Watch
Jupiter Ascending
Your probable score
?

Jupiter Ascending

2015
Sci-fi, Fantasy
2h 7m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 22.81% from 1801 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(1801)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 28 Apr 2015
59
36th
Cinderella by way of Dune, Jupiter Ascending is the silly daydream of a 12 year old girl mixed with the silly daydream of a 14 year old boy. One of those fake movie trailers that you see in comedies like Tropic Thunder but now as an actual feature film. Surprisingly, at times I kinda.. enjoyed this. Yeah, I'm disappointed in me too. Must be the almost gleeful embracing of its own silly premise and just rolling with it, mixed with cool designs and a setting with some potential.
Rated 18 Aug 2019
55
5th
Some of the acting is passable, and the visual effects and action are pretty superb at times. Unfortunately, this feels very rushed. There is a lot of story cramed into a two hour movie. I actually got confused for awhile because the movie just doesn't let what just happened sink in with you before hurrying to the next scene. The love story isn't convincing at all and I don't think Kunis was a very good lead. It's ambitious and pretty, but that's about it.
Rated 04 Feb 2015
30
10th
This is no 'The Matrix'. Not even close. If anything, it's the next 'John Carter'. The story is a derivative mess, and the bland turns from Kunis and Tatum are as boring as the ugly action scenes. A dud, albeit a just about watchable one.
Rated 10 Feb 2015
34
9th
Does for inheritance law what "The Phantom Menace" did for free trade agreements. Right down to the pod race.
Rated 20 Nov 2019
59
33rd
I have a soft spot for this pointy-eared batshit space opera Thumbelina featuring galactic fallen angels, Freudian reincarnation and Eddie Redmayne shouting evil deeds like a boomer chain smoker whispering sweet nothings through a floor fan. It's so focused on world-building it doesn't realize everything looks and sounds like garbage. It's also a near-perfect fairy tale masquerading inside a young adult dime novella and that's it's own kind of impressive.
Rated 09 Feb 2015
50
31st
Seems like they edited this goddamn thing with a chainsaw. I read a comment somewhere that said this was like watching three three-hour sci-fi epics stuffed into 120 minutes, which I agree with. A cool image floats by every once in awhile, but this is too frigging misguided, shapeless and esoteric to be enjoyable. The director's cut might be worth checking out one day. Emphasis on "might."
Rated 09 Feb 2015
30
7th
A plotline of Jupiter Ascending is about reverse aging and time being a resource. Ironic considering everyone who watches this movie is wasting 2 hours of their short life.
Rated 23 Apr 2015
30
8th
It's like a special edition, beautifully illustrated print of Dune, but with blank pages.
Rated 11 Jun 2016
54
18th
As always an amazing use of imagination and visuals are displayed. However it all feels so disjointed the confusion actually is distracting. It can be enjoyed as popcorn nonsense on some levels, but I don't think on any level it can be called good, or even entertaining.
Rated 12 Feb 2017
50
24th
It's like an evening of zapping through movies which accidentally have similar casting. And they're all written by the same 14-year old girl who never leaves her room.
Rated 09 Feb 2015
50
18th
Cool elements can still make a disappointing whole. Not that it didn't look great, and not that it was the stupidest thing I've ever seen, either. My problem was, I expected chicken salad. I got... cucumber salad. Still okay, just not what it could be. Nobody has to (or is asked to) stand out performance-wise. Too little is asked logic- and motivation-wise. Bad script and strange (not in a good way) editing. As forgiving as I am to Sci-Fi, I couldn't come to a point of true enjoyment with this.
Rated 11 Feb 2015
15
7th
Oh my god, that was an abomination
Rated 17 Feb 2015
30
5th
I think that this film only excels in the eye-candy department; the animations were and the action scenes were decent. However, the whole film felt rushed to me; scenes did not feel complete at times. Furthermore, I did not care about the characters at all, because they were not fleshed out well, and the romance part felt tacked on; the result was a teenage romance idea that made me cringe. Expect no substance at all, but a badly paced film, resulting in a bore. Could have been so much more!
