Watch
Honey I Blew Up the Kid
Your probable score
?

Honey I Blew Up the Kid

1992
Comedy, Sci-fi
1h 29m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 17.87% from 2531 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(2531)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 13 Nov 2017
75
30th
Dumb and overly-cutesy, but harmless. There are a couple laughs and some good effects, but not much more. Not as terrible as the scores here would have you believe.
Rated 30 Nov 2019
50
21st
“Honey, don’t say the N-word in front of the two year old”
Rated 14 Aug 2007
4
43rd
What a violent title!
Rated 21 Jul 2007
19
18th
This movie didn't have to happen. What's weird is that it was written by Stuart Gordon, who directed "Re-Animator", and Brian Yuzna, who produced "Re-Animator". What is it with these guys and re-animating and/or enlarging people?
Rated 07 Feb 2012
19
1st
That's a big kid there, movie.
Rated 24 Oct 2010
57
37th
My enjoyment of these movies seems to be directly proportional to the amount of screentime Rick Moranis gets. There's far more of him in this than the original, so despite being typical '90s kidstuff otherwise, it gets a higher rating.
Rated 06 Aug 2008
39
5th
Kids are annoying, giant kids even more so
Rated 18 Jan 2008
20
4th
Not satisfied with shrinking things, they now decide to blow things up. It's too bad the kid didn't actually explode, that'd make a better movie.
Rated 05 Nov 2008
60
5th
Entertaining enough when I was younger.
Rated 20 Apr 2010
22
0th
just fucking odd more than anything
Rated 09 Oct 2007
25
15th
Entertained when I was a kid, but is not a good movie.
Rated 12 Dec 2006
30
1st
Even as a kid who liked the original I knew this was shit when I saw it. It takes the few funny things the original had and completely discards them for sheer stupidity.
Rated 19 May 2008
63
19th
As I said before, after the first one there was no need to make sequels, but at least this is different rather than just retreading the footsteps of the first movie, though only nominally different.
Rated 27 Mar 2007
24
3rd
Yep, pretty fucking stupid.
Rated 07 Sep 2010
40
8th
So-so sequel. The concept had one big (blown up) flaw: little kids in movies are generally very very irritating.
Rated 18 Aug 2015
50
15th
It's fine, but hinging any movie on a toddler actor (two I guess) is a big gamble that never really pays off fully
Rated 06 Feb 2010
12
3rd
Production values didn't appear to be a priority.
Rated 25 Sep 2010
24
7th
Would have rated more points had the kid actually exploded.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
76
45th
It's a pretty good sequel to the original, but it was missing some of the heart and overall I just don't appreciate it as much.
Rated 20 Feb 2009
8
3rd
The only purpose this movie can possibly serve is to perhaps keep children occupied for 90 minutes while you get to go do something adult like grope your wife in the closet. Otherwise, it does not need to be seen by human eyes.
Rated 09 Aug 2017
55
34th
Yes, it's the first one all over again only in the other direction; but it still has lots of fun with the premise and I was ultimately entertained.
Rated 01 Aug 2009
8
6th
Shitty sequel.
Rated 08 Jan 2009
3
8th
The first time I saw the title I thought "Sweet, a kid gets blown up!" This is not what I had in mind. -_- Anywho, this is just plain awful. This guy is a horrible scientist! Thank God he finally gave up on his shitty inventions...Also, I hate the look on the bunny's face. Yea, odd, I know. But God damn it, does it piss me off! >=/
Rated 10 Jul 2007
20
8th
Sequels, schmequels.
Rated 11 Dec 2006
4
35th
Rick Moranis is a balla
Rated 25 Mar 2009
70
43rd
Not a match for the original, the sequel din't work like the original. Fun for the kids, but leans toward boring for adults.
Rated 20 Jan 2008
46
15th
Bad sequel.
Rated 17 Dec 2006
15
3rd
Blow on this, kid.
Rated 23 Dec 2006
75
37th
NO NAP!
Rated 04 Sep 2016
30
0th
Worse than the original somehow
Rated 14 Aug 2007
10
0th
The first one was based in all thoise amazing visual effects and singular plot. This time it's all the contrary: dull, boring and un-interesting.
Rated 17 Apr 2007
5
4th
The original was bad enough, but this is just bloody awful.
Rated 21 Mar 2009
80
72nd
Classic
Rated 26 May 2007
50
36th
Classic. The rest sucked.
Rated 18 Oct 2012
35
5th
Fool me twice, Rick Moranis, shame on you further.
