Watch
Little Fockers

Little Fockers

2010
Comedy
1h 38m
Family-patriarch Jack Byrnes wants to appoint a successor. Does his son-in-law, the "male nurse", Greg Focker have what it takes?
Your probable score
?

Little Fockers

2010
Comedy
1h 38m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 21.97% from 1614 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(1614)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 05 Apr 2012
35
3rd
The only funny thing is this supposed to be a comedy.
Rated 19 Feb 2011
60
34th
Why was Harvey Keitel in this? Welp, see you all in part 4.
Rated 21 Dec 2010
5
2nd
"Despite its title, Little Fockers barely features children. Other things it's lacking include laughs, coherence, and a reason to exist." - Nick Schager
Rated 10 Jan 2011
60
46th
Well, you know, if you liked the other previous films, here's more of it. It is not necessary or good, but you will have some fun.
Rated 17 Apr 2011
64
26th
Enjoyable comedy, something of a come-down from the modest success of the earlier Focker films, but not the embarassing disaster that it has been made out to be. Best moments come from De Niro's amusing strait-lacedness during moments of absurdity, and some nice (albeit brief) comic bits from Hoffman and Streisand. Stiller is the usual Stiller, and Alba's character forms the basis of an inexplicably strange moment, but the film overall is fairly painless if ultimately uninspired.
Rated 02 Oct 2011
60
30th
the fight scene was pretty funny
Rated 23 Dec 2010
17
6th
Haha, their name sounds like a swear word. Yes, this is the level of humor throughout the movie. It's not that there aren't any funny jokes whatsover, but there are precious few of them. Furthermore, the story is just a series of unresolved events and recycled plot points from the last two movies to try and set up jokes. I was actually amazed they had enough of a long term memory to make a remix of Stiller's speech for the end credits.
Rated 27 Dec 2010
60
22nd
ok
Rated 23 Jun 2012
2
59th
Started out quite poor, and sure, not on par with the previous two, but it got better and better as the movie progressed. At times I found it to be laugh out loud funny, even. Jessica Alba, will we ever get married?
Rated 29 Feb 2024
25
15th
If you thought Meet the Fockers tried hard, wait until you see Little Fockers, a movie whose jokes are as subtle as a Mike Tyson uppercut to your nutsack. Harvey Keitel and the turkey carving are probably the only two redeemable things about this movie.
Rated 06 Feb 2012
30
23rd
Stop it Robert De Niro! Stop IT
Rated 15 Jan 2011
20
1st
It's simply not funny. And by not being funny, even with a great cast, it turns out to be actually sad -- especially for De Niro and Hoffman, two of the greatest actors of the last century.
Rated 07 Jan 2012
25
1st
A phone it in performance by everyone involved. Ben Stiller hasn't been funny since Meet the Parents, actually, he hasn't been funny since Zoolander. The material is just rehashed endlessly with the same fart (seriously), old people sex, and pee pee jokes. Barbara Streisand is just fucking terrible and automatically warrants an even lower rating just based on her odious presence. DeNiro clearly does not give a fuck anymore either.
Rated 27 Apr 2013
0
3rd
I don't have much to say. This is just a terrible movie.
Rated 27 Dec 2010
40
25th
If you like the formula of the latter two movies you are in for no surprises. Once again we follow the struggle for power between Jack and Gaylord and it has its funny moments as usual. Jessica Alba is f-ing annoying and with that said this film will hopefully work as a conclusion to the franchise, cause by now they've milked the cat for everything...
Rated 13 Jan 2011
50
35th
A few laughs.
Rated 06 Jan 2011
50
38th
Is it a good movie? No. Was I bored? No. Effortlessly "Hollywood" in a way that makes it inherently enjoyable despite how obviously bad it is. For a comedy during which I didn't laugh once (except, I'll admit, the Jaws reference) this is oddly recommendable. I'm convinced that you can feed DeNiro absolutely any line and he will deliver it in an enthralling fashion.
Rated 24 Dec 2010
1
0th
A pretext to continue one of the lamest franchises in contemporary Hollywood history.
Rated 26 Feb 2011
62
22nd
More Dustin Hoffman and less Stiller/De Niro is what this flick needs. Hoffman acts Gaylord's father with such coolness, it's hilarious, but a pitty that he has only a few scenes. As well it's pretty wearing to see the same jokes ever and ever again, the third time!
