Your probable score
?
For a Few Dollars More
1965
Drama, Action
2h 12m
Two bounty hunters with completely different intentions team up to track down a Western outlaw.
For a Few Dollars More
1965
Drama, Action
2h 12m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 72.96% from 5282 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews
(5318)
Compact view
Compact view
Show
Sort
Rated 22 Feb 2009
4
70th
A Fistful of Dollars is a great western, but this is a huge leap forward. It's more compelling in terms of narrative, direction, cinematography...it's pretty much superior in every single aspect. It doesn't have the grand scale of The Good, The Bad and The Ugly, but instead, it's a leaner, more muscular film in which not a frame is wasted. The combined screen presence between Eastwood, Van Cleef and Volonte is explosive.
Rated 22 Feb 2009
Rated 22 Jul 2020
95
96th
Deeper and darker sequel. El Indio is a heinous villain, you don’t even notice Klaus Kinski. There’s this running motif throughout of someone lighting their tobacco from someone else’s and I’ve come to the conclusion that it signifies how annoying it is to keep matches on you in the rootin rootin old west.
Rated 22 Jul 2020
Rated 02 Aug 2020
93
97th
Comparing to the films of 50 years later, this film was apparently made for a smarter audience. Even when the guy says "I'll tell you the plan.", he doesn't. Nowadays film plots are so simple yet still they try to tell the whole story verbally, just in case.
Rated 02 Aug 2020
Rated 13 Oct 2008
97
99th
The second of the Leone westerns is just as enjoyable as the first with some excellently directed screenplay and cleverly taken scenes coupled with another series of great characters, some old and some new. Eastwood is just as good as usual and is backed up by the equally excellent Van Cleef as a fellow bounty hunter. This installment also seems to have been injected with a wacky sense of humour, displayed no more profoundly than in scenes such as the hat-shooting showdown. What you'd expect.
Rated 13 Oct 2008
Rated 23 Oct 2009
86
80th
The first shot of this movie sums up its effect: soundlessly slowly a man crosses the desert. The tension builds with his approach. It builds, and then! snap! Quiet tension and amazing screen presences keep your eyes glued to the screen throughout. (Now that I've seen the whole trilogy, Leone revisits his same ideas, making them bigger each time. Part of watching is seeing how Leone grows. His hand is visible, because he is bigger than his work.)
Rated 23 Oct 2009
Rated 19 Jan 2010
89
96th
That scene where Eastwood and Van Cleef keep on shooting each others' hats down the street is peak western. Nothing can top it.
Rated 19 Jan 2010
Rated 01 Feb 2007
90
85th
Better than Fistful of Dollars, but not quite as good as Good Bad Ugly. Where Fistful occasionally suffered from its small budget, Leone was here able to take the action to the next level (although, of course, he would take it to the millionth level with GBU).
Rated 01 Feb 2007
Rated 09 Feb 2007
4
74th
Intense. Leone's directorial skills improved significantly in just the year after A Fistful of Dollars. This whole film feels more refined and precise, both technically and narratively. The three main characters are some of the most memorable in any western, and I especially love Gian Maria Volonte. He's got those wonderful ice cold eyes. And look, Klaus Kinski!
Rated 09 Feb 2007
Rated 21 Jan 2019
70
60th
Must see film. Clint Eastwood doing what he does best.
Rated 21 Jan 2019
Rated 14 Aug 2007
82
73rd
The weakest of the Leone/Eastwood trilogy. It certainly has a lot going for it... the usual iconic Leone widescreen compositions, Morricone music, Eastwood and Lee Van Cleef, humor, Klaus Kinski, et cetera. But it's just not as memorable as the other two. Despite this being my third viewing, I couldn't remember what happens in it. Not that it isn't a good story, it just doesn't really stick with you as much afterwards. I still like watching it, though.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 29 Apr 2015
82
85th
Leone developing his style and giving it richer context and substance. There's still a sense that he's playing around with the format. It's more disjointed and baggy than Fistful but has more originality and vision, more self-aware about the nihilistic macho-fantasy it portrays. Eastwood is more human than in the other two and the music is still classic. You can really see the evolution and progress throughout Leone's work, all leading up to his grande finale with America.
