Interstellar (2014)
A group of explorers make use of a newly discovered wormhole to surpass the limitations on human space travel and conquer the vast distances involved in an interstellar voyage. (imdb)
Cast and Information
Directed By: Christopher Nolan
Written By: Christopher Nolan, Jonathan Nolan
Starring: Michael Caine, Ellen Burstyn, Matt Damon, John Lithgow, Matthew McConaughey, Anne Hathaway, Wes Bentley, Jessica Chastain, Casey Affleck, Topher Grace, Timothée Chalamet, Mackenzie Foy
Genres: Drama, Sci-fi, Adventure
Where to Stream
Loading...
Interstellar belongs to 107 collections
1. IMDB Top 250 (public: moderated by ppinocchio - 120 stars)
2. Mindfuck (public: moderated by Mockus - 84 stars)
3. Time Travel (public: moderated by mpowell - 42 stars)
4. Passed the Bechdel Test (public: moderated by geohawk - 28 stars)
5. List: Empire's five star movies (public: moderated by KasperL - 24 stars)
6. IMDb Top 250 Complete (public: moderated by Jorg - 23 stars)
7. Hard Sci-fi (public - 19 stars)
8. Intellectual Sci-Fi (public: moderated by BeeDub - 17 stars)
9. Edgar Wright 1000 Favorite Movies (Aug 2016) (public: moderated by Aron Ericson - 16 stars)
10. Spacecraft setting (public: moderated by djross - 15 stars)
11. Most-ranked film of each year (on Criticker) (public: moderated by nauru - 13 stars)
12. Films available in HD (public: moderated by kubricksucks - 12 stars)
13. Future (public: moderated by djross - 12 stars)
14. Best of criticker: Sci-fi (public: moderated by avgcrtckr - 11 stars)
15. Best of criticker: Mystery (public: moderated by avgcrtckr - 8 stars)
16. Alien planets (public: moderated by edkrak - 5 stars)
17. Voiceover narration (public: moderated by djross - 5 stars)
18. Availability: Netflix Canada (public: moderated by geohawk - 5 stars)
19. Near future (public: moderated by djross - 4 stars)
20. Over 10000 ratings on Criticker (public: moderated by peyrin - 4 stars)
21. Triumvirate of Oscar Winning Actors/Actresses in the Cast (3 or more) (public: moderated by Dunstan-xxx - 4 stars)
22. Best of criticker: Action (public: moderated by avgcrtckr - 3 stars)
23. Worldwide box office over $500,000,000 (public: moderated by djross - 3 stars)
24. Oscar: Best Visual Effects (public: moderated by BeeDub - 3 stars)
25. Masters of Light: Modern Cinematography (public: moderated by DeadFox - 3 stars)
26. Interstellar (public: moderated by djross - 2 stars)
27. MovieMeter.nl Top 250 (public: moderated by Jorg - 2 stars)
28. Best of criticker: 2014 (public: moderated by avgcrtckr - 2 stars)
29. father-daughter relationship (public: moderated by livelove - 2 stars)
30. Cinema Sins (public: moderated by Phantom Nook - 2 stars)
31. INFJ movies (public: moderated by sboden - 2 stars)
32. INTJ Movies and Shows (public: moderated by BeeDub - 2 stars)
33. IMAX (public: moderated by iceblox - 1 star)
34. Hans Zimmer (composer) (public: moderated by nauru - 1 star)
35. Best of criticker: Adventure (public: moderated by avgcrtckr - 1 star)
36. Journey to the unknown (public: moderated by edkrak - 1 star)
37. film puanlamalarım (public - 1 star)
38. 4k Ultra HD discs (public: moderated by dumbjaw - 1 star)
39. Amazon Prime Latam (public: moderated by Roman_Herbom - 1 star)
40. Wow! Five or more Oscar winning actors/ actresses in the cast. (public: moderated by MzeeShikamu - 1 star)
41. Netflix Sverige (public: moderated by Jakobostgren - 1 star)
42. Just Top Movies Public (public: moderated by AlbertE)
43. wanna see (public: moderated by canelledeb)
44. FThisMovie Overrated (public)
45. FThisMovie Doug's Top 10 (public)
46. 2014 US Theatrical (public: moderated by DrBroel)
47. Legendary (public: moderated by djross)
48. Ratings (public: moderated by cheapthrills)
49. One Word Titled Films (public: moderated by Dunstan-xxx)
50. Top (what I consider to be) "hard" sci-fi films (public: moderated by cscopeland79)
51. Like Stories of Old (public: moderated by BeeDub)
52. Available on Divicast (public: moderated by Dunstan-xxx)
53. Big-time Hollywood science fiction (private: djross - 7 stars)
54. Top 3000 movies with the most votes on IMDb (private: fanfic - 5 stars)
55. Best by different standards (private: sesito71 - 5 stars)
56. Djross science fiction movie of the year (private: djross - 3 stars)
57. 87th Academy Awards: Nominated (private: okayfrog - 3 stars)
58. Sarsanlar (private: Ozancan - 3 stars)
59. Top 1000 movies with the most votes on IMDb (private: fanfic - 3 stars)
60. Cinema, dream, desire, memory (private: djross - 2 stars)
61. Top 2000 movies with the most votes on IMDb (private: fanfic - 2 stars)
62. IMDb Top 250 (2 years) (private: sianaa - 1 star)
63. Göz Nuru (private: Ozancan - 1 star)
64. Tekrar Tekrar İzlenesi (private: Ozancan - 1 star)
65. Cult classic SF for my wife (private: Temptershell - 1 star)
66. IMDB Top 250 (private: Jason212 - 1 star)
67. Blank Check with Griffin & David (private: TychoCelchuu - 1 star)
68. Djross seen at the cinema (private: djross)
69. My DVDs/Blu-rays, for better or worse (private: Actionberg)
70. Movies to See (private: gsb)
71. Visti al cinema (private: Rubens)
72. My Blu-rays (private: Kavu)
73. Movies I've Seen In Theaters (private: SirStuckey)
74. zae's DVDs & Blurays (private: zae)
75. Hemma (private: QPR74)
76. Peliculas que tengo (private: escarta)
77. Bajar (private: escarta)
78. Curzon Ripon (private: mandy)
79. Just Top Movies Private (private: AlbertE)
80. 2014 Seen in theaters (private: fartblaster)
81. My Movies (private: Thilerion)
82. Djross seen at an IMAX theatre (private: djross)
83. 2014 (private: EbruCavdarli)
84. Films I saw in the cinema (private: Malcym)
85. Movie Collection (private: BeeDub)
86. The AV Club 20 best films of 2014 (private: TychoCelchuu)
87. 2010s best movies (private: ccllanos)
88. Sine-Müzik (private: Ozancan)
89. Bilimkurgu Mucizeleri (private: Ozancan)
90. Available to watch (private: Paxton)
91. P. Watched List (private: nnraiden)
92. Tom's Movies (private: tomwalsh)
93. to-do (private: chxflx)
94. My Movie Collection (private: elhenzo)
95. Djross major works of science fiction (private: djross)
96. Ayıla Bayıla İzlenen Filmler (private: Ozancan)
97. Sinemada izledigim filmler (private: Bunyas)
98. seen (private: gamzeknc)
99. Science Fiction and Fantasy Society (private: BurakOzturk)
100. My Favorite Sci-Fi (private: cscopeland79)
101. SEEN IN CINEMA (private: wicked치킨)
102. C-Snacks (private: cantahta)
103. My ratings (private: tpbradbury)
104. Academy Museum BEHOLD Exhibit - Sci Fi Montage (private: gyrro7)
105. must watch (private: gintokidai)
106. IMDb Top 50 (private: amazedemon)
107. Blu-ray Collection (private: TripEuphoric)
Browse the full list of collections
| Stars | User | Rating | |
| 29 |  |
gorguts | 20 16% |
|
A 3 hour origin story about a bookshelf.
|
|||
| 26 |  |
BillyShears | 80 77% |
|
Uninspired casting of Topher Grace as the black hole.
|
|||
| 22 |  |
KasperL | 50 30% |
|
The first movie in Nolan's incredibly accomplished filmography to receive a thumbs down from me. As well as warranting a big fat middle finger, too. I don't particularly mind the sappy message, but I have a huge problem with thought provoking themes being underdeveloped and, ultimately, abandoned. They should have called it The Overambitious, Predictable, Pretentious, and Far From Stellar Mystery of the Morsing Bookcase Ghost. What a letdown! The best thing about it was the design of the robots.
|
|||
| 18 |  |
NothingsGood | 35 27% |
|
According to the theory of relativity, that's roughly 21 years of my life I'll never get back.
|
|||
| 18 |  |
eCitizen | 95 99% |
|
Huge excellent cast. Interesting, intelligent, exciting and engaging story. Great acting and dialog. Wonderful video, music, CGI and SFX. Fun to watch, even though very long. A few awe inspiring moments and if you can accept wormholes is at least somewhat plausible science . But, I didn't like the spooky messages in the dust. A little mushy at the end, but it was good closure to the story. Some flaws, but mostly good.
|
|||
| 17 |  |
Suture Self | 6 54% |
|
Not only does Nolan force you to suspend your belief in his ability to write a coherent story, you're forced to suspend your belief in the value of entertainment as well, slogging through 3 hours of tortured analogies, kitschy science, and low-grade philosophizing that's clouded in meaninglessness. A few magnificent space scenes allude to what might have been, but alas, that version of Interstellar is far away in another dimension. Note: My opinion of this movie has improved in hindsight.
|
|||
| 16 |  |
mwgerb | 73 89% |
|
2001's plot, by way of Contact's emotional through-line, with just a hint of Sunshine's disappointing villain / third act twist. Nolan's biggest flaws are on display, but so are his greatest strengths, along with some new ambition and emotional power. Some may claim Nolan can't match Kubrick's visual language and instead relies on overdone exposition, and though that's partially true, you can hear a few visuals very explicitly say "I dare you to watch this IMAX shot on your fucking cell phone."
|
|||
| 15 |  |
frederic_g54 | 7 57% |
|
(after repeat viewings) The more I ponder this film, the more annoyed I become with its contrived exposition, temporal incoherence and blatant disregard of scientific integrity. More impressive, however, are the film's often breathtaking visuals which, although not matched by a Kubrickian sense of composition, evoke an unmistakable feeling of awe and a throbbing sense of uncertain exhilaration. A serviceable adventure albeit not the space epic I was hoping for.
|
|||
| 15 |  |
Barthalen | 63 42% |
|
2001: a Gravity Armageddon
|
|||
| 15 |  |
Jerky | 70 89% |
|
Coolest part about this film was not knowing the casting (besides McConaughey), then when I first heard TARS, I said to myself, "hmmm...they got Matt Damon for the voice", then when I heard CASE, I thought "hmmm..Casey Afleck is the voice for this one".....then the film proceeded to blow my mind as both Damon and Affleck showed up on screen. Looking at the credits, I learn that neither voiced either robot. Then I realized the tv was off the whole time!!! And now I'm standing right behind you.
|
|||
| 13 |  |
CMonster | 55 32% |
|
When you go sci-fi you kinda need to make a choice: science or themes. Being that none of this stuff exists, things always travel to the realm of pseudoscience, but I'm willing to suspend disbelief. But when you push the science/pseudoscience hard and then throw it all away because The Power of Love by Heuy Lewis and the News, it completely ruins what you built up. Had some great moments, but the third act took a steamy 80's synth shit. (No offense to Mr. Lewis, your music is fine)
|
|||
| 13 |  |
DavidBlast | 70 65% |
|
'Interstellar' is a hard movie to rate. As a blockbuster the story is a cut above the rest, but Nolan's lack of visual flair detracts from the spectacle. Viewed as hard sci-fi the third act is an incredible letdown, a dumb man's '2001: A Space Odyssey', set in a world where they have invented funny robots, but not the technology of greenhouses. What the Nolans attempted cannot be done. Hard-fi and Blockbusters don't mix. But should they be punished for their ambition?
|
|||
| 12 |  |
Vdecraim | 75 57% |
|
Another teeth-grinder from Nolan. The overwhelming cinematic experience mostly succeeds in hiding the many mistakes and scientific bullshit that Interstellar so blatantly throws at you. But after subsequent and thorough viewings, the outright arrogance with which this film was created becomes clear. Smothered with pseudo-science and philosophy, filled with false sentiment for the sake of cheap emotional involvement, and even boasting the occasional sensational action sequence.
|
|||
| 12 |  |
elmakebabi | 40 11% |
|
A cliche and stupid movie that pretends to be a smart one. No character development whatsoever. I know you will love it if you never heard wormholes or theory of relativity. But face it, it's overused in documentaries and definitely Nolan didn't invent it! Argh!
|
|||
| 12 |  |
lisa- | 3 30% |
|
i have never disliked nolan's exposition. i have never disliked his detatchment. i have always liked his visuals, which here are very good, and could have been extraordinary if not constantly obscured by spaceship parts and impatient editing. what ruins this is something he usually avoids: love philosophy. if this initially was a celebration of exploration, it isn't by the end. it is about love. that is fine, but once one starts talking about love as the fifth dimension, i step off the ship.
|
|||
| 11 |  |
Okkervil | 91 97% |
|
Of course any film that throws itself at temporal phenomena as unfearingly as "Interstellar" does open itself up for criticism. But you really shouldn't care. I loved this. Its themes, its visuals, its sound and its cast. This is big spectacle, Chris Nolan style, and very simply I am always up for a bit of that.
|
|||
| 10 |  |
Tony Irwin | 50 46% |
|
I was absolutely engrossed for the first 45 minutes or so, but soon realised nothing was going to happen. By the time we reached the ending it seemed laughable to me, like a short story from a sci-fi anthology in a school library. Like all "Odyssey" genre films, there's a danger that the episodes between the first and last ones feel disconnected and ultimately pointless. That's how I felt - that the middle two hours I'd spent gazing at beautiful images were disconnected, dreary, and pointless.
|
|||
| 10 | theficionado | 50 48% |
|
|
Possibly the most left-brained filmmaker at work today, Nolan tacks his not-insignificant themes (what is love? what is mankind's destiny?) to a narrative so beholden to a set of rules that, self-defeatingly, it runs slipshod over character & idea alike (see: Inception). Judging by how he shoehorns Dylan Thomas into his script 20 times, Nolan thinks he has something important to say. Remove the narrative tricks, & we have a rudimentary time travel story w/ a quaint moral about parental devotion.
|
|||
| 10 |  |
Leonardis | 96 91% |
|
I would go as far to call this pretty groundbreaking, Interstellar, while it may not appeal to everybody, is quite possibly one of the most visually splendid movies we'll get in years. McConaughey is good and this movie served up quite a few twists and surprises and it was intense above all. Also has an emotion grasp to it. Writing and directing are solid as usual from Christopher Nolan and an incredible music score. Worth a watch for his fans and just in general.