Rated 27 Apr 2015
20
22nd
A young girl with a personality deficit gets caught up in a 3-way relationship with a space werewolf and an immortal space vampire. Welcome to Twilight: Jovian Dawn. A real mess of a movie, shamelessly 'borrowing' elements from dozens of classic sci-fi pieces but failing to turn them into anything remotely engaging or coherent. Even the action sequences (the one thing the Wachowskis are known for doing well) are barely above Michael Bay standards.
Rated 05 May 2015
55
19th
This film showcases effete British space villains, space rollerblades, faaaabulous Joan Riveresque costumes, Potato eating Russkis, Area 51 aliens, and talking winged crocodiles from OZ. It's the 80's Flash Gordon sans charisma or camp value and the high budget cum rag you would expect from the Wachowskis horned up off Matrix residuals. However, there are nice visuals here buried under horse turd space fantasia. It's not total diarrhea but it's certainly a waste of time ala. Moonwalker.
Rated 06 Jul 2015
30
20th
Beautiful and dumb. (Spoilers) As I was watching it my mind was saying "I should love this movie, but I don't." Why? Three reasons: 1) The story: "Jup" gets kidnapped three times. 2) I'm probably a weirdo but the talking and long actions scenes don't bug me: "I like dogs" ROFLMAO. What bugs me is that they came at 100% the expense of any character development at all. 3) As the new queen she could work to make Earth & The Verse a better place but nope she wants to scrub toilets. I'm serious.
Rated 24 Aug 2015
25
7th
A kind of interstellar Cinderella tale, but where she gets to keep BOTH the prince AND the household chores. It is difficult to decide about these two filmmakers whether they simply have a juvenile sensibility that leads to kitschy efforts such as this one, or whether, perhaps for reasons to do with the generally anti-capitalist vibe they seem to like to inject into their films, they have some kind of bad conscience that leads them to deliberately sabotage their own chance at profitability.
Rated 06 Dec 2015
54
59th
As I sit and wonder how this movie is panned while GotG is doted on like a virgin bride in a Turkish bathhouse, I soon realize I'm wasting my time pondering over a question whose answer I couldn't give a fuck about. Space mercenaries with dog DNA vs. space mercenaries with raccoon DNA, space bees being attracted to royalty vs space genes allowing full body exposure to the vacuum of space, surfing on space shields vs. distracting a space overlord by dancing a jig. Same fucking difference.
Rated 12 Oct 2017
20
5th
Formulaic uneven and poorly-executed sub plots and oh so predictable and hectic writing, uneven pace and naive plot (although some intriguing world-creation) make for a dysfunctional film that is trying very hard to reach the WOW factor and epic proportions of Cloud Atlas. The zero chemistry between the leads and the massive overacting of Redmayne in comparison to Mila Kunis' low-key performance - as if acting in very different films - don't add much. Costumes - what the fuck. Effects - meh.
Rated 30 Mar 2021
2
1st
The self-discovery journey has a passive and bland protagonist, the space politics plot is interesting but confusing, and the shallow romantic arc feels purely obligatory. Nothing works, and the serious tone, poor dialogue ("I love dogs"), and mediocre turns and VFX don't help. With the ending repeat of Jupiter's life on earth I almost forgave it all as a weird character growth metaphor, but then wolf-man boyfriend comes zooming in again on his sky skates and he's grown wings now and.. yeah.
Rated 05 Feb 2015
50
47th
Jupiter Ascending is one of those few movies that needed to be longer than it was, not shorter. It would work as a two-part miniseries, or a film as long as individual Lord of the Rings movies. There's so much to explore that the movie takes far too much time giving us exposition. By the time that's out of the way, it's almost over, and there's so much more to explore. It's coherent, beautiful, and gives us an interesting universe in which to spend two hours, but more of it would be much better.