Rated 29 Apr 2015
Rated 08 Mar 2009
88
95th
A little less action laiden than the other two, but a fantastic movie anyway. Leone's awesome close-ups are most prominent in this one, and as the other two it ends with a sweeping, poignant, and charismatic ending.
Rated 08 Mar 2009
Rated 15 May 2014
9
93rd
Has everything any great western has: multiple badass characters, great music, gorgeous locations, titties, humor, and entertaining fight scenes. Has anyone ever been cooler than Clint Eastwood?
Rated 15 May 2014
Rated 13 Mar 2020
80
94th
Lee Van Cleef is a great addition to the already superb cast, bringing the 2nd film of the trilogy one level higher. The film itself is a more perfected version of the quintessential western that A Fistful was: the atmosphere is palpably menacing and the psychopathy of Gian Maria Volontè's character makes him a villain to remember. The chemistry between Eastwood and Van Cleef, and the intricate interaction between the leads + the atmospheric score complement everything smoothly. & Klaus Kinski!
Rated 13 Mar 2020
Rated 26 Jun 2016
88
83rd
The villain's plans increasingly feel like the writers are just trying to figure out new twists as they go (let the bounty hunters go free presuming they'll kill the other 10 guys - w/ guns that appear from nowhere - & then go toe to toe w/ them?), but Leone directs with such style, stopping just short of parody w/ his overheated stand-offs & the story moves in such unpredictable ways it's hard not to see what made these so great. Laconic bad-sses are rarely surrounded by this much creativity.
Rated 26 Jun 2016
Rated 06 Jun 2019
94
96th
This is a sublime movie. The story is better rounded than the first, they are not any technical hiccups with the duels, fighting scenes, the scenery is even more impressive and excellent acting all around. You think what else they can do with the music first, but it is even better than the first in that aspect also. It is just pure genius how they use natural sounds, repetitive themes to give a special feeling to the movie. I wish more directors have this few but impactful movie mindset.
Rated 06 Jun 2019
Rated 22 Apr 2018
91
97th
Van Cleef and Eastwood as friendenemies is my kind of duo. Hide your hats.
Rated 22 Apr 2018
Rated 09 Apr 2012
97
97th
I've seen this the least of the three and have only myself to blame.
Rated 09 Apr 2012
Rated 18 Jun 2012
92
94th
As if it could not get any better. I mean, you already have 'Manco' as an established badass, then you add Mortimer and his arch-rival El Indio, which are both so rich and deep that it is amazing; Eastwood's cowboy is sacrificed to enrich the rivalry between the Colonel and the Indian but it pays so well when you figure out the true meaning behind it all. It over-dramatizes some bits that drag on but it is still a superb take on the classic Western; Morricone and Leone, my hat is off to you.
Rated 18 Jun 2012
Rated 04 Nov 2013
90
92nd
Quite a pleasant romp in the saddle (don't ask me why I used those words). You asked for a western, you got one, here it is, not too much fuss, plenty of show, a bit of glaring, great characters - but that goes without saying - and a free-spirited shoot-em-up ride into the sunset. Can't ask for much more than that.
Rated 04 Nov 2013
Rated 09 May 2015
90
90th
A tad better than its predecessor. Clint Eastwood ,Gian Volonte, and Van Cleef steal the show and provide amazing characters and relationships for a highly interesting story. Plus with Sergio Leone's direction, its hard to go wrong. An amazing film.
Rated 09 May 2015
Rated 11 Aug 2014
99
96th
Grimy, sinewy, atmospheric and funny adventure builds on its predecessor and doubles the squinty amoral protagonists. Ennio's score is even catchier now and Sergio's artful editing of close-ups to communicate the characters' spatial relationships is always a pleasure.
Rated 11 Aug 2014
Rated 12 Jul 2007
90
66th
Mmm... spaghetti.
Rated 12 Jul 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
90
95th
To my knowledge, this is the first on screen pairing of Clint Eastwood and Lee Van Cleef. What an awesome combination.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 13 Nov 2021
90
84th
I didn't find the bad guys as memorable as the first movie but everything else about this movie was fantastic. I loved the set up of having two bounty hunters there was a feeling throughout the movie that one of them was going to screw over the other at any moment. Towards the end of the movie you could feel a real comradery between the two of them. The acting and direction were top notch in this sequel and it whet my whistle in anticipation for the last of the series.
