sign in
register
Watch
Starz Apple TV Channel Apple TV Google Play Movies
+5
Peter Pan
Starz Apple TV Channel Apple TV Google Play Movies
+5
JustWatch
Remove ads

Peter Pan

2003
Family/Kids
Fantasy
1h 53m
A live-action version of Peter Pan with all of the wonder, danger and excitement of J.M. Barrie's original vision. (Universal Pictures)
Directed by:
P.J. Hogan P.J. Hogan
Written by:
P.J. Hogan P.J. Hogan J.M. Barrie
+1 more
Starring:
Lynn Redgrave Lynn Redgrave Olivia Williams Olivia Williams Jason Isaacs Jason Isaacs Jeremy Sumpter Jeremy Sumpter Ludivine Sagnier Ludivine Sagnier Rachel Hurd-Wood Rachel Hurd-Wood Richard Briers Richard Briers Harry Eden Harry Newell Freddie Popplewell George MacKay George MacKay Rupert Simonian
More
Franchise:
Peter Pan
Genres:
Family/Kids, Fantasy, Action, Adventure
Countries:
Australia, UK, USA
Languages:
English, North American Indian
imdb More information at IMDb
See title update history
Suggest an edit
Show Less
Your probable score
?

Peter Pan

2003
Family/Kids
Fantasy
1h 53m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 41.47% from 1333 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(1333)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
davidblastDavidBlast
Rated 02 Jun 2010
75
72nd
If a bit overly "Disney" in tone, but the sexual tension between Wendy and Pan is palpable, and if I ever were to show your kid a version of Peter Pan, this would be it. And then I'd put on 'Alien' ...
Rated 02 Jun 2010
frederFreder
Rated 30 Jun 2007
95
92nd
The best, most faithful film adaptation of J.M. Barrie's play. Somehow manages to balance a modern approach with respect for the source material. A terrific cast all up and down the line, and magic that doesn't curdle. Highly recommended.
Rated 30 Jun 2007
aidangaleAidan_Gale
Rated 27 Jul 2010
75
32nd
A nice adaption, some of the cgi and acting is terrible though. Jason Isaacs plays an awesome villian though.
Rated 27 Jul 2010
brianduffBrianDuff
Rated 14 Aug 2007
80
63rd
Wonderful retelling of Pan, with a GREAT Hook by Jason Isaacs. It gets a little muddled in there, but I sure wish the same people had made Narnia.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
fabfunkfabfunk
Rated 14 Aug 2007
92
91st
The definitive rendition of J.M. Barrie's work, superior even to Peter Jackson's "Lord of the Rings" as far as recent fantasy adventures go. Spotlights the speculative sexuality latent within the material and really allows a young cast to shine.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
stevekimesstevekimes
Rated 24 Jan 2012
85
73rd
Easily the best live adaptation of Peter Pan. Actually exciting and fun.
Rated 24 Jan 2012
tsvetetsvete
Rated 05 Sep 2015
85
42nd
1
Rated 05 Sep 2015
mystericemysterice
Rated 14 Aug 2007
60
55th
Normally dislike the Peter Pan story. But this was darker and more real overall. Seemed more intense somehow. That made it slightly more enjoyable overall.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
jaws275jaws275
Rated 14 Aug 2007
100
91st
this movie makes me never want to become older!
Rated 14 Aug 2007
tevtev
Rated 18 Jul 2023
20
9th
at least the 201 5 one was funny. (to be fair I haven't seen this since I was 10 but remember disliked it then)
Rated 18 Jul 2023
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 11 Sep 2022
89
81st
Well-wrought adaptation that balances the frivolity of the tale, while adding psychological (and dramatic) complexity - just like MURIEL'S WEDDING, Hogan proves he is a master at this sort of tricky tonal balancing act, making Pan a wistful and poignant figure, while turning the Pan-Wendy relationship into a touching (and moving) love story, contrasting against a furious Isaacs, who goes full pantomime as the vicious Hook, as Sumpter and Hurd-Wood effortlessly ground their scenes. Great fun.
Rated 11 Sep 2022
videoetronVideoetron
Rated 26 Oct 2021
63
58th
The idea of going more serious and darker on some points is interesting, but it's kind of uneven. Some kids could be lost halfway through by the slowing down of the pace and the psychological war with Hook. The romance and the way Wendy was treated, while they start out telling she's like 12, was a bit weird at times. I guess other kids might like it still.
Rated 26 Oct 2021
julesfmbjulesfmb
Rated 13 Oct 2020
63
51st
Much better than the Disney version.
