Watch
Inland Empire

Inland Empire

2006
Drama, Suspense/Thriller
3h 0m
An actress's perception of reality becomes increasingly distorted as she finds herself falling for her co-star in a remake of an unfinished Polish production that was supposedly cursed.
Your probable score
?

Inland Empire

2006
Drama, Suspense/Thriller
3h 0m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 58.73% from 2585 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(2585)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 28 Jan 2020
70
53rd
I like it when it’s weird, I hate it when it’s boring. David Lynch walking around with my dad’s camcorder getting into people’s faces. “Okay let’s see tits” I had to break this into three, hour long chunks because I am simple.
Rated 19 Jan 2007
61
24th
I really enjoyed some of the images and sequences, but a lot of it felt pointless. Yes, I understand that this is Lynch, but the length of the film seems overbearing at times. Nevertheless, there is a lot of interesting stuff here, especially for Lynch fans.
Rated 08 Jan 2007
69
17th
David Lynch has out-Lynched himself, and it seems he is out of his mind. In all seriousness though, I did enjoy portions of the film. The bits with Jeremy Irons and the interplay between Dern's character's personal life and the film she is making are really great. However, often it seems as if Lynch is almost parodying himself. He already perfected this story with Mulholland Drive. Even as a big Lynch fan, I was a bit weirded out. An interesting experience to be sure.
Rated 29 Jul 2007
40
11th
Lynch paying tribute to himself. His technique, mastery in conveying emotions by camerawork and music, as well as his skill in interwining different planes of the story are to be admired. However, three hours of psychodelic images forming a riddle seemingly without - unlike 'Mullholland Drive' - a solution was just too much for me and the admiration become boredom at the end.
Rated 17 Sep 2007
100
90th
Though Mulholland Drive will always have a place in my heart as Lynch's best film, this easily grabs a close second. I'd say it's the most bizarre chain of events I've ever seen, though it's fairly clear this is not a chain of anything. What is it then? It's brilliant. And the most terrifying thing you'll ever see. This is really Lynch's most horrifying and absurd film to date. It's hard to know what to say about it.
Rated 22 May 2009
21
0th
An unintelligible three hour long collection of characters babbling mindless nonsensicle absurdities that proves equally to both rape the viewer's eyes with terrible camera work and insult their intelligence with incohesive blunderings that apparently serve as a plot. I am thoroughly convinced that I need only wait a couple years longer until Lynch's brain deteriorates to the point where it can't even make his heart beat; and wouldn't be surprised if, in time, this movie destroys the world.
Rated 01 Feb 2014
1
12th
A movie that accurately displays how fucked up the mind of a senile baby boomer can become. He's a few years out from cashing social security checks so in a moment of hysteria he takes a dump on film and then shows the world. It's almost like Lynch made a movie on the fly and just thought of things randomly and put them in the final product. This is what happens when you buy in to your own legend. Fucking terrible movie.
Rated 11 Dec 2007
90
88th
i credit any film that hurts you for watching it
Rated 03 Sep 2009
94
97th
Intense. There's nothing to do but sit back, enjoy the ride, and realise that Lynch has perfected the art of mood. If that makes sense. Also Dern is fantastic and should have been nominated for an Oscar.
Rated 11 Jan 2012
90
97th
I don't even know where to begin with this movie. It doesn't feel like a movie, it feels like a meditation. It's like a serious of scenes with nothing connecting them, a dream that never ends. I don't even know if I watched a movie or if I just fell asleep and dreamed the rest of it.
Rated 03 May 2013
8
80th
I watched this drunk and stoned and had no idea what was going on. This is the most Lynchian Lynch that Lynch has ever Lynched. I'd need to see it again sober, though I'm not sure that'd make a difference.
Rated 21 Oct 2007
60
23rd
Disturbing and beautiful but so obtuse as to be utterly pointless. Story counts above pretty shots and atmospherre. If I wanted a creepy screensaver, I would download one.
Rated 03 Sep 2007
94
97th
Given what I'd heard about it, it was a lot more coherent than I expected. Not that I can pretend to understand ALL of it, but there were enough shreds of narrative to keep it well out of the realm of "weird for the sake of being weird". Very moody and intriguing, I definitely want to watch it again in the near future. Sme parts are less interesting than others, but on the whole I was fascinated and never knew what was going to happen next. It was pretty funny at times, too.
