Jurassic World (2015)

Probable Score

Not Enough Info

Your Score

(0 - 100)

Twenty-two years after the events of Jurassic Park (1993), Isla Nublar now features a fully functioning dinosaur theme park, Jurassic World, as originally envisioned by John Hammond. After 10 years of operation and visitor rates declining, in order to fulfill a corporate mandate, a new attraction is created to re-spark visitor's interest, which backfires horribly. (imdb)

More Information and Actions

Cast and Information

Directed By: Colin Trevorrow

Written By: Colin Trevorrow, Derek Connolly, Amanda Silver, Rick Jaffa

Starring: Irrfan Khan, Vincent D'Onofrio, Judy Greer, Omar Sy, BD Wong, Bryce Dallas Howard, Chris Pratt, Jake Johnson, Lauren Lapkus, Nick Robinson, Ty Simpkins

Genres: Sci-fi, Suspense/Thriller, Action, Adventure

Franchise: Jurassic Park

Country: USA

Where to Stream

Invalid Trailer

Ratings

Collections

Stats

Loading...
loading

Jurassic World belongs to 47 collections

1. Films available in HD (collaborative: moderated by kubricksucks - 13 stars)

2. #1 at the US Box Office (collaborative: moderated by BeeDub - 10 stars)

3. Sequel (collaborative: moderated by td888 - 9 stars)

4. Rifftrax (collaborative: moderated by x-human - 8 stars)

5. Big-time Hollywood science fiction (public: djross - 7 stars)

6. Best by different standards (public: sesito71 - 6 stars)

7. Top 3000 movies with the most votes on IMDb (public: fanfic - 5 stars)

8. Belated sequel (collaborative: moderated by djross - 4 stars)

9. Nostalgia Critic Episodes (collaborative: moderated by KirkJiggler - 4 stars)

10. Product Placement (collaborative: moderated by Jellysauce - 3 stars)

11. Dinosaurs (collaborative: moderated by Jellysauce - 3 stars)

12. Famous People Acting As Themselves (No Documentaries) (collaborative: moderated by SirStuckey - 3 stars)

13. Worldwide box office over $500,000,000 (collaborative: moderated by djross - 3 stars)

14. Top 1000 movies with the most votes on IMDb (public: fanfic - 3 stars)

15. Worldwide box office over $1,000,000,000 (collaborative: moderated by djross - 2 stars)

16. Worldwide box office top 100 (collaborative: moderated by djross - 2 stars)

17. Cloning (collaborative: moderated by djross - 2 stars)

18. Cinema Sins (collaborative: moderated by Phantom Nook - 2 stars)

19. Top 2000 movies with the most votes on IMDb (public: fanfic - 2 stars)

20. Worldwide box office over $750,000,000 (collaborative: moderated by djross - 1 star)

21. Ten highest-grossing films by worldwide box office (collaborative: moderated by djross - 1 star)

22. Highest grossing film of the year (collaborative: moderated by djross - 1 star)

23. Worldwide box office over $1,500,000,000 (collaborative: moderated by djross - 1 star)

24. Hollywood Hits, 1920 to present (collaborative: moderated by lisa- - 1 star)

25. Netflix Sverige (collaborative: moderated by Jakobostgren - 1 star)

26. Annual top 5 worldwide box office, 1975 - 2022 (public: djross - 1 star)

27. Jurassic Park (collaborative: moderated by td888)

28. Michael Giacchino (composer) (collaborative: moderated by djross)

29. Development Hell (collaborative: moderated by Ag0stoMesmer)

30. Legendary (collaborative: moderated by djross)

31. Ratings (collaborative: moderated by cheapthrills)

32. Dead Meat: Kill Count (collaborative: moderated by delollio)

33. Soft Reboot (collaborative: moderated by BeeDub)

34. Movies I've Seen In Theaters (public: SirStuckey)

35. Owned (public: ribcage)

36. saw in theater (public: ribcage)

37. Films I saw in the cinema (public: Malcym)

38. Movie Collection (public: BeeDub)

39. 2015 (public: ccllanos)

40. Complete Theatrical Watchlist (public: SageSledge)

41. My Movie Collection (public: elhenzo)

42. SEEN IN CINEMA (public: wicked치킨)

43. seen in 2021 (public: sproost)

44. My ratings (public: tpbradbury)

45. Jurassic (public: LibraLynx98)

46. Blu-ray Collection (public: TripEuphoric)

47. Alex 12As (public: Adam P-D)

Browse the full list of collections

Show:

All Ratings | With Reviews

Order by:

TCI | Percentile | Date Rated | # Stars (Reviews)

