sign in
register
Watch
Starz Starz Roku Premium Channel Starz Amazon Channel
+9
King Kong
King Kong
+9
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
King Kong

King Kong

2005
Romance, Drama
3h 7m
Director Peter Jackson helms the dramatic adventure King Kong, bringing his sweeping cinematic vision to the iconic story of the gigantic ape captured in the wild and brought to civilization where he meets his tragic fate.

Directed by:

Peter Jackson

Screenwriter:

Philippa Boyens, Fran Walsh

Starring:

Adrien Brody, Naomi Watts, Jamie Bell, Jack Black, Thomas Kretschmann, Colin Hanks, Andy Serkis, Kyle Chandler, Lobo Chan, John Sumner, Evan Parke, Jason Whyte

Franchise:

King Kong

Genres:

Romance, Drama, Action, Adventure

Countries:

Germany, New Zealand, USA

Language:

English
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

King Kong

2005
Romance, Drama
3h 7m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 42.48% from 13185 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(13266)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
jimmynmujimmynmu
Rated 14 Aug 2007
62
41st
A large disapointment. Unlike the LOTR trilogy, this film wasn't fun or exciting. I felt bored, and was wishing for it to end. The action sequenes went on for far too long, and were ridiculous.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
beedubBeeDub
Rated 27 Mar 2016
82
50th
A two-hour story squeezed into three hours. Jackson's penchant for self-indulgence and bloated running times started here before reaching its apex with the Hobbit trilogy. Competent but exhausting.
Rated 27 Mar 2016
parmandurParmandur
Rated 14 Aug 2007
65
42nd
An interesting failure, that dissapoints throughout and leaves the viewer in dismay over such a monumental waste of talent.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
colinzealukColinzealuk
Rated 14 Aug 2007
37
4th
Takes three hours to do what could comfortably be done in 2. Cinematics etc are good, as you'd expect from Jackson, but ultimately it bores me. Not his best effort by any measure of the imagination.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
teddedonTedDedon
Rated 18 Mar 2007
89
83rd
King Kong is really quite good. It's epic, it's daring, it's intense, and most of all, it's incredibly well made overall. If you like movies that try their hardest to blow you away with thrilling action sequences this is the movie for you.
Rated 18 Mar 2007
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 25 Apr 2019
93
88th
Jackson's mammoth retelling uses its extra time remarkably well, especially in fleshing out Darrow's poignant, heart rending connection to the beast (well played by Serkis) and telling his tale on a grand, at times overwhelming scale. Beautiful evocation of 30s New York is a highlight; while some judicious trimming may have helped (especially with the crew on the island), this emerges as a formidable achievement, even managing to out-Spielberg in some of its terrific carnage scenes.
Rated 25 Apr 2019
carpetgiantCarpetgiant
Rated 05 Aug 2014
86
69th
Okay, wait, I'm confused about the ending. Was one of the airplanes named "Beauty" or something?
Rated 05 Aug 2014
rillaroo_winRillaroo Win
Rated 26 Jun 2010
0
0th
yes dis rilla can asocisciate v dot good movi
Rated 26 Jun 2010
overratedoverrated
Rated 10 Jan 2010
28
19th
Just way, way too long. Too much time given over to setting things in motion and uninteresting characters. The action scenes feel really green screened and weightless. Also I don't know about you but I was squirming pretty hard in my seat when Watts dances for Kong.
Rated 10 Jan 2010
frederikaFrederikA
Rated 12 Oct 2009
75
77th
Excess in its purest form. Jackson may have bit off more than he can chew, but he orchestrates the mess wonderfully.
Rated 12 Oct 2009
mwgerbmwgerb
Rated 10 Sep 2009
52
47th
The incredible improvement on the original in terms of graphics was pretty much all wasted on pacing issues. This did NOT have to be over 3 hours long. Still, in those three hours, it has its moments.
