sign in
register
Watch
Amazon Prime Video Apple TV Google Play Movies
+6
Insurgent
Amazon Prime Video Apple TV Google Play Movies
+6
JustWatch
Remove ads

Insurgent

2015
Sci-fi
Suspense/Thriller
1h 59m
Beatrice Prior must confront her inner demons and continue her fight against a powerful alliance which threatens to tear her society apart with the help from others on her side. (imdb)
Directed by:
Robert Schwentke Robert Schwentke
Written by:
Akiva Goldsman Akiva Goldsman Mark Bomback Brian Duffield
+2 more
Starring:
Naomi Watts Naomi Watts Ashley Judd Ashley Judd Kate Winslet Kate Winslet Ray Stevenson Ray Stevenson Maggie Q Maggie Q Octavia Spencer Octavia Spencer Zoë Kravitz Zoë Kravitz Miles Teller Miles Teller Shailene Woodley Shailene Woodley Theo James Theo James Jai Courtney Jai Courtney Suki Waterhouse Suki Waterhouse
More
Franchise:
The Divergent Series
Genres:
Sci-fi, Suspense/Thriller, Action, Adventure
Country:
USA
Language:
English
imdb More information at IMDb
See title update history
Suggest an edit
Show Less
Your probable score
?

Insurgent

2015
Sci-fi
Suspense/Thriller
1h 59m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 27.93% from 1196 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(1196)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
cinemaasiaCinema_Asia
Rated 10 Apr 2015
60
30th
These teen sci-fi movies (Hunger Games, Divergent, Mazerunner) all seem to blend together into one franchise like a Matrix for millenials. They have similar cinematography, tone, and plot premises, and the characters are all whitebread suburbanite archetypes. Forget about the dumb story and just space out on the trippy visuals. There are interesting sci-fi effects but otherwise it's.. same, same. You could switch the leads for any of these sci-fi franchises and the audience wouldn't notice.
Rated 10 Apr 2015
matthew_parkinsonMatthew Parkinson
Rated 21 Mar 2015
40
31st
With less on its mind, just as much boring world-building, and a waste of an even more talented cast, about the only thing that Insurgent has going for it is that it kept its running time to under two hours, which means that, if you wind up watching it, you're wasting slightly less of your life. Outside of a 20-minute stretch when things actually start to get interesting, Insurgent is a mediocre meandering movie that'll more likely put you to sleep than raise your heartbeat even a touch.
Rated 21 Mar 2015
obdurateObdurate
Rated 21 Mar 2015
55
18th
Woodley is still miscast but is a good actress, and everyone else does a good job (Watts was a welcome surprise 'cuz I love her). It's a dystopian film with very little to say and tries to hide that with action sequences that are mildly entertaining. It has the worst usage of slomo that I've seen in a while in one particular scene, and I would have liked the movie a little more if it wasn't for the final act. Very predictable with slow world-building, but I kinda liked it anyway.
Rated 21 Mar 2015
quez2goquez2go
Rated 09 Jan 2016
60
31st
The idea behind the society these films take place in is interesting and the sequences where characters have to pass simulation tests for the factions are cool. Much of this movie is nothing special but Shailene Woodley and Miles Teller are good young actors and Theo James is not quite bad despite being bland and generically handsome. The adult actors fill in their roles admirably, especially Kate Winslet. On the whole this is my favorite of the distopian teen film series.
Rated 09 Jan 2016
ducoDuco
Rated 13 Nov 2015
43
4th
Meh. While the first movie still somehow engaged the viewer and made you care for the characters, this movie's just a series of bad scenes where you either watch Theo's muscular body and determined gaze, Shailene cry, or Kate Winslet be a b***h. Accompanied by a very weak plot, it reminds me of the Hunger Games franchise a lot, but it's even worse than that.
Rated 13 Nov 2015
mwgerbmwgerb
Rated 24 Mar 2015
39
26th
Decent dystopia and action scenes, but as a whole it's a lot less enjoyable than the first entry since I find myself completely incapable of caring about any of the characters.
Rated 24 Mar 2015
superargoSuperargo
Rated 22 Mar 2015
71
66th
The first one was ponderous and self-important and pretty much insisted that we suspend our disbelief. In this one, I'm happy to report, shit actually happens. The heroes actually BAND TOGETHER and GET STUFF DONE and KILL BAD GUYS and WIN BATTLES--all stuff that they haven't managed to pull off in the HUNGER GAMES movies yet. And the slate gets wiped clean at the end, which leaves me excited for part three. I'm not quite on Team DIVERGENT yet, but good job, people.