Rated 13 Nov 2021
Rated 14 Aug 2007
95
97th
Stands on its own outside of the shadow of The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly both in their relative qualities as well as its differences from its successor, particularly the memorable performance of El Indio by Gian Maria Volonte.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 29 Apr 2017
50
24th
Clint Eastwood is like a ray of sunlight to this film. Overall, too long and boring.
Rated 29 Apr 2017
Rated 07 May 2015
59
54th
Some quirky characters and Ennio Morricone's perhaps most memorable soundtrack.
Rated 07 May 2015
Rated 19 Feb 2008
93
82nd
Although this is the weakest of Leone's spaghetti western trilogy (at least from a plot perspective), that still makes it better than 99% of all the westerns ever made. Essential viewing.
Rated 19 Feb 2008
Rated 22 Apr 2008
9
90th
I guess "A Fistful of Dollars" suffered heavily from its low budget, but this one makes up for it. Form its cold-blooded opening (which really sets the tone right), this is a marvelous Spaghetti Western from the great Leone, definitely one of his best. Personally, I prefer "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly", but the man with no name is amazing as always.
Rated 22 Apr 2008
Rated 15 Apr 2017
94
94th
For a Few Dollars More is arguably the weakest entry in the Man with No Name trilogy, but it also happens to be one of the finest Westerns ever made.
Rated 15 Apr 2017
Rated 05 May 2015
70
71st
Much better than 'A Fistful of Dollars', though this is only because of the last hour.
Rated 05 May 2015
Rated 13 Jul 2008
91
96th
Perfect combination of Leone's directing and Morricone's score. Good story with great acting performances.
Rated 13 Jul 2008
Rated 28 Jul 2020
71
69th
stylish samurai movie starring morricone
Rated 28 Jul 2020
Rated 27 Nov 2018
70
54th
Title card: "Where life had no value, death, sometimes, had its price. That is why the bounty killers appeared."
Rated 27 Nov 2018
Rated 06 Apr 2017
76
60th
Eastwood has loosened into the role this time around & can claim an established back story, leading to a credible performance. Another observation; rarely do you see a lead actor return for a sequel as a different character, albeit the lead protagonist, as Volente does here. Highlights are the hat(s) sequence & the finale. Good to see Kinski out of nowhere too, as a blonde hunchback of all things.
Rated 06 Apr 2017
Rated 11 Jun 2014
70
51st
Lee Van Cleef is at LEAST as cool as Eastwood in this. Leone is a much better director than when he made Fistful, and makes every scene dynamic and clear. While ultimately I still think this is just good filmmaking, not great, it's easily worth your time.
Rated 11 Jun 2014
Rated 17 Apr 2015
90
92nd
A beautifully shot film that is defined by it's code of masculinity. Kinski gives a great, excitable performance, and Volonte provides El Indio with a sensual, erotic appeal. Both of these performances counter Van Cleef and Eastwood's stoic heroism. Of course, I'd be remiss if I didn't mention Morricone's score. The scene where El Indio plays the music the first time, and it gives way to Morricone's rising eruption of noise, before coming back to the music, is one of the best scenes in the film
Rated 17 Apr 2015
Rated 28 Jul 2009
95
80th
Since each addition of the trilogy brings the spectacle to a whole other level, I think I'll just add a tier to each member.
Rated 28 Jul 2009
Rated 06 Aug 2009
85
84th
A Few More Dollars is much better than Fistful of Dollars and is much more entertaining than Once Upon a Time in the West (although not nearly as pretty or refined). Morricone's score is, as always, integral to the movie, and the final showdown owes it a great deal. Leone was clearly building up to something fantastic.....
Rated 06 Aug 2009
Rated 21 May 2020
95
96th
Under Quarantine Re-Reviews #94: How to make a perfect western; take two of the memorable protagonists played by Eastwood and Van Cleef, add in Volonté as one of the coldest villains in the game, mix it with the elegant direction of Leone and garnish it with a superb score from Morricone and you'll end up with For a Few Dollars More.
Rated 21 May 2020
Rated 14 Jun 2018
94
82nd
A-
Rated 14 Jun 2018
Rated 11 Feb 2017
90
89th
Lee. Van. Mother. Fucking. Cleef.