Rated 28 Dec 2010
51
53rd
Okay movie
Rated 27 Dec 2010
4
20th
I have a soft spot for this trilogy, and I am not ashamed to say that I enjoyed this one.
Rated 03 Feb 2017
3
5th
A little old and tired, just like its characters, with a dumb plot pulled out of thin air ("Godfocker"? Really?) and over-the-top body/sex humour trying desperately but failing to get some laughs (see the finger-cutting; erection incident). Elsewhere, there are a few funny moments (Dern's small part is a highlight; Wilson's Spacey Kevin is always good), and the marriage/family drama probably would have been decent if the film didn't try and make it funny (see the uncomfortable hospital scene).
Rated 17 May 2011
9
2nd
As star-studded as it is heartbreakingly lazy, Little Fockers takes the top-grossing trilogy to embarrassing new lows.
Rated 22 Jun 2020
45
2nd
Under-average movie. Worst movie of the series. However you will have some fun.
Rated 08 Aug 2020
25
7th
Shoutout Laura Dern and Harvey Keitel. Getting those checks
Rated 01 Oct 2014
20
7th
Nobody needs another Meet the Parents movie. Especially one as completely devoid of jokes as Little Fockers is. We got away with a six-year gap between films, and I for one wished it was longer. There's little comedy here, no good acting, and not even the funny situations on which this franchise has built itself. There's just nothing. It's 100 minutes of nothing that cost $100 million to make. You can do better things with your time than watch this, or even thinking about watching it.
Rated 03 Jan 2011
53
12th
Yeah, it was pretty "meh"...
Rated 21 May 2011
40
28th
Had a few laughable parts (probably cuz I was hammered). Other than that.......... yeah.
Rated 14 May 2011
59
17th
It has its moments, but that's about it. You see most of the jokes coming a mile away, and overall it's just kinda meh.
Rated 22 Oct 2015
10
2nd
Nah
Rated 20 Sep 2011
45
15th
Kiepscizna. Humor w duzej mierze bardzo niskich lotow, jak to mawiaja - "toaletowy". Najslabsza czesc sagi o Fockerach ;-)
Rated 25 Feb 2011
68
20th
It is what you'd expect it to be. De Niro was pretty funny and Stiller had his moments, so it wasn't a total waste, but everyone else in the cast did nothing for me. Lots of juvenile humour and annoying shit, but at this point in the series you've got to know what you're getting into.
Rated 30 Dec 2010
75
26th
This was a lot better than I thought it would be.
Rated 15 Oct 2011
18
5th
Please stop already. His name is Gaylord Focker and he is a male nurse, we get it. Stiller's awkward movies are unbearable at this point.
Rated 07 Oct 2012
48
3rd
little trash...
Rated 17 Nov 2019
60
4th
These films are built as an endless loop of predictability, boredom, and tediousness
Rated 12 Mar 2015
20
0th
I haven't seen Meet the Parents, but I actually found Meet the Fockers, tolerable, maybe because I found Babs so damn likable. But this, no not this. No charm, likability or redeeming value whatsoever.
Rated 04 Mar 2013
68
26th
It's surprising what titles movies can get away with as long as it is a characters last name! This is the 3rd movie in the Gaylord Trilogy. Sadly unlike Star Wars where the third movie is really good. This movie is hardly good at all. DeNiro is still the worlds scariest in-law but he is hampered by a bad heart in this film. Stiller has a little more self pride in his upgraded nursing job but he's still a screw-up. Laughs were very few and really this movie is about party planning for 5 year olds
Rated 27 Apr 2012
74
34th
I saw it 4 months ago and hardly remember it, so I'm not sure what that says, but what I DO remember is that I didn't hate it when it was over... If you liked the originals, this is an additional dose worth the 90 minutes.
Rated 17 Sep 2011
17
9th
#11#, popcorn, story, 'pt1-2', (casting).
Rated 19 May 2011
68
30th
The first two had a couple good gags and I didn't regret seeing them, but this one...apparently everyone involved had all run out of gas. It fails on a comedy level, it's not that it's put together badly, it's simply not funny, not interesting, and not worth the time.
Rated 18 Jul 2013
85
15th
Forced this one and lost the magic.
Rated 18 May 2011
35
8th
The first two outings succeeded for me. They made me laugh. I felt like major actors slummed it down to amp up laughs. It worked. 'Little Fockers' isn't a complete disaster. It's worse. Nobody involved is even remotely trying. You can see dollar signs cachinging in the ears of everyone in front and behind the lens of 'Fock3rs.' From low-rent jokes, to alien characters (Alba), to cameo-sized performances for much of the cast, the film spends most of its time embarrassing DeNiro and Stiller.