Rated 22 Mar 2015
therealj_roTheRealJ-Ro
Rated 21 Mar 2015
60
25th
The best things I can say about this are as follows. I think it's better than "Divergent", Woodley is better (still a shade melodramatic, but shades are better than eclipses), and I actually ended up caring about certain things this time. Teller is 100% pure bag of dicks, but he's convincing. Winslet is even better. However, and I'm not one to cry "predictability" very often, I found the climax to be VERY predictable in its message and its execution -- WITHOUT having read the source material.
Rated 21 Mar 2015
djrossdjross
Rated 22 Sep 2016
45
34th
More interesting and involving than the first, even if it is ultimately about how the fate of the world depends on finding someone who can complete a computer game all the way up to the end of level five. This sequel is made with greater flair and is also less anti-Cleisthenes than the first instalment. This series does introduce genuine narrative surprises more than does something like THE HUNGER GAMES, but this seems to go unrecognised by audiences and critics.
Rated 22 Sep 2016
corbadCorbad
Rated 20 Jan 2016
45
10th
Scattered, bland, and uninteresting.
Rated 20 Jan 2016
damildamil
Rated 23 Nov 2015
45
17th
I found this one to be largely dull, and I didn't really care about what was happening. The characters are bland, the world is derivative, and only the smallest effort is applied to get the story moving. Woodley seemed to be phoning it in, and none of the other performances are noteworthy either. The 3rd act was a whole lot better than what came before it, and I'll admit that I am a little curious as to what's going to happen in Allegiant, but it was still far from being a good movie.
Rated 23 Nov 2015
indyatmnINDYATMN
Rated 11 Apr 2015
75
41st
Roth's already strained societal metaphor breaks this time around as the dystopia's designers aims r explained insuring the "rationale" behind this society makes no sense whatsoever. Still, there r some thrilling action scenes, interesting CGI sequences & Woodley's at her best, even if the script shortchanges her, never allowing us to believe that the character has legitimate cause to be so wracked with shame & experiencing all the emotional turmoil which the actress so convincingly delivers.
Rated 11 Apr 2015
waltermittyWalterMitty
Rated 28 Feb 2021
65
12th
I'm not sure i'm appreciating the direction that the story is following
Rated 28 Feb 2021
tevtev
Rated 16 Jul 2023
30
18th
don't remember it
Rated 16 Jul 2023
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 17 Mar 2017
55
14th
Dreary sequel loses much of the charm of the first instalment, for the most part thanks to Woodley's curiously uninspired performance, especially compared to her highly charismatic one in the previous episode. A well stocked supporting cast does its best with the rudimentary dialogue but is never given a chance to distinguish itself; some occasionally exciting action scenes stop the film from becoming a major bore.
Rated 17 Mar 2017
cowfrappecowfrappe
Rated 08 Apr 2016
50
17th
Somehow less-assured than its predecessor, this film relies even more on Woodley to hold it all together, and she can only do so much.
Rated 08 Apr 2016
ptraversPtravers
Rated 25 Feb 2016
3
16th
Insurgent stubbornly fails to surge.
Rated 25 Feb 2016
letskillrobotsletskillrobots
Rated 21 Oct 2016
6
14th
Too many nose bleeds for the FUTURE
Rated 21 Oct 2016
peaceanarchyPeaceAnarchy
Rated 04 Aug 2015
52
8th
Being a thematically inconsistent mess wouldn't be so bad if the film weren't such a bluntly constructed commentary on individuality and government. Or if it weren't also a narrative mess that is heavily in love with dream sequences. Or if it weren't terribly acted. It does at least keep things moving, so while it will make you roll your eyes it probably won't also make you fall asleep.
Rated 04 Aug 2015
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 12 Sep 2015
60
26th
Loses the small amount of traction the first film had. It's cliched, predictable and sometimes boring.