|
|||
| 10 |  |
FrederikA | 60 50% |
|
Credit where it's due: Nolan is ambitious, and momentarily throughout the film, we are presented with big ideas and beautiful artistic interpretations of the universe. Unfortunately Nolan treats the space exploration with the same lack of enthusiasm as a tired tourist guide and instead focuses on the human drama, which could have worked, had the characters been more human less plot propellant, making the climatic shift from physics to metaphysics particularly shallow.
|
|||
| 9 |  |
Superargo | 56 38% |
|
A tone-deaf, borderline laughable first hour. A brilliant, lush, gripping space opera in the middle. Then one of the most ludicrous, most ill-conceived, most flat-out frigging dumb wrapups you'll ever see. Might be worth watching for that genuinely awesome midsection, but it's basically pulp, and nowhere near as Profound-n-Beautiful as it thinks it is.
|
|||
| 9 |  |
Kojiless | 84 88% |
|
The fifth dimension is love. If you threw up a little in your mouth after reading that...you'll probably still enjoy Interstellar, but I recommend packing a couple breath mints.
|
|||
| 9 |  |
Filligan | 95 92% |
|
Interstellar has shortcomings, but in such an immense display they fall by the wayside. This is the first Nolan film that's felt its length for me, but that's not necessarily bad because it also happens to be his dramatically heaviest film. He achieves something he's often been criticized for lacking: pathos. It's beautifully and uniquely done, as expected, and McConaughey trumps his Oscar-winning role with this performance. This succeeds where Gravity failed: it's a spectacle with a heart.
|
|||
| 8 |  |
cclxndr | 95 95% |
|
If I was 15 years old and this was my 2001, I would be completely blown away. But I'm not, and it's not. The comparison to Kubrick is unfair, but understood: a multidimensional adventure, with honest humanity the whole way through. Nolan also successfully blends indie-film intimacy and blockbuster thematics. This is a massive movie with incredible creative intentions; my appreciation for the attempt overshadows the flaws. An immense watch, especially in 70mm IMAX.
|
|||
| 8 |  |
spleen | 83 80% |
|
In 2014 the cast of "Signs" decided to do an amateur theater performance. Unfortunately the production fell apart when no one could agree if they were remaking "Solaris" or "Contact".
|
|||
| 8 | sbirko | 40 26% |
|
|
One of the most well-crafted pieces of anti-environmental propaganda I've ever had the disgust to lay eyes on. No wonder it is so popular. It is telling the audience that they do not have to change a thing, they'll be saved by a hero and technology in either case. It is not you, movie-watcher, who is doomed, but this unconscious rock you call Earth, so carry on. thumbs down. way down.
|
|||
| 8 |  |
BeeDub | 92 84% |
|
A flawed masterpiece that shows that even Nolan's lesser works are huge in ambition, scope, and craft. Definitely rewards repeat viewings.
|
|||
| 7 |  |
d_drudges | 30 30% |
|
A bloated graphics demo with the most contrived second half you're likely to see. Similarly to Gravity, the movie has lots of pretty scenes, which might have something to do with its setting. The delusions of channeling Stanley Kubrick are a laugh. Speaking of trying to reproduce great things without their context, Philip Glass might want a word with Hans Zimmer after this one.
|
|||
| 7 |  |
ehk2 | 1 0% |
|
just hate Nolan; or Nolan-lovers should I say! constant bombardment of science humbug (correspondence to theory is not the point). contrast it with the silence of 2001! You science-geniuses all needed this information overload to accept a not-even average story as a cinematic masterpiece. How I hope the days come when this movie shall share its honorable place in the dustbin of history alongside Battlefield Earth or Armageddon etc, when the Nolan fanboys and its industrial franchise fade away
|
|||
| 6 |  |
Timon88 | 36 27% |
|
A bit like "2001: A Space Odyssey" meets "The Matrix" (and me comparing something to "The Matrix" is NOT a good thing). In other words, it's like "2001" with none of the artistic vision and a whole lot of stupid explanations for shit and WAY too frantic a plot. The one or two moments it calms down, it actually becomes almost watchable.
|
|||
| 6 |  |
Nathan S | 2 21% |
|
A fascinating and high concept, full of spectacular visuals but suffering from flaws typical of Nolan. The plot is over-engineered, attempting to reconcile long-winded and sterile exposition with puzzle-piece revelations. It's rigid, allowing no room for ambiguity or subtlety, nor for the wonder that outer space inspires. Not that it's cold or heartless, because there's plenty of metaphysical nonsense about love saving the world. Beneath the hard-science surface is a grossly sentimental film.
|
|||
| 6 |  |
Honest_Thief | 3 31% |
|
The grandiose spectacle of space venture is marred by Nolan's increasing intent on sterile exposition and his usual stuffing: inspirational one-liners and ancillary characters, that are anything but. All this hollows the emotional connections for a movie that relies so much on it.
Still, on those rare moments, you can see the shimmer of brilliance; unfortunately, I can't shake the feeling as if someone saw 2001 and thought it could improve by dumping more exposition.
|
|||
| 6 |  |
juntakinte99 | 77 53% |
|
This is 3 hours of Star Wars & 2001 Gen-X Film Bro Love where a farm boy teams with an old man and sassy robot for consciousness changing space exploration. Nolan's tropes are annoying here; namely the arguments on suppressing emotion and bad women characters putting on a dramatic competition to outcrazy Ophelia. The Philip Glass-style soundtrack creates a cool elegiac commentary on humanity. Recommended, but I would've enjoyed it more if it weren't marketed as the Greatest Cinematic Event Ever.
|
|||
| 6 | jymkata | 55 30% |
|
|
(Read in Christopher Nolan's awful England accent) NOLAN: OY! LOOK AT ME! I'M FOOKIN KUBRICK! OI'VE GOT A WEIRD FOOKIN SOUNDTRACK AND ME EDITIN'S ALL TE COCK. But I've also put in a story about t' family trauma so all yowse regular tossers can appreciate it. I'm a fookin genius, me.
|
|||
| 6 |  |
thehynes | 58 56% |
|
And in the news today,area man who was found hiding in the bookshelf of a young girl's room states that he got there by falling through a black hole whilst trying to save the human race.Next up,sports & the weather
|
|||
| 6 |  |
cgcore | 45 22% |
|
if you really loved this movie, then we have a problem with you.. every nolan film gets worse than the former one and here is where we stand now. ordinary, cliche, nothing special.. excessive, always wannabe epic music usage (also sounds like ripped off from early philip glass), failure on character development etc. hard to find something to like in this flick. total let down.. unfortunately nolan keeps on getting more mediocre in every movie. what a disappointment.. (despite IMAX!)
|
|||
| 6 |  |
MArkjp | 60 41% |
|
Mankind must abandon earth, proposes the Nolan brothers. Nolan brothers must abandon feature films and travel to other formats to find space (AHAHAHAHA!) for their larger than feature film length stories, proposes I. Also: cornfields and the whole book thingy makes this more M. Night-ish than need be.
|
|||
| 6 |  |
Matthew Parkinson (CineMarter) | 60 62% |
|
If someone were to ask me whether or not Interstellar was worth watching, I would say that it was. I would preface that answer by saying that it's too long and that it often attempted to be an emotional roller coaster that wound up being more like a carousel. There are still highs and lows, but they're more predictable and less intense. Still, it has a few terrific performances -- that make it far more watchable than it would be with lesser actors -- and it looks beautiful from start to finish.
|
|||
| 6 |  |
dunbar | 70 44% |
|
Perhaps this film's a case of the less said the better. It's agonising to think of the potential that was wasted, some gorgeous visuals and occasional epic bursts from the musical score come crashing down to earth with some flat dialogue, characters and plot. Anything that isn't pretty, shiny and spacey is a morass of sentimental slush. The ending rivals The Abyss for worst alternative plot idea instead of just killing off one of your main characters.
|
|||
| 6 | bharath | 65 41% |
|
|
Considering this a movie from Christopher Nolan I expected so much more. It is a scifi movie, and I am willing to accept the science of this movie. Nolan tried way to hard to create way too many twists and long dramatic speeches backed by voodoo science. Finally, the last nail in the coffin what doesnt make sense is explained by all powerful love. The movie gets a higher rating than what it deserves because of the visual effects. The movie is just way too long. The worst Nolan movie.
|
|||
| 6 |  |
cagedwisdom | 100 90% |
|
Some parts are a bit thin, as has been the case with Nolan a few times before. He's very good at packaging plot holes in a way that makes them seem less like plot holes and more like mysteries. That said, I couldn't care less, I loved this and it's the best film of 2014. The visuals, music, acting - amazing. An absolute spectacle. This is exactly what a blockbuster should be, though I wouldn't have minded a different ending. Adventurous and awe-inspiring, Gravity wishes it had been this movie.
|
|||
| 6 |  |
SirSass | 70 69% |
|
It is a 3 hour movie about McConaughey being a spooky ghost that haunts a little girls bookshelf.
|
|||
| 5 |  |
Langelund (CinemaZone.dk) | 40 24% |
|
Narnia in space - with southern accent. Was Nolan just never as smart as we've been led to believe?
|
|||
| 5 |  |
hellboy76 | 75 92% |
|
An achievement in capturing the pioneering spirit of man, and the desire to continue existence (from several different standpoints) no matter what. Yes there is some hokey philosophical nonsense and the comparisons to 2001 are well deserved, yet it still maintains its own identity and legitimacy as a story. Not for everyone, especially if you need a traditional story arc of action and reaction, but I felt it well worth the time spent.
|
|||
| 5 |  |
Icarus | 60 27% |
|
Ambitious, to be sure, but ultimately compromised by its mawkish narrative, Interstellar fails to rise above its mismatched collection of stunning set pieces and it's characters nonsensical responses to one another. For every invigorating moment (such as entering the wormhole), there are one or two bizarre narrative moves (a character's unconscionable lie, another character's deathbed rejection of someone else).
|
|||
| 5 | Launch | 83 77% |
|
|
I liked it a lot up until the last 10-15 minutes where it seemed Nolan was only interested in satisfying the audience rather than the story. Still a pretty imaginative film although the comparisons to 2001 are completely insane. Nice homage with TARS being monolith-shaped though.
|
|||
| 5 |  |
Ocelot | 65 64% |
|
A lot of this movie is complete gobbledygook, which is fine, considering it's founded on science fantasy -- we were never going to solve wormholes through a Christopher Nolan movie. At the same time, a lot of it is boring and redundant gobbledygook, often amounting to no more than "people, space, woah." The space scenes are magnificent, though, and the actors get far more to do performance wise than I was expecting. A solid movie, but alas, what could have been...
|
|||
| 5 |  |
Nroo | 72 49% |
|
KOYAAAANISQATSIIIIII
|
|||
| 5 |  |
bowfinger | 50 42% |
|
I always suspected Matt Damon to be a dick in real life, but man, this is unacceptable. And for the record, love is not the fifth dimension, it's the fifth element, how do you screw that up??
|
|||
| 5 |  |
meltemcilik | 60 32% |
|
it's overrated...
|
|||
| 5 |  |
Alex Watkins | 4 70% |
|
In the year of '39 came a ship in from the blue/ The volunteers came home that day/ And they bring good news of a world so newly born/ Though their hearts so heavily weigh/ For the earth is old and grey, to a new home we'll away/ But my love this cannot be/ For so many years have gone, though I'm older but a year/ Your mother's eyes in your eyes cry to me. Don't you hear my call, though you're many years away?
Don't you hear me calling you?
|
|||
| 5 |  |
Paxton | 70 63% |
|
It took eight years but they were finally able to adapt Gnarls Barkley's "The Boogie Man" to feature length.
|
|||
| 5 |  |
mattorama12 | 84 93% |
|
The biggest surprise to me is that this was probably Nolan's most emotionally effective film. Perhaps interestingly, then, the biggest weakness is that it goes overboard into the cheese at times. The "science" could certainly be criticized and the plot holes were many, but it swept me up enough to enjoy the ride. The visuals were pretty great and the sound design was effective (apparently the mix didn't sound too great in IMAX, but I didn't see it in IMAX).
|
|||
| 4 |  |
djross | 65 70% |
|
Opening shot indicates this is an ode to the human adventure and its physical, intellectual and technical pioneers, playing on fears of this adventure's end. But it is also an engagement with (even update of) 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY (and in the end with SOLARIS), and is quite cinematically and thematically ambitious, though the Nolans fail to avoid silliness and low-grade philosophising about love that seems light-years from either Kubrick or Tarkovsky. The visual imagination is mostly impressive.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
Boxcars | 6 32% |
|
"Interstellar" starts out promising enough with its strong visuals and effective (if overbearing) score, but a saccharine script and ludicrous final act nearly results in this film completely incinerating upon re-entry.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
Pickpocket | 4 35% |
|
You could forgive all the pseudoscience if this story had any heart but it doesn't and that's sadly what Nolan is turning in to - an emotionless filmmaker who desperately wants you to know how clever he is. Why so serious? Anne Hathaway gives legitimately the worst monologue about love in film history. He also needs to stop using mystery as a gimmick. He's slowly turning into M Night, people just haven't caught on yet. Also Murphy's law is anything that can go wrong, will go wrong. Fail.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
doctordave | 68 43% |
|
Like so many films, visually stunning but the plot is complete nonsense. Found i didnt care about most of the characters and the ending contains a lot of deus ex machina.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
dylanwilson6 | 90 96% |
|
The ending felt oddly tied off, but there's no denying the Visual and Acting strength that this film posses.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
CHR1S | 70 50% |
|
If you're looking for a thought-provoking movie, for true art and for philosophy, watch 2001: A Space Odyssey. If you, however, are looking for CGI and drama..
|
|||
| 4 |  |
TheEscapist | 87 96% |
|
Another impressive Nolan film. The nearly 3 hour runtime was easily justified and even now I feel like a lot of ideas were introduced somewhere but never followed up on, probably because there was no more time. The scientific accuracy or logical plot consistency of the film often had to make way for spiritual and cinematic moments, which is something you'll just have to accept. Surprising score by Hans Zimmer, it really helped with the awe-inspiring and emotional feel this film gave me. Immense!
|
|||
| 4 |  |
filmfreak88 | 70 54% |
|
So yes, Interstellar is a very flawed film that I enjoyed and wouldn't hesitate to consider as essential cinematic experience. It offers the best and worst of Nolan's attributes from its awe-inspiring visual command and sense of scope to the relatively satisfying but much spottier emotional through-line and clunky exposition. Few directors currently working today challenge the mold of blockbuster filmmaking the way Nolan does so it's easy to admire, if not exactly love, this ambitious endeavor
|
|||
| 4 | Mechalex | 50 35% |
|
|
Clever but cold. For all the talk of love being the most powerful force in the universe it was a limp, unemotional thing. Tries for Kubrick, ends up zombie Spielberg.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
Prophet92 | 99 98% |
|
Interstellar is the most ambitious science fiction movie since "2001", and like its closest neighbor, it's dense, complicated, and in places hard to comprehend, but it's also a tremendous accomplishment that stands out as one of the most striking films of the last few years. Some will find it a tad too detached, but there is still a powerful emotional core to the film that pulls it all together. The ending could be better, but the movie is still (Inter)Stellar.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
MadMan | 100 97% |
|
A stirring and emotionally charged sci-fi film noir space adventure. Currently the best film I've seen from 2014 and is Nolan at his most ambitious, building upon previous successes.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
kickpuncher | 74 27% |
|
Too smart for its own good, Interstellar falters from an unnecessarily, over-complicate plot and a very poorly mixed (was it intentional?) sound mix. However, Matthew McConaughey delivers an exceptional performance that will ensure you stick with the adventure and remained entertained throughout.
|
|||
| 4 | Lightning17 | 86 98% |
|
|
A glorious spectacle, Interstellar is a deeply profound and thought provoking film masterpiece that leaves you wondering... and wondering... and wondering what you just watched and how you can go back to normal life afterward. Even though it can be a bit of a tangled mess of confusion, it is brilliantly acted and filmed, and dares to explore the question of love and the makeup of the universe.
|
|||
| 4 | Reesie_Aries | 74 9% |
|
|
I LOVED this movie, and then absolutely hated it. It had a wonderful, outstanding beginning and middle, and then it's like the writer got stoned off his ass, drank an entire twelve pack by himself, and just decided to write a NEW movie, but just for the ending. It went from "Alright, this is pseuoscience, but it's beautiful so let's roll with it!" to "What the hell...? ...Wait, what? Uhhh...."
