 15 Feb 2015
10
4th
Christian's drive to inflict pain ultimately tears the two apart. Ana walks out, refusing to be treated as merely an object for his pleasure and reservoir for pain. We know from subsequent books that their estrangement is not permanent, of course. But this movie, at least, offers a small statement as it ends supporting self-worth and respect. (pluggedin.com)
Rated 14 Mar 2015
30
1st
Made no sense from neither side of the story, just a bad bad movie.
Rated 15 Mar 2015
30
4th
Fifty Shades is not the embarrassment that it could have been. It substantially improves upon the source material but it's still not a good movie. It is a perfect example of how not to write a script and of the two leads, only Dakota seems to be interested. It's a bit of a slog and feels longer than it is while being decently photographed. It doesn't really matter at this point, nor did it ever, because it has made its money. We will see sequels and we will have the same discussions.
Rated 10 May 2015
20
6th
The two meet in a languid interview scene where nothing happens but we are told they have chemistry so that's fine.
Rated 03 Mar 2015
20
9th
Don't believe the hype, this movie isn't as atrocious as everyone is making it out to be. It's actually a decidedly, annoyingly, and plainly mediocre film. There's nothing to really complain about (besides Dornan being a bit wooden, but I think it was established early on that this was just a paycheck for him) because there isn't really anything to the movie. It's incredibly superficial but it's not criminally bad.
Rated 17 Jun 2015
15
0th
Had to watch it on x1.5 speed. Disastrous and ridiculously incompetent.
Rated 01 Oct 2015
50
8th
Fifty seems like a good score for a film that is about as bland as a grey bowl of porridge. I'm not sure what I was expecting for the film adaptation of one of the sexiest books that has come out since the Kama Sutra (according to some women). Sadly it was about as sexy as Edward and Bella's honeymoon vacation (at least they broke the bed). It isn't all bad and I do think that Dakota Johnson is a beautiful woman and did an okay job as Anastasia...
Rated 15 Apr 2015
35
9th
So, just an edgy fragrance ad compared to the worst possible kind of erotic filmmaking you can find.
Rated 11 May 2015
1
1st
Worst ''BDSM'' scenes ever.
Rated 16 Aug 2015
44
24th
Ruined the subject potentials.
Rated 26 Mar 2015
20
4th
Well, I have to give it some points for making me laugh.
Rated 27 Feb 2016
30
1st
jesus
Rated 21 Apr 2015
5
0th
As if the invasion of the body snatchers was already underway in our culture.
Rated 14 Mar 2015
10
2nd
An utterly boring movie. Absolutely nothing happens, no story-line, no character development. It is also quite ironic how abusive this Grey guy is, and all the females in the audience just take it for granted. This guy is just abusing his power position. Flabbergasting.
Rated 13 Apr 2015
20
14th
Fifty Shades of Grey the book made dirty sex houseclean to the conservative girl. Fifty Shades of Grey the movie removes the dirt from the sex so not risk losing the same conservative girls from buying cinema tickets. Tame and tedious, made even worse by the casting choices. Jamie Dornan was not the strong minded man he was supposed to be. Dakota Johnson was a little better with the way she was blushing. But you know a sex film has failed when the sex scenes doesn't even turn you on.
Rated 05 Jul 2016
20
4th
It got me in the mood... For murder... as intended.
Rated 22 Jun 2015
2
1st
Fifty Shades of Grey commits the greatest entertainment sin: it's boring
Rated 07 Feb 2016
5
4th
5 shades of not-fucked-up-enough
Rated 08 Apr 2016
32
4th
Problematic in tone, for sure, but the real issue is the unbelievable dialogue and lack of any chemistry between the leads.
Rated 21 May 2015
51
44th
HA! I can see what all the fuss is about ;). I never read the book(s), so I can't judge Fifty Shades Of Grey from that angle. Which doesn't seem to hurt, because I didn't think this was too bad! It moves kind of slow sometimes, and I often don't seen to understand some of the choices made, but I thought the acting was alright and I didn't get bored. 51/100.