Rated 13 Oct 2020
battletoadBattleToad
Rated 14 Aug 2007
70
37th
The first Peter Pan adaptation to show many of the original story's darker themes, this version is much deeper than previous versions, but it's not as much fun as Hook or Disney's Peter Pan. Good for kids, but nothing really memorable. Meh!
Rated 14 Aug 2007
clopinetteClopinette
Rated 26 Jun 2007
60
21st
While the visuals relied way too much on CGI for my liking, I did enjoy the somewhat more mature and bittersweet take on the story, though it fumbles a little. Hurd-Wood's Wendy is both sweet and tomboyish, a very fresh and likable interpretation of the character. Sumpter's Peter is nothing special, but at least he's just kind of irritating instead of downright obnoxious. Isaacs plays a refreshingly creepy and dignified Hook, a nice change from the more comical incarnations of the past.
Rated 26 Jun 2007
benoBeNO
Rated 26 May 2012
65
38th
could have been better tho it did try and had some cool parts dident like peter for some reason wasent no robin williams thats for sure.
Rated 26 May 2012
kavuKavu
Rated 31 Dec 2008
27
10th
A completely unnecessary movie with irritating child actors that were chosen by face rather than acting talent.
Rated 31 Dec 2008
jengerbreadJengerbread
Rated 29 Dec 2009
44
25th
Wow peterpan... a man in tights... self-explanitory.
Rated 29 Dec 2009
menialretconMenialRetcon
Rated 31 Jul 2018
72
47th
Maybe they could have cut about 15 minutes out? The color regrading needs to be dialed back, but this was the early 2000s so is understandable.
Rated 31 Jul 2018
kdevinekdevine
Rated 19 Aug 2009
85
58th
A darker version of Peter Pan than either the Disney-fied version or Hook. Peter Pan is actually kind of a jerk in this movie.
Rated 19 Aug 2009
dippyblondedippyblonde
Rated 11 May 2009
55
25th
Yet another Peter Pan movie. Worth a seeing once but there are so many better versions out that this one is rather forgettable.
Rated 11 May 2009
lookjabbaLookJabba...
Rated 21 Feb 2016
4
22nd
Peter Pan is an unnecessary retelling of the well known J.M. Barrie story. Personally I love both Disney's animated classic and alternatively Steven Spielberg's charming 'Hook'. This adaption however is tonally all over the place. It's the darkest take on Pan yet. But for the most part the writing and acting panders to children and the young cast of unknowns are tolerable and of mixed quality. But Jason Isaacs is the only notable exception and he steals the show as a worthy and menacing Hook.
Rated 21 Feb 2016
juanduringJuanDuring
Rated 24 Jan 2009
3
39th
Pretty enjoyable, but I don't think Peter Pan is suited for live action. You see a dog who is a nurse in an animated film or a stage play, and you don't bat an eye. But you see a real live dog force a kid into a tub, and you think "wait, how did the dog do that? That doesn't make sense!"
Rated 24 Jan 2009
tavingtonTavington
Rated 31 Jul 2010
2
37th
All actors not yet of age are just horrible. Since this movie is based on the fairytale was quite expected that plot would be mediocre at best. Only good thing is captain Hook with his servant.
Rated 31 Jul 2010
bellamyrbellamyr
Rated 24 Mar 2008
80
60th
For its genre not at all bad. A true to life adaptation of the JM Barrie classic. Charming and a good family film
Rated 24 Mar 2008
gokcanzgokcanz
Rated 26 Oct 2012
42
13th
* Casting, Acting : 2 * Script : 4 * Directing, Aura : 5 * Ease of Viewing : 5 * Naked Eye : 5
Rated 26 Oct 2012
svicciarellisvicciarelli
Rated 14 Aug 2007
87
63rd
Marvelous adventure. A lot of fun.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
ofthestarsofthestars
Rated 24 Jun 2013
5
86th
This movie was bloody amazing. Jeremy Sumpter is quite adorable in this.
Rated 24 Jun 2013
tarmatarma
Rated 15 Nov 2014
80
59th
Gorgeous. Jeremy Sumpter and Rachel Hurd-Wood are good, but the real pleasure in this is watching Jason Isaacs. He makes a *wonderful* Hook, and Richard Briers is a perfect companion Smee.
Rated 15 Nov 2014
filliganFilligan
Rated 22 Apr 2014
74
30th
Read my other reviews of Pan adaptations and you'll see it's one of those stories I have an inexhaustible adoration for. Why has it taken me ten years to watch this one? Well, it's because I love Peter Pan so much that a bad film would've been crushing. It has problems like dated effects and a suspicious lack of genuine fun, but Sumpter knocks this one out of the park with his devilish performance and heart-melting smile. Extra points to Isaacs as a fresh but still diabolical Hook.