Rated 10 Sep 2009
alex_watkinsAlex Watkins
Rated 10 Jul 2009
4
70th
King Kong is sort of a mixed bag. It has character depth that adds another dimension to the story, but it still could've been substantially shorter. The action sequences are thrilling, but overblown at times as well. The effects are wonderful, but overambition leads to some awkward looking sequences. Overall? The good, to me, far outweighs the bad. It's a great experience, and its best sequences rank among my favorite in any popcorn movie. Also, having a crush on Naomi Watts helps (she's great).
Rated 10 Jul 2009
djrossdjross
Rated 18 Oct 2008
25
7th
Some initially promising ideas and decisions are soon drowned in a deluge of uninteresting and meaningless digital effects. Unimpressive musical score.
Rated 18 Oct 2008
thedeekTheDeek
Rated 04 Aug 2008
61
29th
Worth seeing for the bizarre relationship between the big black guy and Jimmy
Rated 04 Aug 2008
panzerwolfpanzerwolf
Rated 11 Jul 2008
40
12th
It was way too long, I lost my interest somewhere half-way through, yet forced myself to watch it. King Kong and T-Rex, now how can you make that boring? Apparently you can.
Rated 11 Jul 2008
babamotsbabamots
Rated 24 Jun 2008
74
62nd
Excellent special effects and several good twists on the original. However, some less interesting parts were simply spread out much too long to hold my interest, even allowing for artistic pondering.
Rated 24 Jun 2008
battletoadBattleToad
Rated 14 Aug 2007
70
37th
This monster of a remake has one big problem. It's too darn long. I would say that a good 45-60 minutes could have been cut out, and it would have made it better. There are a lot of unnecessary plot points that could be left out. Overall, the movie will captivate and entertain. It looks beautiful, and the scenes with Ann and Kong interacting are positively delightful. Meh!
Rated 14 Aug 2007
kirjatKirjat
Rated 14 Aug 2007
70
28th
A meaningless film, but a good one. Want to see the film-making in whole? Watch Kong. Martial arts, car rides, ships, copters, romance, retro, CGI, animals, jokes...it's all in there, you name it.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
moribunnyMoribunny
Rated 14 Aug 2007
30
15th
Jack Black is actually a highlight here. That's how bloody lame it is.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
gravymaximusGravyMaximus
Rated 25 Feb 2007
70
66th
BORING FOR AN HOUR THEN GIANT BUGS AND DINOSAURS AND KING KONG FIGHTS THREE TYRANNOSAURS AT THE SAME TIME THEN NOTHING FOR AN HOUR AND FOURTY FIVE MINUTES THEN KING KONG PLAYS WITH AIRPLANES FOR A BIT AND DIES
Rated 25 Feb 2007
farzanFarzan
Rated 12 Feb 2007
62
49th
Amazing visual effects, and strong performances all around, but the movie was too long and the script was written terribly.
Rated 12 Feb 2007
magbMagb
Rated 03 Feb 2007
50
15th
Disappointing as all hell. The action sequences are tedious and sport some very intrusive CGI, some characters are underdeveloped while others are overdeveloped, most of the acting is underwhelming (notably excepting Naomi Watts), it's far too long, and so on. Jackson does bring the time period to life convincingly and Kong himself looks spectacular, but it's not enough to save this mess.
Rated 03 Feb 2007
martintellerMartinTeller
Rated 17 Jan 2007
62
20th
An overall disappointment, although I really never had my hopes up in the first place. It's too damn long. Everything takes about 40% to longer to happen than it does in the original. The story just isn't enough to sustain a 3-hour film. The various homages to the original film are clever, the acting is good, and the effects are convincing. Unfortunately, it all adds up to something a little bit dull.
Rated 17 Jan 2007
joelwatchesmoviesjoelwatchesmovies
Rated 03 Apr 2020
7
63rd