Rated 06 Feb 2015
40
7th
Seriously ?! I knew it would suck after seeing the trailer but this is beyond sucking. Such a disappointment from Wachowskis.. I thought maybe it would kinda be like Guardians of the Galaxy, nope my bad. Stay away..
Rated 08 Feb 2015
100
90th
I really like their style, so I'm willing to forgive that the script is so-so. At least it's an original script, and you can tell from every frame of any Wachowski film that they're giving 100%. Visually a creative firework, with great attention to detail. Jupiter Ascending is what John Carter should have been. Mila Kunis wasn't a great fit though.
Rated 12 Feb 2015
2
17th
started off feeling that kunis was ill-equipped for this role, but then i began worrying about whether i felt that way because i was boxing her as a particular brand of heroine just like the various villains do to her character. it's cool this is the kind of movie which insists on that kind of introspection. i mean, boy oh boy is this a lot of movie, much of it generic or misguided, but it's also among the more endearingly earnest & feminist of this recent spate of silly sci-fi blockbusters.
Rated 14 Feb 2015
61
23rd
Waste of potential. Visually it looks good, there clearly is enough lore for a potentially interesting story. Unfortunately it is completely underdeveloped, we only get to see fractions of this seemingly huge universe. And what we see are mostly clichéd scenes and characters. A bit of a chaotic mess, characters and plot themes get introduced and then suddenly disappear completely. Has one of the lamest villains, a caricature. Performances are not good, Mila Kunis in particular was unconvincing.
Rated 21 Feb 2015
59
22nd
So much potential in the story line and the characters, but NOTHING WAS DEVELOPED. Like nothing. They show you a character, makes you curious and it NEVER appears again in the movie. What happened to them? Doesn't matter, here's a 10-minute-scene where elf-Channing is surfing through the sky with his gravity defying rollerblades(that was cool, I admit, who needs hoverboards anymore!!!) fighting god knows what while Mila is just...there. Looking pretty. No acting detected. CGI was superb though.
Rated 21 Apr 2015
68
69th
For what it's worth, the product of a genuine personal passion, even if it ends up like a trans version of Guardians of the Galaxy.
Rated 09 May 2015
42
16th
The 1st half of the movie is confusing. They did a very poor job at explaining what was going at first. Then the 2nd half of the movie kicks off. What an imaginative concept on par with The Matrix but executed like Paul Blart Mall Cop. If a lot more directing, storyline, & acting ability went into this film then it could have rivaled the best in the genre. Instead you get flabby Channing Tatum and "deer in headlights" Mila Kunis
Rated 22 Jun 2015
4
13th
Excess is the Wachowski's enemy, and they fall prey to it again.
Rated 21 Aug 2015
40
4th
The fact that this is a movie is both depressing and enlightening. Depressing because it's made by the same people that did The Matrix. Enlightening because it is a true space opera (just not a good one). I would love to see more movies of this calibre, just not ones that are so awful. Although the world building and universe they create cannot be denied, that doesn't mean it needs to be remembered.
Rated 27 Feb 2016
62
49th
If I never again have to look at Mila Kunis' blank doll-face in a movie, it will be to soon. The film itself, however, is a two hour long dream-sequence of the the kind you get if you eat a dozen very glittery cupcakes and then watch a movie-marathon of the Matrix series, Underworld series and the Star Wars prequels. It is a glorious train-wreck of a movie and I am happier for having seen it.
Rated 08 Jan 2017
40
11th
Why oh why is it so hard to get decent writers for a space opera (I know, it's the Wachowski's, but they obviously need help)? Why do actors forget how to act? Why?? *sob*
Rated 03 Feb 2017
54
7th
This film has some original ideas but they do not really go any place interesting. The script has several weak moments. The actors try their best but they can not overcome the weak material. Overall this film is disappointing.
Rated 06 Nov 2017
35
0th
I lost it at the bees...this was a great example of too much too quickly with zero investment from the audience. It was like coming into a film that was half over.