Stars	User	Rating
46	Barthalen	48 _25th
"..and as you can see" the head accountant continues, "adding the Poochiesaurus Rex boosts expected revenue to ridiculous heights." The Omni Consumer Products execs applaud. "Once we realised we could simply copy the original product and replace its 'suspense' and 'sense of wonder' with our InsultinglyContrivedBullshit formula, we got results! We present to you... Jurassic World!". A reanimated dinosaur corpse shuffles into the room. It opens its crooked, drooling maw. Money falls out. Applause.
29	bakcheia	36 _31st
JW was brought to you by: Beats Audio, Samsung, Starbucks, Brookstone, Viewmaster, Verizon Wireless, Pepsi, Tostitos, Hasbro, Mercedes, Coca Cola, Nikon, Triumph, NBC/Jimmy Fallon, IWC, Ben and Jerry's, IMAX, Jamba Juice, Margaritaville, Hilton, and Pandora. Don't worry though, there are enough shreds of a story in there to keep this 'Logorama' of a film moving along, but not fast enough for you to miss all the plot conveniences and buffoonery packed into each scene. What a wasteful cash-grab.
18	mrandersen10	60 _20th
As a lifelong fan of cinema, I find it discouraging that the global audience continues to reward mediocrity. This shattered the opening weekend box office record?? The msg we send is clear: characters, story and quality are not important to us. I don't think this is terrible by any means, but it plays it too safe; it doesn't try to be the best it can be and reach its potential - yet, we reward them with a massive bonus anyway! What incentive is there for studios to work hard and make great film?
13	frederic_g54	6 _35th
At first I felt disappointed, as if lured into what seemed to be an appalling parade of product placement and tie-in appearances. But then a Mosasaurus devoured a careless British nanny after having been snatched by a ravenous Pteranodon. I then tore up my shirt in excitement and was asked to leave the premises.
13	BillyShears	60 _34th
"Welcome to Remember Jurassic Park Park"
13	XakkMaster	55 _25th
Despite an enormous world to explore, it feels like we don't see much of it. There were too many plot lines and a lack of consistency; even with character personalities. The dinosaurs are cool, and the nostalgia nods were nice, sure, but I'd just rather watch the original JP a dozen times. Direction was lacking. Everything feels forced, like a hollow, corporate-sponsored set up for a sequel, even though the premise is exhausted now. But a $$ record breaking opening means another 'must be made.'
13	FlipWhitman	45 _17th
Military is bad, family is important, dinosaurs are people too.
11	Suture Self	2 _13th
Fun to laugh at, but make no mistake, this is a huge cash grab. Bad punch lines, paper doll characters, rehashed themes, dinosaur carnage towards the end that felt eerily similar to a dog fight, and somehow the VFX aren't as impressive as the 22 year old original (?). Early on it makes a lazy stab or two at rampant product placement only to force feed you rampant product placement for the entirety of the movie. It wants to lampoon consumerist hell while simultaneously being consumerist hell. No.
11	BeeDub	75 _29th
Lazy, dumb, by-the-numbers sequel with none of the heart of the original. Also, somehow, the effects look worse than they did in 1993.
9	Kojiless	38 _39th
Jurassic World the movie is in many ways exactly like the entry's alpha villain, the I-Rex--crafted in a lab by evil Chinese investors without any regard to ethics or decency, artificially enhanced with CG and "hey ma, look, it's that guy from Guardians of the Galaxy" star power, void of any soul, beyond redemption, and ultimately destined to be pwnd by (the more memorable monsters from) the original Jurassic Park. Yet despite all that, life will find a way...to make a 5th installment.
9	fenixdown	51 _11th
Somewhere between Sharknado and Snakes on a Plane, with a gratuitous amount of callbacks to Jurassic Park and Aliens.
9	Beccaa2406	59 _30th
Cynically and manipulatively nostalgic, creatively bankrupt, yet somehow still enjoyable. The T-Rex somehow manages to look worse than it did twenty years ago. The best of the sequels, at least!
8	KasperL	40 _20th
Not nearly good enough. Sort of entertaining, granted, but the characters and their development are just plain awful. So no, I'll keep rewatching the more or less spotless original instead, thanks.
8	FrederikA	65 _59th
After an all-in-all well composed first act, the movie takes a wrong turn into uninspired monster territory (in which the lack of Spielberg's touch is missed the most) before completely letting go of the reins and climaxing in a wonderfully ridiculous final battle that sets a new standard for "jumping the shark".
8	MArkjp	50 _29th
It seems like the people behind Jurassic World the movie has the same approach to movies as the guys behind Jurassic World the park has to theme parks. And from what I can understand, this makes both Jurassic World the park more profitable than Jurassic Park the park as well as Jurassic World the movie more profitable than Jurassic Park the movie. That saddens me as this is basically Jurassic Park written by those guys who write the story lines for WWE.
8	Tony Irwin	30 _28th
Tiresome franchise extension that tries so very very hard to copy and paste the formula of the previous ones but misses entirely the beat-by-beat action scenes where every action has an unexpected reaction, and fails to include Jeff Goldblum who (I realised with dismay) was quite possibly all the original really had going for it. Packed with glorious comic actors like Judy Greer, D'Onofrio, Lauren Lapkus and of course Chris Pratt who sadly are wasted on a cgi snoozer with a subpar script.
7	cagedwisdom	50 _38th
Jurassic World is a two hour long reason to watch Jurassic Park instead. This film adds literally nothing to the world, it's fairly competent but there is not any way in which it isn't less good than the original; even the special effects were handled better 20 years ago (when they couldn't just do the entire film in CGI).
7	Ytadel	5 _57th
It's mildly enjoyable as a pure turn-off-your-brain adventure flick, but still falls far short of the classic 1993 original in both the pre-dinosaur attack and dinosaur attack phases. Pre-dinosaur attack, there's no one around with the sheer personality or great lines as Goldblum in the original. During the dinosaur attack, the CGI dinos just never convince me they're in the same physical space as our human heroes. I missed the raptor suits. Honestly, I think I like JP2: The Lost World better.
7	spleen	68 _37th
Spoiled kids vs negligent adults vs dinosaurs. Guess who I'm rooting for?
7	knuth	45 _2nd
A girl who loses her clothes during the story but becomes more and more sweaty, an alpha male with way too much testosteron and a badass dinosaur. All in 3D! It was hilarious awfull...
7	Leonardis	78 _26th
This is by no means an amazing movie, but it's better than I thought it would be. Jurassic World, while still failing to live up to the spirit of Jurassic Park, manages very well on its own as a standalone film and a solid Summer blockbuster. Directing isn't too bad. It certainly passes the time and is probably the second best Jurassic Park movie, if one wants to even consider it a Jurassic Park movie and not just a Jurassic World movie. You won't be missing much if you skip this.
7	Groovy_Souls	55 _35th
Jurassic World is a tough rank, because while it has all the makings of a summer blockbuster, it fails to become a really good movie. While it does sport some awesome scenes and CGI, it suffers from an underdeveloped cast of actors who some (not Pratt) seem to be phoning in roles. Trevorrow's cinematography is alright, but altogether he makes a film that doesn't live up to what was given to us in the original entry.
6	twincinema	35 _14th
A hot mess of a film which is the end result of too many writers in the writing room. There's a whole bunch of plot that goes nowhere and the only characterization is to build archetypes. So, really, the film is about the dinosaurs on screen, even as the film just barely tries to connect this with something larger (like the shadowy military cabal). Sometimes watching the dinosaurs is fun, but often, it's a boring experience. Chris Pratt has nothing to do, other than look handsome and strong.
6	Luna6ix	72 _41st
What kind of crazy world is it where sequels and remakes take up such a large proportion of releases, and to add insult to injury, the remakes have more originality than the sequels? This is the same movie that came out in 1993, only now it's an idea that's been used three times over. Let's make another park with dinosaurs, great fuckin' idea. Oh, no, they busted out again! Who could have predicted such catastrophe? Anyone with a memory, that's who, you fuckin' idiots.