"It was beauty killed the beast": A stupid line that botches the promising thematic arc. This character was the one who dragged Kong from home to hellhole for a life of humiliation all for his own gain but sure, let him end the film with this bullshit poetic proclamation that places blame on the fucking sunset and the woman who literally just tried to save Kong's life. It's a great film otherwise: the action-adventure is truly breathtaking in spite of dated CGI and cringe-y native portrayals.
Rated 03 Apr 2020
paxtonPaxton
Rated 01 Sep 2014
58
35th
Story's fine. They make the necessary updates and keep the cgi nonsense grounded in giant creature reality. Direction is solid. Peter Jackson knows an epic when he sees one. BUT, the actors that were miscast, specifically, every last one of them, turn this into a near debacle. Watts is the closest but it's still a swing and a miss. Black, Brody and Hanks are just so out of place. Plus what's with pre-50's era Adrian Brody flicks? It makes sense if we admit he sucks in these last two decades.
Rated 01 Sep 2014
martrynmartryn
Rated 24 Jul 2013
70
50th
Some great action sequences that don't really make sense from a plot perspective. I love any film where scores of people die but no one gives a shit as long as you can rescue the girl. Course, Naomi Watts is worth saving, and I'd let people die to fuck her. Jack Black seems out-of-place. For an adventure film, it's good to flip on and half-pay attention to, so it fills a niche.
Rated 24 Jul 2013
lexlex
Rated 01 Aug 2012
70
28th
Overblown to a fault. Unfortunately Jackson's epic directing doesn't always work here but he's still managed to make something special and powerful, even if it is quite flawed.
Rated 01 Aug 2012
sirstuckeySirStuckey
Rated 20 Nov 2011
65
45th
Too long. I appreciate the fact that the original King Kong is such an inspiration to Jackson, but he still needed to trim this film up a bit. I thought the premise was solid, as a remake it made it something a little different without wrecking the original's ideas. Too bad some terrible bits (Watts and Ape scenes becoming weirdly flirtatious, too many scenes on the island, Black's overacting) brought down the film as a whole. Props to Andy Serkis who motion captured Kong perfectly.
Rated 20 Nov 2011
troothTrooth
Rated 19 Nov 2011
70
54th
It's good to see Jack Black in something a little less... Dumb. Most of the special effects are really good, and there's one particular scene with a lot of giant insects that I still find hard to watch. It almost seems out of place in the rest of the movie. Of course it's nowhere near as groundbreaking as the original, but remakes of anything generally aren't.
Rated 19 Nov 2011
pompousasspompousass
Rated 27 Mar 2011
0
12th
The Kong films show a sharp decline, this one a farther step down from the last than the last was down from the first. Three hours are not automatically "better" than one and three-quarters or two and one-quarter. Even the supposed progress in special effects -- from stop-motion models to computer animation -- is largely illusory. The former falsity of stiffness and creakiness has simply been replaced by the falsity of fluidness and facileness.
Rated 27 Mar 2011
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 21 Sep 2010
66
51st
Should not have been stretched out to 3 hours, but there are some very good effects.
Rated 21 Sep 2010
mrandersen10mrandersen10
Rated 16 Dec 2009
65
31st
This could have been so much better. As is, it lacks the expected intensity and suspense given the monsters involved and crazy action on screen. And utilizing fast-cut CGI for the action sequences does not do it any favors. Still, it's an enjoyable movie that really delivers the sense you're on a grand adventure. I enjoyed it. It's solid escapist fun.
Rated 16 Dec 2009
garlonussGarlonuss
Rated 19 Feb 2009
75
43rd
A bit over hyped and over long for my taste. It is well made, though, and the gorilla comes across as surprisingly human.
Rated 19 Feb 2009
muetiMueti
Rated 20 Dec 2008
9
2nd