Rated 06 Apr 2019
20
11th
I mean, it's freaking funny. I can't deny that.
Rated 21 Feb 2014
3
14th
Little Fockers third time round finally sucks the life out of the same old gags that began to tire all the way back in the first film. The chemistry between Stiller & De Niro in the first film was refreshingly fun and seemed like a stroke of casting genius. But by this point it's become tired, repetitive and at times cringe worthy. De Niro really stoops to a new low here, he's become a specialist in mocking and parodying his past success. And why the hell did Keitel get involved? Poor third act.
Rated 05 Jan 2014
2
46th
A seasons worth of early evening sitcom ideas shoehorned into a movie. Not terrible but there's no flow.
Rated 26 Oct 2012
20
3rd
Why does it called Little Fockers? Kids have smallest roles and they appear only 2-3 scenes. The first two films in this series were okay but there's no signs of life in here at all. * Casting, Acting : 4 * Script : 1 * Directing, Aura : 2 * Ease of Viewing : 2 * Naked Eye : 1
Rated 25 Apr 2011
75
12th
favorite line: belly flop!!!!! not as good as the first, but these fockers are still good for some chuckles....
Rated 29 Dec 2016
85
68th
lot to learn, was great to watch
Rated 14 Oct 2020
55
15th
Godfockerlol+albasobadlol+lmaofight+allrentsgonnamoveclose
Rated 08 Mar 2013
29
5th
This is what happens when you take a franchise too far. The first film was alright. The second was unnecessary. This is just absolute shit at this point.
Rated 25 Sep 2011
30
3rd
This series is tired and played-out. Mostly unoriginal writing, with the only chuckles coming from a couple of gross-out gags. It's a low point for legends like DeNiro and Hoffman to keep churning this crap out.
Rated 15 May 2011
45
8th
Mesmo considerando o aspecto ligeiro desta série de comédia, este terceiro episódio é sem duvida nenhuma o mais fraco de todos. A história demora imenso a começar e arrasta-se penosamente, as situações são pouco verosímeis e principalmente (e infelizmente) pouco engraçadas. Apesar de tudo, o primeiro "Meet the Parents" era uma lufada de ar fresco, principalmente pelo excelente papel do Robert de Niro. Este não é nada mais que um filme simpático para ver ao Domingo à tarde com a família.
Rated 31 Jan 2011
60
13th
A few good laughs, nothing special.
Rated 22 Feb 2011
4
15th
They still use the "focker" joke... come on... really ??
Rated 16 Apr 2011
37
6th
The first two movies were quite fun to watch, just for the giggles and nothing else. This franchise has never been about quality, but at least the two first ones managed to pump out some funny jokes and decent storytelling, this however did not. I think the basic problem here is that they oversold the concept. While there probably could have been a decent third movie, it wouldn't involve milking the same jokes that were in the first two over and over again like this one did. Just plain bad.
Rated 10 Jan 2011
50
6th
i'm a little biased here cos my fav actors are here - de niro and harvey, but i dislike owen wilson's character here.. how many times are they gona try and reignite their old flame.. its just recycled plot points from the first and 2nd movie. i thought the movie would be about the kids wrecking havoc but the only stuffs that i can remember is the kid puking and the little girl's fucked up whining
Rated 16 Jan 2011
82
55th
I really liked this movie. It has been getting a lot of hate but I, and mostly everyone else in my theatre seemed to enjoy it. It's a comedy and I'm rating it as just that, a comedy.
Rated 23 Aug 2011
5
18th
More of the same but worthy of a few laughs.
Rated 31 Mar 2024
5
6th
Jessica Alba is hot, not much else here. A fitting way to end the franchise.
Rated 26 Oct 2011
46
12th
46.000
Rated 20 Jan 2011
30
22nd
i couldn't help laughing when Stiller went full blast godfather on de niro with the ring and all. And yeah, that's about it..
Rated 21 May 2011
58
17th
Despite the star-filled cast, Little Fockers is simply not as good as the other Focker films
Rated 19 Mar 2011
20
9th
It has been milked to the bone. The worst of the three. Godfocker was funny though
Rated 30 Jun 2011
54
7th
They're not even trying anymore.
Rated 28 Dec 2010
100
51st
very funny 10 out of 10
Rated 20 Apr 2013
80
16th
Its funny at places

Collections

(15)
Compact view
Showing 1 - 15 of 15 results

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...