Rated 13 Apr 2010
20
9th
from a david lynch fan this lost my interest pretty quickly
Rated 07 Aug 2007
55
53rd
Lynch's least successful movie since DUNE (1984): the nightmare just didn't happen for me. It would be an unfortunate outcome if this director, possessing such an outstanding ability to craft beautiful cinematic imagery, decides to continue working with digital video cameras rather than film. To be fair, I have not seen it since 2006, and perhaps another viewing is indicated.
Rated 19 Feb 2012
70
57th
The only other experience in life that can compare to watching a 3 hour Lynch film is taking an ice pick dipping it in hot sauce, then proceeding to shove it up your urethra. After the burning subsides take the same said ice pick jam it in your forehead and give it a good whirl. Only after that go on the internet and have some douche tell you that you just don't understand the movie the way he does.
Rated 17 Jul 2013
35
9th
The wonderful reviews here are a victory for desire over reality; their high rankings justified in that "IE is an experience". Yes, well so is crashing your car! This pretentious pile of nonsense appears to have been edited together from out-takes from the cutting room floor cobbled together into a 3 hour borefest of mammoth proportions. It's a shame, because the first hour held real promise and Dern puts in a sterling effort, but it is of no value in a film that doesn't make any sense at all
Rated 21 Jun 2014
87
98th
"In the future, you will be dreaming. And when you wake up, someone familiar will be there..."
Rated 12 Aug 2008
100
99th
One of the greatest films of all time and an experience like no other. Nightmarish, frightening, hilarious, irrational, ridiculous, delirious, exhausting and fucked up beyond recognition - proof that this kind of pure, persona cinema isn't quite dead yet. How someone could not appreciate the joys and terrors of this masterpiece is beyond me.
Rated 03 Jul 2013
10
2nd
Laura Dern is basically the only good thing about this movie. However, this is one of the all time worst movies. The story is feeble, disjointed, disconnected incoherent nonsense. Nothing makes sense. A monumental failure in story telling! And a complete waste of time, money and effort. This must be what it's like to completely loose your mind as a writer and director. Entirely stupid, confusing, sad, pathetic, boring and utterly pointless. Boooo!
Rated 28 Mar 2011
0
1st
David Lynch proves once and for all he has no place making movies. As a 180 minute test of filmgoers patience, Inland Empire is a monumental achievement. But as a piece of cinema trying to convey anything beyond sheer confusion and stupidity, Inland Empire fails on every level. The worst looking, worst acted, worst written, worst edited film I've ever seen.
Rated 21 Dec 2008
70
49th
The Visualization of Inland Empire is marvellous, it's just a blow what Lynch and his co-workers did. But on the other hand the visualization cannot outweigh that it's just damn hard to follow 172 minutes of confusion. Lynch takes every bit of your attention but you don't get a lot of information in return. Pure mindfuck. 21/12/08
Rated 22 Jul 2011
90
97th
The most incoherent and nightmarish of Lynch's films, probably to the point of being inaccessible to the average moviegoer. Makes you want to take a shower afterwards, it's pretty great.
Rated 30 Jul 2013
10
99th
an utterly nightmarish experience. almost incoherent, but makes just enough sense to be enveloped in the terror. if this could possibly be considered to be a movie about movies, this'd be among the best.
Rated 14 Dec 2012
95
98th
Dark, surreal, disjointed, chronologically twisted, with dialogue just barely within the bounds of sense and a plot just barely coherent, Inland Empire is one of the most nightmarish films I've ever seen, and possibly Lynch's best work since Eraserhead. It's obviously the director's Magnum Opus, a labor of love more neatly crystallizing his aesthetics than anything he's done. Heading an incredible cast is an utterly unbeatable Laura Dern. The more you immerse yourself the scarier this is.
Rated 16 Nov 2016
97
99th
Showgirls: Hollywood as an oppressive eastern bloc edition. The sparkles are removed in this personal home-video edition. The Lynchian aesthetic, part of which means to reflect some kafkaesque, horrifying quality, infrequently is pushed farther than what roots underneath the surface, if at all present, permit, causing it to fall flat, into a caricature of everything Lynchian. When it works, the bounce from between said quality and undercurrent, is an effective journey to an outskirt real.
Rated 18 Dec 2015
76
60th
Studio Canal presents: David Lynch's Scary Boner Jams. At some point in my life I'd like to shake the man's hand and ask him "What the fuck, bro?" Some of his most disturbing moments are found here but it might be his weakest overall narrative - if you care about that sort of thing.