Rated 21 Jun 2015
40
31st
An adaptation of a poorly written mummy porn bestseller does not warrant high expectations, but this was insanely weak. Technically it is very well made, but it is insanely dull and Dornan gives least charismatic performance of the year.
Rated 30 Jun 2015
45
19th
I've heard that this is an improvement over the book, and I can believe that because I wouldn't call the film an absolute trainwreck. Mostly, it was just a snore fest that felt at least an hour longer than it was. There were moments where the horrible dialogue was laughably bad, but not nearly enough to make this an entertaining sit, even for shits and giggles.
Rated 24 Jan 2016
1
0th
That glider scene was pretty neat.
Rated 10 Aug 2015
42
9th
A bit of a cliche melodramatic love story, but honestly not as bad as I had heard. The acting of the characters was fine, it was more that the events were very vanilla. There's nothing special about any of the dates the couple goes on, and even the vague BDSM sex scenes they have can barely be called that. The final killer is that there seems to be nothing worth exploring about the pscyhe of either character - they're just a regular confused movie couple with the typical angst.
Rated 17 Feb 2016
20
4th
Boring.
Rated 25 Feb 2015
3
2nd
Bland with little connection between leads.
Rated 01 Mar 2015
30
12th
dakota johnson would be a very nice Bella from Twilight.
Rated 15 Mar 2015
45
3rd
Everything about this movie is just so hard to identify with. Christian Grey is the worst male cinematic lead in the past 25 years and Anastasia Steele is just another typical female lead drawn to the brooding mysterious man she is warned to stay away from. This never should have made it to the big screen and now we have to wait for the two sequels to be just as bad if not worse. Hollywood needs to stop focusing on selling sex and get back to the plots that people care about.
Rated 04 May 2015
1
8th
Fifty shades of lame... *Bad
Rated 25 Jun 2015
15
1st
50 shades of boredom... If you have to watch it I recommend to use the x2.0 feature of your player
Rated 14 Oct 2015
2
0th
Compared to this shitty movie, the book was good! Johnson & Dornan are completely without charisma or any real acting strength & have absolutely no chemistry with each other - FACT. It all felt so stupid, fake and boring.
Rated 13 Nov 2015
25
3rd
such a sick man
Rated 05 Apr 2015
5
1st
30 dakika dayanabildim.
Rated 13 Apr 2015
38
17th
What a tease...
Rated 11 Dec 2017
40
28th
On a craft level, this film fails on nearly every level. But psychologically, it's a fairly fun & funny two hours. Christian Grey possesses shades of both Hannibal Lector & Buffalo Bill. Just imagine Christian saying, "The submissive puts the lotion in the basket, or else it gets the whip again."
Rated 06 Mar 2016
1
0th
I don't normally review movies that I haven't watched, but I certainly tried to watch it. Seeing as I will never be able to even sit through this movie, I feel it deserves a solid 1/100. I'd give it a 0, but that spot is forever reserved for Gigli.
Rated 28 Feb 2015
33
6th
For all the hype, it's amazing how bland and inconsequential it really is. The story, even if it is the first part of a trilogy, would barely fill half an hour, told efficiently; at 110 minutes it feels almost comically pointless. To be fair, Seamus McGarvey's cinematography is pretty decent and Sam Taylor-Wood's direction softens some of the story's more problematic aspects, but Jamie Dornan is fatally bland as Christian Grey, and Dakota Johnson isn't really that much better as Anastasia.
Rated 06 Feb 2016
6
1st
this is the best porn i have ever watched
Rated 01 Mar 2015
15
5th
Pretty much nothing happens in this movie. Neither of the characters is very likable and I really didn't care for them at all. I have to admit, the soundtrack is pretty good, though.
Rated 04 Mar 2015
10
2nd
so bad it's good
Rated 28 Mar 2015
20
6th
I THOUGHT THERE WILL BE BDSM
Rated 12 Feb 2015
40
24th
The dialogues are dull, the characters are not realistic and it's really just a porn for all those horny single virgins, no matter their age. The book is stupid and I hate the female character both in a book and a movie. The guy spanks her and she realizes that it hurts. What a surprise!