Rated 12 Sep 2015
hakkanarejohakkanarejo
Rated 25 Aug 2015
92
47th
I got to see an early screening of Insurgent, as it takes on a different path in many sequences that are nowhere in the book, while keeping other events similar. Overall, I enjoyed the movie. It is way more action packed than the Divergent, with lots of really cool special effects, it kept me glued to the screen the whole time! Due to the large scope of the movie's action sequences, this movie is pretty cool. I am looking forward to the third installment. I do recommend to fans of action films
Rated 25 Aug 2015
muutanetmuutanet
Rated 16 Jul 2015
6
4th
Take the first movie, Divergent, and drop the interest of the story to zero and you'll get the sequel for it. There was a cool pixelating effect, only the effect was used during half of the movie! Constantly! That much for the coolness.
Rated 16 Jul 2015
movie_opMovie-Op
Rated 22 Jun 2015
5
26th
The second installment takes a step back in the same way the book series did, but the plot is crafted into a slick action story that's pleasing in the moment.
Rated 22 Jun 2015
thorn969thorn969
Rated 23 Jan 2016
51
49th
It had some issues and weird major changes from the book... but I thought it was pretty decent.
Rated 23 Jan 2016
jessjess125Jessjess125
Rated 11 Aug 2022
41
17th
Meh
Rated 11 Aug 2022
seethruskinSeethruskin
Rated 23 Feb 2016
2
10th
I'm not sure why another two sequels are needed after this one. It kind of had an actual ending already.
Rated 23 Feb 2016
ryan_luedersRyan Lueders
Rated 23 May 2016
64
21st
inSURGEnt! Well, this movie didn't have the intensity of a surge soda commercial but it did have some interesting action sequences. What I can't get over in this series is how much it feels like it has ripped off ideas from everything around it. This has a Harry Potter feel, a Maze Runner feel, a Matrix feel...etc. The movie doesn't really have a good identity of its own. It is trying to be Divergent like in the movie, a bit of everything...
Rated 23 May 2016
daphnlDaph_NL
Rated 23 Jul 2016
68
85th
Obviously not as good as the first movie, but I still really liked Insurgent. I am still surprised by Woodley, she is perfect for the role of Tris. Winslet is great as always. The movie was entertaining. 68/100.
Rated 23 Jul 2016
hotsakehotsake
Rated 30 Jan 2019
49
29th
This was a mishmash of ideas from better movies and books all rolled into one half baked teen angst sci-fi empowerment story. The story was okay, the music serviceable, the acting completely terrible.
Rated 30 Jan 2019
dougcollinsDougCollins
Rated 22 Apr 2016
70
10th
Can't really find words to describe this. But I wonder if they will ever stop writing this crap. Probably not.
Rated 22 Apr 2016
wicheWiche
Rated 21 Mar 2015
57
31st
This is in fact a storyless and actionless story. In the Divergent Universe this means you end up with nothing at all and in dead an utterly boring movie. And I still don't care for Shailene Woodley. She isn't nowhere near what Daniel Ratcliff was to Harry Potter or what Jennifer Lawrence is to The Hunger Games.
Rated 21 Mar 2015
bookhouseboybookhouseboy
Rated 22 Jun 2018
23
13th
#18#, exp3, rw2, popcorn, prequel, cast
Rated 22 Jun 2018
luna6ixLuna6ix
Rated 30 Dec 2022
58
13th
While the whole series boasts a strong production and good effects, it's a sobering thought that a garbage plot just doesn't matter to the 15-25 demographic, that adept storytelling is a non-issue to the youth of today. Further expanding on the already simultaneously generic and wholly nonsense world built in the previous installment, the faults run deep in this one. But rest assured, if the prime features of Dauntless are pleather and what can only be described as frolicking, teens will pay.
Rated 30 Dec 2022
hamstercanhamstercan
Rated 21 Oct 2015
35
16th
ilkini aratanlardan
Rated 21 Oct 2015
brrrpbrrrp
Rated 19 Feb 2024
30
11th
The direction of this installment is slicker in a more conventional way, but, while not perfect in the first, it had an idiosyncratic flavour that complemented the subtext. That subtext is drastically reduced in the second film. I'm not satisfied with the way it's handled, but I would maintain that in some way this narrative and adaptation is an important one in political terms (the popular incarnations of political discussion must necessarily be somewhat watery to reach its audience I wager).
Rated 19 Feb 2024
christofchristof
Rated 07 Feb 2017
33
7th
YA blandness.