6	Ofterdingen	47 _30th
If Jurassic Park were a band they have re-recorded their best album adding only a few silly bonus tracks.
6	JacoIII	27 _15th
This was fine for a theater flick, and had a surprisingly anti-capitalist message (albeit, this also made massive bank for a massive company a la The Lego Movie). Best part: When Chris Pratt masks his scent from the corporate-made dinosaur product (Indominus rex) using a different corporate-made dinosaur product (gasoline).
6	GordonBombay	65 _39th
I love the fact that Dr. Chinese played by B. D. Wong has been at InGen since at least '93, and probably 5-10 years before that (let's face it it making a dino takes time) ... and YET he is STILL surprised when the animals attack. Okay, not all the people in J.W. are dumb as fuck, but when the raptors and the big bad Designer Rex outfox you on several occasions it's not a good sign What is wrong with these people? When the alarm goes on at a park with actual dinos, YOU FUCKING RUN!
6	Superargo	37 _21st
This summer's version of that recent GODZILLA remake: iconic, expensive monsters plopped into the lap of a director who doesn't know what the hell to do with them. Commercial-minded and completely unnecessary, and Trevorrow cannot competently handle the dinosaur action. No oomph here, no scares, and (until the last 15 minutes or so) no memorable set pieces to speak of. Lots of stiff performances, to boot. A soulless, halfhearted botch.
6	TrixRabbi	56 _13th
I don't think I ever need to see another "movie about movies" again.
5	joseywales	70 _56th
The parts with dinosaurs were great, the parts with humans were not.
5	KMcNeil	1 _9th
Absolutely fucking terrible.
5	SirStuckey	50 _23rd
Pretty damn dumb. The plot was mostly just a bunch of cliche crap. The dinosaurs were too CGI heavy. All attempts to make me nostalgic for the first one made me roll my eyes. The few bits where I got that sense of wonder at seeing a dinosaur on the big screen were overshadowed by annoyance. Just wasn't for me.
5	mwgerb	54 _51st
In the background, Jurassic World has an oddly self-aware commentary on its creative bankruptcy, blatant overuse of product placement, and desire to appeal to both nostalgic sci-fi lovers (Child A), and modern, disaffected teens (Child B). Consider the Indominus, a crowd-pleasing T. Rex / Raptor hybrid, sponsored by Verizon. Armed with a meta sense of fun, JW is actually an adequately enjoyable successor to the original. Plus now we can pretend that the other two sequels never happened.
5	jthusky	35 _11th
I'm not intending to be a wet blanket, an outlier or a contrarian - I legitimately thought this film was hot garbage. The first movie, which this one tries so desperately to ape, was a success because of rich characterization, great performances, stellar effects and half-a-ton of dramatic tension. In JW, the characters and writing are paper-thin at best, the performances are stilted (and almost every role is miscast), the effects don't wow and the characters are never legitimately in harm's way.
5	RandallODim	68 _21st
The best thing about this movie, after Vincent D'Onofrio having the best time playing a slimy ballbag, is that it seems to be almost entirely about how Jurassic World should never have been made in the first place.
5	bof	40 _15th
...Yeah, yeah, but your producers were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should.
5	LookJabba...	8 _76th
JW is a worthy and by far the best sequel to follow the beloved JP. It doesn't achieve the same sense of wonder and amazement that JP did, but as a lifelong fan I felt like a child again and I had a lot of fun. Colin Trevorrow adds plenty of nostalgic and fan pleasing touches, Chris Pratt is great and Bryce Dallas Howard grew on me. There are writing and characterization issues and I would have preferred more animatronics. But the flaws are forgivable and overall JW is thoroughly enjoyable.
5	karamazov.	6 _6th
That is one big pile of shit.
4	andayb	40 _15th
you know when you band up with your old college buddies in your garage and jam out a few classics, then say "whew, that was great, we should do this again sometime" and part ways? that was what t-rex and the raptor did at the end, nonchalantly walking in different directions as the movie concluded. GUYS, seriously, a t-rex on the loose is basically the premise of the original film, not a fucking closure.
4	sophie	80 _81st
Jurassic World is entertaining the full length of the film. The ending seemed a little forced, but dino-battle! So, I can let that slip. Big minus is the female lead role, felt like a huge step back from the role of Ellie in Jurassic Parc. (Plus: The endless running around in high heels bothered me more than is healthy!)
4	TheRealJ-Ro	80 _70th
Pretty damn fun. Basically everything that I want from this kind of movie. It homages while standing on its own as its own movie, and has lots of entertaining moments both action- and comedy-wise. It includes: Chris Pratt, velociraptors, Chris Pratt riding a motorcycle between four velociraptors, swerves, heel turns, babyface double-turns, and an ending sequence that is unadulterated movie-making fun. It's a tad cheesy, and it doesn't ask much performance-wise, but fan and non should take it in.
4	Prophet92	81 _65th
The first Jurassic Park sequel that I don't feel compelled to qualify when I talk about enjoying it. I never felt compelled to say "It was good, but..." or "It wasn't bad, but...", I just enjoyed it start to finish. Also, to be honest, the last fifteen or so minutes is everything I ever wanted from a Jurassic Park sequel.
4	nauru	34 _24th
CGI simply isn't as immersive as the animatronics of the first film. For a few shots they add some good sound and slight camera shake to create a sense of mass, but most of the time the giant dinosaurs appear weightless, especially toward the end and during dino-on-dino fights. The writing is of course derivative, while the weak cast is made even weaker by the child actors. Really they should have just brought back the original cast from the first film; there's no comparison. Disappointing.
4	Gideon	1 _16th
I was eight years old when I watched Jurassic Park about a 100 times in the cinema and loved the film more than almost anything. I wanted to become an archaeologist even. I knew all the dinosaurs their names by heart and the walls of my room were filled with dino wallpapers. I scored the highest possible score for my school project about dinosaurs and fossils. Jurassic World raped all of this. Fuck you Jurassic World, please die.
4	forehead1	40 _26th
If I'd known this was just a remake/reimagining of the original I wouldn't have bothered, being yet another criminally lazy rehash of a decades-old film that still looks much better in comparison. Things are tweaked but essentially it's the same movie, save for the fact it fails to be anywhere near as suspenseful or exciting, with much of the conversation scenes downright dull. If this is over 20 years of progress then cinema truly is dying. Talking of which, the 3D once again adds nothing.
4	overrated	34 _26th
Very "safe" through playing the theme music at every opportunity/the last half hour being the movie version of a 4 year old smashing toy dinosaurs together. Really though it's impossible to recapture the awe of the original, on a meta level JW expresses this with hordes of margarita swilling tourists blocking your view of a T-Rex eating a goat. Side notes BDH is annoying, Pratt needed more Andy moments, the director must really hate his PA given the on screen version's fate.
4	BionicNinjas	65 _39th
There are only so many times dinosaurs can get loose and wreak havoc on their stupid human 'masters', and only so many times you can make the same point about the illusion of control, and not even Johnny Karate can change that. Disappointingly popular as it ensures several, even more hollow sequels in the future.
4	tsyni	80 _77th
The end scene was epic and how it had to be. I am surprised at the lower ratings for this. Beats by Dre.
4	Jerky	60 _72nd
Turn off your brain and enjoy dinosaurs eating everyone and then fighting each other. Last 15 minutes felt like a WWE match (tag teams and all) Also, Chris Pratt uses Jedi mind tricks to control Raptors.....yeah.
4	guy piranha	65 _53rd