Rated 07 Mar 2019
63
15th
Apparently the Matrix was a fluke. Kunis' character is a virtual blank w/ no discernible interests or connection to anyone other than her mom. Worse, she's so empty & non-proactive that even discovering she's alien royalty barely registers. Only an actress with a mountain of charisma could pull this off. Tatum isn't any better as a hero whose satyr-on-rollerblades appearance just makes him look silly. Even the CGI space battles are bad since it's never clear what the hell the heroes are fighting
Rated 12 Mar 2019
50
14th
This is not nearly as bad as advertised but it is just as silly. As long as you go in with the expectation that their will be camp, then everything is pretty fun. The script is the biggest problem for me as jumps around without care. Redmayne is...something else. He makes a few choices and then just runs with it. The Wachowskis make films that they want to see, which is commendable.
Rated 07 Sep 2019
48
17th
A few neat visuals try and fail to support a very busy plot heavy on exposition and light on characters worth caring about. Not to mention how groan-worthy the plot is: The protagonist returns home after being kidnapped only to be immediately kidnapped again! Chemistry between the actors is non-existent, everyone's just kinda there. Also this is minor but when Kunis puts the pad on Tatem's wound SHE PUTS THE STICKY SIDE FACE DOWN WTF HOW DO YOU MESS THAT UP
Rated 06 Feb 2015
48
40th
The Wachowskis deliver a fascinating new universe, driven by a plot that of course centers around a bureaucratic boondoggle in an evil capitalistic system. It's full of exposition, strange mythology, plot holes, and unused symbols. However, it's also full of weird aliens in cool fight scenes, and I'm a giant nerd, so it was pretty okay overall.
Rated 08 Feb 2015
35
27th
If there was ever any question that the Wachowski's were mid-talent hacks who got super lucky with the Matrix by basically co-opting other stuff and packaging it well, here's your answer.
Rated 08 Feb 2015
5
57th
I wanted to love this - I eat up anything space opera and am a Wachowskis fan (not Cloud Atlas so much, but I've seen The Matrix at least thirty times). And it has its merits in its fun, enticing mythology and attractive imagery. But it's also mired in ponderous exposition. Some action scene are fun, others go on wayyy too long. So-so acting at best; Kunis, Bean and Redmayne all phone it in, and Channing, who has grown into a pretty damn fine actor, reverts back to circa 2009 GI Joe blandness.
Rated 08 Feb 2015
70
53rd
Watchable just for the stunning visuals, I suspect this has been edited over the last year to make it more palatable (and by the numbers) after the studio started panicking. There are a number of subjects like gene splicing that are mentioned and then glossed over as if they hit a cutting room floor.Same with character motivations for the royal family members.
Rated 08 Feb 2015
55
7th
Credit for doing something different, but this really wasn't for me. Questionable performances, a mess of a plot: a huge step down from Cloud Atlas, as great as it looks.
Rated 09 Feb 2015
40
25th
From the directors that brought us the "The Maxtrix" and the silly "Speed Racer", this movie brings us boring action and a plot so full of itself to have fun. At points it is hard to tell if the things in the movie are homage or just laziness by ripping, wholesale, parts of better Sci-Fi franchises. If the romance was replaced with character and world development, the movie would be a lot better. "Guardiains of the Galaxy" this is not.
Rated 11 Feb 2015
50
8th
It's like someone very high up said: "Okay guys, here is X dollars, now go and make me a stupid blockbuster", and the Wachowskis said: "No probs, but we'll do it our way". It is stupid but also funny and charming in a kitsch way.
Rated 11 Feb 2015
55
39th
Definitely the best hard fantasy sci-fi action space opera Disney cross-over in which SPOILER ALERT Sean Bean doesn't die, I've seen all day.
Rated 12 Feb 2015
90
91st
it was awsome i like it soo much :)
Rated 24 Feb 2015
40
16th
Jupiter Ascending is a very pretty movie, with lots of gorgeous makeup, costumes, and special effects. Unfortunately, all of these things have far more character than the actual characters, or the plot, for that matter. It's a good movie to see in IMAX 3D if you just want to turn your brain off for a couple hours and enjoy something really pretty, though. I can recommend it for that.
