Love in the Time of Cholera

Seeing this film is like going on a date with someone who is beautiful (or handsome) but very dull. I began to think of things I could do that would be more interesting than watching the film. I decided to make toast.

I don't know where to begin the points this film does not work: The awful dialogues? The shallow and uninteresting characterisation? The caricatured spanish-accented english speaking? The terrible acting (sadly incuding Badem who may have been pulled to the overall standard of the film)? The tacky soundtrack accompanied by the overly-vibrating voice of Shakira? The length? Too bad this novel was wasted such...

It should be spoken in spanish!

The book is way much better than the movie. It's a disaster

I rather liked this, even though it does have its share of flaws - the greatest of them being that it's about 30 minutes too long and that the makeup department failed miserably. Javier Bardem easily outperforms everyone else here.

Boring and uninteresting, some novels dont work as movies

Javier Bardem was worth a try, but my expectations were not completely fulfilled.

eng; [Die Liebe in den Zeiten der Cholera; Love in the Time of Cholera]; ein junger mann verliebt sich in die schöne fermina, von ihr wird er zurückgewiesen und ist auf der verzweifelten suche nach liebe um sein gebrochenes herz zu retten - doch letztendlich helfen keine affairen sondern nur die liebe selbst den schmerz zu beenden.; (gefühlvoll);

A true romance story. not afraid to pull pull punches with something not being "sexy" which makes it all the more endearing. All in all a surprisingly good movie.

?????????An illusion?? ??????????·??????????5??????????/?????????????????????????????????????

only made it through the first 20 minutes

"Would that Newell's visual panache were as robust as his understanding of the novel's romantic implications, but what the film lacks in brio it makes up for in reverence." - Ed Gonzalez

not so good