It feels like two different movies in one. The first is great, and the second shouldn't exist.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
moraesfelipe | 55 44% |
|
While it's hard to really care about Nolan's harsh self-explanatory script, I admit that some parts got me -- maybe because they carry such a strong heritage from the sci-fi films I love the most, such as Close Encounters and Abyss. There is such a striking sense of grandeur here, with a feeling of both emptiness -- hey, Earth is past now -- and hope -- what we will get out there? who's there helping us? Too bad Nolan brutalizes most of this trying to rationalize this scary, awesome, mystery.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
Josie19 | 62 27% |
|
Overly long, stunning visuals, confusing, tortured, convoluted, waaay too long, awe-inspiring, cliche-filled, fabulous score, pointless, disconnected, run time too long, sappy, weak characterizations, incoherent, exhilarating, and trys too hard to be something, anything at all. Did I mention that this film's run time is far longer than need be? ;)
|
|||
| 4 |  |
LookJabba... | 9 91% |
|
Interstellar was my most anticipated film of 2014 and it's almost perfect. Christopher Nolan once again excels himself and this is certainly his most ambitious work to date. For me this film evoked the same sense of scale and wonder only previously achieved by '2001'. McConaughey is incredible and Hathaway & Chastain are strong also. Hans Zimmer's score gave me goosebumps and visually I was overwhelmingly transfixed. There are undeniable flaws, but otherwise this film is truly astonishing.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
begoniabol | 61 49% |
|
I liked a lot about this movie. Liked especially the middle part. AND THEN HOLY SHIT THAT GODDAMN ENDING. What an absolute bull of shit, and it made me extremely angry. Not only does the ending suck, so does the acting of the girl. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUURRPPH
|
|||
| 4 |  |
WWallce4prez | 74 56% |
|
The shortcomings of the narrative are glaringly bad by the time the third act comes around, but it is hard to ignore what comes before. A blend of stark visuals and a stunning score highlight the sense of awe that Nolan was clearly striving for. It is difficult to fault a film for its ambition and not reaching the astronomically (ha) high bar that we set for it.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
MikeH | 69 18% |
|
Too grand, too serious, too ambitious. Since the Dark Knight, for me Nolan has been like one of those bands that you love and annoy people by saying "I love their early stuff, man, but since they became popular they just got too commercial". The plot trickery reminded me of The Prestige, but this isn't half as good. The cheesy love stuff edged it towards the same kind of pseudo-philosophical silliness as The Matrix. WIth an editor, could've been a great 90 minute film.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
cherrorist | 60 30% |
|
Great filmmaking spoiled by 15 minutes of absolute cheesyness passed of as ending. Knocked 20 points straight off.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
Actionberg | 100 99% |
|
A science fiction epic that adores its genre predecessors as much as its American socio-historical context, which makes it practically impossible for me not to enjoy it. But then it happens to have some of the most magnificent spectacle I've ever seen in movies, powered by a consistent, genuinely emotional narrative. Nolan's older work looks like hollow exercise now. This is an instant favorite and, as I am sure I will argue in the years to come, an American classic.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
Ytadel | 9 98% |
|
I'd give the execution a solid B-plus. It's beautiful to look at (props to Hoyte van Hoytema), excellently acted, with a strong Zimmer score. The latter-middle section with Matt Damon does get a bit draggy, but everything else is well-paced and engaging. I'd give it an A for ideas (albeit not an A-plus because of some cheesy theorizing on love): The film's exploration of time dilation, fourth/fifth-dimensional space, relativity, and just plain old outer space yielded great post-movie discussion.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
FunkyAstro | 90 93% |
|
Anytime someone can make an audience question the realism within a science *fiction* film I feel they have done their job. Interstellar boasts some very imaginative and fun ideas while mastering the suspense behind every single thing we take for granted in this genre. Yet even with the many nods, when compared to the almighty Kubrickian masterpiece it still falls way short. It lacks the philosophical awe that accompanies the mysteries of the universe. Still quite an awesome experience.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
babamots | 70 55% |
|
The middle act is great scifi. The enclosing acts with the farm and climax are, dare I say, corny.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
disconnected | 50 21% |
|
A few problems. The pace is ponderous, but without the hypnotic quality that made 2001 so great. The internal logic of the movie is troublesome, especially at the end when the time travel comes into it. It's also distracting that 80% of the significant characters in the film are played by extremely famous people. You can't think about them as characters, only as the actors who portray them.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
recklessmess | 85 87% |
|
The least believable thing about this movie is the idea that Matthew McConaughey is capable of anything more than dropping out of high school. All right, all right, all right.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
AAAutin | 52 52% |
|
Matthew McConaughey, Housetronaut, in: INTERWALLER.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
Cinemuck | 98 99% |
|
http://cinemuckblog.wordpress.com/2014/11/06/interstellar-2014/
|
|||
| 4 |  |
chadisdanger | 84 78% |
|
Nolan has very bad habits, namely how grandeur can be undercut by characters' low-key response to it, endless exposition (bad speeches), and detours that go nowhere. But man, what a powerful cinematic experience this is. It's so earnest in its romantic view of space exploration, McConaughey is great and it's an audacious and often quite overwhelming visual and sonic experience. Falls short of a "2001"-like visionary achievement, but it's not nearly bad enough where I can fault it for trying.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
nutcrackr | 55 11% |
|
Impractical, irrational and tries to romanticize science fiction. Obfuscates facts to carry on with its lunacy. The Earth is dying, for some reason, and our best chance is a wormhole to another galaxy. So off they go with crysosleep and exceptional space tech, yet they cannot grow crops properly. Forget all logic; one character hides the truth in a robot that is booby-trapped, yet accessible to anybody. What a genius! And for god sake, Doyle, get in the Shuttle before you drown.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
Cowman | 75 75% |
|
A science-fiction epic focusing heavily on 'science' and hereby forgetting that fiction is always more important for these kind of adventures. Thanks to the great cinematography and perfect soundtrack this imbalance is easily overlooked, but on the contrary, the overwhelming amount of melodrama is NOT. The final act was especially hard to digest; it seems as if Hollywood threw away a decent ending and just did some lame stuff about love transcending the space-time border instead. Dude, what?
|
|||
| 4 |  |
Syntheseizur | 67 21% |
|
One of Nolan's most fundamentally flawed movies with a shallow basis in real science but a compulsion to awkwardly humanize it with sentimentality. The result is a collection of emotionally stirring scenes that are scientifically and narratively nonsensical, and it ultimately feels more like it comes from a Nolan imitator than the genuine article. Still, the main relationships resonate well, and some of the disconnected sci-fi ideas translate well to the screen, even if others don't.
|
|||
| 4 |  |
stuie299 | 100 99% |
|
Is this movie flawed? Yes. Does that stop the movie from achieving its main goal? No, and resoundingly so at that. Simply put this is an emotional thriller. Interstellar grabs ahold of your emotions in a way no film has ever done before. In achieving that I give a lot of credit to composer Hans Zimmer and cinematographer Hoyte van Hoytema who create the perfect marriage of music and image. On top of that the cast and acting are great. And if it wasn't already clear I'd call it Nolan's best film.
|
|||
| 3 | klea | 45 44% |
|
|
LOVE CONQUERS ALL!!!1!
|
|||
| 3 |  |
ratedargh | 70 44% |
|
Unruly and large. At its best when allowed to breathe (slightly ironic considering the dirt clouds) and explore themes of the human psyche. The score is one of the best I've heard in a long time. It's a fine movie that needs a big trim. The exposition really gets out of hand near the end, but it doesn't entirely derail things.
|
|||
| 3 | Scorpus | 94 96% |
|
|
Aside from some odd choices towards the end, Interstellar is a visual masterpiece and an amazing voyage of storytelling
|
|||
| 3 |  |
SirStuckey | 65 45% |
|
It's ok, just very long and the sound was mixed weirdly in some scenes (might have been where I was sitting or the theater). It gave me a headache and I started to lose interest after the 2 hour mark. Plot started to get more and more absurd than I was willing to give the movie credit for. Visuals were great as was the acting.I hope TARS wins an Oscar.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
Seethruskin | 4 52% |
|
Nolan almost tricked me into loving one of his movies. Thank god for that ending!
|
|||
| 3 |  |
Judge Holden | 4 51% |
|
Nolan seems to think that using big, ethereal ideas (space, dreams, memory) will alone imbue his films with substance and weight. While he routinely succeed on a visual level, I find there's often a lack of feeling. Not that I'm demanding sentiment - it's just that his films, especially this one, feel perfunctory. But if you can look beyond the hokey ending and amateurish philosophy, Interstellar is an entertaining, albeit far too lengthy, piece of bullshit.
|
|||
| 3 | mkellins | 65 65% |
|
|
It's no 2001, and definitely doesn't deserve the almost 3-hour runtime. Nonetheless, it is an exciting adventure, quite literally, through space and time. Visually the film is compelling, and the acting is mostly good. Sadly, they're trying to create unnecessary extra drama with silly subplots, because they're occasionally clueless what to do with the awesome subject. Also, I wonder how many people will want to jump into black holes after seeing this? I know I'm intrigued.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
VorpalKitten | 80 59% |
|
Nearly amazing movie mostly ruined towards the end by being overly predictable and sort of dumb really.
|
|||
| 3 | ahmetay74 | 100 99% |
|
|
just, wow. McConaughey was perfect, another Nolan masterpiece
|
|||
| 3 | movieboy | 70 73% |
|
|
Soap Opera meets Sci-Fi. But at least it's not another Batman movie. The first half is engaging, but the second half is almost never ending.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
Calabria | 78 47% |
|
probable score 86? ahahahahaha you guys are the worst. As a layman's quantum physics fan I enjoyed a lot of the cerebral stuff, but for the most part found this to be a wannabe 2001 that, aware it was a cheap imitation, subsequently tried to pass itself off as an homage to it.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
oldgoat | 79 82% |
|
Half the movie is signs 2: space lookings. The other half is fantastic space action that harkens back to 2001 at moments.
|
|||
| 3 | DougieD | 85 68% |
|
|
Frustrating but awe-inspiring. Confusing but moving. Cheesy but honest in its emotion. Clunky and filled to the brim with exposition, but always fascinating.
|
|||
| 3 | makrostek | 0 11% |
|
|
overratted
|
|||
| 3 |  |
TC Mercado | 70 32% |
|
Looks and sounds beautiful. Zimmer's score stands out in particular, as he's refreshingly moved out of his rut of ticking strings and ridiculously loud horns. Like anything Nolan, however, the weakness lies in the writing. Much like the last Batman movie, you'll often be asking yourself, "Why would they even add this?"
|
|||
| 3 |  |
Noblet | 79 67% |
|
Sometimes beautiful, occasionally clunky. I don't think this movie really showed me anything "new", but it did have a supreme level of polish and enough emotional hooks to keep me interested the whole way through.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
hisblob | 30 19% |
|
Every scene becomes a predictable outcome of the previous as the writers choose the dull expository route everywhere. Genuine character interactions are ignored and the performances feel stilted. And every few minutes you're in for a good trolling, whether it's gravitational anomalies, astronauts being goofs during launch, or the dumbest-looking robot ever made.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
PerryStroika | 55 24% |
|
A few good set pieces (the docking scene, the tesseract, going through the wormhole) float in an ocean of incoherent, bombastic, sentimental, melodramatic, overwrought, overlong and repetitive gunk. And the dialogue? Nolan apparently has never had a conversation. Who talks like this? Bloviating about love, and halfbaked science mumbo jumbo and pop philosophy. Long, tortured expository passages. One Dylan Thomas reference is fine, but six?
|
|||
| 3 | chhe | 77 32% |
|
|
Without a question the loudest movie I ever heard in theaters. Why directors feel the need to deafen their audience is beyond my understanding.My fingers were in my ears throughout the movie to endure it. Regarding the movie itself, its very confusing at times, in part because the voices are muffled by the booming surrounding noise and also because simply the storyline is not perfectly worked out.It was visually appealing, nicely sad at times, but without a clear story it doesn't stand up.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
woodoo | 70 22% |
|
Goofy assed Star Wars prequel with rigorously mundane effects. Has a really lively and spirited cameo featuring an evil astronaut, which bumps it up a few points. Lets McConaughey say "slick" one too many times, for some reason, a sure sign of a director who either doesn't pay that much attention to the actors, or can't pick a script worth a damn.
|
|||
| 3 | Nepeta | 75 56% |
|
|
Pretty torn. On a raw experiential level it's often euphoric (if derivative). There is also seemingly no understanding of, well, humans, which is troubling considering a desperation to put our emotions and our capacity for love at the heart of things. Yet it's all so beautiful and fascinating regardless.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
Zio | 60 44% |
|
Another Nolan spectacle. Visually amazing with a muddled narrative and forced sentiment. For a movie that ventures on nearly 3 hours, you never become invested in the characters (most of which are plot devices) and that is the movies downfall. It relies on cheap tricks, over reliance on exposition by explanation, and trying to cover this up with visuals. But man, those visuals are amazing. With some tighter editing and certain subplots scraped, this could have been a great film.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
daisy-fairy | 20 8% |
|
Bullshit after bullshit, there's no real science behind it, just theories and hypothesis... Which are just fables, like Bible and other stuff. Real shit. Points are only for Hans Zimmer's music...
|
|||
| 3 |  |
ikkegoemikke | 83 97% |
|
I admit, I love SF so I'm a bit biased. But my opinion about Interstellar can be summarized as follows :
Magnificent. Fascinating. Absorbing. Breathtaking. Titillating. Mind-blowing..... Need I say more ? :)
http://opinion-as-a-moviefreak.blogspot.be/2015/02/interstellar-2014.html [Full Review]
|
|||
| 3 |  |
d_r_e_s_ | 4 90% |
|
I really don't want to be one of those that blindly loves a movie because of the director, but I must admit that I thought that this was very good. Even though I've watched more than 1800 movies, I am very inexperienced on various topics. The subjects that this movies depicts is not something my mind can fully grasp, but I believe Nolan manages to make it ingestible for movie watchers, even less experienced than myself. And that, I applaud. - Very Good
|
|||
| 3 |  |
ladymcdeath | 30 16% |
|
Woah. So I and my partner totally missed the fuss on this one. We were both pumped to watch it, cos SPACE but....I felt like Nolan treated his audience like dummies. Might have been better on the big screen?