Rated 28 Apr 2012
20
6th
I think I'm done with David Lynch now. I've seen 4 of his films, as well as Twin Peaks. I don't see it. I give up.
Rated 20 Jul 2007
50
33rd
Huh?
Rated 06 Oct 2011
17
6th
Boring nonsense.
Rated 09 Sep 2008
76
64th
Parts of it were incredibly effective, other parts made me almost want to reach for the fast forward button. Fortunately, the former definitely overpower the latter on the whole.
Rated 08 Dec 2008
98
98th
The closest anyone can ever get to a feature-length, fully auteristic film. This is like drilling a hole into Lynch's head and projecting what's inside - from beautiful scenes (the Polish dinner table) to disturbing (the spotlight face!) to plain brilliant (everything where Dern plays the beat-up whore). Analyzing the film is not the point: this is about setting tone/mood and it is all done masterfully. Cuddle up next to your girlfriend and watch alongside Bergman's Persona for a definite mind-f
Rated 18 Feb 2007
51
57th
I hesitate to rate this film because it so bewildered me. It's a whirlwind of fairly unrelated images, many of which are quite insane, but at the same time it is incredibly emotional and there are some brilliant scenes. Regardless of whether I understand it, there are images in this film which deserve to be remembered in film history as much as anything from Eraserhead or Mulholland Dr. And I do believe there to be important and coomplex themes even if there's not what one would call a plot
Rated 10 Jul 2010
65
42nd
I have a problem watching Lynch movies which can't be summarised in 500 words.
Rated 19 Dec 2008
60
32nd
I admire Lynch's philosophy of pure inspiration, but the product of that method here is very much a hodge-podge. A filmmaker working steadily and prolifically in this vein, especially with known and beloved performers, could change the face of narrative film as we know it, but as the only film of its kind, and with the cheap DV robbing it of gravity, it's mostly an atmospheric, eclectic curio.
Rated 31 Mar 2009
100
97th
Some of the most incredible cinematic moments are in this film. This film is burned into my skull; some of it I will never be able to forget.
Rated 16 Aug 2007
9
76th
Nobody Lynchs Lynch the way Lynch Lynchs Lynch.
Rated 13 Nov 2015
69
34th
It's hard to stick a Lynch film with the mediocre tag, but when it's largely laborious with only flashes of brilliance and plenty risible, that's about what it breaks down to. Inland Empire sees Lynch bizarrely remaking his past glories in the most tedious, obfuscated fashion. This was one of those crushing cinema trips where feverish anticipation gave way to funereal silence and disappointment. Not so much a challenge as it was mental masochism. Tough to recommend based on that experience.
Rated 08 Nov 2017
70
69th
She can't get on a bus to pomona? Now that's just ridiculous.
Rated 06 May 2008
4
55th
A further abstraction of what Lynch's previous film was. It takes about over an hour to really get going, and even then dips in and out of interest, but fuck when it is good. Fuck.
Rated 20 Apr 2008
90
84th
I expected boredom: an unending string of random David Lynch home movies. Instead I saw something I can't really explain. Considering how improv and cheap this project was, I'm amazed that there exists some sort of coherence you can barely grasp and a frightening surreal atmosphere that I thought impossible to do on video. No one can capture dream logic like Lynch. Just like half-remembered dreams, I'll just let the memorable scenes sit in my mind, mysterious, hinting at their possible meanings.
Rated 16 Jun 2007
94
96th
Lynch definitely hit another home run. The extremes of human emotion are all here and done quite effectively. The visuals shook me up, they ranged from being vulgar to stunning and contained some of the most startling images I have seen in film. The humour is quite excellent too, with quite a few hilariously absurd situations. It may be a little tedious, and it took me a while to get into the film, but by the end the whole experience is entirely unique and completly worthwhile.
Rated 17 Mar 2007
98
95th
This is the film David Lynch has been working towards his entire career, where he can finally toss any sort of narrative sense out the window and assault you with bizarre images, terrifying scenes, and general chaos. The line between reality and fantasy, something Lynch began to deal with in Mulholland Dr., is completely obliterated here, and makes for an infuriatingly confusing film. But what a damn good one.
Rated 22 Jun 2021
0
0th
I think there's maybe a sort of Stockholm Syndrome where some people who wasted 3 hours of their life on this turd need to tell themselves it was genius otherwise they can't go on knowing they'll never get that 3 hours back. The worst of Lynch's films, he clearly jumped the shark after Lost Highway.