Bonus points for unintended humor.
Rated 20 Dec 2008
janusjanus
Rated 14 Dec 2008
75
65th
The definition of bloated, but what it lacks in pacing it makes up for with variety, flow and focus. Behind the CGI it's an old-fashioned good time at the movies as is rarely attempted anymore, let alone pulled off.
Rated 14 Dec 2008
green_goblinGreen Goblin
Rated 07 Sep 2008
50
44th
The action scenes are quite prolonged and they look fake. King Kong looked realistic, though. By the way, the film itself was too long for its genre. The only good thing about this film was sad, touching ending.
Rated 07 Sep 2008
critickerkawcritickerkaw
Rated 04 Mar 2008
90
64th
Overall, a beautiful and touching film--Kong is incredible! The film has action, tenderness, adventure and humor. I felt Brody was sadly lacking as our "hero" but, then again, that may have been Jackson's intent because I was left really caring only about Kong and Anne...
Rated 04 Mar 2008
detonathorDetonathor
Rated 16 Jan 2008
77
58th
No doubt that this reeks of Jackson's hubris, but it's still a pretty good film for the most part.
Rated 16 Jan 2008
beladonnesbeladonnes
Rated 20 Sep 2007
50
21st
Good action sequences, but the plot was lame and the movie was about 2 hours too long.
Rated 20 Sep 2007
gerudogerudo
Rated 14 Aug 2007
5
23rd
There's such a thing as too much action. I got bored at all the action scenes piled upon one another, assaulting my senses. I think Peter Jackson needs to learn that letting the audience use their imaginations can be a good thing at times.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
dildanoDildano
Rated 14 Aug 2007
8
55th
Absolute blast from beginning to end
Rated 14 Aug 2007
herbert_ederHerbert Eder
Rated 14 Aug 2007
90
93rd
Peter Jackson wanted to do a remake of King Kong since he saw the original 1933 King Kong movie as a kid - he loved this movie so much it became his inspiration to be a director - and after his Lord Of The Rings triumph he had the freedom and money to finally fulfill his dream. And his love of the material shows - KING KONG is a CGI-action-romance extravaganza with a heart.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
easymac742easymac742
Rated 14 Aug 2007
60
14th
Giant bugs, giant monkeys, dinosaurs, stampedes, actors, movie, 3 hours, tired, wheifxsd.........
Rated 14 Aug 2007
lrampartllrampartl
Rated 14 Aug 2007
61
48th
Way too much detail and unnecessary subplots, and it really really drags towards the end. Still, a very fun homage to the original, and Jack Black doesn't suck for a change.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
mdruskinmdruskin
Rated 14 Aug 2007
78
59th
This is probably the most entertaining movie of the year. I would go as far as to compare this to such adventure classics as Indiana Jones or Jurassic Park. Despite the gigantic running length and many cliches (some charachters are very standard and the constant danger becomes laughable after a while.) and even some lame dialog, this movie is just so much fun, that it deserves an 8.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
fuxoftfuxoft
Rated 14 Aug 2007
85
83rd
Grand spectacle
Rated 14 Aug 2007
idiot27000idiot27000
Rated 14 Aug 2007
72
47th
Simplicity is a word that Peter Jackson has probably never heard of. Too bad, he could've use some for this film.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
frederFreder
Rated 30 Jun 2007
5
11th
You're Peter Jackson. You've just completed the monumental LORD OF THE RINGS trilogy. The film industry is at your feet. You can write your own deal. So what do you do? You remake fucking KING KONG, a movie that CLEARLY does not need to be remade. AAAARGH! Why? I ask you, WHY?
Rated 30 Jun 2007
joojooJooJoo
Rated 20 Apr 2007
3
32nd
I refuse to believe anyone has watched this film to completion, giving it your undivided attention, outside of a theater setting. My thoughts: early setup bits >> Skull Island action >>>>>>> romance between Naomi Watts and a giant ape.
