Watch
Pet Sematary II

Pet Sematary II

1992
Action, Horror
1h 40m
The zombie-raising cemetary is back to its old tricks, this time, with new inhabitants. (imdb)
Your probable score
?

Pet Sematary II

1992
Action, Horror
1h 40m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 21.78% from 416 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(416)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 01 Apr 2019
75
65th
Insane shouldn’t exist but glad it does sequel. Sometimes dead is better but sometimes Clancy Brown has an electrified cage in his backyard filled with rabbits he watches have sex.
Rated 25 Sep 2010
29
8th
Ok, this movie is terrible but there are a few stellar highlights. 1. a dog with tits. 2. Clancy Brown is hilarious.
Rated 13 Dec 2021
3
16th
I was surprised that this actually does have a few fans. Pet Sematary 2 has a few positives, mainly Clancy Brown’s sheer fun with this. Even Mary Lambert has some visual flair (why dog tits though?) However, this feels like quite the opposite of what the original created. There is no sense of dread, or tension for that matter. There isn’t anything particularly emotional either. This is just so bizarre and weird, that it even becomes comical at some points. This really ain’t for me.
Rated 24 Aug 2014
3
73rd
They took the first and turned it's camp-y, King-y thing up to 11. Fun until the final act which was -completely- unhinged.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
30
28th
disgrace to the original
Rated 25 Jul 2009
19
10th
Admittedly it's worse than the first, which wasn't even very good in the first place. We've got Edward Furlong and Anthony Edwards, both of whom I consider capable actors, thrust into this absolutely horrendous horror crap. It's not scary, it's laughs aren't funny, it's special effects are dated and it's just generally insulting.
Rated 26 Dec 2009
63
21st
Minor improvements here include less emphasis on explaining the stupid premise, more over-the-top gore FX (courtesy of Steve Johnson), and Brown's scenery-and-flesh-chewing turn as one of scare screendom's most animated -- nay, downright hyperactive -- zombies. (This features what may be the first necrophilia scene where the corpse is the sexual aggressor!) This doesn't break any new ground (burial or otherwise), but it does deliver on a straight-ahead horror level.
Rated 23 Jun 2007
15
7th
Typical needless sequel.
Rated 07 Mar 2008
38
21st
Edward Furlong steals the show in this one. Unfortunately, the show was only worth $2.98, so it wasn't worth it to begin with.
Rated 19 Mar 2008
80
65th
That kid's face is put into motorcycle spokes
Rated 03 Oct 2008
20
10th
Removed everything that was well-done from the first instalment, and replaces it with cheap thrills and gore. Clancy Brown is entertaining as a shambling revenant, and it's entertaining to watch Furlong and Edwards in such low-brow fare, but overall the movie is lacklustre and tedious where the first was gripping and unrelenting.
Rated 15 Nov 2008
50
51st
okay
Rated 08 Jan 2010
20
7th
Naaah... awful. And it doesn't make any sense. Why does the dog change fur? The only scary thing about this was the abusive husband when he was alive..
Rated 21 Mar 2010
43
22nd
Another needless sequel from the director of the original. The film is slow and mean-spirited, but the performers (especially Brown as the sadistic local sheriff) are good and the makeup FX are well done.
Rated 24 Aug 2010
60
12th
Unforgettable and unnecessary sequel to an already fantastic movie. Story is really silly and badly written and almost no suspense whatsoever. Skip this and just watch the original.
Rated 20 Sep 2011
19
11th
It's bad but as usual Clancy Brown is really enjoyable.
Rated 23 Oct 2011
60
6th
Not nearly as bad as I thought it’d be. I absolutely love the book (as long as it feels) and the first movie was an imperfect, somewhat eerie adaptation. This original sequel to the movie doesn’t reach the cinematic heights of that film (what it had anyway). It’s not great, but it’s well paced and I found myself pretty invested. I particularly liked Clancy Brown. The movie does get a bit too weird though. It’s a dull, reasonably okay time-killer if nothing else.
Rated 10 Jun 2015
43
25th
Bad but pretty entertaining nonetheless, and ends with my favorite Ramones song.
Rated 02 Mar 2019
78
48th
B
Rated 01 Jun 2020
55
43rd
Not nearly as bad as "history" says, mostly because Lambert is a skillful director, Clancy Brown's full Nicholson performance and the delicious make-up, special effects. Too bad the script can't quite follow so much over-the-top shit going on all the time -- psycho bullies, undead dog attacking everyone, depressed kids wanting to run away, nightmares featuring Zowie's head with a woman body. In a way, it's like the original was murdered and then brought back to life by the Pet Sematary itself.
Rated 05 Jun 2020
55
21st
pretty aimless and cheap but not actually bad or anything

Collections

(19)
Compact view
Showing 1 - 19 of 19 results

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

No Trailer