Rated 24 Feb 2015
30
17th
Oh no. Cool world, cool visuals, but everything else kinda ruins it.
Rated 28 Feb 2015
7
75th
The plot was bad. The lead actors are wooden and should not star in any movie ever until they learn how to act. The movie was interesting though, in how unique it was. Weird, creative, interesting, some good classic sci fi and I love that. A recommended watch if you can shut down your brain and just enjoy the pretty images and the trip through your imaginary.
Rated 28 Feb 2015
38
7th
A disillusioned house-cleaner (Mila Kunis) is genetically identical to the Queen of the Universe, and so must assume her rulership of the Earth so as to prevent its destruction by an intergalactic corporation run by squabbling siblings. Ridiculous, messy outing from the Wachowskis, with striking (if wildly erratic) production design and expensive special effects wasted on a murky, derivative story. Kunis is miscast, and a decent cast is mostly wasted on shallow and superfluous characters.
Rated 02 Mar 2015
40
11th
preposterous
Rated 06 Mar 2015
83
79th
Excellent scifi. Eddie Redmayne is brilliant in this. Original story yet realitic human interaction and dynamics. Imagining the Universe as a City Hall bearucracy
Rated 08 Mar 2015
40
5th
:(
Rated 15 Mar 2015
41
5th
Too vivid imagination mixed with a level of stupidity in the script that is hard to grasp makes it entertaining for all the wrong reasons. I guess the book explains all of it much better... wait, are you saying there is no book?
Rated 06 Apr 2015
4
34th
The hero has an invincible shield and the ability to block nearly anything. Jupiter, exposed to a galaxy-spanning civilization, decides she prefers cleaning toilets to exploring it (at least she takes to hover boots ^^;) -sigh- humans...
Rated 07 Apr 2015
76
66th
See! Eddie Redmayne's post-Oscar slump! Channing Tatum's stupid-looking ears! Terry Gill-wait, Terry Gilliam? What the fuck's HE doing here?
Rated 21 Apr 2015
28
6th
phantom menace
Rated 23 Apr 2015
74
74th
Whisper whisper. Has the right ingredients, but rushes through a 240-minute story in two hours. It's called "Christopher-Nolan-syndrome", I think. Still, it's exactly my kind of sci-fi cheese. And Gilliam was my highlight. :D
Rated 29 Apr 2015
55
13th
It's just as bad as people make it out to be. Please stay away.. And dammit, stop hiring Channing Tatum--he's awful.
Rated 01 May 2015
35
4th
Weird characters, meaningless action sequences, unappealing story-telling. Sadly, another failure for the Wachowskis.
Rated 10 May 2015
10
30th
Reaches an almost zen-like level of incoherent stupidity, which made it slightly more entertaining than its brethren with the tiniest modicum of coherence and intelligence.
Rated 11 May 2015
67
83rd
I don't understand the bad comments..?! I thought it was entertaining, well played out, good story although the character of Kunis could have been less naive, and actually decent acting. I thought it was a good way to spend my time. 67/100.
Rated 12 May 2015
19
4th
Just hopeless from start to finish. The whole sci-fi action thing for girls could be interesting if done properly, but this movie is just very poorly made.
Rated 15 May 2015
46
5th
One of the worst movies I've seen so far this year. I fast-forwarded parts of it so that it was maybe 15 minutes shorter and it still was too long. Possibly aimed at boys age 15 i wold not recommend this movie to anyone.
Rated 24 May 2015
48
21st
Tatum ice skates through some green screen sets with eye-liner on & cut to Kunis for a static shot covering some universe exposition. Also, Sean Bean doesn't die.
Rated 25 May 2015
55
13th
inconsistent. great effects, but what the hell happened to story, the characters? most of things were too shallow without proper explanation, or at least some narration.
Rated 05 Jun 2015
41
18th
It has its moments, but ultimately this "girlie Matrix" is just too dumb for its own good.