Rated 07 Feb 2017
dresd_r_e_s_
Rated 26 Jul 2015
1
8th
As expected, this was a bad sequel, but I had a feeling, even after the first movie, that this story wasn't going to be groundbreaking. I only watch these movies so that I can have a somewhat fair opinion about them. And my opinion? I think that it's a very poor movie. *Bad
Rated 26 Jul 2015
seenmanyseenmany
Rated 30 Dec 2016
76
36th
good action, that's it
Rated 30 Dec 2016
burkayadaligburkayadalig
Rated 22 Jul 2015
67
32nd
bland, nothing comparable to the first... feels like they tried to create Matrix for generation Z
Rated 22 Jul 2015
amazedemonamazedemon
Rated 29 Jul 2015
63
39th
Insurgent is bland. It's full of action, stunts and CGI; but there is no suspense. Actually one of my major complaints is that the film is more style over substance. Woodley's character is annoying at best and boring for the rest. The only character moments that are enjoyable are Teller's. While lots of "moments" drag, the film's saving grace is that its 2hr runtime doesn't feel that long.
Rated 29 Jul 2015
war_machineWar Machine
Rated 29 Feb 2016
80
77th
the end concept of the past civilization being behind all of it and testing them or whatever is really cool
Rated 29 Feb 2016
juntakinte99juntakinte99
Rated 15 Apr 2015
61
27th
The Divergent series is one of the weaker sci-fi dystopian YA adaptations/franchises. It has no philosophy, teachable moments, or a relatable entry point for young people. The world is very silly & illogical. And you don't get the otherworldly action that fanboy cinema deserves. It gets a marginal recommendation as Teller & Woodley make this interesting with their onscreen personas. Woodley, in particular continues great chemistry with 3 actors she's already had fantastic onscreen moments with.
Rated 15 Apr 2015
greenerGreener
Rated 25 Mar 2015
80
86th
One of my guilty pleasures. Thoroughly enjoyable and intriguing.
Rated 25 Mar 2015
annabananaAnnaBanana
Rated 16 Feb 2016
80
59th
Yeah this movie was way worse than the first, and didn't do the book justice either.
Rated 16 Feb 2016
theescapistTheEscapist
Rated 21 Mar 2015
75
77th
Completely took me by surprise since I didn't care much for the original. The cast is better and the characters more diverse. I liked the story a lot better as well and I felt connected to the world on screen from start to finish. Time flew by. There are some slow scenes but I thought they fitted well and were effective in what they were trying to accomplish. By the end I was ready to watch the next instalment, which will hopefully live up to the quality of this film.
Rated 21 Mar 2015
pluggedinPluggedIN
Rated 08 Apr 2015
50
50th
These themes may sound familiar to Christians. And Veronica Roth, author of The Divergent Series, is reported to be among that number. So perhaps it should be expected that we see mercy, sacrifice and forgiveness become important parts of this series. But are they enough to compensate for or redeem Insurgent's content issues? (pluggedin.com)
Rated 08 Apr 2015
nothingsgoodNothingsGood
Rated 09 Apr 2015
25
15th
How many Deus Ex Machinas and artificial lengthening can we have to arbitrarily add tension and plot? Maybe someone from Erudite should've written the book/script instead.
Rated 09 Apr 2015
ytadelYtadel
Rated 02 Sep 2015
1
5th
No offense to anyone who likes this series, but I honestly think this is the least interesting, least compelling, most nonsensical world of any genre film/TV series in recent memory. I don't even especially like Hunger Games, but it's a hell of a lot better than this. Just boring, boring stuff. I really think these movies suck.
Rated 02 Sep 2015
spaceflohspacefloh
Rated 01 Nov 2015
50
35th
eng; [The Divergent Series: Insurgent]; beatrice muss gegen ihre innere furcht ankämpfen um gegen das regieme zu bestehen, dabei schließen sie sich mit anderen fraktionslosen zu einer allianz zusammen.;
Rated 01 Nov 2015
moraesfelipemoraesfelipe
Rated 19 Jul 2015
20
1st
A film that ends with Kate Winslet dying from a headshot just should not exist.
Rated 19 Jul 2015
duderDuder
Rated 06 Aug 2015
40
3rd
You can check this movie out to find out how to shoot bad action sequences.. Not too boring but not a good movie...
Rated 06 Aug 2015
mrblacktronMrBlackTron
Rated 22 Jul 2015
74
62nd
Başarılı devam filmi. Hikaye ve karakter oturmuş olduğu için devam filmi çekmek avantajlıydı fakat yine de yenilikler ve sürprizlerle dolu dolu geçmesi sağlanmış. İlk filme göre tempo daha düşük çünkü daha fazla şey anlatmaya çalışıyor. Onun haricinde ilk filmle ilgili bütün görüşlerim aynen duruyor, hem kitapları hem de filmleri mutlaka izlemeli, mutlaka okumalı.