Rated 11 Feb 2017
Rated 21 Dec 2009
75
27th
The usual stark settings and Leone posturing.
Rated 21 Dec 2009
Rated 09 Jan 2010
75
80th
A funny and very entertaining prelude to the greatest western ever made.
Rated 09 Jan 2010
Rated 10 May 2018
60
69th
Pretty good, loads of action. In its day I can see it being wonderful. Now, definitely watchable.
Rated 10 May 2018
Rated 17 Aug 2016
96
97th
The quintessence of western
Rated 17 Aug 2016
Rated 02 Apr 2010
7
78th
What Leone does well is explore character depth well in the context of the Wild West, and more importantly the motives of his characters. You couldn't say there were any 'good' or 'bad' guys in here, but a lot of men with the same aims. In the end very few stood, but intriguingly for different reasons (both fortune and redemption). Great flick.
Rated 02 Apr 2010
Rated 13 Apr 2010
70
80th
much more fleshed out than "for a fistful", and more accessible than "good, bad and ugly", this movie cements Eastwood's cult status. Although Leone relies a bit too heavily on the raw charisma of the leads and the face-off scenes, the story is quite intriguing, with a hint of the paranoia which is missing from the other two films. Epic soundtrack renders it even more memorable.
Rated 13 Apr 2010
Rated 15 Nov 2019
81
89th
It might be less emotionally resonant and more straightforward than the first one (although still having its own share of twists and turns) but it dials up the cool factor and is more ambitious.
Rated 15 Nov 2019
Rated 22 Sep 2010
80
95th
The entire soundtrack (including but not limited to the music) is brilliant. Also, the film perfectly pits the characters' various motivations against each other, leading to the great conclusion.
Rated 22 Sep 2010
Rated 17 Nov 2014
91
90th
Eastwood has few words, but lots of swag.
Rated 17 Nov 2014
Rated 07 Dec 2010
84
75th
For all intents and purposes, I've always thought that Lee Van Cleef was more of the focus instead of Eastwood in this film. At the very least, he had more of a personal stake in the story line and that is precisely why this is my favorite of the first two movies in the Dollars trilogy. Gian Maria Volonté returns as the(you guessed it) villain of the piece and, well, he is just as effective as he was in the original. The music is great, and the tone is as gritty as ever. Great stuff.
Rated 07 Dec 2010
Rated 11 Jun 2016
94
94th
For a Few Dollars More is arguably the weakest entry in the Man with No Name trilogy, but it also happens to be one of the finest Westerns ever made.
Rated 11 Jun 2016
Rated 04 Oct 2014
71
90th
I've got to tell you Indio, your gameplan is flat out stupid
Rated 04 Oct 2014
Rated 23 Jun 2012
92
94th
Doesn't have the narrative strength of the first in the trilogy but individual scenes are still brilliant and each ingredient in just perfect, cast, score, tone.
Rated 23 Jun 2012
Rated 23 Jul 2012
90
84th
The best entry in the Dollars trilogy get a little too wrapped up in its own convoluted plot in the final act, but when it hits its stride, by god, it excels. Lee Van Cleef and Clint Eastwood shooting each others' hats deserves its place in the pantheon of great Western scenes.
Rated 23 Jul 2012
Rated 11 Aug 2012
98
99th
Another beautifully stylized revisionist western from Sergio Leone with Eastwood, Volonte, van Cleef and Morricone. Volonte's erratic bandit villain and van Cleef's steely eyed colonel are two of the most memorable characters I've ever seen.
Rated 11 Aug 2012
Rated 07 Oct 2012
96
99th
the best movie from the trilogy of "the man without name" in my opinion.
Rated 07 Oct 2012
Rated 24 Oct 2012
75
77th
Eastwood actually feels like a spare part during sections of this because Van Cleef and Volonté steal every scene they're in. Volonté, in particular, is totally badass. All in all, it's much better than A Fistful of Dollars, both in terms of character development and narrative.
Rated 24 Oct 2012
Rated 02 Jan 2018
75
22nd
The plot is attractive but the depth could be more explored.
Rated 02 Jan 2018
Rated 02 Oct 2015
84
87th
Best of the 'Dollars' trilogy. Not by a whole lot, but I think it is. Improves upon nearly everything in AFOD and doesn't suffer from the bloated narrative of TGTBATU. The musical locket is also the best aspect out of the entire trilogy; I just love the usage of the soundtrack playing directly into the fears of both the characters and the audience.
