sign in
register
Watch
Apple TV Google Play Movies Fandango At Home
+3
Miss Congeniality 2: Armed and Fabulous
Miss Congeniality 2: Armed and Fabulous
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
Miss Congeniality 2: Armed and Fabulous

Miss Congeniality 2: Armed and Fabulous

2005
Comedy, Suspense/Thriller
1h 55m
Miss Congeniality 2: Armed and Fabulous catches up with FBI agent Gracie Hart (Bullock) shortly after she successfully disarmed a threat against the Miss United States Pageant while working undercover as a contestant and became an overnight media sensation. Things haven't been going so well for her lately. Reeling from a broken romance and frustrated to find her newfound fame is jeopardizing the undercover work she loves, Gracie now reluctantly agrees to serve the Bureau... (imdb)

Directed by:

John Pasquin

Screenwriter:

Marc Lawrence, Katie Ford

Starring:

Regina King, Diedrich Bader, Sandra Bullock, Treat Williams, William Shatner, Stephen Tobolowsky, Abraham Benrubi, Ernie Hudson, Heather Burns, Nick Offerman, Octavia Spencer, Elisabeth Röhm

Franchise:

Miss Congeniality

Genres:

Comedy, Suspense/Thriller

Countries:

Australia, USA

Languages:

English, Italian, German, Yiddish
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