Rated 22 Jul 2015
comepeliculacomepelicula
Rated 03 Aug 2015
20
4th
Just a cold planned money maker and it shows, it lacks character and does not take chances, definitely a boring predictable movie. I really don't know what else I was expecting to watch really.
Rated 03 Aug 2015
supersuiSuperSui
Rated 24 Mar 2021
20
5th
Why the fuck would anyone want to watch this abomination of a sequel. They do the dumbest (or first) thing in the book for every scene. Nice and there is still one more movie to go
Rated 24 Mar 2021
arossaross
Rated 21 Nov 2016
64
22nd
A step down from the first, which probably means you don't need to watch unless you read the books
Rated 21 Nov 2016
benoliver999benoliver999
Rated 14 Aug 2015
20
6th
Insurgent is not a terrible film but it fails in all its endeavours to entertain or move the audience. In an age where one can watch almost anything that's ever been made Insurgent commits the biggest crime of all - wasting our time.
Rated 14 Aug 2015
cocoramirezCocoRamirez
Rated 28 Jul 2015
60
21st
Well, uhm..no. The only spectacular things were the special effects and Kate Winslet. Not because she's played particularly extraordinary here But because, you know, she's she.
Rated 28 Jul 2015
navinieanaviniea
Rated 11 Sep 2015
40
12th
It's not exactly that bad of a movie. It's just really bland and forgettable.
Rated 11 Sep 2015
begoniabolbegoniabol
Rated 19 Aug 2021
21
25th
Don't know if I've ever experienced this before, but the pacing was way too fast. The movie was all over the place and found it sometimes hard if things were a dream or real. So duuuuuuuuuuuumb.
Rated 19 Aug 2021
obtiosovobtiosov
Rated 21 Aug 2015
37
5th
Worse than Divergent. Woodley and Theo Jones had no chemistry whatsoever. And now Naomi Watts is in this as well as Kate Winslet. Just how much money do these producers have to spend on these really bad movies, I really wonder. My guess is slightly less than, but close to an average Marvel movie?
Rated 21 Aug 2015
wulfstanleeWulfstanLee
Rated 30 Nov 2015
30
25th
I liked this one a little bit better than the original. The pacing is much improved, especially in the second act, and the action is fresher. I still don't think Jai Courtney or Theo James have much presence as a villain or hero, respectively. I 'm also done with having these wonderful female actors playing boring bureaucratic villains (compare Winslet to some of the roles Jodie Foster and Sigourney Weaver have had of late).
Rated 30 Nov 2015
thedicemanTheDiceman
Rated 26 Jul 2015
45
25th
Passes the time.
Rated 26 Jul 2015
cagedwisdomcagedwisdom
Rated 26 Mar 2015
75
65th
Not as good as the first, but almost. Way too much forced exposition, and I still found it hard to follow during the first half hour trying to recall what happened in the first film. Also, glosses over a lot of major character decisions and the dialog is a bit hammy. That said, I like this series, and the production is really good overall. Woodley and Jones are a great leading couple. Still the best of the young adult wave.
Rated 26 Mar 2015
rossRoss
Rated 13 Jan 2017
65
64th
Weaker, but still interesting, both visually and the blatant sociology
Rated 13 Jan 2017
luordluord
Rated 06 Aug 2017
47
22nd
The story becomes increasingly formulaic and boring here, offering nothing new to the table and just plodding along.
Rated 06 Aug 2017
gkfilmgkfilm
Rated 19 Apr 2015
55
37th
Entertainment: 3.5/4 -- the camerawork was noticeable (and distracting) and the acting was subpar, although special FX were good. Spirit: 1.5/3. Sustainability: 0.5/3.
Rated 19 Apr 2015
ecitizeneCitizen
Rated 16 Aug 2015
50
49th
Shailene Woodley & Theo Jones make a great duo and they were sometimes mesmerizing. Personally, I would rather not have Kate Winslet as the super villain, but it worked. The story has a lot of action, but perhaps fewer moments to really connect with than the original. The CGI was both amazing & over used. I particularly liked how they undermined the theme at the end, pulling the rug out from under the story. However, it was entirely ridiculous that they had never explored beyond the wall.