|
|||
| 3 | xacviant | 89 90% |
|
|
Christopher Nolan's madly ambitious epic about the search for a new home for the human race is, on the big screen, as purely thrilling an experience as any I've had this year. It's not perfect; scientifically, it's extremely dense and often so abstractly theoretical as to border on fantasy. And the acting, while never less than good, is for the most part subordinate to Nolan's vision. But it's one hell of a vision, and paradoxically, it's perhaps his most emotionally satisfying film to date.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
Greyscale | 60 15% |
|
This film seemed promising for the first hour or so but the ending was a huge disappointment. Of course, I went into it having been told that I was going to see things more amazing than I could possibly imagine, so perhaps my expectations were too high. I don't think I've ever been impressed by a film that involved time travel or communication through time, and this one is no exception. The circular reasoning is just too absurd, and the visualization of the whole process was also disappointing
|
|||
| 3 |  |
fra paolo | 29 21% |
|
Quite the watchable spectacular if one doesn't mind interruptions in the drama for clunky exposition of the science needed to understand what might be going wrong. Remember when Cecil B. DeMille introduced his epics with a brief lecture to give the audience the background? Is that really worse?
|
|||
| 3 |  |
Corbad | 80 79% |
|
A visually arresting and conceptually incredible film that waxes a little too poetic to hit deeply.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
FoxyRussian | 42 13% |
|
Nolan treats his viewers like idiots, explaining concepts such as black holes and worm holes, instead of giving characters character. Acting is inconsistent, with some scenes being amazing and others feeling like the actors were miscast. The movie is really pretty to look at though, and the sound design made me feel as though I was in the movie! Just wish I was in a movie with a decent story or characters that behaved as something other than plot devices
|
|||
| 3 |  |
cmull | 80 55% |
|
Interesting vision of alien worlds.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
CoinQuatro | 85 93% |
|
Cringeworthy moments en masse. So what? Tidal waves FTW! Edit: This movie transcends Christopher Nolan.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
sophie | 95 98% |
|
Great movie, with great cast. Visually stunning and mind bending as we know it from Nolan
|
|||
| 3 |  |
Stradivarius | 68 32% |
|
Tries so hard to be 2001 that it overshoots and hits closer to 3001. While I'll give it credit for playing in interesting ways with the concepts of time dilation, events are mostly overshadowed by an excess of schmaltz. Dramatic visuals carry it for the duration, but the film has little lasting effect.
|
|||
| 3 | Egregius | 83 51% |
|
|
One can go either of two ways with this film: 'Great story! Scientifically accurate too!' or 'If you think about it, the story is completely silly, and the science falls flat on it's face a few times'. I for one am happy to FINALLY HAVE AN ORIGINAL HOLLYWOOD MOVIE, with solid performances all around! Can I have more, pls?
|
|||
| 3 |  |
Ofterdingen | 89 99% |
|
It takes a lot of guts to follow in the footsteps of '2001: A Space Odyssey' but Nolan (and Hans Zimmer!) succeeds on almost every level despite the obvious flaws. A modern space opera if there ever was one.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
TheDiceman | 80 95% |
|
Great SCI FI.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
XakkMaster | 90 88% |
|
Foremost are the amazing visual sequences and the atmosphere that rivals Gravity, second are the strong performances by McConaughey and Hathaway in particular. Some say the emotional content is hokey, but watching this with my family certainly added to the feels. Though the spiritual or philosophical depth may not be fully realized, the Nolans must be applauded for their ambition and success at popularizing such a difficult subject. At 3 hours, it rushes by and could stand to be even longer.
|
|||
| 3 | nuotio | 73 93% |
|
|
You have to respect Nolan's film for sheer scope and ambition. In a world of superhero films and re-makes, it is like fresh water. Nolan earned his reputation as an engineer, and this is the 1st time he displays more humane side. While it does feel a bit forced, you still have to applaud his drive to evolve. It's easy to see why Spielberg considered this script, and while his version no doubt would have focused even more on emotional side, I don't think it would have been a better movie.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
RealMacgyver | 90 94% |
|
You got your science in my fiction! No, you got your fiction in my science! Very dense film, particularly towards the end, but easy enough to follow if you don't worry about it too much. Nolan apparently can't do much wrong (apart from Dark Night Rises being a bit crap)
|
|||
| 3 |  |
iqcumber | 59 21% |
|
This is a loooooooong movie.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
cowfrappe | 78 83% |
|
Despite its plot-holes and often-clunky dialogue, there's no denying this film is epic in ambition and execution.
|
|||
| 3 | greghend | 88 94% |
|
|
If Nolan had only gone full throttle down the high-level physics wormhole (he was 95% there), this would have been something truly remarkable. However, the inclusion of love as a fundamental force of the universe is a slap in the face to the rest of the film's ambitious scientific endeavors. All things considered though, even that sin is swallowed by the visual grandiosity of the black hole at the center of this film.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
adilekin | 68 41% |
|
just an ordinary space/sci-fi movie.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
Harmonica | 77 60% |
|
Frothy pseudo-science space adventure. Whilst the sheer spectacle of Nolan's vision is laudable, the screenplay leaves a lot to be desired. Torn between its hard(ish) sci-fi heart and human interest drama, the many plot contrivances and sappy interludes of a conventional blockbuster dilute what could be an interesting sci-fi film. A worrying amount of the film is directly lifted from 2001, but unlike Kubrick's masterpiece, Nolan's expositional dumps explain away most of the mystery and wonder.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
terrymac | 80 84% |
|
Inventive and imaginative, stylish and gripping, but also a bit bloated and, conversely, perhaps a bit rushed towards the end. I really liked the setting and build-up, and the cast generally did a good job throughout, but I perhaps wasn't blown away by the script. The score was effective, perhaps boosted for me by its similarity to Philip Glass' Koyaanisqatsi music - homage? This is superior and ambitious sci-fi/fantasy, with just enough charm to help suspend disbelief.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
Charlie | 90 96% |
|
More of a journey than a film...
#3400
|
|||
| 3 |  |
letskillrobots | 32 94% |
|
A better name for this movie would be "Gravity".
|
|||
| 3 |  |
joseywales | 89 96% |
|
I dunno, I loved it. It does veer into 'Event Horizon' territory at one point and the characterization can be a bit hit or miss, but the long shots are worth it. I liked how we got to do without a Matt McConaughey training sequence and as a summer blockbuster sci-fi flick I thought it was just fine.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
Jimmy Suede | 60 26% |
|
The first 2/3 of the movie is really really good, but the last 1/3 ruined it for me. Despite the claims that it's rooted in some real theory, it descends into a complete magical drug-trip fantasy.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
TheRealJ-Ro | 80 70% |
|
This movie to me is one of great talent, high performance, extremely-ambitious plot and storytelling, which all combines in an engaging, thought-provoking, watchable-but-not-entirely-approachable sci-fi drama. The entirety of the cast is very good, the visuals are spot-on from frame one, it's technically brilliant, but at a certain point it gets VERY dense and theoretical; some may claim difficulty in following. I don't know that this DEMANDS multiple viewings, either. Liked it, didn't love it.
|
|||
| 3 |  |
nauru | 54 49% |
|
Passable sci-fi film, but nowhere near as good as you'd expect from all the hype.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
k177105 | 55 35% |
|
About the end of the world, but penetrated by the fantasy that we can in the end find a way to keep living in our usual way with the help of our technologies. Very impressive scenes of exploring the universe, with a pleasant (and cliché) tint of love narrative.
|
|||
| 2 | DavidYates | 77 56% |
|
|
Nolan shouldn't try to include gooey love nonsense in his movies -- it just comes off weird and uncomfortable. Other than that, enjoyable classic sci-fi.
|
|||
| 2 | myfavchords | 76 54% |
|
|
This is an interesting science fiction film. I am a huge fan of the director Christopher Nolan, I enjoyed this movie but not as much as some of his other excellent films. The performances are good in this film and the script has several interesting moments. There are some slow moments and it seems that the one characters actions are to obvious. Overall I would recommend this film.
|
|||
| 2 | Madnas | 87 70% |
|
|
A wonderful tale of love and hope. Nolan successfully manages to conceal the film's flaws.
|
|||
| 2 | BadFurDay | 8 86% |
|
|
The plot reeked of new age bullshit, felt like a lecture on our wrongs as human beings at times. The journey however was great. The cinematography, the musical score, and the overall attention to detail and realism (if you exclude the eccentric new age parts of course) were some of the best I've seen in a long time. Even though I guessed how the plot would end about ten minutes in the movie, I enjoyed it greatly due to being a big time sucker for space operas.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
PeaceAnarchy | 83 72% |
|
Indulgent, ambitious, breathtaking, flawed, but still really good. Some of the exposition is repetitive, some of the narrative turns ineffective, and the emotional aspect of the film falls short of what it tries to do. But even with those flaws it's an incredibly compelling film with interesting ideas and beautiful images and it succeeds in broad strokes even if it stumbles in some of the details.
|
|||
| 2 | ttoshi | 95 99% |
|
|
A real thinking person's science fiction classic. True to the science, and full of emotion and passion without gratuitous action. A delight for the heart and mind.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
mannaz230 | 49 34% |
|
Nolan's Prometheus.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Calexico | 90 91% |
|
Good setup, but the last two hours basically turned into one long, repetitive montage. Interesting ideas, but poor execution that oddly combines Hollywood's love for rapid-fire editing with Chris Nolan's love for making movies that run far longer than they should. / Edit: After my first watch, this stuck in my head for a couple of years until I finally re-watched it. Knowing how it would play out, I was able to really appreciate the characters, visuals, and storytelling more.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
td888 | 80 89% |
|
This is missing one important genre tag: drama. I went in without any knowledge about this film, other than expecting a Sci-fi movie. Well, it's not. It feels a bit like a mix between Contact and A Space Odyssey, but it isn't done well. Also - spoiler, spoiler -, why does he give the binary coordinates to his daughter when he wants to prevent himself from going? Ok, on second viewing I must admit. This movie is amazing.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
caiman | 62 25% |
|
The aim is ambitious, the science is well-thought-out, and the technical proficiency is top-notch. But it's all so cold, despite the attempts at real humanity. It fails to reach me on an emotional level, which leaves the cerebral level - one that I would expect Nolan to nail. But he misses there too; the science is SO calculated that it primarily comes across as an obvious attempt to pander to space nerds who scrutinize every detail of time dilation and black hole theory.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
obtiosov | 95 97% |
|
I was stupefied for at least 2 hours after I saw it on an IMAX screen. This is the space movie that excels "Contact". After this, I feel bad for liking "Gravity". I enjoyed Nolan's work before, but I wasn't a die-hard fan. You got to give him credit for his creativity and masterful editing. Acting was never worse than average and McConaughey delivers as always. Scientific accuracy and film's love for the science and space exploration gave me geekgasms. Want to see it again in no time.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
ott | 40 21% |
|
how convenient: a love-dimension
|
|||
| 2 |  |
aakkyy | 100 99% |
|
a perfect masterpiece
|
|||
| 2 | oel | 94 43% |
|
|
MUUUUURF
|
|||
| 2 | jthusky | 80 80% |
|
|
Beautiful, bloated, frustrating and fantastic, this is Nolan's attempt at reaching something transcendent. It doesn't quite get there, but dear God, it comes close. The acting is only serviceable, the plot chunky and at times overblown, but when given a chance to go beyond anything he's done before, the director takes it and acquits himself well. The visuals are stunning, to say the least, and many of the sequences are enthralling (especially in IMAX, clearly how it was meant to be seen).
|
|||
| 2 | damil | 75 81% |
|
|
Nolan's weakness lies in creating believable emotion, which is a problem when you clearly state that it's at the core of the story. I like the overall concepts, and while there was probably too much exposition, I enjoyed the science fiction elements. It has a great cast, and they do a good job of injecting emotion where there isn't much. Zimmer's score was obnoxious and pandering. It's flawed and highly pretentious, but I did enjoy enough of it for me to consider it a good film.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
vandenio | 56 28% |
|
huge letdown :(
|
|||
| 2 |  |
guy piranha | 70 68% |
|
I think this time nolan simply wanted too much. Besides the obvious nods to 2001, there's easily three movies in here, all crammed up into a roundtrip that can not really find its core. It's like nolan molded this huge ball of story aspects, that, once you dive in, propels you into all sorts of directions, leaving you clueless where it's all headed[/black hole analogy]. Flattering imagery, an overwhelming score and great performances are vital assets, but they can't fill 3 hours that lack focus.
|
|||
| 2 | keggles88 | 80 64% |
|
|
Stupendously ambitious, which I love, and it truly grapples with Kubrick as well as offers philosophical thought that some found trite, but I thought was on the right track. As a film, it is not a masterpiece like 2001, and it doesn't completely gel into greatness. But it is a fascinating stab at greatness.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
schnofel | 75 84% |
|
Sloppily written, lacking logical, thematic, even stylistic coherence. But I loved Hans Zimmer's score (aka Nolan's lifeline), which carries the pathos of those staggering, weepy space/earth montages. At the film's best it seems like the sky is closing in and we're falling into an endless pit.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Dogubomb | 40 35% |
|
Signs + Close Encounters + Sunshine + Upstream Color, aka, "the curse of a blank sheet of paper"
|
|||
| 2 | BeautyBliss | 80 61% |
|
|
The story is very touching, and very well done. I guess my main problem is with the ending.
|
|||
| 2 | mjoya | 80 59% |
|
|
A great premise dulled somewhat by the leading cast's inability to portray thoughtfulness.
|
|||
| 2 | mrt.dlgc | 100 96% |
|
|
Couldn't be better.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
angrypierre | 89 92% |
|
This did what truly great sci-fi does: it takes a fantastical idea and situation and uses it to examine the inner workings of we humble humans. You can complain about the wibbly wobbly timey wimey stuff being hard to follow or silly, but that's missing the point that the film is about love, loss, separation and devotion. To see what I mean you only have to compare Matt Damon's character with McConaughey's. Beautifully designed and executed.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Liv | 51 9% |
|
Another sensationalist north-american tuttie-fruit movie. Long hours spent in rolling up to with nothing at all. Although the presence of some good actors, they didn`t interpreted fairly as it should be. Scientists are not dramatic people, generally. The best pilot of an airplane cannot fit an explosive and irresponsible behavior. Go to take an ice cream in the park, is more interesting, if its sunny. If not, read a book. I give 51 points for the reminding about universe intriguies..
|
|||
| 2 | qmiller32 | 90 65% |
|
|
I'm a sucker for space movies, and while the plot didn't hit quite as hard as Nolan intends, the visuals are mind-blowing at times.
|
|||
| 2 | Evelyn Waugh | 70 29% |
|
|
Dylan Thomas: for real?
|
|||
| 2 |  |
DMCrimson | 83 82% |
|
That soundtrack!
|
|||
| 2 | eritsuku | 98 98% |
|
|
A great film. Don't know (as others have claimed) if there was pseudo-science used, and that ignorance free me to accept the story as it came. A beautifully told story with nice interweavings and coherence. And while the 'love' portion (no spoilers here) was a bit schmaltzy, I still bought the story and was engrossed by it. McConaughey, though I hate to admit it, delivered a most believable performance.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Moribunny | 53 41% |
|
Still a really hokey story, sciency but scientifically nonsensical, with a bit of that Fifth Element tripe about love saving the world, and a transparent debt to 2001... but technically capable and aside from Hathaway, excellently cast (William Devane's part was too small, alas). People who are into this sort of thing might adore this. I'm not. But I didn't suffer as I usually do watching Nolan films. I was entertained, even.
|
|||
| 2 | DyanneThorne | 75 75% |
|
|
I died of old age while waiting for the movie to really get started and had to watch the rest as a ghost. Still, I'm glad I did, for it is actually rather good. Kind of a mash-up of 2001 and Sunshine mixed with a generous dose of Shyamalan - and I mean that both in the good and bad sense. If only the human characters had been as funny an endearing as the robots, it could even have gone beyond 'rather good' to 'actually good'.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
qwershady | 83 95% |
|
but power of love? cmoooon
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Matija D | 85 87% |
|
Visually and acting wise (i could feel emotions with characters how strong they were)movie is top notch,fantastic movie experience.One and only trouble is a bit farfetched ending,but I dont see why so many people are complaining on it cause the fact is that we dont know in our understanding of physics enough about black holes so practically all options were wide open for Nolan. Also movie is well paced and I havent felt at all that it was 3 hours long.Oh and yeah,thumbs up for TARS, he is epic!