Rated 02 Oct 2015
Rated 30 Aug 2014
79
68th
Borders on pastiche, and Eastwood character is rendered a bit of an anomaly, redundant by Van Cleef, who clearly stars, Eastwood even seems out of place at times. Decent acting, writing and plot nothing to shout about, but some lovely shots and moments enough to make it a worthy western, if a little poured on at times.
Rated 30 Aug 2014
Rated 23 Feb 2013
95
96th
In its trilogy, it's a by-no-means-shameful 2nd place. It's more ambitious than the first, and it flexes the muscle of its higher budget. Eastwood is amazing as always, and Van Cleef very nearly steals the show from him. The final showdown is awesome, even if it can't compare to the final movie's.
Rated 23 Feb 2013
Rated 28 Mar 2013
75
56th
The film has quite a bit more badassery and humour than the first with Eastwood and Van Cleef both being excellent in the former regard (expect a lot of squinting). The hat shooting scene definitely stands as a highlight here.
Rated 28 Mar 2013
Rated 07 Sep 2013
95
97th
My favorite of the trilogy. Amazing acting, great music, and some of the best cinematography you'll ever see. Basically what you'd expect from Sergio Leone.
Rated 07 Sep 2013
Rated 15 Sep 2013
84
92nd
* Casting, Acting : 8 * Script : 8 * Directing, Aura : 9.5 * Ease of Viewing : 8 * Naked Eye : 8.5
Rated 15 Sep 2013
Rated 30 Dec 2006
90
70th
clint eastwood is by far my favorite cowboy every. i have the whole collection and this is one of the greats
Rated 30 Dec 2006
Rated 03 Jan 2007
78
88th
Not as good as the first or third installments of the Dollars trilogy, but still great.
Rated 03 Jan 2007
Rated 22 Jan 2022
100
0th
Pros: Musical pocket watches. Hat shooting competitions. Amazing showdown (highly underrated compared to The Good, the Bad and the Ugly). Lee Van Cleef being a badass. Clint Eastwood being a badass (never gets old), another opportunity to see Gian Maria Volonte play an awesome antagonist. Soundtrack is one of the best of all time. Cons: The damned trains!
Rated 22 Jan 2022
Rated 25 Jul 2007
85
78th
If the Vatican ever inducted Saints based on their Awesomness instead of silly stuff like miracles or good deeds.....we would have St. Eastwood of California, St. Leone of Rome, and St. Van Cleef of Bald.
Rated 25 Jul 2007
Rated 14 Aug 2007
84
93rd
While overshadowed by the first (FISTFUL OF DOLLARS) and third (THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY) films of the series, FOR A FEW DOLLARS MORE is a film that deserves not to be overlooked as it's every bit as wildly exciting, funny, touching and utterly brilliant.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
Rated 26 Jul 2008
83
88th
More classic spagetti-werstern. I was in the Canary Islands at the western village tourist attraction where was shot some westerns back in 60's. Lee Van Cleef was mentioned by name. I think this one was not one of them though.
Rated 26 Jul 2008
Rated 26 Sep 2008
90
95th
Sergio Leone rules. A must see, a western that showed the Yanks how it SHOULD be done
Rated 26 Sep 2008
Rated 14 Feb 2009
94
96th
The "Dollars" films featuring the Man with No Name are total classics that will never get old. Eastwood portrays the ultimate bounty hunter and Van Cleef's performance matches Clint's perfectly. Very well shot with brilliant musical cues, we see Leone's style begin to shine brighter, well on it's way to culmination in the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Fantastic western.
Rated 14 Feb 2009
Rated 04 Mar 2009
20
44th
Second in the line of Leone-Eastwood spaghetti Westerns. Van Cleef enters the equation as a black-frocked genius of gunmanship named Bright Eyes, or Beady Eyes, nursing a mawkish revenge motive. This is supposed to add interest to the continuing conflict between Eastwood and a resurrected Volonte, but it adds very little, in fact.
Rated 04 Mar 2009
Rated 18 Sep 2018
90
95th
On one hand, For a Few Dollars More is narratively the weakest in the trilogy. However, the brilliance of the individual moments and a continued effort by Leone to perfect his craft of tension and a desire to outdo John Ford in his shot composition make the second entry in the Dollars trilogy an uneven film but certainly one of higher highs than the original.