if only they'd put half as much effort into a cohesive third act as they put into trying to make chris pratt look cool (which didn't work once, i counted). it started out simply upscaling the original, but not without restraint, and that was fine. even the raptor thingy didn't seem that ridiculous at first. but then...i swear to god, i wouldn't have been surprised if the t-rex and the raptor high fived and chris pratt screamed after them "run, buddies, you're free now!"
4	damil	50 _25th
Weak on pretty much every level. Can't match the wonder nor thrills of the original. The characters are all stereotypes. Howard's character is the stuck-up, all-business woman who needs the superhuman alpha-male Chris Pratt to loosen her up and unlock her sexuality. Absolutely embarrassing. As for the action scenes: I just see CGI fighting itself and humans dodging out of the way of nothing. Maybe I sound cynical, but it just wasn't very fun or entertaining - just dull & silly.
4	goremeat	50 _30th
It is a ludicrous blockbuster, but there was a satisfying thread of malice. Jurassic World made its monster well. It killed characters with speaking lines and the movie barely shrugs. The death toll would be shocking - but in the end JW seems to feel that so long as the people you don't care for die then everything is okay. Similar to Star Trek Beyond where a huge death toll is swept under the carpet - but JW let's us see that we as viewers too do this with hardly a flinch.
4	future42	30 _35th
Predictable, maybe too much relying on nostalgia with a lot of "hey remember Jurassic Park? That was a great movie!" scenes. Some of the most interesting parts of the film for me was just seeing a running dinosaur theme park and the attractions they designed for it. Still, enjoyable movie.
4	Paxton	56 _30th
Jurassic World: where the only suspense is your suspension of disbelief. Spoiler spoiler spoiler: the hilarious hackneyed anti-military character (this is grating even in Avatar, a movie directed by the guy that made the greatest corporate stooge ever in Aliens. If James Cameron ain't getting away with it, it's officially done) is right. He's right the whole time. Everything he thinks is true and everything he wants comes to fruition. Are we on the verge of a Top Gun era Jurassic sequel? Yikes!
4	TheEscapist	58 _15th
Incredibly 'Hollywood'-esque. The original films had this problem as well but at least those had a certain charm. Maybe it's because this film is so full of (unconvincing) CGI that it all feels so lifeless. Or maybe it's the bland writing and characters. Or both. The Indominus Rex is far less intimidating than the original T-Rex. The dinosaurs feel fake, the characters feel like actors and the film feels like a modern re-imagining of the original JP. Bad but somehow it's quite watchable.
4	Bobbles	34 _13th
An unstructured mess; feels like the plot was improvised during filming. The "friendly dinosaurs" stuff is nonsense, while the bafflingly rushed "romance" becomes the lynchpin of the ending. Add the wildly inconsistent characterizations, the "cool" staging of what is supposed to be horrific violence, the lame humor, the general waste of good actors in lousy parts, and the PG-13 (and possibly sequel-) friendly strategy of shoving major character deaths off-screen, and you have a recipe for trash.
4	Boxcars	4 _12th
'Jurassic World' has its share of exciting action and touches of charm, but with uninspired characters, an overall absence of freshness, and a surprising mean streak, this installment pales in comparison to the original picture that instilled awe in audiences.
3	Filligan	82 _48th
Okay. All right. There will never be a Jurassic Park as good as the first, and Jurassic World transparently explains why, but World does the best it can with its impossible expectations. I've seen people deriding this film for its spectacle-over-substance quality, but that's all any sequel to Park can manage to be. All moral ruminations are explored by Park, and so each sequel, even Lost World, only has dino craziness as its main asset. It's smartly made where it can afford to be.
3	terrymac	65 _47th
The theme park actually felt like a theme park, bustling with queues of people and product placement, dingy staging areas in the background. Pratt was a likeable and capable lead, but the characterisation of pretty much everyone was a bit forced..."he's like this because....". It's all utterly ludicrous, of course; shocking health and safety procedures, trainable velociraptors and a smirking evil beardy. Still, it's good fun, even though we've seen it all before.
3	Harmonica	64 _27th
About as silly and underwritten a blockbuster as you could ever imagine, and yet somehow despite that (and thanks to Chris Pratt), Jurassic World is an enjoyable, well-paced action film. I'm willing to give Trevorrow a lot of credit for somehow yanking on all the right strings to make fun out of what is a spectacularly bad screenplay. There's a fleeting kernel of a great idea, the blockbuster-franchise-as-theme-park, which is never exploited and deserved a credible writing team to do it justice.
3	Pickpocket	3 _28th
Only after you see the credits and see 4 writers does it make sense why the writing is so convoluted. It's so absurd that they ask you to believe that the US would train raptors in order to hunt terrorists in the middle east. The only accurate writing was displaying the alpha/beta relationship and showing how poor of natural leaders women are. Really by the numbers and often quite boring and uninteresting. And as I said of Jurassic Park 3...how do you make dinosaurs boring?
3	timmo	10 _1st
Incompetently put together, with the worst writing and direction of any movie (period) in at least the last year. Joylessly dreadful and stupid. Did they take two disparate scripts, combine them in a blender, and just film whatever came out, and not question anything because they knew they'd make money regardless of the box office, because of all the product placement? It's not so bad it's good; it's so bad it's pitiful. Really, really pitiful.
3	nutcrackr	68 _30th
Not nearly as bad as expected. There is quite a bit of fan service and fortunately it puts the original at the top of the food chain. Mercedes. Too much CGI in places though, and the gotta-show-all-the-dinos mentality hurts in the end. The kiss was poorly timed and romance arc lazy. The two kids did just enough to be tolerable, but they have none of the charm of Lex and Tim. Mercedes. Hearing the music with those views is almost worth it alone.
3	ephedrin	55 _50th
Same story different actors. :(
3	msprague	55 _19th
My first thought is nope, there isn't really much new in this film and sure enough that is the case. It's noisy and a lot of people get eaten by dinosaurs but that's about it. I'd pass and go see something else with lots of noise and sand instead.
3	INDYATMN	79 _54th
As formulaic as possible, it doesn't have characters as much as archetypes: the child stand-in's an adorable tow-head; the hero works on motorcycles to relax; the heroine needs to realize what's really important. All of this is strung together by a string of implausibilities. Still, the thrills pick up once some pterodactyls turn a babysitter into a ragdoll and the last 30 minutes of the film has the good sense to give us plenty of dino vs dino action and even turn the raptors into good guys.
3	topaz420	60 _9th
Everything that's good about this is either self-homage or self-plagiarizing, and everything that's bad is half-baked CG which somehow looks worse than it did 25(!) years ago.
3	WWallce4prez	60 _25th
A nostalgia factory at best, and a mediocre summer blockbuster at its worst. Still, there were enough dino fights to entertain and the Alpha-Male-that-is-Chris-Pratt is comical...even when he isn't meant to be. Comparisons to the original, while inevitable, are pointless. You will never have the same experience as watching JP in 1993.
3	DavidBlast	40 _28th
Minor Spoilers Thanks to 'Jurassic World', I've been able to scratch two items from my list of phobias: Dinosaurs and gene manipulation. Sure we can blend dino DNA and create the perfect double-sized T-Rex with every conceivable upgrade we can think of (longer arms being the obvious addition), but we can never teach it the simplest of Shyamalanian wisdom: If you're alien to this world then stay clear of water. Bwwrrr I feel like writing more, but this review is making my ablutophobia act up.
3	filmfreak88	35 _10th
This bored me out of my mind. The complete antithesis of Mad Max: Fury Road, especially with regards to its treatment of female characters.
3	Talyn Golic	55 _13th