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Maaxwell | 65 49% |
|
The Nolans deserve nothing but praise for their ambition, but unfortunately the narrative and characters aren't nearly engaging enough, with the stranded madman segment feeling especially uninspired. The visual feast however is tremendous, culminating in a brilliantly-created aesthetic for the fifth dimension. Though the acting is mostly good, Hathaway was gravely miscast here.
|
|||
| 2 | emres | 100 98% |
|
|
I have never seen a movie like this before
|
|||
| 2 | kokoskote | 80 41% |
|
|
Great acting by Matthew McConaughey, John Lithgow, and others. Surprise plot twist, but somehow, the whole thing was overrated.
|
|||
| 2 | jepson23 | 50 14% |
|
|
Visually nice, I guess, but not much else going for it. I hope the Nolans dabble in time travel again sometime because the potential for them to rock that genre is huge, but it wasn't realized here.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
lrampartl | 77 71% |
|
The more time passes, the more this film's plot comes undone. McConaughey is tremendous, and everyone else is pretty good (well, I'm not such a fan of Chastain). I just found myself letting my suspension of disbelief go when Cooper hit "Ludicrous Speed" or whatever it was.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Barnowl | 92 62% |
|
Somehow, it keeps turning out to be a good movie. It's like a 2014 version of Flight of the Navigator?
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Minorsage | 70 54% |
|
A little slow. Not confusing - which I heard it would be - and totally forgettable. If it wasn't almost three hours long, I would recommend it.
|
|||
| 2 | legstump | 55 29% |
|
|
A 3 hour lecture more grating than an undergrad determined to prove their intellectual bona fides in line at the vegetarian co-op, with a tedious bunch of love-transcends-space-and-time hooey as the payoff. The overquoting of Dylan Thomas, the sub-Phillip Glass organ music, the obfuscatory relativistic bullshit, another rote Caine-in-a-Nolan performance: frankly none of it is as interesting as Matt Damon. And that is a worry indeed.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Groovy_Souls | 85 82% |
|
Definitely a great film. Nolan always does a good job directing a visual story and perfecting a written one. McConaughey is great and Hathaway is functional, and the visual effects are absolutely perfect. Matt Damon does a good job too. Yet despite all this whether its the pacing, or charm, this stands a little below a lot of the other Nolan filmography. I can't put my finger on it, but it is just not my favorite film of his.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
o_rety | 55 24% |
|
Apart from dr. Mann's subplot (great Matt Damon) the only link this movie manages to establish with the cosmos is the cosmic scale of the bullshit that its story is made upon. That means solid 20 minutes out of 3 long hours of shallow, sentimental, Hollywood style pseudo-drama. And don't get me started on how fast Matthew McConaughey playing the same mixture of hard-ass, grittiness and mumbling in every damn film he's cast gets old.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Carpetgiant | 80 35% |
|
Though it passed one hundred eighty mil, I can't say I was thrilled and I thought I knew which way this plot would go. Tell Anne H. I love her very much. (She knows!) Carpet G to Chris Nolan, there's something wrong, your logic's flawed. Can you hear me, Chris Nolan? Can you hear me, Chris Nolan? Can you hear me, Chris Nolan? Can you ... Here I'm writing on my Criticker in my darkened room. The PSI is green for this movie I've just seen.
|
|||
| 2 | Bagarbjorne | 70 77% |
|
|
I really like the supporting characters' reaction to the dying world and loneliness. Spoilers if I spell it out, but that is what I like most about the movie. McConaughey's character is a bit too much all-American action hero for me to really connect with, and some of the philosophy a bit weird.
Acting is alright but never more than that.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
gogokain | 85 92% |
|
What I really appreciate most about Interstellar is its scope. If you still have a chance to see this on a giant IMAX screen, do it ASAP. The SFX shots are really a sight to behold. Unfortunately the word I'd use to best describe Interstellar is uneven. Stilted dialogue, awkward pacing, great (McConaughey, Caine, Irwin) clashing with bad (Grace, Damon) to mediocre (nearly everyone else) acting, a sudden shift from hard, serious sci-fi to kinda goofy... the movie is all over the place.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
The Pirate | 83 72% |
|
Pure emotion and wonder. Maybe a few plot points were fairly predictable and the ending wasn't as good as it could have been, but this movie kept me amazed, thrilled, and in awe for three hours straight!
|
|||
| 2 | satsujin | 8 50% |
|
|
Interstellar is an interesting movie though I found some of the science confusing especially the latter part involving the tesseract and time dilation.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Derekstar | 80 68% |
|
i liek teh robuts
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Emrah1968 | 50 7% |
|
Why does Nolan repeteadly scores under my expectations, I ask myself. Then again, it may be my bad. He definitely lost it and I shouldn't expect that much from him. I will always cherish The Prestige but the rest...??
|
|||
| 2 | Zipster | 100 99% |
|
|
Nolan's most complete film to date is as cinematically intrepid as it is personal as a drama, a miracle of continuity from the opening shot to the final frame, courageous enough to take us on an exciting adventure sans go-for-broke action set pieces. The thrill is on an astronomical level, but from a purely human angle; deeply felt performances from a star-studded cast and one of Zimmer's most exquisite scores.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
amazedemon | 84 99% |
|
If 2001 was made for philosophers, Interstellar was made for scientists. While not as visually groundbreaking as its predecessor, it is undoubtedly aesthetically pleasing; delivering much more in terms of emotion (from M.M), humour (from TARS) and coherence. A testament to Nolan's skill as a director, the almost 3 hour runtime is hardly an issue due to the tension built-up, the performances given and the allowance to think. Overall, a feel good film, definitely worthy of a re-watch.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
philamental | 68 51% |
|
Went into this guarded and it probably helped me appreciate the film more. It was too slow to begin with, arguably too long, and surprisingly predictable. I enjoyed it and it's a very good film but it just doesn't reach the heights it clearly aimed for. Acting is solid for the most part but I thought Damon to be woefully miscast and a weak link. Visually impressive but I expected more in that respect from Nolan. I would recommend lowering your expectations to get the most from Interstellar.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
comepelicula | 90 95% |
|
What a great movie, I might be a bit biased because I have a soft spot for sci-fi and space and this movie delivers that in a great way mixing it along the survival of humanity through space colonization, that's a great story, I was on the edge of the seat almost the entire film. The pacing of space travel, the shots of Saturn and the accuracy of the science it was all great. The only things are that it could've been a bit shorter and I felt that the last part of the film was poorly done.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Age Jellema | 80 83% |
|
It's not a Kubrick, but it's still damn good.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
patman | 89 98% |
|
As audacious as we've ever seen Nolan as he takes us on an epic space journey through wormholes and black holes. A master of large scale productions where he's always given us visually stunning and suspenseful action but this time I think he has created his most emotional piece to date. McConaughey continues his impressive run but not enough could be said about Zimmer's haunting and breathtaking score.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
muutanet | 91 97% |
|
A technical triumph and majority of the story was well done. The loads of emotions mostly hit the target though I did not buy everything in it.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
alanstrang | 92 97% |
|
nolan courageously enters one of the most difficult subjects in movie history. although I find certain parts too sketchy and romanticized, it is a mind numbing and inspiring film. i think it's difficult to compare it with gravity and say one of them is better, for one is very strong in casting and intricate screenplay and the other is revolutionizes the film-watching experience.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
janus | 70 51% |
|
Behind the bombast this is Science Fiction 101 for better and worse. Hated the mawkish sub-Spielbergisms of the first act on Earth. Once it gets to space McConaughey stops talking like he's drunk and brain-damaged, Nolan drops his sophomoric quotables, and things start to go a little better. Refreshing use of in-camera effects. A great robot. Matt Damon's character doesn't derail the story a la Sunshine. All in all it's quite good, but what a long way to go for just "quite good".
|
|||
| 2 | Blockrocker | 84 61% |
|
|
Quite entertaining, but the story has serious credibility issues.
|
|||
| 2 | tef | 100 97% |
|
|
I'm rating this directly after seeing it. It's fundamentally an emotional thriller. If you look too close at the logic and science it doesn't hold up. Nonetheless I find it to be a masterpiece. I must disagree with those who don't. My reasoning is thus: it works to make me feel. Few movies work like that for me anymore. Is the fundamental message silly? Is the view of what's inside a black hole silly? Is the positing of future humans taking such an odd role in their own fate silly? Yes. So what.
|
|||
| 2 | timmytom | 76 66% |
|
|
Storytelling by-the-numbers, but told well.
|
|||
| 2 | Cg5007 | 95 70% |
|
|
While some of the science isn't great, the parts they get right, they get right. I have a soft spot for space movies so this one has a special place in my heart.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
afifchoirul | 85 61% |
|
The ambition in this movie is beyond technical somehow credit to Nolan with all his best directing skills to make it real and compelling. Great performances by all casts, and Zimmer sound design, matters.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
graveyardtan | 60 21% |
|
This movie was terrible, yes. I can't deny it, but I did have a lot of fun watching it, so there's that.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
ITBSPodcast | 100 0% |
|
"I don't think most people are interested in doing that and I don't think most people should be interested in doing that."
http://illusionpodcast.blogspot.com/2015/04/episode-56-quo-vadis-moviegoing-quo.html
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Tjekhov | 80 86% |
|
So much of it I love. So much of it falls into the category; the visual mastery of Nolan. So much of it falls into the category: the narrative complexity and banality of Nolan. When I re-watch Inception I'm amazed by the subtle layers of both categories - and this time - I expected to find it all the first time. My problem, Nolan's lack of subtlety. This is the most predictable Nolan film (batman excluded), still though, very good. Zimmer's score is incredible.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
TV+Film-Hub | 9 47% |
|
75% of the way through the film, it was a great film. Strong acting, intense drama, complex plot... Then when they tried to wrap it up. The created an ending so stupid it was laughable. Honestly, all thy needed to do was leave more to the imagination, and I'd be recommending this film. Honestly, it's like 3 goddamn, they can't decide how to end it hours long, just shut it off 2 hours in, No Country for Old Men style and you've got a great film.
|
|||
| 2 | nell57 | 76 56% |
|
|
Despite the incredible atmosphere and the rest of the movie, the ending disappoints.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Rufam | 65 42% |
|
As a spectacle (with its stunning, "2001"-mimicking space shots and Zimmer's dramatic score) held by some cheesy but well-crafted jigsaw-puzzle plotting, "Interstellar" is sturdy. But when he reaches for more, Nolan becomes trapped in formula and pomposity: a predictable end-of-the-world scenario, cardboard characterizations (aided by the fact that McConaughey, although still firmly our favorite badass, has become a better crier since getting AIDS) and a corny, reassuring cosmic philosophy.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Neonman | 62 19% |
|
Technically impressive (apart from some lacklustre editing), the effects are really out of this world and that's surprising to say about a sci-fi drama (rather than a sci-fi action). Unfortunately, the quality of the characters and narrative aren't as high, with unmemorable dialogue, ordinary performances, and a plot that goes to all sorts of places (to its disadvantage) just to seem like it's more encompassing than it is. There's talent and ambition here, but it isn't tied together very well.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
mandy | 7 74% |
|
There is a lot in this film to digest - ideas, images and emotions. Some bits didn't work for me but quite an epic.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
DougCollins | 100 93% |
|
Another amazing film from the Nolan Brothers.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
M.Fitzgerald | 84 74% |
|
Very cool depiction about what future space exploration might look like. The science was mostly plausible but the film has an emotional core, so I didn't mind the moments where it's too far of a stretch.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
hakkanarejo | 95 63% |
|
With our time on Earth coming to an end, a team of explorers undertakes the most important mission in human history; traveling beyond this galaxy to discover whether mankind has a future among the stars.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Nyctalope | 85 83% |
|
Deep and meaningful sci-fi complete with excellent performances by McConaughey and crew. Top of its class.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Guillaume | 90 98% |
|
One can call bullshit on a lot of facets of this film, but overall it remains a greatly balanced epos about a reasonable issue of humankind, with a tremendous use of both its soundtrack and the absense of sound. The use of "love" as the defining trade of man always makes me itchy, but this does manage (barely, but enough) to not make it too much of a cheesy tragedy. Overall, I was engulfed in it completely, which is all that matters in the end.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
EastonD | 75 54% |
|
christopher nolan makes decent films you know? I watch them and go yeah that was pretty decent.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
DorothyOz | 80 81% |
|
So complex but good!
|
|||
| 2 |  |
DaWolfey | 81 97% |
|
The ending aside, where the film starts to get weird and was losing my interest as it went off the rails into emotion-before-science territory, I was most impressed how the clues to some of the events were all there if you knew a bit of science and gave it some thought.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
constantine | 56 18% |
|
Go watch 'Contact'.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
joel-w-m | 8 80% |
|
The years-long save-the-world plot, poignant near-future setting, and infinite themes both heady and heartfelt are all undeniably epic and compelling, and while the exposition weighs quite heavy at times (see the repeat of the ghost revelation), it doesn't stop the film from reaching many incredible cinematic heights both emotional (see the devastating return from Miller's planet) and action-oriented (see the spinning dock sequence), helped as it is by stunning visuals, music, and performances.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Mo- | 73 44% |
|
its called luuuv you eeediot
|
|||
| 2 |  |
monclivie | 92 98% |
|
Docking!