Rated 16 Aug 2015
michaelsmichaels
Rated 11 Jul 2015
50
25th
Adults are assholes but luckily, we have teenagers to save the world. It has more action than the first movie but somehow manages to be more boring. Shailene Woodley is a good actress but playing a badass is not her forte.
Rated 11 Jul 2015
chrispalmChrisPalm
Rated 16 Jul 2015
67
16th
Same, same but same..
Rated 16 Jul 2015
catnipCatnip
Rated 10 Jul 2015
40
23rd
Ooooh man I think this one really is better now I didn't read the book. Still, it's a weak movie. Still tons of plot holes but that's just a given with the source material, long stretches of nothing-really-happens paired with too much angsty teen love stares between Woodley and James - ugh, please, no. The ending was 20 minutes of actually enjoyable action and leaves for a pleasant yet not that strong cliffhanger. I'll probably go see the last one just for closure anyways.
Rated 10 Jul 2015
lightning17Lightning17
Rated 16 Oct 2015
72
34th
Though it's visually appealing and the action is great, all in all Insurgent falls as just another young adult sci-fi flick that has an intriguing plot but not much else to separate it from the crowd.
Rated 16 Oct 2015
mistersplicemistersplice
Rated 30 Jan 2016
25
5th
2+ not worth your time
Rated 30 Jan 2016
roonay3kroonay3k
Rated 30 Mar 2015
70
63rd
As usual, the second installment is not as good as the original. This was also the case here. Iv'e got a feeling the 2 next movies will be even worse. Don't get me wrong it wasn't bad but i tought the original was awsome. In Insurgent there wasn't really anything new that intrigued me and I was hoping to se more of the big fight which the whole movie was leading up to.
Rated 30 Mar 2015
hajikarimihajikarimi
Rated 09 Aug 2015
90
59th
1340: i like it!
Rated 09 Aug 2015
punqPUNQ
Rated 19 Jul 2015
40
57th
Divergent 2. Saw Divergent (2014) in the cinema and acceptable entertainment. Insurgent (2015) however struggles to find a feasible story and simply doesn't engage all that much. A much lesser 2nd part of a 4-part series. Might build up to something more exciting for the franchise climax, but judging by Insurgent they better have a much more spectacular game plan for Allegiant (2016/2017) to hit that peak because this one only helped lower expectations.
Rated 19 Jul 2015
jordanligejordanlige
Rated 22 Mar 2015
100
51st
very good
Rated 22 Mar 2015
barnowlBarnowl
Rated 18 Jul 2020
72
17th
Better than most Disney, especially as a series.
Rated 18 Jul 2020
bentienbentien
Rated 16 Dec 2019
38
14th
This franchise went downhill pretty fast.
Rated 16 Dec 2019
wezzoWezzo
Rated 24 Mar 2015
60
11th
A substantial step down from Divergent, a tedious and unexciting mess that meanders relentlessly. The cast are still doing good work, but there's so little to get excited about here.
Rated 24 Mar 2015
ikkegoemikkeikkegoemikke
Rated 06 Aug 2015
60
52nd
I said I wouldn't watch the second part, but still did. I'm glad I did cause this is one action-packed,CGI filled part of the "Divergent" series. My opinion here : http://opinion-as-a-moviefreak.blogspot.com/2015/08/insurgent-2015.html
Rated 06 Aug 2015
vassagoVassago
Rated 29 Mar 2015
73
64th
A lot better than Divergent, pleasantly surprised for that. But the script is so fake, honestly, it takes out all the wow factor for the visual work of the movie.. and Woodley should just stop being poor man's J-Law.
Rated 29 Mar 2015
lenaclena_c
Rated 18 Sep 2017
2
17th
Apparently I thought the first movie was "terrible". Then I watched it again and for some reason I suddenly thought it was OK. Then I watched this one and it didn't get worse. But if you compare it to Hunger Games you will be disapointed... *Okay
Rated 18 Sep 2017
joelwatchesmoviesjoelwatchesmovies
Rated 29 Mar 2015
6
43rd
The second installment looks even better than the first with some really cool scenes from the "sims" in particular. Woodley is solid again and her character's personal plight remains captivating, while Teller is fantastic as a bad guy/good guy/jerk and Winslet is again a great villain. All of that said, the film's overload of easy and implausible plot movements throughout distracts from the great characters and prevents it from reaching the same level as its predecessor.
Rated 29 Mar 2015

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...