Rated 07 Sep 2013
37
7th
Nearly 3 hours of Lynch being wilfully,and boringly,weird.
Rated 25 Aug 2010
71
41st
I'm often a fan of David Lynch's twisted filmic and narrative style, but here it's a bit hard for me to swallow. Before anything else, this was shot on DV, so strike one there. Most of the scenes in Lynch's film often thread through each other on mood rather than story, but here the mood seems to be as convoluted as the storyline. Thankfully we have Laura Dern's career best, guiding us well through Lynch's scariest, but messiest, nightmare.
Rated 21 Oct 2007
30
10th
'Mulholland Dr.' is one of my all-time favorite films. Which might have played into my massive disappointment in this film. It's basically the same film on even more crack. It's overly loose structually; too loose for my tastes, I guess. I feel like Lynch simply went to Poland, shot some random stuff and then went back and did some coverage on Hollywood Blvd. There are a few shots in there that were absolutely terrifying, though.
Rated 18 Feb 2009
5
93rd
"...dazzling and exquisitely original riddle..."
Rated 20 Mar 2014
50
15th
Inland Empire beats out Eraserhead for the scarier surrealistic movie, mostly because it has much less of David Lynch's diffident "unintentional" humor. Frustratingly enough, that humor still shows up in Inland Empire from time to time, but despite its incomprehensibility Inland Empire is somewhat entertaining in how manic and disturbing it is, where before Lynch's cryptics were often just boring. Inland Empire can be enjoyed as simply a morphing spectacle. But for three hours? No thanks.
Rated 01 May 2007
100
99th
I've never seen anything like this before.
Rated 13 Mar 2016
49
6th
Demonstrates that freeing Lynch from the oversight of the money men isn't necessarily productive or desirable.
Rated 15 Jun 2010
2
0th
Too long. Too weird.
Rated 02 Dec 2017
100
97th
I can totally understand how this would feel so incomprehensible to some that it practically feels like David Lynch parodying himself. I can't claim to have worked out any full narrative, but there are a lot of interesting bits to grab onto even if they are hard to put together. What I really get out of this film is pure feeling. The movie elicits terror better than almost any I have seen, but what really sticks with me is the ending. It's one of the most cathartic things I've ever experienced.
Rated 20 May 2017
8
85th
Halfway between the black lodge and the pre-fuck parts of a porno.
Rated 24 Jan 2011
60
38th
There gets a point when 'intriguing' becomes 'non-sensical'
Rated 05 Jan 2010
76
91st
I found it much more rewarding when I viewed it, not as a series of arbitrary scenes (like I did upon my first viewing), but as a cohesive narrative, shattered into a thousand small pieces. I'll admit I still havent gotten everything figured out, but I have a good theory going. In any case, this film probably requires the most patience of David Lynch's films. I recommend seeing it only when you're feeling especially zealous.
Rated 25 Jan 2009
15
48th
Every Lynch movie I have seen is the same process: I don't know what to think at first--in fact, I tend to dislike it--but over time, it sits with me, lingers in my mind, and attaches to me. That is the mark of a great artist. The movie is more of an experiment than it is an 'experimental film,' but you have to hand it to him for being so uncompromising, a rare thing in today's cinema.
Rated 30 Aug 2008
90
79th
Hard to describe in just a mini-review. If you're reading this, buy this movie now. Joyful in almost every aspect, and the scenery is brilliant. Horrifying too, and it's just one of a kind. Like nothing I've ever seen before in a picture has all been captured in this classic.
Rated 28 Dec 2010
4
70th
Even by Lynch's standards this is incomprehensible (I say that as a fan), with lots of tenuously connected and underdeveloped plot strands never quite cohering into something that works as a larger narrative. However, it is a very moody, sensuous film much of the time, and Lynch's use of DV to create claustrophobia, ugliness and tension is something to see.
Rated 16 Feb 2011
65
23rd
Lynch himself admitted that he had no idea where the film was going, instead writing the fucking script several pages per day. Should such a radical approach to filmmaking be applauded for its spontaneity? Or frowned upon for allowing its director to build a film that has no direction or intended purpose? While I applaud Lynch's...erm, creativity...this is just too much: too obtuse, too long, too meaningless, too abstract. Blah.
Rated 02 Nov 2007
83
86th
Baffling, but fascinating.