To say this is the best Jurassic Park sequel is damning it with faint praise. It's the kind of movie I wouldn't turn off if I stumbled upon it on TV but wouldn't go out of my way to watch again. I would've liked more large-scale sequences that took advantage of the large crowds in the open park but we don't get much of it instead we get small groups running around the island, which we've seen before done better. Just keep watching the original, it's a classic for a reason.
3	d_r_e_s_	2 _31st
Pretty disappointed. The story holds every standard monster-movie-plot, and the characters are dull. I clearly expected too much. *Okay
3	doughbaron	67 _41st
My expectations for this were so low that my impression upon first viewing is likely inflated, but I enjoyed the hell out of 2/3 of this movie. Many of the cringe-worthy commercial moments ended up being drowned out by a dumb spectacle that made my drunk ass smile.
3	klea	30 _15th
They can custom engineer their own dinosaurs but they can't afford working phones? Seriously, every time they tried to communicate with someone, it was static. This one adds an aquatic dinosaur, so if you thought any of the previous Jurassic Parks needed that then you'll like this one
3	DougieD	65 _28th
An uninteresting plot filled with dumb stereotypical characters is countered with really fun action set-pieces. It's nowhere near the quality of the first film, but it's better than the previous sequels. It works as a big dumb popcorn movie. It takes awhile for the dull story to get into motion but once the action kicked in I found myself having a really good time.
3	mattorama12	53 _20th
There are times when you can feel where the script was "punched up". At one point, the climax made sense within the movie's own world--it called back to a theme established earlier (mutual respect v. control). Then it instantly decided to elevate the action (twice) in ways that were totally incongruent with the story. Even for a franchise like this that is justifiably focused on spectacle, it really does a disservice when story is so obviously second fiddle.
3	lex	70 _28th
It was really dumb but by the final showdown I didn't even care and was actually getting a real kick out of how ridiculous it had gotten so as a Jurassic Park movie it must be doing something right, right?
3	redflag	78 _14th
The postmodern sequel. All pretense to sincerity abandoned, but better than JP3. JP1 is an auteur's parable for nature's ghost in the machine in revolt against scientific "progress;" here, the focus-grouped spectacular bio-as-machine (weapon) is in revolt. Tourists munch their popcorn like good spectators while shopping at Brookstone, only to be torn to shreds by airborne genetic monsters, while hipsters ironically save the day. But does it give us warmth? Nope, just cynical simulacra.
3	Yiannos	45 _13th
Jurassic World isn't bad as far as remix-reboots are concerned, and it's at least self aware, but a feeling of redundancy inevitably sets in that erases any potential enjoyment. Pratt and Howard are attractive but hollow as the two leads, and the script was seemingly assembled on the fly. The modern theme park concept held promise, but they did nothing with it, and Trevorrow's direction is surprisingly poor until the CGI laden dino fight finale, which is fine but it's too late to save it.
3	joel-w-m	6 _44th
I'm sure the anti-"bigger and better" thematic thread was more hypocritical than cleverly self-referential, but I appreciated it all the same (Owen has a great-and surprisingly lengthy-early back-and-forth with Hoskins: "Progress always wins" "Maybe progress should lose for once"), and so help me, despite some plot contrivances, I loved the bigger, darker dino-action (see the bird snatch) and the badass final bite. It's decently funny too (see Lowery and his failed aftermath-kiss attempt).
3	Hawkins	56 _19th
The real lesson here is that they should just keep the aqua dinos and scrap the rest, at least those ones can't run amok when they inevitably break their feeble human confines. In an ironic twist the 'jumping the shark' scene was the best bit.
3	SpeedMarque	35 _19th
Completly lacks the charm of the first movie. The writers of the movie pretty much sums it up in their own dialogue within the movie. Why make a super monster, dinosaurs should be enough. Sadly just another of a long line of revived franchises that is only out there to make money, not add something new to the universe
2	CinematicESP	78 _40th
Flawed? Sure. The characters are a bit thin and the plot takes a while to get interesting, but the film pushes the unique Jurassic Park concept forward in ways the other two sequels really didn't. And in a time when plenty of sequels fall victim to blatant, distracting nostalgiurbation, it's relatively tasteful in its homages to the original.
2	AFlickering	2 _19th
reminder that the effects in jurassic park were noticably better than this, not to mention better than just about every other blockbuster released this decade. everyone should read THIS positive review though because it's wonderful: http://letterboxd.com/davoarid/film/jurassic-world/1/
2	theficionado	13 _10th
I agree with others that Jurassic World is a hysterical caricature of a blockbuster, indulging itself with scenes of surprising violence (the death of one secondary character) and fan service both ridiculous (the motorcycle scene) and/or interminable (the raptor-and-rex-teamwork conclusion). I suppose I get the impulse behind not taking this whole thing seriously, but then what's the point? It's just another summer blockbuster, only more so and with more than a hint of self-loathing.
2	Mentaculus	39 _14th
A smorgasbord of narrative stereotypes and unrelenting safe violence that seems driven more by some kind of untapped social ennui than any real purpose. Maybe it's the caffeinated culture it describes, but we simply take it as an assumed that these characters matter, and we should care about their adventure, without making any true investment their direction. There was a lot of aw shucks but no awe. Depressing.
2	Der_Barney	60 _5th
Jurassic World has got to be the most spectacular Mercedes ad ever, full of action and glamorous lens flare shots. But its story & characters are underwhelming; even the naturally witty Chris Pratt seems pale in this soulless, superficial, ill-conceived clusterstomp. Plotholes are GAPING everywhere. It's basically a movie about a bunch of bumbling, conniving idiots mismanaging the most dangerous theme park on earth. I wouldn't entrust those guys with running a popsicle stand. Not with my money!
2	Obdurate	75 _52nd
The final act is astounding; so much excitement and the build up to the final dinosaur fight is great. The rest of the movie is also quite entertaining. Just a fun movie about dinosaurs, with some comedy thrown in for good measure.
2	HyphenateMe	75 _72nd
Jurassic World is loud and dumb, but I'll be darned if I didn't enjoy every minute. I can look past the plot issues involving children and their magic fannypack or cliche ridden plots if the movie has fun with what it is delivering, and JW sure does. There's also an argument to be had for the Indominus Rex as a metaphor for "reboots." It's a few new elements, a few old. And in the end, it's taken down mostly by nostalgia.
2	moraesfelipe	40 _14th
The way it embraces many of the original's beloved elements -- gate, Jeep, fences design, sound effects and even its (now) antique publicity -- is a true bliss. But JW's ambition to show more teeth ends up biting some cold meat. The film never finds its inner voice and has to look back for Spielberg's PG-13 sollutions, like blood splatter against glasses and trees, or even embrace some Transformers/Pacific Rim/Godzilla reboot-like sense of spectacle.
2	letskillrobots	5 _13th
"Dinosaurs just aren't exciting anymore." Uh no that is incorrect because millions of people are flocking to the movie which is essentially the exact same as the other and there are like 15 Land Before Times.
2	CosmicMonkey	68 _29th
Hollywood blockbuster that plays it incredibly safe, eschewing any genuine artistry or originality for a by-the-numbers, passably mediocre kinda-dumb action flick reliant on nostalgia, who's best praise is that it wasn't as terrible as the other two Jurassic Park sequels. I watched it once and have been given no reason to want to watch this or any of its upcoming sequels again, especially wile the masterpiece original Jurassic Park exists. -2 pts for the egregious level of product placement.
2	jfen	78 _13th
Fantastically ridiculous ending, lots of dino fun. Bad CGI and unlikeable characters make it a bit of a disappointment after all this time. Honestly barely better than the other sequels, if better at all.