Rated 15 Jun 2015
45
24th
Jupiter Ascending is The Wachowski's ambitious Star Wars/Star Trek/Ender's Game lovechild, but it really isn't worth the whole time it takes to watch it. While it is stunning in its cinematography and CGI, it contains little to no coherent plot, and what it does have is led by weak characters with weaker motivations. Not much in terms of story, but it sure does look nice... at least.
Rated 20 Jun 2015
20
0th
I still cannot decide how much bad this film is... I do not like acters, their performances... I have really difficulty to find anything positive on this movie :(
Rated 24 Jun 2015
25
5th
Magnificent images from space, but what a terrible story and pitifully poor performances. My opinion here : http://opinion-as-a-moviefreak.blogspot.be/2015/06/jupiter-ascending-2015.html
Rated 25 Jun 2015
38
6th
technical achievement (sfx/sound) and the original score is outstanding - the rest is not even worth mentioning. I wonder where the brothers go from here... they are on a step descent into worse and worse movies. However I did like "Cloud Atlas" one of the few people, but everything else they have been attached to is just terrible!!!
Rated 28 Jun 2015
80
79th
Don't really get why everyone is so down on this. It looks lovely and the plot isn't any more nonsense than a lot of sci fi/fantasy films
Rated 30 Jun 2015
35
2nd
Beautiful special effects--the fact that it was done entirely by a single effects house probably lends to its fidelity and consistency. Unfortunately everything else about this film is astonishingly inept. I love the Wachowskis even when their films are a mess (Cloud Atlas, Sense8)--but there just isn't anything here.
Rated 01 Jul 2015
60
52nd
When did people stop being entertained by nonsense? The narrative is a disaster, the characters likewise and the screenplay is all over the place. There's also the clear sense that the Wachowski's have spent a great deal of time carrying out some very detailed world building, but they manage to only give you fumbling glimpses of what could've been something genuinely interesting. But, despite the myriad of flaws that this film has I couldn't help but be a little swooned by its campy stupidity.
Rated 22 Jul 2015
15
2nd
If you imagined a film that combined Disney princess movies and Star Wars, then imagined that film was as terrible as it could possibly be, you would still come up with a higher quality result than this movie ended up as. The character limit doesn't even come remotely close to allowing me to describe how stupid this movie is.
Rated 25 Jul 2015
45
17th
More like Jupiter Descending! Seriously though, she falls a whole lot. Even with the abundance of exposition, the story still feels convoluted. The characters suck and they've got uncharismatic meathead Tatum & miscast Kunis playing the leads & a ridiculous performance from Redmayne. Jupiter is supposed to be special, but all she does is get kidnapped & saved by Tatum. Some ok visuals & a couple of pretty decent action scenes, but they don't make up for the stupid, boring & clunky film.
Rated 03 Sep 2015
40
23rd
What even IS this movie? I feel like they created this whole huge world and then didn't take enough time to explain anything or even give life to the characters who are all awfully flat and boring, in favor of a mediocre love story and some space-laser shootin' action. Yay. Can't say I didn't enjoy the cgi and all that, but I feel cheated in a way. They could've made this good. Could've, should've.
Rated 15 Oct 2015
37
13th
The concepts aren't exactly new but applying them to a big budget space epic could have been damn cool if someone besides the wachowskis did it. This is a bloated mess. Kunis has one of the weakest protagonists and all the main action scenes are tatum saving her from making bad weak willed decisions. And the action is such a explosion of cgi it looks terrible. Tatums flying boots and shield made it look like a nasty mix of halo and highlander 2. The ending was stupid
Rated 11 Jan 2016
35
5th
What the hell was that?
Rated 24 Jan 2016
59
47th
More like Jupiter descending. Gawd, on how many cliffs can a girl fall off in one movie?
Rated 29 Feb 2016
70
53rd
cool concepts like how reincarnation was just the same formation of genetics repeating so they look the same and shit. and how the advanced aliens (humans) became immortal by creating humans on planets and harvesting them once they reach the sustainable limit of their planet
Rated 05 Mar 2016
52
16th
A great example of a movie I wanted so badly to like. Its visuals are amazing, but its plot is shoddy, and there's no saving that.