Rated 20 Apr 2007
thaneoffifeThaneOfFife
Rated 01 Mar 2007
90
76th
If there is one thing that Peter Jackson knows how to do it, its make an enjoyable action movie. He did that here. Some absolutely amazing special effects. Breathtaking to see in the theatre. Its also very touching, because he is able to show the depth of Kong, as if he were a human. If you like action, this is the movie for you.
Rated 01 Mar 2007
jackpulpJackPulp
Rated 13 Jan 2007
40
5th
man this movie was way to long and really who cares about the humans...all i wanted to see was King Kong go nutz...and you get a minimal time of that
Rated 13 Jan 2007
whomperizewhomperize
Rated 02 Dec 2006
88
94th
Seeing King Kong made for THE BEST in-theater experience I have ever been a part of. The visuals are absolutely mind-blowing, and put pretty much everything else to shame. Wonderful story, Kong is fleshed-out, emotional, and so likeable, and although Jackson devotes time sometimes where he probably shouldn't, the action, ambition, and the attachment to the characters alone make this movie seriously amazing, despite it's horrific acting and dialogue; this film tells a great story with vivid and
Rated 02 Dec 2006
bzymusbzymus
Rated 14 Sep 2024
70
41st
audiovisual 71 acting 69 overall feeling 69 avg 70; trochę przydługi, ale generalnie spoko rozrywka (wyłączając sceny walk, gdy były dziwne spowolnienia xd)
Rated 14 Sep 2024
eatbeanseatbeans
Rated 04 Sep 2024
3
27th
Peter Jackson did to King Kong what he did to the LOTR movies, made them overlong, empty spectacles with willy violence and machismo.
Rated 04 Sep 2024
ceyhunk26ceyhunk26
Rated 07 Jul 2024
63
48th
Plot 12/20 Fiction 13/20 Casting/Acting 12/20 Worldbuilding 13/20 Entertainment 13/20
Rated 07 Jul 2024
cromcrom
Rated 30 May 2024
60
46th
CGI age terrible but fine entertainment.
Rated 30 May 2024
bookhouseboybookhouseboy
Rated 13 May 2024
55
74th
#24#, [Extended Edition], rw3(TC!), popcorn, liked, rewatch(3) }*{ #05#, popcorn, hype, story, director Jackson, Naomi.W!
Rated 13 May 2024
sneezy0984Sneezy0984
Rated 11 Dec 2023
85
2nd
This is a beautifully made film. It's too long, and it really wasn't a necessary film. It's a bit masturbatory but the look and the performances are great. Probably Jack Blacks best dramatic turn.
Rated 11 Dec 2023
thatyoungmthatyoungm
Rated 13 Oct 2023
84
23rd
Doesn't have much magic or excitement to it, outside of a few scenes. Jackson does a competent job of directing, but I didn't see much that he added to the original idea, aside from better special effects and sets. The film looks cool, but a lot of the bigger action set pieces do feel a little robotic and lifeless because they aren't supported by a more engaging plot or better characters.
Rated 13 Oct 2023
moviespudMovieSpud
Rated 21 Aug 2023
92
76th
King Kong meets high expectations with methodical, relentless action, benefiting both studio and audience.
Rated 21 Aug 2023
scuffedScuffed
Rated 14 Jul 2023
60
45th
Impressive on a technical level for its time.
Rated 14 Jul 2023
gradecgingerGradeCGinger
Rated 13 Jul 2023
65
17th
This movie traumatized 7 year old me. Wept for hours after King Kong died
Rated 13 Jul 2023
kiritoKirito
Rated 25 Feb 2023
7
25th
Beauty and the beast
Rated 25 Feb 2023
angrypierreangrypierre
Rated 10 May 2020
60
31st
Not seen the original. This one however I think might not have aged well since 2005. Possibly like LOTR, things that might have looked magic and incredible back then now look a tad shonky. However, Naomi Watts does an excellent job of performing opposite a CGI creature, and the moments of just her and Kong are rather touching. Jack Black even does alright, however, his delivery of the final line was laugh-out-loud, not in a good way. Overall, not bad.
Rated 10 May 2020
solomonburrrSolomonBurrr
Rated 14 Apr 2020
76
68th
75.8
Rated 14 Apr 2020
rihreyrihrey
Rated 03 Apr 2020
52
61st