2	wetwillies	60 _10th
A remarkably soulless and plodding attempt at a thrillride, filled with cookie-cutter characters and motivations, and action scenes without any sense of danger or intrigue. So, in that regard, I guess it's the exact opposite of Jurassic Park. Has a couple of good scenes (The pterodactyls dropping out of the sky and pulling people into the air is the one setpiece that worked for me) and hey, Lauren Lapkus is in it. She's great. The "ironic capitalism" thing made me want to vomit.
2	billkerwin	70 _14th
The script is dumb, but the oafish yet cunning menace of Vincent D"Onofrio kept my interest, and I was delighted when (not really a "spoiler") he was chomped to death by a raptor. The art direction is excellent, and made me believe it was a real theme park (I think I could map it right now, by myself!) Otherwise, not much. The finale is so frenetic and over the top that I started to yawn. The suspenseful attack of the raptors at the end of "Jurassic Park" was a much more effective conclusion.
2	VinegarBob	10 _6th
A prime example of everything that's wrong with Hollywood blockbusters.
2	Cinema_Asia	60 _30th
There's excellent casting choices here with kid actor #1 and #2 who seem to exemplify everything nostalgic about 80's and 90's films without memorable features. You get child actors that remind you of Goonies or the Feldmans without witty lines or star power for us to recall them. ingenius. This is repackaging nostalgia. It's revisitation of another contemporary film. When Ho-wood is retreading SFX laden blockbusters from only 20 something years ago the well is as dry as a nun's honey pot.
2	Matthew Parkinson (CineMarter)	70 _77th
While it probably never could have matched the awe-inspiring original film, we finally have a Jurassic Park sequel that feels like a proper Jurassic Park sequel - and one that is worthy of holding that title. Jurassic World is one thrilling ride. It's fun, it's exciting, it gives you several great moments, it has good acting, and solid special effects. [Full Review]
2	hellboy76	65 _45th
Good CGI and Chris Pratt give this only a decent score. It's insane and insulting at times, and plays like satire except it doesn't seem to be in on that fact.
2	Marnie	83 _48th
OLD SCHOOL T-REX IS THE BEST!!!!!
2	wedders	86 _82nd
This film is brilliantly subversive, a pastiche of modern cultural cynicism. The park's re-open, and John Hammond's naturalist approach isn't profitable anymore so they genetically engineer a new dino, and then get it "presented by Verizon Wireless" - guess what goes wrong? Excellent throwbacks to the original film throughout too. Chris Pratt maybe not my first choice in this role, but he tries and the result is watchable. A well-formed action/monster film with some good chuckles throughout.
2	ratedargh	60 _30th
Deja vu. I can't really take the raptor army seriously enough to fully get into the movie, but at least there's no victory by gymnastics. It's fine for the most part, but never touches the greatness of the first one. Nice to see Christ Pratt's audition tape for Indiana Jones, though.
2	eCitizen	50 _49th
Some really good computer graphics and special effects but also much was substandard. The ridiculous plot ruins it. Reptiles surviving being shot and raptors for warfare was nonsense. Nothing made sense. They successfully destroyed the sense of immersion and wonder. Tedious dialog and acting esp. from Chris Pratt. Unsatisfying & unbelievable. A waste of a franchise with huge potential. Abysmal writing and atrocious editing. Perhaps 20 minutes of great stuff, but the rest is garbage!
2	suplextrain	70 _51st
Second best JP movie. The first movie focused more on the drama and thriller aspects, while Jurassic World focuses more on the action with some light comedy. It's basically slightly cheesy action movie with some nods to the original. By no means a classic, but it's solid fun.
2	The Pirate	63 _20th
I like some of its concepts, but the writing isn't really there, and the humor is complete hit or miss. Except for Chris Pratt, the only characters I was invested in were the dinosaurs. Still, for all its flaws and over use of Dino Ex Machina, it is a pretty fun ride.
2	Quaffee	50 _12th
Manages to make dinosaur chaos somehow insipid, and does so with a mean streak and self-loathing cynicism that makes it uncomfortable to watch for all the wrong reasons. There are some fun performances in spite of the poor dialogue and few chances anyone gets to establish any sense of multi-faceted character, but ultimately I just felt sorry to see so many good people in such a so-so movie. Even taken as nothing more than a dino-fest it isn't hugely memorable.
2	VorpalKitten	90 _87th
The movie kept one-upping my expectations as it played through. I can imagine it being a much more enjoyable if shorter movie if a LOT of non Chris Pratt stuff was cut, though.
2	mwhiteout	16 _57th
This review is sponsored by Coca-Cola, Mercedes, Samsung, and Beats Headphones.
1	wayofthegun	65 _29th
Fun summer blockbuster-type movie that is on par with the other sequels, though falls well short of recapturing the magic and thrill of the first entry in the series.
1	Voltaire53	78 _76th
The basic plot leans heavily, as expected, back to the magnificent first in the franchise but they add a few clever new ideas to keep things fresh... it moves at a pretty cracking pace but still gives time for the characters to be developed and 'breathe'. The effects (CGI and animatronic) are as impressive as you'd hope for and the set action pieces are exciting and well shot (though some ideas are 'stolen' from other (great) films). Overall a great, fun action movie... with cool dinosaurs
1	nuotio	63 _77th
Surprisingly solid summer blockbuster, which remixes parts of original Jurassic Park with new stuff. It should please old and new viewers alike, and is clearly the 2nd best entry in the series. Pratt plays a likable hero and Dallas Howard is fine as the career-orientated damsel. The film is surprisingly old-fashioned in it's approach and views, but not enough to make it insulting. It will be interesting to see what director Trevorrow does, if/when given an original property and similar budget.
1	grimsooth	38 _29th
This movie is terrible. It's so horrible it's almost good. This is a C grade horror flick that doesn't know it. If you go expecting a grind-house flick, brother you get it. A level graphics for sure. 3D graphics are not gimmicky and flying into your face.
1	HP_Buttcraft	59 _24th
It was a fun movie. Lots of dinosaurs! But oh man, was this movie STUPID. Jurassic World was essentially a SyFy Channel movie with a budget the size of a tyrannosaurus rex.
1	cowfrappe	69 _55th
So fun and well made; characterizations are paper thin but the dinos are the point.
1	Anomaly	61 _31st
Tries to rise above the average blockbuster spectacle with some meta-commentary on its plot and the inherent absurdity of it all. This it fails at, since it doesn't fully commit to going in any one direction, at least until the climax finally gives us the over-the-top dinosaur smackdown we came for. The kids were as annoying as always. Only bright spot is BD Wong killing it as the older, more morally dubious Henry Wu.
1	maddog	63 _24th
How could a park with this many potential safety problems ever be green-lit? How much bribery had to take place? The absurdity is what really ruins it.
1	caffe	27 _5th
Perfectly decent but without much heart. Moves along at a nice pace, doesn't bore and does what it is supposed to. It would have been nice if it had done anything surprising. At all. Also it's continually fascinating how these movies put together by the capitalistic committees of Hollywood still want to have capitalists as their bad guys. Are we to assume they know they're the evil ones and have simply accepted that because they won?
1	Vassago	81 _84th
Despite the cheap looking 3D shots, I really enjoyed the movie. Pratt/Howard duo is very likeable. We miss dinosaurs, that's for sure. Who wouldn't like to pet one, ehh ?
1	Koalafish	70 _68th
Some good stuff, some bad stuff. Overall quite entertaining, but the final showdown is just a bit too much.
1	Duder	50 _12th
* I really liked the park itself, a lot of nice ideas in there and made me want to visit. But the film itself was just a summer dumb blockbuster that does not have much to offer and was very shallow. Even though Howard is just a delight to look at with those eyes and lips.. Man..
1	Age Jellema	55 _17th
Really? Just bigger animals? That's it?