Rated 18 Sep 2018
Rated 26 Apr 2009
89
92nd
All of the Dollars trilogy is worth watching again and again. This is my least favorite of the three, but it's so damn good saying least favorite is not giving it the credit this movie deserves.
Rated 26 Apr 2009
Rated 09 May 2009
74
44th
The debate for this film is always how does it compare to the other Leone Spaghetti Westerns and for me it just falls slightly behind a Fistful of Dollars. I didn't find the plot as interesting and the action was more limited but Eastwood was still epic as the 'Man With No Name' in the role of a bounty hunter. Another classic western in a must see trilogy !!
Rated 09 May 2009
Rated 22 May 2009
83
97th
Not as raw as "Fistful", but overall a better, professionally done film. Few scenes are really beautifully composed. Characters, especially evil ones are much better than in previous movie. Great watch and not only for western fans.
Rated 22 May 2009
Rated 17 Aug 2009
81
66th
Quite an improvement over Fistful, largely due to the more comic tone and the presence of Lee Van Cleef. The early scenes of Eastwood and Van Cleef interacting with the bad guys and each other are deliciously comic> Leone's use of the extreme close-up on the eyes of his characters both ratchets up the tension and provides some comic relief because it is so over-the-top melodramatic. The story doesn't always make sense, but who cares. This is just good fun.
Rated 17 Aug 2009
Rated 07 Oct 2009
8
93rd
I was surprised to actually like it a lot more than A Fistful of Dollars (albeit not as much as The Good, the Bad, and The Ugly). The dubbing is horrendous, but outside of that it's 130 minutes of pure, unleaded badassery.
Rated 07 Oct 2009
Rated 11 Jan 2010
88
60th
Another great revisionist western from Leone. Ironically, this is the only one of Leone's movies that I found to drag in places, most notably during the set-up to the end. However, the end more than makes up for any dragging during the middle part.
Rated 11 Jan 2010
Rated 21 Jan 2010
15
17th
They've definitely got something here. The visual style combined with the very invigorating music is all very stirring. But the very rampant fetishism and sadism leads me to say that, ultimately, this is a sick, ugly story told by a sick, ugly man for the entertainment of the sickest and ugliest parts of ourselves. I wanted to see these first two of Eastwood's spaghetti westerns just to see what all the fuss was about. Now that I know, I will never watch another Sergio Leone movie.
Rated 21 Jan 2010
Rated 04 May 2010
97
98th
If I absolutely had to choose my favorite Leone flick, this would probably be it. It occupies a happy medium between the confined setting of "A Fistful of Dollars" and the epic excesses of "The Good, the Bad, and The Ugly". The world here is just as lawless as that of "A Fistful of Dollars", and the protagonists just as amoral. Ennio Morricone's score is once again amazing, and I'd argue that "For a Few Dollars More" contains one of the greatest showdowns of all time.
Rated 04 May 2010
Rated 27 Jul 2010
80
88th
A strong film, significantly more well-made than its predecessor, with a terrific score courtesy of the one and only Ennio Morricone, Lee Van Cleef as Clint's unlikely partner and a script overall more well-written. "For A Few Dollars More" takes the basic characterization and standard thrills of "A Fistful Of Dollars" up one notch, opening the way for the trilogy's final and best part, the epic "The Good, The Bad And The Ugly".
Rated 27 Jul 2010
Rated 17 Aug 2010
75
88th
If this is on TV - I'm going to be staying up late to watch.
Rated 17 Aug 2010
Rated 28 Dec 2010
87
72nd
Much better than A Fistful of Dollars.
Rated 28 Dec 2010
Rated 21 Apr 2024
89
90th
audiovisual 90 acting 90 overall feeling 88 avg 89
Rated 21 Apr 2024
Rated 05 Dec 2011
65
71st
More enjoyable than Fistful. The final showdown is a high point but it's really superb throughout. Volonte's villain is great, and the soundtrack is excellent even by Morricone's high standards.
Rated 05 Dec 2011
Cast & Info
Collections
Loading ...
Similar Titles
Loading ...
Statistics
Loading ...
Trailer
Loading ...
PSI
?