It was decent i guess. There were too many cgi shit-fest sequences for my taste, but it has really cool visuals and sometimes great cinematography, so it's alright. It really didn't need to be so fricking long, tho; it doesn't justify its 3:10hs runtime.
Rated 03 Apr 2020
anttirAnttiR
Rated 26 Jan 2020
48
6th
Actually I rated wrong king-kong, have not seen this but do not know how to delete rating.
Rated 26 Jan 2020
mega_rubmega RUB
Rated 01 Oct 2019
100
99th
my favorite movie growing up. Great adventure movie!!
Rated 01 Oct 2019
geranim0geranim0
Rated 23 Jun 2019
0
7th
awful
Rated 23 Jun 2019
timon88Timon88
Rated 26 Dec 2018
43
36th
Great look, lousy writing.
Rated 26 Dec 2018
batmantisBatmantis
Rated 25 Dec 2018
64
32nd
Another one I've already seen, yet I haven't voted for some reason.
Rated 25 Dec 2018
vv238vv238
Rated 20 Sep 2018
48
49th
Peter Jackson's first work post Lord of the Rings is him at his most unrestrained, and bad. He understands how to use scale, props, cgi, forced perspective, and emotional beats to put together a film but it is all too much and not enough at the same time.
Rated 20 Sep 2018
rcmaccrcmacc
Rated 16 May 2018
90
87th
Peter Jackson's King Kong may be regarded as longer than it ought to be, but I love every moment of it. Jack Black is fantastic in a rare serious role, and the effects have barely aged. This is a great epic and a fantastic remake of the original
Rated 16 May 2018
skapskap
Rated 02 May 2018
0
2nd
It looks like a big budget TV mini-series, not more, not less. That is, it's all about quantity. It takes a story everyone knows and inflates it to 3 long, absolutely unjustified hours. The plot is monotonous and overloaded with unnecessary scenes, the acting is corny, the editing exasperating. There is absolutely nothing good about it, but there is A LOT of it. And, the most important, this movie is a real CGI junky. And when you abuse something to this point, nothing good can come of it.
Rated 02 May 2018
nyctalopeNyctalope
Rated 04 Apr 2018
78
52nd
A movie with some legitimately great moments, special effects, and acting performances, held back by it's extreme length and brutally slow pacing.
Rated 04 Apr 2018
mwestcottmwestcott
Rated 04 Jan 2018
65
32nd
The sheer size and scope of Jackson's version all considered. King Kong is a excessively long, unconvincingly CGI animated, overacted piece of monster fiction. The passions are there, no question, but the film is too overdone and is completely missing the human touch of subtly. Anyone who believes in the 'less is more' philosophy should probably avoid this one.
Rated 04 Jan 2018
mrttmrtt
Rated 13 Nov 2017
65
36th
I just watching Naomi
Rated 13 Nov 2017
chiptbhtvChiptbhtv
Rated 09 Oct 2017
81
64th
This is exactly the kind of remake King Kong needed for our generation.
Rated 09 Oct 2017
luordluord
Rated 09 Aug 2017
72
75th
Way, way too long for its own good (as is Jackson's trademark), but excellent special effects, a fantastic cast and apt period details make for a very good epic that only rarely disappoints.
Rated 09 Aug 2017
metalhankmetalhank
Rated 30 Jun 2017
71
79th
Jackson brings out to the world a really big king kong with lots of action and really good effects/CGI. Watts is entertaining as the damsel in distress and Black plays his role well adding some humour.
Rated 30 Jun 2017
timecapsuleTimeCapsule
Rated 12 Mar 2017
79
82nd
After the smash success of the "Lord of the Rings" saga, director Peter Jackson attempted an even more epic task in remaking the iconic classic "King Kong"(1933). To the director's credit, unlike the 70's remake Jackson never shied away from trying to recapture if not top the spectacle of the original. However an admitted super fan of the original, Jackson may have ultimately hurt the movie with his passion. The film ends up as a 3 hour long love letter to Kong bloated with good intentions.
Rated 12 Mar 2017
arossaross
Rated 21 Nov 2016
55
9th
overlong movie I didn't like from the start and as the special effects look worse, I'm sure this will be less and less appreciated. at the time it was acclaimed.
