Watch
YouTube
Gangster No. 1

Gangster No. 1

2000
Suspense/Thriller
1h 43m
The brutal, mesmerizing story of a deadly battle of wills between a gangland leader and his apprentice, a young man who emulates him to the point of psychosis and beyond. (IFC Films)
Your probable score
?

Gangster No. 1

2000
Suspense/Thriller
1h 43m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 46.58% from 303 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(303)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 09 Jan 2009
1
0th
"...a handsomely ugly affair, well dressed enough to make a few friends, but tough enough to make just as many enemies."
Rated 14 Aug 2007
67
35th
Bettany is fascinating as a sociopathic aspirant, and Thewlis is also great as the model of gangster glamour. McDowell, whom I usually love, is fine in his own sequences, but his narration occasionally muddles the force of the film, and the films many artificial editing techniques often fall flat and feel gimmicky. The solid story doesn't fare as well as it could because the script and editing are not as restrained as they should be.
Rated 06 Jul 2007
84
85th
Mesmerising performance from Bettany makes all the difference. Don't expect Richie-esque twattery; this is deeply unpleasant, ignorant, violent bastards being shitty at each other. Malcolm McDowell wobbles his normal line of hammy and good.
Rated 24 May 2010
85
75th
In the end, no one wants Freddie's chair. Bettany/McDowell's sociopath doesn't really want any of the trappings of his success, but seemed to have found some meaning in struggle. When none remained, he was gone too. I don't know whether this film makes sense. Does sociopathy collapse in on itself?
Rated 14 Aug 2007
75
74th
A pretty typical British gangster film highlighted by a couple of excellent acting performances. Thewlis and Bettany both shine as violent but sophisticated thugs.
Rated 10 May 2011
60
41st
Not bad, not that great either iirc. Good cast, though.
Rated 29 Dec 2014
27
18th
A puzzling film that possibly raises more questions than it answers, and relies too heavily on violence and more specifically blood to make an impact. It does make it plain that 1960s London gangsters were better dressers than 'gangstas' of more recent vintage. More evidence of how the modern world offers more, but worse.
Rated 13 Apr 2012
75
62nd
Unhinged, menacing and brutal. Psychotic performances from Bettany and McDowell make it.
Rated 12 Oct 2022
45
11th
Scarface plus American Psycho minus the entertainment factor of both. I don't get why Paul Bettany ages into Malcolm McDowell but David Thewlis just ages into age makeup. I think you either gotta recast both or do makeup on both, this mix-and-match thing doesn't work.
Rated 04 Dec 2009
72
34th
A story about wealth, envy and, obviously, gangsters. Nothing outstanding, but it has a great story to tell and Paul's superb performance.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
70
42nd
Not in the same league as Sexy Beast or Layer Cake, but it has its moments.
Rated 17 Jul 2014
68
55th
Extremely strong British cast can't save an extremely British script. I'd give it 10 more points if it came out 5 years earlier. I have to admit though that I should've at least heard of this before a coworker turned me on. It's not his fault though, he was wearing tight jeans. Huh?
Rated 28 Nov 2017
58
56th
oooh a London gangster film, how original
Rated 14 Aug 2007
65
73rd
Excellent.
Rated 02 Feb 2007
10
5th
What does this movie want from me? It's just a load of epigonic gangster movie cliches with nothing new or interesting to add.
Rated 22 Nov 2017
67
55th
Paul Bettany was great. I was disappointed in Malcolm McDowell, and the last 30 minutes of the film.
Rated 17 Sep 2007
70
63rd
engaging

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...