|
|||
| 2 |  |
omgfridge | 6 53% |
|
"Could of" are words that come to mind. Could of been great. Could of fleshed out themes more. Could of not cast Anne Hathaway and not let her speak at all. Wasn't completely sold on the Matt Damon arc either. It did draw me in to begin with, that combining with excellent visuals, another great McConaughey performance and the time mechanics. Just not quite the championing feeling of a great sci-fi.
|
|||
| 2 | ulffers1 | 100 99% |
|
|
One of my favs.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
andayb | 80 91% |
|
interstellar gets a bad rep because of its so-so science and the tearjerking third act, but the fact remains that it never actually tries to establish itself as a "serious" and hard on the facts movie. it's nolan's somber direction that gives people that impression, and they cry foul when the movie decides to take a literary licence, "being science-fiction" and not the fucking cosmos documentary.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
cinegeek.de | 80 55% |
|
Christopher Nolans Interstellar, in dem einige Astronauten zum anderen Ende des Universums aufbrechen, um einen Ersatz für die ausgeplünderte Erde zu suchen, ist ohrenbetäubend laut und rasend bewegt. Die Musik ballert, um die Aufregung in sämtlichen Szenen aufrecht zu erhalten... die ganze Rezension sowie unsere favorisierten Hard SciFi Filme findest du auf cinegeek.de
|
|||
| 2 |  |
closedmouth | 70 40% |
|
Typical post-Batman Nolan; looks and sounds incredible (Zimmer's score is really extraordinary), and has several gut-wrenchingly tense sequences, but often gets bogged down in over-exposition (the dialogue in general is just terrible) and attempts at pathos that simply inspire eye-rolls (the thing with the books, oh my god that was awful). I think if I'd seen this on a small screen with an average sound system I would have hated it.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
yesistasty | 50 5% |
|
Bloated, maudlin, excessively grandiose, and ultimately cowardly. If you are going to create an earnest homage to 2001, your movie will fly or fall in the comparison. Where Kubrick transcends us, Nolan grovels for our tears.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Luna6ix | 84 86% |
|
It was good, it was great, it was dazzling, it was epic, and it was visually sublime. It was everything that we've come to expect from Nolan. There's a problem, though, "Interstellar," for a movie preaching climate change, and focusing on humanity, it's really missing the big appeal of space. There's not enough wonder, not enough discovery, it's missing a heart. Sure, there's plenty of emotion and human conflict, but I want to look at people landing on a planet for the first time and say "WOW!"
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Wezzo | 86 70% |
|
Not quite transcendent, but the sheer scope of the narrative, and the way Nolan deftly weaves emotional intensity with scientific awe, cannot be underestimated. Utterly stunning visuals, complex and convincing performances, and a narrative that, for all its flaws, leaves you wide-eyed, agape and gasping for more. Nolan harnesses the raw power of cinema so thoroughly that I'd feel churlish to rate any lower.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
Rexlito | 65 1% |
|
Another overrated space movie. This is basically Signs mixed with Gravity. Murph!!!!!!!
|
|||
| 2 |  |
whatismyname | 85 97% |
|
I don't like to rewatch films but I already want to with this. Everything seems to click - acting, visuals, audio, story.
|
|||
| 2 |  |
glumpy_99 | 99 97% |
|
Wonderful Spielbergian sci-fi masterwork is Nolan's warmest and most ingratiating effort to date; while there are his usual heavy exposition drops, robbing some of his supporting cast of genuine personalities, it is more than made up for its sheer, overwhelming scale and scope of ambition; Nolan has broadly remade 2001 with a warmth and heart that Kubrick lacked. Aided by a career-best turn from McConaughey, and stellar support work from all and sundry, this is an utter charmer and delight.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
hssnozdagg | 90 91% |
|
Those who claim this movie is awful can kindly fuck themselves :)
|
|||
| 1 | kalichan88 | 75 68% |
|
|
Interesting concept. I wish I knew more about physics so that I can appreciate how everything is almost possible. I felt like I missed many subplots, and I know it's my problem, but I felt like I didn't enjoy as much as I expected.
|
|||
| 1 | Tim007 | 95 72% |
|
|
A science fiction movie with a profound human relationship between a father and daughter at its heart.
|
|||
| 1 | selenatorvue | 59 34% |
|
|
a really visually appealing film - the special effects are fantastic. The story is good and the acting is excellent. However, Interstellar has all the ingredients for a masterpiece of a film but just doesn't bake them very well. This is Nolan's weakest effort to date as he has clearly tried to be too clever. an effective third act that doesn't quite match up with the other 2 acts which are slow at times. Interstellar needs to 'go further' to deserve the acclaim it has received - disappointed.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Fuentissimo | 69 89% |
|
I felt this movie was trying to be more profound than it was. It needed to speak more through its heart and with less words. The core of the film is that humanity is not merely survival, that science and survival on their own won't cut it; there is an immeasurable heart and inexplicable love that may save us. All the babble took away from this. It's not about the black hole, it's about the relationships. The story is very heartening and sentimental. I didn't care for the score.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
JSchlansky | 70 58% |
|
I watched this the way Christopher Nolan intended: in 15-minute intervals while doing the dishes over the course of several weeks.
|
|||
| 1 | Donny1916 | 90 75% |
|
|
I must say I really enjoyed this movie. The love of a dad for his daughter pulled my heart strings and I lapped up the whole human race endeavour angle. Excellent.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
LyleChipason | 69 0% |
|
and the sequeel 'intercourse' were matthew mchoneyballs cumes and fucks yur motha tss im jus chippin ya guys
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Soixist | 90 90% |
|
Movie is great. Soundtrack is great+
|
|||
| 1 | zhalla | 80 64% |
|
|
An instant classic, loved every bit of it.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
jbutler2021 | 85 82% |
|
love the movie and the cast is really good. i much prefer it to other interdimensional/space-travel movies
|
|||
| 1 |  |
michaels | 20 4% |
|
Aww, Christopher Nolan. I've tried to watch your films sober, I've tried to watch your films drunk, and yet, your popularity remains a great mystery to me. As usually, ambitious idea but poor writing & execution, horrid dialogues. Nothing spectacular about your direction style either, huh. Matther McConaughey... learn to fucking speak clearly.
|
|||
| 1 | Toxic Melon | 91 90% |
|
|
89
|
|||
| 1 | GorillaNosh | 90 59% |
|
|
Awesome and actually Sciencey... But I applaud the director for taking the audience along for the ride and giving them some credit with trying to understand somewhat complex astrophysics. The MC Escher bookcase library scene was a little bit jarring. It takes a little suspension of disbelief to get through that and I'm not quite sure what the director was trying to convey by specifically trying to highlight that father daughter relationship. loved it and all actors involved.
|
|||
| 1 | mactonight | 30 10% |
|
|
The organ music was fantastic however I could only stand like the last 30 minutes or whenever they finally got to space. The story at the start can only be described as goofy. I just fast forward through it. Nolan is losing it.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
WalterMitty | 70 24% |
|
I didn't ask for a love symposium, but is what interstellar does for all the length of the movie. You are in the goddamnit space, why do you think about love and relationships the whole time? You are supposed to be pilots, scientists and physics, not the reincarnation of William Shakespeare
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Bbeaty | 93 50% |
|
Very interesting and cool space movie. Lots of mind bending science at time. Stunning visuals as well. I recommend watching this in 1080p Blu-ray on a good TV.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
skap | 20 7% |
|
Interstellar feels exactly like a half-hearted adaptation of a good book. It's too busy with getting the story told within a reasonable running time, so it doesn't really take time to create it's own world, it just goes from scene to scene functionally, despite of all the visual wizardry deployed (wastefully?). Towards the end, its bookishness was so overwhelming I couldn't care anymore for what was on the screen. Nolan should have written a novel instead of directing a film.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
kito1 | 70 73% |
|
Some great things happen here, but the constant music and a slight feeling of non-science ("love goes beyond time and space"??) were a bit annoying.
|
|||
| 1 | dswearin | 37 96% |
|
|
Too Loud, still good though
|
|||
| 1 | air0storm | 67 11% |
|
|
The first hour or so is excellent. But SPOILERS: no film has the right to take you through three hours of space to tell you love is the most powerful force in the universe
|
|||
| 1 |  |
luord | 64 53% |
|
Slow to start and unapologetically melodramatic, it would have been better had it focused more on the science (fiction). Still nice, though.
|
|||
| 1 | boesball | 82 91% |
|
|
This movie had flaws, but it excelled in having absolutely amazing special effects, and it was emotionally gripping. I loved this movie.
|
|||
| 1 | Wicklebee | 84 90% |
|
|
A pretty good movie where you start off wondering what's going on and later in the movie it pinpoints practically every moment as a scenario brought about for a reason. It's strange, but well done for science fiction.
|
|||
| 1 | srmt99 | 100 98% |
|
|
breath taking...
|
|||
| 1 | gatoquente | 98 95% |
|
|
Highly recommended. Gripping. Thought provoking. Plot is well researced, and the acting and cinematography are astounding. Truly deserving of the awards it got. The movie reexamines the meaning of our existence, laying bare at the same time the limitless possibilities of the human race to literally reach the stars beyond our imagination. MY SCORING: 99-96=Great; 95-90=Very good; 89-85=Good; 84-80=So-so; 79-70=Boring; 69-1=Forget it
|
|||
| 1 | MovieMelee | 94 46% |
|
|
Interstellar is far from perfect, but it is still a good movie about a man trying to protect his family at all costs. This is probably my least favorite Nolan film, but that's not saying a lot because it's still an A movie for me. A little slow at the start, but it picks up after the four smartest people in the world do the dumbest thing they can possibly do first. Still very enjoyable, though.
|
|||
| 1 | plexlover | 95 93% |
|
|
Awesome
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Emir Han | 93 94% |
|
I believe that if I will watch a movie which is Sci-fi, it doesn't matter if the story is realistic or not. I don't care about those scientific things. I care the performances and script, that's for sure. For me, "Interstellar" is the most remarkable movie of 2014. And Nolans pushed to their limits.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Iamdwg (Interpreting the Stars) | 96 96% |
|
The runtime of this film often has me questioning if I should even watch it, but once I give in and watch it, it pulls me in instantaneously. The musical score alone is one of the best modern scores that I can think of. It's powerful enough to change a movie viewing...into a cinematic experience. There's so much emotional weight going on in the movie. What they're doing on this mission is so important...and when you watch, you have this overall feeling that it might not even work...crazy!
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Ceekay19 | 70 55% |
|
Cooper: "We used to look up at the sky and wonder at our place in the stars. Now we just look down, and worry about our place in the dirt."
|
|||
| 1 | jinwonton | 100 98% |
|
|
amazing film, with great acting, story, drama, and original concept.
In my opinion, Nolan's best work yet
|
|||
| 1 | elperkele | 79 42% |
|
|
I am not a fan of Nolan's school, but I feel this was the best Nolan movie for a while. It is warmer, more constrained and subtle than director's previous action flicks, with emphasis on calm music and semi-realistic visuals. Human element is as lacking as always, with familiar archetypes spewing exposition when necessary. Zimmer's music is still telegraphing a lot and the plot makes little or no sense. However the movie is entertaining and despite its length doesn't feel too long.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
backwardsuit | 72 56% |
|
Really fantastic effects and great idea for a story but the forced bit with Matt Damon stretches credibility and the final 15mins blows it out of the solar system. If it had ended in the black hole I would have probably thought it was brilliant. The interesting story gets kinda sidelined by some uninteresting filler and overblown melodrama. Still an ambitious sci-fi spectacle in the truest sense of the genre.
|
|||
| 1 | Fuchu | 87 72% |
|
|
A classic film bearing many similarities with 20001 a space odyssey. The movie explores some extraordinary subjects without getting too far fetched or unbelievable. I would recommend this to anyone.
|
|||
| 1 | dhartle | 100 98% |
|
|
I loved this movie! It was beautiful, and showed things that have never been done before in sci-fi films. A great parent/child relationship explored. And great performances, most notable Matthew McConaughey and Mackenzie Foy.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Kmilchev1 | 95 98% |
|
Greatest film ever made.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
marcello | 35 0% |
|
of course as a sci-fi it takes you in but still has nothing to say
|
|||
| 1 | yash kaushik | 90 50% |
|
|
i was completely unaware of sciences potential when i watched this movie when i was 14.one of my all time favourites.
|
|||
| 1 | mwestcott | 99 90% |
|
|
Interstellar teeters on the edge of perfect. With Matthew McConaughey leading a worthy cast through an equally scientifically and emotionally driven story line. Packed with special effects and flawless imagery. The script is unfortunately somewhat let down by a small lack of subtlety.
|
|||
| 1 | Revan007 | 83 68% |
|
|
Arguably overrated by many, Interstellar is nevertheless a very well acted and entertaining movie with a truly amazing score. While it's high concept ideas and contrivances either work or don't depending on the person, this somewhat mind-bending outerspace drama is worth a watch.
|
|||
| 1 | Derridative | 88 51% |
|
|
Ambitious storytelling, riveting action sequences, genuinely moving moments. As with all Nolan films however, Interstellar is ultimately too clinical and too literal to be a truly great movie.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Pigwickle | 85 72% |
|
3 hour long movie that will leave you asking for more. Visually striking! They took the time to really develop the storyline and it did not disappoint. This movie will stay with you and you will definitely want to watch again.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
PrestoBix | 86 80% |
|
Seen: 2x
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Armilio | 68 52% |
|
Great visuals, good emotional impact, bullshit ""science"" and cheap philosophy.
|
|||
| 1 | rufio2 | 60 12% |
|
|
Not my favorite. Inside the black hole was...weird.
|
|||
| 1 | andreaslutro | 75 64% |
|
|
A gripping story told simply but beautifully. Some elements of the ending are just a bit too far-fetched, though, and somewhat ruin the movie.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
jacobclark12 | 88 84% |
|
When the imagery from a film is what stands out more than its script or its message, it tends to sour a bit over time. I loved Interstellar upon first watch, but looking back it leaves a bit to be desired because of its over-reliance on melodrama and sentimentality that it doesn't entirely earn. Major props to Nolan and Hoyte van Hoytema for creating such a beautiful film though, even if on the whole it doesn't live up to the film it's trying so hard to be.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Movie-Op | 7 56% |
|
Interstellar is a lesser film than we all wanted it to be, but it's still an ambitious and at times wonderful piece of work.