Rated 26 May 2011
35
17th
Laura Dern looked almost as lost as I was. Almost. Her face is my review: http://img812.imageshack.us/img812/318/huhk.gif
Rated 22 Oct 2018
50
20th
At times there are glimpses of interesting statements about the boundary between film and reality that are a surprisingly fresh addition to the Lynchian thematic repertoire. As for the rest of the film, ?????????????????????????????????????????????.
Rated 14 Jul 2008
100
96th
There is a plot here. Some say no, but it's there. You just have to dig deep for it. Laura Dern is excellent and Karolina Gruszka is great in an eye opening performance.
Rated 01 Oct 2007
76
47th
It's a Lynch Movie through and through, and I really enjoyed watching most of it, but it felt overly long and didn't really fit together all that well.
Rated 15 Jun 2012
94
84th
An utterly indescribable film, not so much watched as experienced. David Lynch succeeds in creating an atmosphere in which nothing feels quite right.
Rated 12 Sep 2008
65
21st
I always admire Lynch's artisitic work, although he always gives me a pain in the stomach. I like his movies and I don't like them. I like the way Lynch approaches his aim of the movie but I detest the topics and how they are conveyed. But I know that all of his movies would not be as much effective as if they would have been done otherwise. Inland Empire made me not watch it for the last half an hour because I got really sick, but I acknowledge Lynch's vision.
Rated 30 Dec 2010
50
50th
Lynch always gets inside my head.
Rated 19 Aug 2010
90
66th
Sometimes hard to follow but filled with the usual David Lynch dreamlike, almost surreal imagery. I think it helps a great deal if you are familiar with Lynch's work to fully appreciate the intent of this film. Highly recommended to Lynch fans!
Rated 27 Aug 2017
66
45th
I never thought I'd compare David Lynch to George Lucas, but both of them do their best work under constraints. This unfiltered vision of Lynch's has some beautiful oneiric moments, but holy FUCK does it go on too long. But at least it has some good character moments. This will end with you saying, "What the fuck did I just watch?", but we Lynch fans would expect nothing less.
Rated 20 Dec 2007
95
50th
People think it's great when musicians improvise, but not with movies. I think maybe the senses get overloaded. I say who cares, you owe it to yourself as a human to see this masterpiece. It's challenging but in a good way. And yes, Lynch is to a certain extent making this up as he goes along. You got a problem with that? Do things need to be spoonfed to you for you to enjoy them? Yes, this is a confrontational review, but see the movie first and then tell me what you think.
Rated 27 Dec 2009
90
93rd
I felt like I was hallucinating for 3 hours. I like that. I loved the break-neck stylistic turn at about the halfway point, but I'm not afraid to let you know that I didn't follow most of this thing, especially the second half. The symbolism was sadly lost on me on the original viewing, but that's kind of how I like to approach movies (much like books) - the first viewing is for aesthetic, subsequent viewings are for interpretation. And I'll need them. Laura Dern was phenomenal in every aspect.
Rated 30 May 2010
60
50th
Not a film you should try to analyze or interpret, but to experience, like a dream. Lasting three hours, INLAND EMPIRE is difficult, consuming and often depressing. But after a week you realize you're still trapped inside it. And you might never want to see it again.
Rated 12 Sep 2011
60
37th
NEEDS REWATCH HARDCORE.
Rated 03 Dec 2007
85
86th
Brilliant. Another great way to experiment with our minds by David Lynch.
Rated 04 Aug 2009
90
75th
This is the serious transcendental shit. As a fanboy-deluxe i respect David Lynch though he is doing some strange Maharishi-PR. This is deep, this is demanding, this is beautiful. 90 rabbitears for the INLAND EMPIRE.
Rated 09 Dec 2010
70
57th
Lynch certainly hasn't mastered the digital video format yet, but there are still some visionary (and scary) stuff in this rabbit hole.
Rated 27 Mar 2011
85
89th
With Inland Empire Lynch seems to have finally been able to accurately project all of his phobias, neuroses and nightmares directly onto the screen in one sprawling, disjointed, spaghetti-like opus. The sound design is on point, the visuals are gnarly and sometimes shocking and Laura Dern is amazing. Scary stuff, and a nice book-end to a remarkable career that started with Eraserhead - the film with which this has the most in common. I could have done without the rabbit people though.