Rated 15 Feb 2015
65
22nd
The first half was not bad. I wanted to see how story progress. The second half dragged. I didn't expect the ending to be like that, and I was disappointed. I knew the book based on was a bad one, so I say this film was well shot not being as bad.
Rated 11 Jul 2015
40
57th
I think the preview was better than the movie, perhaps owing to Beyonce's amazing version of Crazy in Love. The preview clips appeared quite sensual, but those same full-length scenes in the movie didn't have the same magic. I didn't feel much chemistry between the actors, and as such I didn't cross the line into believing that they WERE their characters. I thought the soundtrack was great, though, and I'll still see the next movie, if they're planning on making it.
Rated 06 Apr 2019
8
11th
Terrible pile of ass with shitty acting and vomit inducing score. The writing is atrocious and uninspiring, as is the boring story. This was a tough watch, baby.
Rated 10 Dec 2022
37
2nd
With the smash success of the book, it was only a matter of time before this awful excuse for softcore porn made it to the big screen, and while men might be tempted to watch it merely at the promise of seeing some great nudity, I can say it's not worth it in the slightest. If any lesson is to be learned, here, it can only be that a woman's true desire is to be mentally dominated, and physically assaulted.
Rated 26 Aug 2015
43
3rd
If I try really hard I can kind of see the appeal. In broad strokes it shows how conflicting an abusive relationship can be. The allure of sexual and romantic validation contrasted with repulsion at the reality of abuse. The writing is really really really bad though. As a serious anything the dialogue fails to be remotely believable and as titillation nearly everything is incredibly dull. Sometimes it's good for a laugh but not even that comes often enough.
Rated 19 Apr 2016
50
49th
Dark, somewhat disturbing & strange romance. Dakota Johnson is incredibly lovely, charismatic and basically carries the movie. Jamie Dornan effectively portrays the handsome eccentric sexual miscreant, but his origins were not well explained. I kept wondering how much more Anastasia would take & why she kept coming back when she was so clearly pushed beyond her limits. It was interesting and satisfying to watch her compromise and set boundaries.
Rated 24 Jul 2016
31
0th
Sigh...!
Rated 26 Feb 2017
40
8th
I had low expectations and was actually pleasantly surprised. Don't get me wrong, this is a pretty bad movie with severe pacing issues. It sends mixed signals about the characters' motivations and politics throughout- ie. coming SO close to actually saying some good stuff about consent and respect, but ultimately being a swing and a miss. I'm happy there's a mainstream movie out there introducing people to BDSM culture, even if it's problematic.
Rated 30 Sep 2016
40
7th
Came in with extremely low expectations. Tame as hell, not the worst thing I've ever seen. Better than you're average Sparks but I don't know why. Watch Secretary instead
Rated 05 Sep 2017
10
3rd
Starts with a particularly insipid version of "I'll Put A Spell On You" to set the tone and then gradually gets worse from there.
Rated 15 Feb 2015
25
4th
Próżny.
Rated 10 Mar 2024
63
73rd
Haven't read the book. No, it’s not really healthy BDSM, but like, it’s still a fun fantasy. And as that, I thought it worked pretty well. The way he plays with her hair though 🤌 Maybe I’m biased because I have loved Twilight for a long time and this does wear its influence on its sleeve. For me it’s a fantasy about being wanted by someone appealing and like, maybe it could work even though in real life it would be terrible
Rated 24 May 2016
43
6th
It's not abominable, in fact it seems very aware of the implications of the book. It's just boring as hell.
Rated 10 May 2015
10
1st
Tied down by its awful source material. The filmmaker and actors do what they can, but the "plot" is so thin and the characters so one-note that there is little to keep you invested. No effort is given to say anything relevant about bondage in today's society or the fact that Christian is a manipulative and abusive creep. It's just a generic romance movie with R-rated S&M scenes thrown in as an attempt to titillate. The cinematography is nice at times.
Rated 17 Apr 2015
3
1st
How can they even expect to be taken seriously when they're naked all the time... Extremely embarrassing.
Rated 01 Mar 2015
20
3rd
It's impressive how unsexy this movie is. It's like watching a mannequin tying up some cardboard and then fucking it.

Collections

(25)
Compact view
Showing 1 - 24 of 25 results

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...