Rated 27 Sep 2010
35
10th
What a tragically annoying thing to make giant sized.
Rated 18 May 2009
40
5th
Carp. Just Crap.
Rated 31 Oct 2010
31
4th
Honey, I done blown up that kid yonder. I done done it again.
Rated 18 Feb 2009
65
15th
A Disney sequel. In the end, it's not terrible, but it's not wonderful either. It does a fine job of flipping the main plot device of the first movie, but it doesn't do much with it.
Rated 19 Feb 2007
55
19th
Sillier and more childish than the first, this sequel isn't all bad, but it definitely won't please as wide of an age range as the first did. Crap!
Rated 12 Jul 2007
75
18th
Not great. Sequels are pushing it.
Rated 04 Feb 2018
63
38th
Fun but not as good as the first.
Rated 03 Jun 2010
1
8th
Look at the title.
Rated 25 Jan 2009
60
13th
Funny
Rated 19 Mar 2009
5
1st
i could recognise this movie as bad even when i saw it at like 6 years old
Rated 15 Oct 2008
77
28th
Kinda cute.
Rated 22 Jul 2009
25
5th
Am I the only one who wished they didn't rescue the little brat?
Rated 29 Sep 2008
20
12th
I HATED the origianl so you KNOW I'm gonna hate this too
Rated 16 Sep 2008
80
68th
A huge kid is more of an adult's fear than a child's. Nonetheless, this, too, is a fun movie, even if it's not as good as the first
Rated 10 Oct 2008
15
9th
Nej...
Rated 07 Feb 2008
72
41st
As a kid, I remember liking this way more than the first one.
Rated 27 Jun 2008
12
7th
bad movie
Rated 16 Sep 2007
65
49th
Decent sequel.
Rated 23 Feb 2007
25
13th
Haha I loved this one when I was a kid!!
Rated 12 Jun 2013
25
17th
Pretty terrible, but I'll give it some points because I had a good time watching it and I laughed a lot. Also, there is at least one genuinely great joke in this film. I can't remember what it is, but it's there.
Rated 03 Apr 2011
93
67th
1
Rated 30 Aug 2008
50
15th
promising title, but dissappointing
Rated 15 Jul 2007
1
7th
Whatever.
Rated 30 Mar 2008
66
7th
Movie blew itself up.
Rated 01 Apr 2012
40
6th
39.500
Rated 14 Aug 2007
10
3rd
Horrible does not come close to describing this film.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
60
26th
Way to milk a good idea.
Rated 05 Mar 2008
79
16th
Kind of cute :-)
Rated 04 Mar 2008
25
13th
Bahaha
Rated 17 Sep 2018
45
2nd
The kids loved it and it's harmless, but a total snooze for the grown-ups. 1992 chroma-key quality in full effect (i.e. it's painfully obvious).
Rated 07 Sep 2020
97
76th
In the sequel to Honey I Shrunk the Kids, scientist Wayne Szalinski, now based in Las Vegas, is once again playing with particles. Now, however, instead of shrinking things, he is making them grow and once again, when his wife's away his invention is accidentally used on his offspring, this time around, it's his new baby. The child quickly grows to be taller than buildings and Wayne must stop him terrorizing Las Vegas.
Rated 23 Jan 2019
14
7th
It's hard for me to say too much bad about this. Yes, it is woeful to watch but it isn't insulting, so I can't say that I hated it.
Rated 04 Mar 2019
50
26th
Passable sequel that didn't really need to be made. The gimmick isn't a bad one, and the film is correctly pitched to its target audience (i.e.children) who should get a kick out of watching an oversized kid stomping around Las Vegas like a benevolent Godzilla. Moranis is his usual amiable self, and the film is good natured to a fault, which makes it hard to outright hate. It just lacks qualities that adults can appreciate that were vaguely present in Shrunk, like ingenuity and wit.
Rated 12 May 2021
70
53rd
Anothernicecartoonintro+babecrushkerirussell:P+waybettercuzthetoddlerlol+lmaomediocreeffect+mombigtocalmetc+son/Kshrunklol
Rated 01 Feb 2021
46
32nd
Seen: 2.
Rated 27 Nov 2021
10
5th
Really. How did this happen again? Also, bigger things are inherently campier, goonier and less cute/microcosmically fascinating, so this is instantly a less attractive, clumsier film.
Rated 23 Jan 2022
45
21st
This seems to be loathed by fans of the original. I didn't have any emotional bond with it, and ended up rather enjoying this. It's not a good film nor is it as fun as the 1st, but there were some inventive special effects scenes, and it kept me entertained for the duration which not all family films do.
Rated 02 Nov 2022
30
3rd
Why the fuck

Collections

(15)
Compact view
Showing 1 - 15 of 15 results

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...