Rated 19 Jun 2016
3
25th
I dunno, I still didn't really like this on rewatch. I enjoyed it more for its campiness this time around, but it's still a mess.
Rated 06 Sep 2016
50
23rd
Felt sort of like Tron: Legacy to me in that Jupiter Ascending has great visual effects, and some interesting ideas, but a weak story and with this film having some questionable dialogue. "I have more in common with a dog than I have with you." To which the response is "I love dogs, I've always loved dogs." Um, Okay? So overall, with some touch ups on the script, this could have been a good film, instead, it is simply an entertaining film.
Rated 12 Nov 2016
21
10th
D
Rated 13 Feb 2017
40
6th
I blame Honest Trailers for making me believe that this might be fun. Its not!
Rated 20 Feb 2017
45
27th
Big, loud, stupid and kind of fun. Sean Bean & Channing Tatum being the highlights and the dialogue and Mila Kunis being the worst things about this.
Rated 04 Jun 2017
78
33rd
Didn't quite meet the expectations
Rated 11 Oct 2017
76
57th
There's a lot of hate going on for this one, it's mostly unfounded. "Jupiter Ascending" hearkens back to a day when sci-fi movies were just fantasy movies with technology or space in them, they didn't need to have any modicum of realism, they didn't need to make sense. You can take a lot of liberties when making a sci-fi universe like that, and the Wachowski's do, but the problem is that they've never been very good at writing and directing. Competent, but not good.
Rated 03 Jan 2018
20
4th
The effects are cool. If you're looking for a female hero, fine. If you're looking for a three act structure where each act plays out exactly the same. Give it a shot. All other need not apply.
Rated 09 Apr 2018
29
11th
Amazingly crappy
Rated 16 Aug 2018
9
3rd
An unmitigated disaster of a movie.
Rated 03 Feb 2019
20
8th
I'd like to like this film, but it's just so badly made!
Rated 09 Nov 2020
40
77th
it may be femme trash, but it's my femme trash, and we don't get a lot of that, so I love it, unironically
Rated 22 Feb 2023
31
9th
The Matrix.... IN SPACE!
Rated 04 Feb 2015
100
98th
I love the last scene from this movie. I really really do.
Rated 06 Feb 2015
61
5th
There is a fact that Watchowskis are not the same Watchowskis we know nowadays. First of all, with this cast, you can't do something. It's more like a childish movie. Maybe action scenes are okay but beyond that, there's nothing to mention.
Rated 07 Feb 2015
0
0th
A movie should have a story, direction, actors, and a coherent idea. By this definition what I saw wasn't a movie, but a crappy exposition fest featuring miscast actors or just plain bad performances. Shoutouts to Eddie Redmayne, you were amazing as Stephen Hawkins, I hope you don't win the Oscar cause of this god awful performance
Rated 07 Feb 2015
60
28th
I presume it would be the height of politically incorrect opprobrium to suggest that the Wachowski brothers'/siblings' artistic difficulties started after V for Vendetta during Larry's/Lana's "gender reassignment"-- and manifested itself first in Speed Racer. Certainly Jupiter Ascending, while having an interesting premise, fails to move beyond mediocrity in most aspects of its production. The one place where it does shine (heh) is in the did-I-actually-just-see-that scenes with Mila Kunis clean
Rated 07 Feb 2015
60
23rd
I enjoyed it. Great visuals, except Tatum looked goofy. The dialogue is pretty poor generally, the story is interesting but not communicated well, with some predictability (Kunis interacts with someone, gets in trouble, Tatum swoops in), but I did enjoy the action, the anti-gravity boots, the energy shield, and that long chase scene. Takes a lot of influence from a lot of things and manages to be entertaining despite deep flaws in its storytelling.

Collections

(33)
Compact view
Showing 1 - 24 of 33 results

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...