|
|||
| 1 | Castlevania2 | 90 69% |
|
|
Nolan is "just" a fantastic filmmaker and a vivid storyteller. Just accept that he's the closest we'll get to the next Kubrick and not some higher power of evolution meant to meld science, emotion, and faith via the big screen.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
krypt | 94 82% |
|
Really wasn't a huge fan of this the first time; back then, I thought that it was so detached from humanity, and honestly very stupid. Now I see that that couldn't be further from the truth. I was offput by what I saw as Nolan's tendency to overanalyze and use exposition when m-e-s or montage could do the trick, but I was not seeing the purely cinematic flourishes that are here. The best stuff is McConaughey and Chastain interacting across space and time. I cried hard.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
cetincelik | 100 99% |
|
Tüm zamanların en iyi bilim kurgu filmlerinden. Sadece bilimsel değil, tabii ki ruhsal ve psikolojik bir yolculuk. Defalarca izlenir.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Lexie | 70 59% |
|
I like this one a lot okay it's the best nolan movie even tho he really did go quietly into that dark night
|
|||
| 1 | saharkogani | 89 84% |
|
|
Great concept, beautiful scenes, I didnt like the sadness and the cold colours
|
|||
| 1 |  |
ninjafury | 72 66% |
|
While this is an amazing film, I feel like it got boring towards the end as it felt like the information was just being given to us as if we we're children rather than like in the first half of them movie we we're explained it but not like we didn't understand it. But it's still good
|
|||
| 1 | pendency | 70 37% |
|
|
Predictable. Something about this movie means I can only think about it in comparison to others. The visuals made me think 'This is what Star Trek wanted to do!' and in that kind of context, this is a good movie. As something meaningful, the story caved underneath the sentimental hammer. The situation on Earth was the fascinating part and it was painfully handwaved. As if it wouldn't be quicker and cheaper to gen-engineer a blight resistant crop? Meh -- keep expectations low and enjoy it.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
lkk | 100 99% |
|
Mind-expanding!
|
|||
| 1 |  |
HiResDes | 79 76% |
|
The last third of the film left a bitter taste. The adversity the crew faces on the second voyage is the beginning of the most artificial and forced feeling part of the movie. Nolan parallels things in such a terse manner between events on earth and space. It's very Malick-esque. Then at the denouement a ridiculous event occurs. It forces the plot into this overly sentimental, romantic, and sappy turn that really does a great injustice to the rest of the film. It feels like it retconns itself.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Bearacuda | 4 0% |
|
Not many movies like this one or on the quality level of this one. Impressed.
|
|||
| 1 | oaic | 50 23% |
|
|
I really enjoy it, except that last 10-15 minutes, which are so so bad. I've watched in multiple times now, hoping that I can enjoy the ending or at least get used to it, but no.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Weafdog | 64 97% |
|
Perhaps Christopher Nolan's weakest work to date despite some delightful aspects that we come to expect from the maestro. Phenomenal Zimmer score, beautiful imagery, gutsy, ambitious, multilayered story that provokes thought and attempts to communicate compelling and sophisticated, yet nuanced ideas. Unfortunately, the final product is over-indulgent resulting in clunky pacing, cringeworthy melodramatic dialogue resulting in forced performances. Pic fails to resonate on emotional level.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
chemical404 | 76 91% |
|
Best sci-fi movie that came out of Hollywood since... I really don't want to say 2001: Space Odyssey because this comparison doesn't stand in my eyes, but it was a long time since I saw another so well made big sci-fi film. The action, drama, sci-fi and philosophy is well-balanced to appeal wide audiences, and at the same time it sets some points for deeper discussion. One thing that bothers me a lot is a black hole sequence and the paradox it creates. What if he decided not to move books, etc?
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Corleone | 90 97% |
|
Glorious film. The script is not perfect but I love the ambition and grand scale.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
eric-jan | 85 94% |
|
Well, this masterpiece is one for the books. Thank you McConaughey for one of your outstanding performances. Pretty long movie, but totally worth it. Shout out to Jessica Chastain :). Ah, and the twist at the end is kind of confusing and a little misplaced, but it's still a tearjurker non the less. Get ready for one to remember! Ah yeah, and damn those visual sequences were awesome! :D
|
|||
| 1 |  |
jordanlige | 100 51% |
|
good 10 out 10
|
|||
| 1 |  |
sharpcool | 82 84% |
|
Yes it does have issues but I'm forgiving when a great effort like this is displayed, and especially when I realize I was consistently fascinated for the entire lengthy film.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
CosmicMonkey | 75 49% |
|
I absolutely love the idea of an epic space adventure based in hard sci-fi. Interstellar is like the best episode of Star Trek ever and is a gorgeous, awe-inducing spectacle of grandeur. But the fact that Nolan shoots this with all the seriousness of the Unabomber Manifesto leaves one with no choice to but to watch this as Nolan's own treatise of humanity; a vision so completely blind to its own biases of individualism & colonial Whiteness that it falls apart at only the tiniest string-pulling.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
astrakhan | 82 85% |
|
It's one small step for Christopher Nolan... one giant leap for the average mind. The relentlessly ambitious Brit director unveils the first blockbuster to use extradimensionality as a plot device, and it is magnificent. Not all of the plot or the characters are polished or even well-formed, but the finale is an absolute punch in the face on a par with Inception. McConaughey deserves the plaudits, though the supporting cast not so much. Where in the galaxy will Nolan go next?
|
|||
| 1 |  |
ABUNCHOFCATS | 84 63% |
|
Takes too long to get going and then takes too long to finish up along with a too long segment of Guy-Going-Crazy a la Sunshine. The actual space exploration is mind blowing in Imax though. The special effects are masterful. Hathaway and McConaughey are fine with the main star being TARS.
|
|||
| 1 | Evan Waters | 93 85% |
|
|
Visually and aurally goreous take on our possible future in space; while some on-the-nose dialogue and a drawn out climax threaten to drag it down, the overall effect is still powerful.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
pecet | 60 19% |
|
Starts good, ends confusing.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
mfidler1 | 89 92% |
|
Nolan really knows what he is doing. This was really freaking good. For me, it just felt a tad long. I want more of this in theaters.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Zealot185 | 77 68% |
|
In line with the script, I'm willing to believe that 90% of the film was true to quantum theory and 10% was creative liberty. However, the unifying message of love being a force like gravity and time isn't portrayed - visually nor plot-wise - as strong as the importance of scientific pioneering. The Dust Bowl-era testimonials used as commentary on climate change is the best aspect that grounds this to reality.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Bown | 77 45% |
|
a little more amazing visuals, a little less explaining exactly what's happening while it's happening so idiots aren't confused, and a lot less FUCKING CRYING, plz. succeeds despite itself.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Judo Koala | 80 75% |
|
Almost everything depicted in the film is grounded in actual spacetime theory. Which makes the film SPECULATIVE, yes, but *not* false or incorrect. I tire of viewers complaining that the film is invested in pseudoscience because, though it relies on theoretical speculation, it is not mere 'pseudoscience.' And I give my nod to Nolan for trying to depict mysteries of the universe no one else would dare touch. One of the more ambitious sci-fi films since Kubrick's and Tarkovsky's of the '70s.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
leekenn | 93 97% |
|
My initial review of Interstellar was a little frosty, and with good enough reason; this film is, at its worst, utterly ridiculous, whilst still taking itself very seriously indeed. However, I have found myself coming back to re-watch it several times, recommending it to friends an alarming amount, and looking back on it very, very fondly. In short, over time Interstellar has captivated me in a way it didn't manage to on first viewing; no film has ever grown on me this much.
|
|||
| 1 | Deathcrow | 85 89% |
|
|
(previous version of this was more ciritcal) Beautifully shot and well acted. The writing has some issues in the final half of the movie, but it is intentionally mystical and dream-like, so logic goes out the window (to some degree). Enjoyed it for the art and strong emotional resonance, even though the story gets a bit loopy.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
bolivar | 70 54% |
|
classic nolan-trying-hard-unsuccessfully. weak dialogues; over-wrought yet somehow simple story; over-explained and sentimental. and whats with the constant happy endings?
|
|||
| 1 |  |
cloak | 64 64% |
|
For a Christopher Nolan movie this is impressive.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Gideon | 2 59% |
|
According to Einstein and Interstellar god doesn't play dice. Unfortunately, they are wrong. I had to suspend my disbelief on max setting for this one. Scientifically seen there isn't much realism to be seen, fiction wise Interstellar works within its own universe. A universe where the laws of nature are ignored or made up and where 'Coop and Murph' are the 'determined' heroes, to save planet earth. Criticism aside,Interstellar inspires and leaves us in awe, because of the sheer visual grandeur.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
deaddilly | 80 72% |
|
It felt big and left its impact. This is usually the kind of film I hope for in a blockbuster. Not worth dissecting but certainly worth experiencing.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Stripy | 84 72% |
|
Honestly, I think the story gets silly at certain time towards the end, a bit too much supernatural maybe. Didn't mind too much about it though. It's beautiful, spectacular when it has to be and all quiet and peaceful when appropriate. Really delivered emotion wise, didn't expect it to be so powerful
|
|||
| 1 |  |
roofs_runner | 90 85% |
|
If Interstellar wins no Oscars, it will definitely get the prize for the most discussed film in media and the internet. Despite all the criticism it received, Interstellar beautifully coincides with space boom that happened this year. More importantly it underpins the concept that space is coming back to the movies again!
|
|||
| 1 | Jazzaloha | 72 76% |
|
|
It felt like a Spielberg movie--i.e., sci-fi film with lots of family melodrama--the latter often excessively schmaltzy, which generally ruins his films (with this element) for me. But somehow I enjoyed this film, more than I expected. ps72
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Obdurate | 60 22% |
|
I give props to the soundtrack, the performances and the visuals. Also the science because I don't care if it's pseudo-science or accurate because fiction is allowed to take an idea that is based in reality and do fun things with it. I even enjoyed the plot twist. What I'm not into is how dull it can be, how it drags, the unnecessary shots that get in the way of the flow, and how it comes off like it's trying to say something but it's not really saying much. Also has terrible mixing.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
edkrak | 70 64% |
|
[SPOILER ALERT!!!] Too much dumb dialogues, too much melodrama, too much dad going through black hole to 3D projection of 5D space to become ghost in his daughter's bookshelf (LOL!!!), but it's still quite fun and brought me my hugely needed fix of cinematic space exploration.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
VinegarBob | 70 54% |
|
Huh?
|
|||
| 1 |  |
evrana | 98 98% |
|
I really enjoy this new trend of realistic space opera. Many will point out several holes in the overall plot, but for me the story told was more than satisfying enough to ignore all those. The language Nolan created in Inception worked very well in this multilayered story. Zimmer's music and McConaughey's acting made it a great experience. I think that being a relatively new parent also made me identify with the themes more.Stuff that I would find cheesy a year ago maybe, struck me emotionally.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
somms | 85 94% |
|
Enveloping, exciting, and beautiful. An 'intimate spectacle', one which demands your attention for the full 2.5 hours and leaves you completely exhausted. It straddles a very thin line between hard science, fiction, and fantasy, but even more than that it is a film about humanity and the inextricable connections each of us has to one another. It certainly stumbles in the middle of the 3rd act, but a longer cut, with more breathing space for reflection and contemplation, is almost essential.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
wayofthegun | 90 89% |
|
Another amazing film from Christopher Nolan, despite McConaughey's unconvincing NASA pilot-turned-farmer-turned-NASA-pilot. Great score and several tearjerking moments.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
yoohoo | 95 97% |
|
It may not be the greatest movie, but this ranking is due to the sheer gravity (hehe) of the film. It is audacious and bold and the scope that Chris Nolan brings is immense. It is a spectacle and absolutely something everyone should experience on the big screen. It also may not be the most original film, but the ideas that it draws upon, it does so damn well.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Kavu | 92 97% |
|
I'm willing to forgive a few plot holes here, as the rest is so good. The whole cast is great, McG is stellar, Nolan directs with grandeur and the physics (mostly) works.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Zarkon | 90 89% |
|
Suffers from a lack of internal consistency that made the concepts of Inception so interesting despite being clearly set in a fantasy world. At the same time, it presents space and time on a much grander scale than Gravity did and works better as a sci-fi flick. Also enjoyed the motifs in the soundtrack by Zimmer.
|
|||
| 1 | robsolutely | 71 73% |
|
|
Worth watching, but don't expect 10/10. Points for acting prowess & visuals. Character development was awful & the story progression was confusing. If Contact (1997) & Armageddon (1998) had a baby, you would basically have "Interstellar".
|
|||
| 1 |  |
lpelliott | 97 96% |
|
My text to my friends after seeing this masterpiece: "Intersteller. Oh my God. See it."
|
|||
| 1 |  |
r.Din | 72 70% |
|
Filmmaking 101: Never, EVER, enter the black hole. You simply will not be able to satisfy the audience and will ruin your film. As Nolan did with Interstellar.
Up until that point it was really rather good. After that point it was really rather M Night Shyamalam.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Mojo_Jojo | 64 70% |
|
Hopefully we'll get a re-edit that fixes the sound and lops off the last ten minutes in ten years. And adds more of the robots.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
parcaliham | 70 42% |
|
7 Kasım, Cuma &
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Difontaine | 83 84% |
|
This is a hard movie to review. I completely understand people who didn't like it, found it confusing, didn't like the last 20 minutes. I can see many of the flaws that could take you out of the film. The thing is, I enjoyed it enough to where I could get past it. 3 hours flew past for me. I had some issues with the sound layering (What, eh, whatchasay throughout). The visuals, acting and Zimmer score more than carried me through. Above all, I liked the ambition.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
ephedrin | 90 96% |
|
I didn't see this much physics neither high school nor university. But it's amazing. Some of physical situation's visualization is perfect. And there is always some hollywood's illogical scene.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Vandelay1 | 82 91% |
|
Nice movie
|
|||
| 1 |  |
martryn | 91 94% |
|
Great visual effects. Movie really managed to handle it's lengthy run time with some great pacing. Some fumbling at the end of the film leaves a bitter taste in your mouth after you've watched it, and that's all anyone who has seen the movie wants to talk about, but it's otherwise another incredibly strong entry from the Nolan brothers.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
mistersplice | 75 77% |
|
7+ highly recommended
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Mentaculus | 88 87% |
|
A while back I'm sitting in a Downtown LA cafe for coffee when out of the next restaurant comes Christopher Nolan. As I stand up and drink a shot of nerve to go say something to the man, his daughter comes out. They have a genuinely sweet interaction before Emma and the rest join them. That fairly stalkerish moment completely colored my reading of this film. Each narrative improbability, or eccentricity, points towards a personal conceit of absolute faith and familial trust. Take it or leave it.
|
|||
| 1 | caffe | 73 70% |
|
|
I have the weirdest love-hate for this movie, every minute it doesn't excite me it annoys me and that's on an equal measure. But I've always been a person who enjoys seeing people aim big even if they miss. I said almost the same thing about Birdman, but god-fucking-damn I love seeing directors spending this amount of money on something damn-near insane. Whether they hit or not. 78 is a strange score to give, but it sort of means that every other moment is 90 and the other is 65.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Koalafish | 75 83% |
|
Nolan tried to combine hollywood space drama with serious science-fiction, which is probably impossible, but he still almost suceeded. Visuals are amazing (of course) and I really liked the soundtrack, but storywise I would have prefered a more consequent approach without the crowd pleasing elements. More science, less schmalz!