1	roonay3k	74 _78th
It was everything I had expected it to be! Great visuals & Effects, cheesy story with a lot of stupid moments that just didn't make any sense. The first Jurassic park was slightly better storywise, and the dinosaurs was amazing back then considering what they had to work with. Not a big improvement in this, but it was still pretty damn good. I was entertained but there were parts that annoyed me and I really think they should have made a better story and dialogues.
1	monclivie	89 _96th
Masterpiece of mindless action-adventure. True adventure, actually. Thank you IMAX.
1	whatismyname	70 _77th
Lots of action and some deliberate cheesy scenes made this a summer action film.
1	lumpnboy	25 _9th
Nihilists inviting children and the intellectually childlike to enjoy and see themselves in cheerful nihilism. Feels like extravagant potlatch but it made more wealth, so...cynical conformity which can barely be bothered to pretend. The basic question: why is there nothing instead of something?
1	Timon88	28 _15th
Bad, but not quite so bad as to be great camp. But, lord. it tries. Exhibit A: the awful dialog. Not since Kate Capshaw in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom have we had a heroine like Bryce Dallas Howard. Vincent D'Onofrio blusters and twitches up a storm, and we even get him running, which--with his extra poundage--is, in fact, hilarious. And B.D. Wong as the gaysian scientist... okay, it doesn't get much campier than that.
1	Neonman	61 _17th
A very standard blockbuster that has none of the allure or excitement for the World like Jurassic Park had for its Park (though this film does have some unsure self-referential criticism). First half is full of incredibly dumb decisions just to get the action going, mostly made by Dallas Howard's character who should be fired and imprisoned for being the absolutely wrong person in charge. Hardly any thrilling moments, but some exciting and entertaining dinosaur showdowns are definite highlights.
1	Langelund (CinemaZone.dk)	25 _11th
So Chris Pratt actually thinks he can train raptors like dogs?! This must be the Saturday Night Live version, no?
1	janus	40 _10th
Very poor acting throughout, from everyone. I appreciated the none-too-subtle admittance early on that the magic of Spielberg's cultural touchstone can't be duplicated, but as the film trundles on, more commentary along those lines seems increasingly like the filmmakers excusing themselves for aiming low.
1	jordanlige	100 _51st
really awesome and neat 10 out of 10
1	omgfridge	6 _53rd
Everything involving dinosaur battles is awesome. A lot of highly entertaining sequences. That's what I came to see along with man crush Chris Pratt. Dishonorable mention to Vincent D'Onofrio's cringe worthy performance and that whole side of the plot. Borderline unwatchable and seemingly only there to prompt a sequel, really brought the film down for me.
1	zspyry	2 _5th
None of the actions taken by characters in this movie make any sense, and it's impossible to relate to any of them. And it doesn't help that even the original 1993 movie had more convincing special effects.
1	Okkervil	58 _48th
A more than serviceable CGI smash and grab that is undeniably the best in the series since the unequalled original. There's plenty of problems; ranging from the uneven pacing, the bolted-on romance and brotherly love-up, and a chronic lack of depth when it comes to the story/faux-science/characters/bad guys/most everything! The action is really entertaining however and Pratt and BDH do well considering the script and story limitations. Pretty hollow, but fun enough.
1	bolivar	70 _54th
Enjoyable action, sure. But why, oh why, do these type of movies have to use those twenty-from-the-book-clichés before you can actually enjoy the movie?
1	paussse	75 _77th
Fun action, didn't expect to give a positive review.
1	timmytom	80 _76th
Glorious spectacle.
1	redacted	62 _32nd
So, I thought Howard was Applegate the whole film. She did seem to secrete far more gleam than anyone else in the same environment too. Khan was a refreshing company owner character & Pratt was a Indiana Jones hologram. I was also getting a young George Takei vibe from BD Wong. Highlight was the guy who picked up his drinks before he ran inside during the pterodactyl pearl harbour scene.
1	asdf83sdhf	74 _57th
Nothing spectacular but I found it fun.
1	Clark Nova	9 _8th
The largest compilation of bad actors I've ever seen in a film and just when you think it can't get any worse JIMMY FUCKING FALLON COMES ON!!!! Fuck this film. More like JurASSic Hurled!
1	NothingsGood	40 _33rd
"And now we're going through the actual front gate of the original Jurassic Park, the theme park that never opened because everyone involved in its creation died and then when we tried to move it to the mainland a T-Rex destroyed San Diego. Enjoy your stay."
1	Scorpus	72 _47th
A fun but ultimately not that amazing sequel to the dinosaur-filled original
1	normalchaos	60 _28th
The dinosaurs and the park itself were awesome, even if the characters and plot were a bit lacking.
1	fuzzleshnops	72 _46th
It knew it was never going to be the original. And I think once knowing that, this movie met expectations: subtle yet thoughtful nostalgia to the greatness of the original, a critique on consumerism, an actually likable hero, and DINOSAURS. Yes, it lacked strong internal cohesion, but I expected that... only Jurassic Park will be able to do that, so it was just going with many different angles--quantity over quality-- and I enjoyed expanding JW's presented ideas with my own thoughts and feelings
1	xacviant	72 _30th
A stable, profitable Jurassic Park (now branded "Jurassic World") has been running for some years, and its backers, wanting to spur attendance, have created the Indominus Rex, a beast with greater strength and intelligence than any other in the park...and then it gets loose. There's too much bland human drama before we get to the good stuff, and Bryce Dallas Howard in particular is stuck with a terribly drawn character, but once things get cooking, it's hard not to be satisfied.
1	ribcage	70 _58th
captures the spirit if not the nuances of the original.all the dinosaur bits were totally thrilling &exciting & cool. plots more than a bit contrived & the characters range from acceptable to cartoonish but the action &the overall feel hold up well enough.plenty of memorable setpieces altho no memorable characters.huge complaint is:the old visitor center & EVERYTHING in it is just left there unattended for 20 years?& that jeep left to rot for 20 years just needed a battery change to work?
1	KramYessev	73 _65th
Horrible characters and dialogue, shameless (and confused) product placement, ridiculous and stupid...yet I had fun. It's essentially a mashup of the other three movies, for better or worse. The finale is obvious and telegraphed, but it couldn't have ended any other way and not been a disaster.
1	Gnalkhere	45 _9th
The dino-whale is the hero we truly deserve
1	mkellins	30 _11th
In the film they claim that it's bad to want a bigger, stronger beast with more teeth. On the other hand, that is exactly what the Hollywood mega-budget movies, like this one, represent. We get a soulless story that feels highly calculated like it was only designed to make the most money.
1	Minorsage	45 _23rd
So thin it was transparent. Only two pleasing surprises. Would have been better if it was just Chris Pratt and the raptors, roaming the world, killing bad guys.
1	antidood1	55 _24th
Believe me when I say that parts of this movie are exceptionally stupid. This movie has dumber moments than some of the more infamously dumb movies out there. Not to mention the god-awful product placement (strangely intercut by an attempted jab at... product placement?). But for some reason that didn't stop me from enjoying what I saw at this movie's core, which is a well-directed piece of entertainment that allows you to finish your popcorn without completely hating yourself for watching it.
1	TjlMovFrks23	70 _38th
A fun, summer flick that is meant to be a thrill and a fun ride going back to the world of Jurassic Park. It is a decent attempt to revamp one of Spielberg classic to impress the new generation with his grandiose vision of the cinema. Sometimes, one big budget, CGI fest popcorn blockbuster is all you need to just sit and enjoy the movie for what it really is, an adventure world to escape from the less than stellar, ordinary life.
1	Barraoc	70 _64th
A worthy successor to the original ,and it was nice to see a few ideas from Crichton's sequel (The Lost World) floating in and out. The camouflaged dinosaur, for example.