Miss Congeniality 2: Armed and Fabulous

2005
Comedy, Suspense/Thriller
1h 55m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 17.26% from 2180 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(2196)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
beedubBeeDub
Rated 06 Aug 2019
68
16th
I can't truly hate anything with Sandra Bullock in it, but boy, does this movie make me try.
Rated 06 Aug 2019
spleenspleen
Rated 29 Nov 2014
16
7th
Although I have to admit I did laugh a few times, it only happened when I left the room to watch something else.
Rated 29 Nov 2014
dunbardunbar
Rated 29 Dec 2013
30
5th
I didn't watch this. I'm pretty sure a swallow - probably an African swallow - was carrying a copy of this DVD, which was probably hurled out of a window or nearby dumpster, dropped into my hands because their mate had gone to check out some coconut halves instead of helping to carry the disk, which unbalanced my sexy stride so I tripped and fell forward, releasing the disk into the open DVD player - I was about to watch some Bergman - and started playing by some trickery of its own. I swear.
Rated 29 Dec 2013
omgfridgeomgfridge
Rated 11 Feb 2010
0
1st
Why is there a sequel?
Rated 11 Feb 2010
peaceanarchyPeaceAnarchy
Rated 12 Dec 2006
49
6th
Why do I like Bullock despite the fact that she constantly stars in shit like this? I don't know. This is yet another unnecessary, and terrible, sequel to a movie that somehow transcended mediocrity into being watchable. See: Bridget Jones and The Whole 9 yards for other examples.
Rated 12 Dec 2006
moribunnyMoribunny
Rated 27 Sep 2010
38
23rd
Much of this is just an attempt to do more of the same, but whatever humor worked in the first movie is lame and tired this time around, and whatever Bullock did that made her charming in the first one - here it is obnoxious. Miss Congeniality 1 was a surprisingly decent comedy I thought, but this is one of those sequels that kinda manage to retroactively spoil the original.
Rated 27 Sep 2010
citizenxCitizenX
Rated 23 May 2009
15
5th
is william shatner THAT desperate ?!
Rated 23 May 2009
ndsurfer8908NDsurfer8908
Rated 16 Apr 2009
7
5th
Sandra Bullock is a man.
Rated 16 Apr 2009
cultofsamecult_of_same
Rated 04 Mar 2009
20
20th
Didn't need a sequel...really it didn't.
Rated 04 Mar 2009
liltxgal98liltxgal98
Rated 11 Feb 2009
65
5th
NO NO NO NO
Rated 11 Feb 2009
billkerwinbillkerwin
Rated 09 Mar 2010
40
1st
They should have quite while they were ahead.
Rated 09 Mar 2010
nandorizzinandorizzi
Rated 05 Feb 2009
10
6th
The movie is bad. Completely lost regarding the first film, that was not good. It was silly, but a little funny. This is just silly.
Rated 05 Feb 2009
gberkegberke
Rated 11 Oct 2010
60
22nd
sweet actress
Rated 11 Oct 2010
slantmagSlantMag
Rated 02 Dec 2010
10
9th
"Having basic hygiene skills doesn't preclude a woman from being tough enough to kick elderly Regis Philbin's ***." - Nick Schager
Rated 02 Dec 2010
mlpgaffneymlpgaffney
Rated 21 Jan 2013
65
23rd
This movie is okay - just mindless entertainment to be sure - but my biggest problem is that most of the charm of the first movie is almost completely absent
Rated 21 Jan 2013
vitor_barrosVitor Barros
Rated 29 Jan 2011
10
4th
Uma das piores atuações da ótima atriz Sandra Bullock, e a história do filme também não ajudou ela.
Rated 29 Jan 2011
el_pedroEl Pedro
Rated 18 Mar 2011
32
7th
not as funny as number one
Rated 18 Mar 2011
bdonBDon
Rated 10 Jan 2012
4
0th
I am being generous
Rated 10 Jan 2012
tvfilm_hubTV+Film-Hub
Rated 04 Jan 2009
7
40th
The movie was basically stupid and irritating.
Rated 04 Jan 2009
bjhudsonBJHudson
Rated 20 Feb 2014
0
0th
worst movie i have ever seen probably
Rated 20 Feb 2014
ocelotOcelot
Rated 22 Mar 2014
10
5th
I saw this once and blocked it out of my mind until now.
Rated 22 Mar 2014
hotsakehotsake
Rated 01 Sep 2014
40
18th
It's not overly terrible it's just really substanceless and boring with stupid humor and dumb characters. I actually liked the original quite well but this losses most of what was so good about the first and even manages to completely waste Shatner's presence or lack there of.
Rated 01 Sep 2014
andrew3000andrew3000
Rated 11 Oct 2014
2
1st
Seeing this film theatrically was one of the most painful experiences of my life. It should surprise precisely no one that this was a date movie, and not one that I hand-picked for a great night out, but Bullock and Regina King create a charisma vacuum that still ranks as one of the most interminable film experiences of my life. I mean, I snuck some chicken into the theater, so that helped, but this one's really a wash all around.
Rated 11 Oct 2014
boomdiddlyboomdiddly
Rated 14 Oct 2014
15
4th
An all-too-typical sequel. Adds nothing. Subtracts everything.
Rated 14 Oct 2014
ricRic
Rated 06 Nov 2014
60
13th
Not that bad
Rated 06 Nov 2014
timon88Timon88
Rated 14 Jan 2015
35
25th
I can't help it--I find Sandra Bullock charming. Even in this.
Rated 14 Jan 2015
joelwatchesmoviesjoelwatchesmovies
Rated 23 Mar 2015
3
5th