|
|||
| 1 |  |
msprague | 95 99% |
|
The first two thirds are quite exceptional and very entertaining. Most of the last third is pretty good too. It's visually quite something. Don't get too hung up on the "science" details and you'll enjoy this.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Duder | 70 75% |
|
3.22: It is a really well made science film that falls apart at the love bit. I loved it much better on a second viewing but still that love cross all logic part.. Why?
|
|||
| 1 |  |
ChrisPalm | 88 98% |
|
A little too long, but nontheless a very intense view. Some people did not like the human melodrama, i think it was necessary.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Wiche | 95 99% |
|
I was utterly amazed I was in the cinema for 3 hours, because it didn't feel that long and that's all because of how great this film was. It never left me bored, it grabbed my attention and didn't let go for the entire 3 hours. I have to admit I never cared for McConaughey much, but after his last films and after Interstellar I have to admit that his acting is top notch. This film is well paced, well directed, but has an ending that didn't really satisfy me.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Evolution | 89 94% |
|
Nolan has finally topped Memento. Space Odyssey is easily superior on every level, but I think Interstellar deserves the comparison. I'm usually a fan of Zimmer's work, but the soundtrack didn't do it for me.
|
|||
| 1 | geohawk | 90 78% |
|
|
Pretty sure this loses something when watched as in-flight entertainment, but it still managed to please and surprise. Nice how Nolan managed to arrange for the plane to hit turbulence during the tesseract scene. The schlock promoters of the 60s would have been so jealous.
|
|||
| 1 | forehead1 | 40 26% |
|
|
Another modern sci-fi with some nice effects here and there but displaying very little originality (for some reason Event Horizon was the one that kept coming to mind here - but there are 'influences' everywhere). The whole thing just feels dull and underwhelming, a shaggy dog story that drags on for ages before rewarding you with a conclusion that manages to be simultaneously daft, disappointing and predictable. Nolan's first misstep.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Cinema_Asia | 75 71% |
|
The comparisons with 2001 are obvious but this is less epic and well..intelligent. It manages to instill a sense of wonderment of the unknown. The main flaw is that when we get to the "unknown" the temptation for sentimentalism and to depict everything as relatable mundane life experience to the audience takes over. This isn't just a problem with interstellar but other sci-fi films as well. The visual depiction of the science behind relativity, physics, and space is also laughable at times.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
filmseeking | 90 98% |
|
Visually stunning and bursting with epicness, the movie's ending suffers from the need to combine scientific accuracy with emotional relatedness to the protagonist's past. Nolan solved it cleverly but it leaves too many 'why' questions.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
denizg | 70 38% |
|
tekrar
|
|||
| 1 |  |
bof | 75 71% |
|
Yeah, you can nitpick details, starting with the casting. But it's still an enjoyable and impressive movie that's basically a low-key family drama dressed up in a multi-billlion dollar budget. Nolan isn't Kubrick, but he knows it. He does think he's Malick even though he isn't, right down to the silly ending, but so does present-day Malick and nobody holds that against him. Imagine if they'd consulted each other beforehand, how much better both "Interstellar" and "To The Wonder" could have been.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Läuft. | 61 26% |
|
Entertaining but pretty shallow and dumb in the end
|
|||
| 1 |  |
eminsr | 71 59% |
|
Film olduğu yeri haketmiyor. IMDB'de 30. sıra ne demek?! Bilimsel olarak desteklediklerini izleyiciye anlatmak için zorlamışlar. Matthew McConaughe bir sahnede genius diğerinde açıklamasını seyirciye duyurmak için moron gibi sorular soruyor yav Sci-fi'sın sen baksana keyfine. İyi olduğu noktalar da yok değil ama ilk yarım saatte paradoksa bağlayacaklarını belli ettiler zaten birde evreni de sevgi ile döndürdüler ya ne mutlu bize..
|
|||
| 1 |  |
loc42 | 65 47% |
|
could have been slower in terms of space images like "2001", there was too much sentimental humanistic holywood bullshit :((
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Ryan Lueders (ReelRyan) | 90 87% |
|
Interesting and Stellar: Interstellar. Christopher Nolan once again never fails to impress. Sure, this film was REALLY long... but I got over that by watching it in two parts. The first half of the movie provides a good mystery involving a ghost leaving Morse code in dust. The second half is a beautiful trip among the stars. I love a good sci-fi movie that has some interesting and believable science. None of this film felt like it totally couldn't happen... [Full Review]
|
|||
| 1 |  |
antidood1 | 75 72% |
|
"Overambitious" is probably the best way to describe Interstellar, in both a positive and a negative way. This movie looks and sounds fantastic, and its ambition is hard not to admire. Unfortunately, it's also a very flawed movie, with a script that has a hard time connecting its emotional aspects with its more grounded ones. Overall though, Interstellar is a unique, exceptional, interesting and pretty overwhelming experience, and that's why I can look past its flaws.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
starborn | 15 51% |
|
science? great. fiction? not so great.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Barraoc | 90 95% |
|
A superior science fiction adventure that I would definitely recommend (despite being a little let down by the ending). It felt like the first time recursion was explained to me...
|
|||
| 1 | Insti | 74 42% |
|
|
Long, deserved a better plot.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
gkfilm | 55 39% |
|
Entertainment: 3.5/4 -- awesome visual effects, solid acting, somewhat interesting plot, but at times the music was too loud, drawing too much attention to itself, and the story left some big holes that wanted to be explained. Spirit: 1/3 -- that Love is a mysterious force transcending time & space. Sustainability: 1/3 -- to keep our earth liveable, our farming needs to account for erosion.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
susie-mauve | 84 60% |
|
Pretty neat imagery and the thrill builds up, not dragging at all (in more than 2 and a half hours). Sure, it's action packed, but the plot is a little sweetened every now and again. The cast delivers pretty well and it was nice seeing John Lithgow again.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
magdabag | 92 86% |
|
This was a really good movie. I don't think it's one of my favorites, but it was definitely good. Mathew McConaughey was great in this, as well as Anne Hathaway. The special affects are unbeatable and definitely deserve the Oscar it got.Very well-done Nolan.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Trooth | 82 86% |
|
I'm sure people are complaining about scientific accuracy all over the place, but I am just crazy about those adorable cubivore-like robots.
|
|||
| 1 | Ritteh | 70 61% |
|
|
First half was good. Second half went downhill.
|
|||
| 1 | selena | 95 87% |
|
|
although there is blanks and some unclear passages at the end, the movie carries you with it. you watch it with full attention all along...
|
|||
| 1 |  |
VengefulKBM | 95 97% |
|
Christopher Nolan's crowning achievement. Interstellar picks up where Kubrick's 2001 left off and sprints with it. This is sci-fi cinema at its finest. I'm not one of those blind fangirls who thinks Nolan can do no wrong, but he certainly knocked it out of the park with this one. All three times I saw it in the theater, I could not believe I had been there for three hours at the end. It's totally gripping in every way, and easily one of the best films of 2014.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
denizgunal13 | 75 79% |
|
Matt Damon,Anne Hathaway,Baba kız safsatası,Micheal Caine'in yavan şiiri hariç tatmin edici bir film...
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Dakota99 | 6 62% |
|
This isn't a perfect movie, that's for sure. However, Nolan does have quite the intriguing background for a film like this, and he shows a lot of potential when it comes the cinematography and atmosphere. However, inconsistency in Philosophy and screen writing are really present, and certain ideas feel jumbled at best. Still, McConaughey is very strong like this, and there is a lot of talent in this cast even with there relatively small roles. There is a lot to like, but far from perfect.
|
|||
| 1 | holdingemail | 73 51% |
|
|
This reminded me of gravity, a bit better, id give it like a 7.2/10.
It does make you think, but the movie is not amazing, if you go in with lower expectations, you will enjoy it.
a movie worth watching
|
|||
| 1 |  |
karamazov. | 10 11% |
|
lol.
|
|||
| 1 | ndwnd | 7 67% |
|
|
Great graphics, worth seeing just for the wormhole and black hole, but typical Nolan problems with expository dialogue and forced emotional content.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
mrarn | 75 93% |
|
Ambitious story with complex ideas presented against the destruction of humanity. Convoluted plot piled on top of perplexing concepts makes the movie hard to follow.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
RiverRivers | 91 95% |
|
Won't be nearly as good if you don't watch it on 70mm IMAX, so don't miss out. Sure it's far from being one of the best films out there. However, it was easily the best theater experience I've had in a long, long time.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Chronicler | 98 71% |
|
A thought-provoking, visually stunning sci-fi drama; Interstellar is an ambitious sci-fi that deals with some heavy sci-fi ideas and doesn't sugar coat them which didn't bother me but others may find it difficult to follow.
I found the emotion content of the film too hokey; the whole 'love' as a emotional and literal linchpin to things was a bit much to take. that said, Interstellar is worth seeing for the visuals and the Sci-Fi stuff.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
chmul_cr0n | 73 69% |
|
The boldest thing about this movie is the assumption that people this impatient and emotionally unstable would ever be allowed to be astronauts by NASA or frankly anyone else.
I don't mind all the crying, it's just...for Nolan there doesn't seem to be anything between being super rational and sobbing uncontrollably.
It's pretty much his dumbest movie so far. It's also his best/most fun. I don't know if there's a correlation or if you just need really awesome Hans Zimmer music to compensa
|
|||
| 1 |  |
ribcage | 90 92% |
|
part 2001, part amazing theme park ride, all solidly a nolan film. so rare to realize that my heart is racing not just from the action, but from the story itself. expected it to be a long, long film with pretty visuals, but nolan makes it much, much more than that. plenty of twists, all delivered beautifully. the cast can easily mark interstellar as a high point in all their careers. simply wowed by this.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
PSJ | 71 48% |
|
I didn't know it was directed by Nolan until after I have finished watching it. It explains why it sucked.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
deliz | 86 90% |
|
Wow, when you think nothing happens, it will happen. Great movie, full of meaning and beautifully well shot and composed. Just, yea, a bit overlong, but it's a hell of a piece.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
jmejay | 90 92% |
|
Didn't really appreciate the ending as it was really far fetched and a bit ridiculous - still a great film nonetheless.
|
|||
| 1 | AndersQQ | 85 71% |
|
|
Great robots
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Kingjohnbbq | 90 65% |
|
Matthew McConaughey just keeps killin it. Great movie by Christopher Nolan coming away from the batman movies. I have a few gripes with the movie but theyre easy to overlook given how beautiful it all looks. Overall its a solid film that I wouldn't mind watching again. its definitely got some political bias in the movie but don't let that take you away from the story.
|
|||
| 1 | sawe | 98 99% |
|
|
What a powerful perspective on themes, survival, human emotion and most of all parenthood.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
paussse | 5 7% |
|
what a pitty of wasted time
|
|||
| 1 |  |
AndreasThau | 70 59% |
|
Ah, that was pretty cool. Way more understandable to me than that mind-jumping film of his. I don't particularly like the casting of Matt Damon and Michael Caine though. Stop violating good actors, please.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
jodamico | 83 90% |
|
Full of awe and defiantly hopeful, this is the first actual masterpiece of Christopher Nolan's career.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
cogsworth | 85 71% |
|
The visuals are absolutely breathtaking, and the science involved is surprisingly sound. McConaughey's delivery is deserving of the occasional eye-roll, but great otherwise. A great film all around. Highly recommended. Catch in theaters, especially IMAX, if you can.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Halfang | 80 33% |
|
It is enjoyable. Not perfect, and has its flaws, but you may have to suspend your disbelief for a bit.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
burkayadalig | 68 35% |
|
If you can survive the idiotic first 2 hours, the last part is great... but definitely an average sci-fi
|
|||
| 1 | doughbaron | 80 80% |
|
|
Extremely ambitious concept of a film that could never possibly live up to its vision but does a great job trying. While certain metaphysical aspects of the story threaten to ruin the experience, overall the film is very powerful and engaging.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
vahidtr | 84 94% |
|
movie after movie, Nolan opens new horizons to us, I'm wondering what he's going to do in his next movies! in this movie he has managed to bring science and faith and love all together. this movie is gigantic, epic and glamorous in every aspect.
|
|||
| 1 | kelvin1234 | 85 62% |
|
|
Very great film. I enjoyed it very much.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Naypalm | 90 95% |
|
The ending was like a ketamine binge.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
teckgecko | 87 99% |
|
Both the director's finest & most flawed work. A gripping epic. Marvelous. EMOTIONAL (I wept and I will again). Excepting--if you can--the contrived penultimate act, incredibly inspired.
It seems Nolan loves Dylan Thomas and you should too:
My tears are like the quiet drift
Of petals from some magic rose;
And all my grief flows from the rift
Of unremembered skies and snows.
I think, that if I touched the earth,
It would crumble;
It is so sad and beautiful,
So tremulously like a dream.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
thegreyfox | 90 93% |
|
"IS" is like watching a Led Zeppelin Tribute band: Loud, great sounds and visuals, loads of fun for a night out, but soon forgotten as you return to the originators. When you are emplored to watch a film on the biggest screen possible, you know the story is going to be pretty dumb, but that doesn't stop it being a fantastic visual and auditory assault. Just like Gravity, the "science", plot and dialogue is IS' achilles heel, but unlike Gravity (with its ridiculous acting/casting) IS has heart.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
MontyCircus | 60 68% |
|
Pretty good, enjoyable flick, but definitely not as good as the "best movie ever" type of early imdb ratings. Reminded me a bit of "Contact", but without that film's horrible ending. Reminded me a bit of "Gravity" but much more interesting. I'd be interested in a sequel, so...recommended!
|
|||
| 1 |  |
hajikarimi | 90 59% |
|
1313: more Fi than Sci! (Sci-Fi); if it was not Nolan, i rate it more! but Nolan and this shit!?!
|
|||
| 1 |  |
TrixRabbi | 82 78% |
|
Losing Wally Pfister might have been the best thing to ever happen to Nolan because goddamn.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
goremeat | 80 76% |
|
Definitely not a film about science - rather a celebration of adventurers and will. Wondrous cinema experience, the pulsating rotating space survival scene is one of my favorite "shared with a theatre audience" moments. Spectacular set-pieces abound - solidly good.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
fuzzleshnops | 80 61% |
|
The story lacked "internal consistency" as another reviewer succinctly put it. Near the end when I realized lots of the narrative/philosophical logic would never be fully fleshed out I became a little disappointed by the script's lack of strength. But then I just went along for the ride and enjoyed it through the end.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
SheWas | 63 60% |
|
SABABA, mostly.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
Daph_NL | 80 97% |
|
Captivating. I really liked Interstellar. It is not your typical sci-fi and it works amazingly. New story, great imagery, good acting (even from McConaughey of whom I am not always a fan). Definitely worth 80/100.
|
|||
| 1 |  |
lena_c | 5 92% |
|
Every time Nolan is involved I'm left with a feeling that I've watched something extraordinary; something that reaches beyond normal and straight forward. This time too! *Very good!
|
|||
| 1 | cbrainmovies | 95 72% |
|
|
top notch scifi
|
|||
Displaying 1 to 250 of 489 total ratings: Prev | Next
| Average Percentile 68.41% from 11478 Ratings |  |