Rated 05 Apr 2007
86
76th
Inland Empire is hard to describe or really even judge because so much of its quality comes from the ambiguous storytelling and scenery. It's not a movie that is easily recommendable to really anybody--whether they like obscure movies or not--because it's just so far out there. Although, that being said, I think Inland Empire is among the year's best and surely is in line with Lynch's former classics.
Rated 17 Jun 2015
97
99th
I watched this late at night while recovering from a fever but I feel it was the film itself rather than this combination that left me feeling genuinely nauseous for a whole day afterwards. Your sense of place and time become confused, much like when you struggle to recall a dream just as it fades from waking memory. Mulholland Drive turned up to 11, then turned up to 111 because he can. Lynch at his unapologetic, brilliant best.
Rated 20 Jul 2022
5
91st
Lynch grinds the viewer down and drags them through video generation loss as the contradictions and characters collapse into and out of Dern's performance. Similar to a nightmare but by the end you wake up in a state of grace.
Rated 14 Mar 2012
90
49th
Very good film, loved the photography. Provokes a lot of emotions.
Rated 12 Jan 2013
80
70th
Almost impossible to review. Not terrible, not brilliant, not really anywhere in between. It's an experience that's worth having. That's all I can say.
Rated 09 Oct 2008
99
99th
If seeing is believing...not in Lynchworld. Try to understand the Movie...fail.Try to look "behind"...fail. Inland Empire is so close to be the perfect "mystery experience". Closer than any film before.The reason is easy. You have to F.E.E.L. Don't destroy the movie with analysing characters and scenes that don't want to get analysed. It's a fascinating masterpiece in old Lynch tradition. Awesome in many ways.
Rated 15 Jan 2009
80
74th
What the fuck?!
Rated 13 Nov 2007
10
99th
It really starts to make a lot of sense after watching it 5-6 times... or at least I think it does... Every viewing makes you feel like you are slightly closer to figuring out Lynch's greatest film to date. Unfortunately his commentary on how much of it he actually planned (not that much) is kind of frustrating. Still, incredibly cerebral and rewarding.
Rated 06 Mar 2008
50
19th
I didn't understand what was going on, I will watch it again and probably change my rating.
Rated 30 Jul 2012
3
73rd
Seemed an attempt to re-create the magic of Mullholland Drive using improv and digital. MH was a cut-up rather than improv and a little visual magic was lost with the switch to digital. The dialogues and narratives were that little 'too far apart' for the sparks to jump between them like in Lynchs best. A worthy experiment I hope leads to something even better.
Rated 22 Jun 2008
90
94th
Spooky and enthralling, yet at the same time I have to wonder if it needs to be 3 freaking hours long. And I'm all about ambiguity but that ending left a lot to be desired.
Rated 12 Jan 2009
85
71st
terrifying
Rated 08 Nov 2010
40
97th
"The Atlas Shrugged of narrative avant-garde films, compulsively watchable and insanely self-devouring." - Ed Gonzalez
Rated 28 Nov 2007
94
95th
Fantastically adventurous, I have my own theories on what is happening, and I think everyone who sees this film will form their own ideas. The grainy quality of the digital film can make it difficult to appreciate aesthetically, but feels necessary when considering the range of Lynch's visual palette. Trying to solve what is happening keeps the 172 minutes interesting.
Rated 22 Jan 2017
90
94th
psychoactive like that thing you licked once remember remember
Rated 02 Nov 2017
55
17th
Of course Laura Dern's acting reel was directed by David Lynch there couldn't have been anyone else better for the job
Rated 17 Dec 2011
100
99th
Made me feel sick of art
Rated 28 Oct 2013
14
1st
Combines boredom and nonsense in extraordinary way.
Rated 29 Mar 2017
60
47th
Fuck you, Lynch!! Jump scares at 1:09h, 1:19h, 1:57h and 2:45h. Overall it's damn scary. Has "found footage" visuals, which is not as stylish, but works alright.
Rated 01 Jul 2010
78
80th
er.. what? oh shi- aahhhhhhhhh!!!
Rated 22 May 2013
85
85th
I saw this on a drive-in size screen so that the frequent close-ups were truly overwhelming and creepy. The whole project is outsized, exhausting and well, nuts. For my money, this is Lynch's best and most consistent work since Eraserhead.
Rated 14 May 2011
75
79th
When the master dares you to go get lost with him, you dare. And you might as well enjoy it.

Collections

(88)
Compact view
Showing 1 - 24 of 88 results

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

No Trailer