1	hotsake	64 _59th
While I did enjoy this movie somewhat, My least favorite of the four, the acting is pretty damn bad especially by Vincent D'Onofrio and the two stupid brat kids and a special shout out to the horrendous Bryce Dallas Howard for being so horrible in this I would want to shut it off at times. The story is pretty much a rip off of the previous three movies full of people nobody gives a shit about. The movie was big, loud and pretty. Spinosaurus vs Indominus rex vs T-Rex would've been cool.
1	gracesake	60 _20th
lead female role played by Bryce Fucking Howard KILLED THIS MOVIE! horrible overacting and seriously she ran around in heels 'attempting' to save the day?! wtf. pathetic absolutely pathetic. chris pratt was the only saving grace to this movie, great CGI and definitely could have explored the dinosaurs and world more. stupid freakin characters that held no weight in this movie. love the dinosaurs they should have ate her.
1	Goldbluming	89 _84th
Yeah I know it's not a well structured movie and the characters suck, but I don't care. The stars are the dinos and this movie hits all the nostalgic notes and then ramps it up! It was fun as fuck to watch this in the theater.
1	magdabag	86 _62nd
Even though I did like this movie, it can't compare to the original Jurassic Park (1993). I thought this movie was really entertaining. I did't know what they were going to do with it exactly, but I was not disappointed. Chris Pratt did a great job of, well, be Chris Pratt (which is great by the way). I also think Jessica Chas- I mean Bryce Dallas Howard, did a great job as well.
1	VengefulKBM	70 _51st
Far and away the second-best Jurassic Park movie ever made. Tonally, it's far truer to the original than any of the other sequels, the characters are likable enough that you don't want to see them get eaten, and there are some genuinely tense and genuinely funny moments. It's ridiculous, yes, but it's a hell of a lot of fun throughout. Had to dock a couple points for the totally tacked-on romance, though.
1	HedlesChkn	88 _86th
This is such a dumb film, there's no denying it, but I thoroughly enjoyed it. I think there's an air of self-awareness that forgives the more ludicrous occurrences and it sits in a more contemporary blockbuster role than its more reserved predecessors. Chris Pratt is phenomenal, playing pretty much completely straight with his humour and charm permeating through. It's no thinkpiece, but for awe-levels of the original, it comes close. YEAH, DINOSAURS!
1	Dakota99	6 _62nd
As a sequel/reboot of the Jurassic Park franchise, Jurassic World is actually solid. The script probably could've used some tweaks, and the whole militarizing dinosaurs sub plot is kinda stupid and something that could've been scrapped. However, Chris Pratt is really good in this, and BDH is fine as well, their chemistry does a lot for this, and the chaos itself is pretty entertaining. It's not perfect, but there is a solid ground work for a great franchise revival here.
1	PluggedIN	60 _62nd
But speaking of those terrifying teeth, you'll also see some seriously freaked-out folks being gobbled up whole, squashed by gigantic monster mitts or swept screaming into the air by sharp-clawed creatures in this feature. (pluggedin.com)
1	kjetting	60 _39th
The second best jurassic park movie.
1	gogolit	68 _29th
Jesus this was awful, even for a Hollywood blockbuster, this was bad.
1	michaels	75 _66th
Cliche & thinner than paper characters, hilariously cheesy lines, annoying kids, undercooked suplots -- all checked. But this is a dinosaurs show and I was damn pleased with them. The last half an hour was a thrill ride. Chris Pratt's Indiana Jones-esque raptor whisperer was surprisingly okay, too. Go dinosaurs!
1	Catnip	80 _75th
It's nothing new and it had its flaws (undeniably), but I myself could readily forgive them for all the nostalgic feels and the badass special effects, and of course DINOSAURS and CHRIS PRATT, oh my!
1	BJHudson	42 _25th
bryce dallas howard in a classic bitch haircut running around in stilettos. #iconic #inabadway
1	Otsu	82 _73rd
The ending felt kinda forced
1	amazedemon	64 _50th
Jurassic World is essentially a disaster movie worthy of Emmerich. The film lacks the majesty of the first instalment, all the more evident when Williams' iconic theme is heard. It's also bloated by superfluous sub-plots that are neither interesting nor memorable. I liked Pratt, Johnson and Khan in their roles, though the film is slightly dialogue-adversed. Overall it's "summer fun" with plenty of nostalgia nods, but the ending was uninspired, leaving me to wonder why I didn't just rewatch JP 1.
1	mooper	75 _67th
Expected a modern reboot to be worse. Although some moments were pretty bad, overall I think the movie was pretty good.
1	MovieMelee	98 _83rd
This was truly one of the best Jurassic Park movies. It was everything all the movies should have been before it. Congrats to Colin Trevorrow for giving us a movie for the ages.
1	pmcinern	40 _8th
Why bother? Every scene in the movie is a carbon copy of scenes from the previous ones. It's not... bad... it's fairly well-made, but the product placement is in overdrive, I couldn't connect with any of the "characters," and they valued special effects over awe. Chris Pratt showed that he's just waiting to be the next Harrison Ford, if given the right chance. But this wasn't it. There's nothing redeeming about JW at all. Watch the first one and have a good time.
1	Mr.Olivier	22 _12th
Giving this a 20+ rating 'cause it did deliver some good dinosaurs chompin' humans scenes, & even got a little sadistic for a PG-13 film. Otherwise it sucked, & man FUCK the score. Fuck that terrible "oooh isn't this all so awe-inspiring" sweeping orchestral bullcrap.
1	ikkegoemikke	70 _78th
A worthy successor of the first movie. That's for sure ! My prehistoric opinion here : http://opinion-as-a-moviefreak.blogspot.be/2015/06/jurassic-world-2015.html [Full Review]
1	thunderPIN	60 _20th
Despite all of its shortcomings, Jurassic World still delivers some enjoyable entertainment. I had my expectations set low because I knew going in that it wasn't going to match the original. Chris Pratt continues to impress me and I believe he's got some great leading roles in his future. It's in no way a classic but you just might find some entertainment in this film. These dinosaurs do kick ass. Worth at least a rental. 3 STARS
1	Movie-Op	6 _38th
Jurassic World is a well-intentioned homage to Jurassic Park, but it never learns to stand on its own two feet.
1	IceStark7	70 _59th
My first "Jurassic" movie and I wasn't disappointed. The effects were top notch along with it being an enjoyable watch.
1	LSBCMA	30 _7th
bad plot, decent cgi, bad writting and annoying characters
1	xenodork	24 _2nd
Cynical, joyless, meta garbage.
1	mwestcott	75 _50th
Jurassic World is the second best in the series. Some would question whether that really means anything. Yes, yes it does. It means these movies are fun again. The awe has died out to be sure. But for those simply looking for an enjoyable time at the movies. You could do a lot worse. It would be worth just hearing John Williams theme music again no matter how the film turned out. Playing on nostalgia? Yes. Is that a problem? Not this time.
1	peyrin	30 _10th
There's a small nugget of commentary somewhere in here about how hyper-commodification is antithetical to life itself, like an Okja but for theme parks. But then you get focus-grouped "cute" CGI dinos and it's clear any commentary is entirely accidental.
1	baseballs	35 _10th
Was kind of shocked by how much I hated this, I expected it to be dumb fun but it wasn't fun at all. Reverential of the original in the most obnoxious way whilst managing to be worse than its mediocre sequels. The climax is one of the dumbest things I've ever seen in a film, the cinematic equivalent of a kid smashing his toys together. I genuinely felt insulted.
1	vv238	28 _24th
A woefully inept film that bumbles its way through every rehashed and predictable plot point. Pratt is a decent enough star but he goes between being misused or underused. I knew I was in for a "treat" when within the first 10 minutes there was a painful meta-joke (SEE HOW CLEVER WE ARE?!?!?) about the original park (GET IT THEY MEAN THE MOVIE?!?). Fuck you, Colin Trevorrow and the 16 other writers who are still incapable of writing a better script than a 25 year-old pulp novel.

Displaying 1 to 250 of 309 total ratings: Prev | Next

Average Percentile 35.48% from 4964 Ratings