Rated 21 Nov 2016
war_machineWar Machine
Rated 19 Nov 2016
23
0th
lmao i gave it a 23. watched extended. i'll x2 most next time. Sosnucktherecuzmovierejected-heronlyshotatgoodpart-alltrickedetc+romanceonboat+savages-kongoffering+haventpaidattentionmuch+dinos+lolshedanceforhim+savesherfromrexes+breaksjawlolflaps-wait!onshoulderlol+helpedhimithink+getherback-capture+broadway-8thwonder+havetousediffgirl+breaksouteasylool+shecalmsinstreet+building-diesontop-falls+beautylinemehherelol
Rated 19 Nov 2016
michaelm2391michaelm2391
Rated 29 Mar 2016
1
3rd
when i saw this in a shopping mall cinema complex (deep Auckland suburbs), the audience of entirely white dads aged 50+ clapped, in what to this day is still the only in-cinema applause i have ever witnessed
Rated 29 Mar 2016
estevao3estevao3
Rated 15 Mar 2016
75
45th
Great visualization, but apart from the relationship between Kong and Ms. Watts, this film has no heart. Too much time spent on other, uninteresting characters
Rated 15 Mar 2016
evilmangoesEvilMangoes
Rated 05 Dec 2015
96
90th
A
Rated 05 Dec 2015
dudeabidesDudeAbides
Rated 04 Oct 2015
64
29th
Can't really remember this movie much. Aside from the fact that it was really long and really serious. Maybe it's better than I remember.
Rated 04 Oct 2015
dorothyozDorothyOz
Rated 23 Aug 2015
60
26th
Waaaaayyyy tooooooo looooooong
Rated 23 Aug 2015
prestobixPrestoBix
Rated 20 Aug 2015
98
99th
Seen 4x
Rated 20 Aug 2015
8bitatari8bit_atari
Rated 15 Aug 2015
51
27th
Jack Black is the best part.
Rated 15 Aug 2015
mckenny92McKenny92
Rated 15 Apr 2015
93
70th
I wish it would've stayed on the island the whole time.
Rated 15 Apr 2015
rymRYM
Rated 28 Mar 2015
56
34th
2.79/5
Rated 28 Mar 2015
parexus2Parexus2
Rated 14 Feb 2015
78
84th
One of the better remakes.
Rated 14 Feb 2015
vengefulkbmVengefulKBM
Rated 11 Feb 2015
80
75th
I don't care what people say, I really liked this movie. It gets a bit too long in the fight sequences against the creepy-crawly jungle creatures, but I like the way it manages to build up for an hour before we see the monsters. And after that point it just becomes a really entertaining King Kong movie. My only large complaint is that I find Adrien Brody pretty miscast as the male lead.
Rated 11 Feb 2015
tentontannerTenTonTanner
Rated 17 Nov 2014
70
14th
Jack Black?
Rated 17 Nov 2014
backwardsuitbackwardsuit
Rated 12 Nov 2014
71
53rd
A gloriously cinematic mess. Unquestionably bloated but earnest in its attempt to provide your moneys worth. Enough brilliant stuff to carry the weaker bits. I might be the only one who didn't mind the seemingly endless setup whereas some of the dinosaur wrestling got a bit tiresome.
Rated 12 Nov 2014
ephedrinephedrin
Rated 18 Sep 2014
40
31st
Hollywood has tons of money to spend reporduction. I don't why but they like it. Finally: Just another King Kong movie with different stars, more enhanced effect and better make up.
Rated 18 Sep 2014
tbwTBW
Rated 17 Sep 2014
20
3rd
Awful. I couldn't finish watching this mess
Rated 17 Sep 2014
entertainmeEntertainMe
Rated 13 Sep 2014
70
56th
Stodgy pacing and some dodgy green screen make this one feel its length, but it's still a powerful and fun version of the Kong story with some great use of CGI Andy Serkis. I was surprised during this watch at how good a job Jack Black does.
Rated 13 Sep 2014
mrblacktronMrBlackTron
Rated 01 Sep 2014
80
73rd
Much ado "remake" movies made between the best means possible. Peter jeckson the director, of course, but we should not forget that old in the movie Jessica Lange, and exceptional acting to not call Naomi watts starred in this great contribution, a Peter Jackson classic as very successful visual effects, the film as a criticism, just more than necessary can be said to have long been, but $ here's what we're watching is beautiful!..
Rated 01 Sep 2014

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...