The film's predecessor at least had consistently funny and well-acted performances from Bullock, Caine, and Shatner to make up for a seen-before plot. This film has no Caine, hardly any Shatner, and Bullock just isn't as funny this time around. There are a few good gags but overall the movie falls victim to trying too hard to live up to the original. The spunk and humour has dried up, and its plot isn't just predictable but contrived. An inferior sequel.
Rated 23 Mar 2015
war_machineWar Machine
Rated 04 Mar 2020
55
14th
Famealmostruinsheist+nuffletters+bfbreaksup+trynabefaceofFBI+trainer/itruinsherpersonality/goals+missUSA/pageantrunnerkidnapped+mehpartnerRegina/dontlikeeachother+lolandybrown+famehelpsgetinfolol+realizemissUSAwasinonit+stoppedpayingattentionlol+nvmshewasntinonitlol+goesforschoolgirl'sreport/sluffedheroffearlier
Rated 04 Mar 2020
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 14 Aug 2022
58
17th
Well, how good could it have been anyway? Doomed from the start as being unnecessary and redundant, it's still marginally entertaining and diverting background noise, especially during the moments when Bullock isn't indulging some of her unfunny schtick (the nursing home scene is the nadir, even as it introduces the always welcome Brennan). Bader is no Michael Caine, but his bitchy commentary lands most of the time; ditto some amusing interjections from an increasingly frantic Shatner.
Rated 14 Aug 2022
darknightsDarkNights
Rated 04 Oct 2023
69
64th
Je connais la très mauvaise réputation du film, mais contrairement à l'avis général, je trouve que c'est une suite à la hauteur du premier. Bullock fait son job, et j'ai adoré le rôle de Regina King. Le duo fonctionne et certaines séquences sont franchement hilarantes (avec les drags).
Rated 04 Oct 2023
age_jellemaAge Jellema
Rated 18 Nov 2007
38
4th
really bad acting
Rated 18 Nov 2007
lifeandalllifeandall
Rated 27 Dec 2006
20
3rd
Barely a plot, bad acting, and most of all boring. Doesn't retain any charm from the first movie
Rated 27 Dec 2006
annexeannexe
Rated 25 Mar 2007
1
0th
The sequel no one asked for.
Rated 25 Mar 2007
cclzaCCLZA
Rated 14 Aug 2007
10
0th
One of the best sleep-inducing films ever.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
yilbyilb
Rated 14 Aug 2007
40
25th
Sandra is such a star. Too bad this is so below average.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
mrbeckmrbeck
Rated 14 Aug 2007
20
1st
Saw it on an 8-hour plane ride. Couldn't get up to leave, so I sat through it. PLEASE don't spend any money on it.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
corncabreCornCabre
Rated 14 Aug 2007
20
15th
I can't believe I actually saw this eiiher.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
triletrile
Rated 14 Aug 2007
5
8th
No comment :)
Rated 14 Aug 2007
mystericemysterice
Rated 14 Aug 2007
0
6th
Ugh. It resurfaces. Keep flushing.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
philsalephilsale
Rated 14 Aug 2007
4
14th
Kill me now
Rated 14 Aug 2007
adrianavbadrianavb
Rated 14 Aug 2007
10
2nd
I fell asleep.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
savagelucy42SavageLucy42
Rated 14 Aug 2007
70
24th
Too much "Fabulous" not enough Shatner.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
spoonerspotspoonerspot
Rated 14 Aug 2007
72
16th
Sorry Sandy.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
bigbearBigbear
Rated 19 Aug 2007
90
58th
Sandra Bullock is hot as hell.
Rated 19 Aug 2007
flatluigiflatluigi
Rated 20 Aug 2007
50
8th
Ugh. Though I liked the original, this was just poor.
Rated 20 Aug 2007
jezterkingjezterking
Rated 25 Jan 2009
80
31st
Enjoyed this movie, but not as much as the first one. It's still a great because, well Sandra Bullock and physical humor are a match made in comedy heaven.
Rated 25 Jan 2009
megamanMegaMan
Rated 10 Feb 2008
0
7th
Silly little girl.
Rated 10 Feb 2008
tripwyreTripwyre
Rated 20 Mar 2008
7
2nd
I like the original more than I should (which still isn't much), but this... This is a travesty. You should have bailed, Shatner.
Rated 20 Mar 2008
pickpocketPickpocket
Rated 26 Mar 2008
0
4th
Sandra Bullock is pretty hot but man what the fuck did I just watch?
Rated 26 Mar 2008
cselstoncselston
Rated 01 May 2008
10
12th
Another terrible sequel. Why, Hollywood, why?!
Rated 01 May 2008
luna6ixLuna6ix
Rated 04 Jun 2008
57
12th
Just read the summary, yeah.
Rated 04 Jun 2008
icromaholicxicromaholicx
Rated 22 Jun 2008
40
6th
Disappointing after the surprisingly good original.
Rated 22 Jun 2008
vandelay1Vandelay1
Rated 27 Jun 2008
7
2nd
bad movie
Rated 27 Jun 2008
recklessmessrecklessmess
Rated 24 Sep 2008
35
19th
You'd think a lesson was to be learned from Speed 2...
Rated 24 Sep 2008
omicron91Omicron91
Rated 15 Oct 2008
7
10th
Argh.
Rated 15 Oct 2008
bluewasabiibluewasabii
Rated 13 Nov 2008
40
4th
they really didn't need to make a second one
Rated 13 Nov 2008
hu7Hu7
Rated 15 Nov 2008
15
2nd
What else? ;)
Rated 15 Nov 2008
kavuKavu
Rated 24 Dec 2008
8
3rd
It's amazing that somebody actually liked the first one enough for this to have a large budget too. It's a crime.
Rated 24 Dec 2008
isobelmoonIsobelmoon
Rated 28 Dec 2008
47
40th
The first film was funny but this one, isn't good at all.
Rated 28 Dec 2008

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...