Rated 22 Apr 2014
stainStain
Rated 18 May 2008
60
47th
Peter Pan movies never seem to work for me. Ludivine Sagnier is great as Tink, though
Rated 18 May 2008
servantdagonServantDagon
Rated 14 Aug 2007
87
75th
Jason Isaacs rules in this film, which is probably my favourite Pan-movie of all time. Too bad they couldn't have cast a better Peter.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
turinturin
Rated 09 Apr 2007
30
4th
The only good side to this film is Ludivine Sagnier as Tinker Bell, who does a great job and makes you smile whenever she's on the screen. Sadly, it amounts to maybe a minute altogether, if you exclude the time she's just a tiny speck flying around.
Rated 09 Apr 2007
war_machineWar Machine
Rated 10 Aug 2022
68
46th
Therightchildishtone+herdadlookslikehook+ifyouweremei'dbeuglylol+Hletsherpickpiratename+brosaysWhismomlol+TdrinkspoisontostopP+IDOBELIEVEINFAIRIESlol+finallygivesherhiddenkisslikemomhaslol+momdreamtitsomuchdidntthinktheywerebacklol-broughtsomelostboysbacklol so apparently i was supposed to notice more sexual tension lmao
Rated 10 Aug 2022
unccomp14unccomp14
Rated 29 Aug 2009
90
45th
A great childrens movie which highlights the life a kid who never wants to grow up. Some areas of the movie are a bit unnecessary long, such as the revival of Tinker Bell which takes what seems to be hours. However there was some good humor in the film which can be appreciated by adults, such as the confusion between a thimble and a kiss, which some children are almost guaranteed to overlook. This movie is almost guaranteed to be in the DVD player when children are around.
Rated 29 Aug 2009
gareth_watkinsGareth Watkins
Rated 14 Aug 2007
75
27th
Decent live action adap of the classic childrens tale. You'll believe that a boy can fly
Rated 14 Aug 2007
martrynmartryn
Rated 09 Aug 2007
63
34th
Kids were just too damn young. I had trouble getting into this film because it was aimed too much at a younger audience, I felt.
Rated 09 Aug 2007
doctor7doctor7
Rated 14 Aug 2007
53
32nd
A kids movie without a doubt. It's pretty fun but some really annoying parts (I DO BELIEVE IN FAIRIES repeated about 50 times in a row drag the movie down a lot. It's alright but I doubt you'll find adults that want to watch this unless they have to with their kids.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
askailAskail
Rated 10 Jun 2007
55
28th
"Meh".
Rated 10 Jun 2007
astfglAstfgl
Rated 31 May 2009
60
35th
Middling, but not terrible.
Rated 31 May 2009
micahmicah
Rated 17 Feb 2009
75
79th
The best live-action version of Peter Pan yet, thanks to solid direction and a brilliant portrayal of Captain Hook by Jason Isaacs. Jeremy Sumpter plays a mediocre Peter, but is passable.
Rated 17 Feb 2009
pluggedinPluggedIN
Rated 14 Apr 2014
80
82nd
In an attempt to breathe added dimension into the well-known children's story by J.M. Barrie, this live-action Peter Pan is fun, action-packed and smart-looking, if a bit misguided. Oh, sure, it puts a premium on family. It reminds young and old alike that growing up, while difficult at times, is an adventure not to be missed. There are plenty of positive messages. Yet parents may feel it's inappropriate for the target audience. (plugged.com)
Rated 14 Apr 2014
ytadelYtadel
Rated 14 Aug 2007
4
43rd
Sure, it's a darker version of the original Peter Pan story than any previous (and everyone seems fascinated by the sexual tension), but it lacks much inherent fun, despite some neat set designs. Jason Isaacs is of course a cool villain, but Dustin Hoffman's Hook is still my favorite. Ludivine Sagnier has a glowing screen presence as Tink.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
quinlanljQuinlanLJ
Rated 27 Apr 2016
70
49th
Peter Pan as always faces with adult themes and despite this being made for a younger audience, there are still some pretty harsh adult stuff in it. The acting is alright and I really liked Jason Isaacs as Captain Hook, even if there were times of overacting, it suited the character. I am quite surprised the film cost 150 million dollars to make though, because it certainly doesn't look like it was that expensive to make.
Rated 27 Apr 2016
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 07 Sep 2009
20
15th
Horrible sickly sweet re-telling of Barrie's classic story. The child actors in this are hateful little shits as well.
Rated 07 Sep 2009
deanazhollisdeanazhollis
Rated 24 Apr 2016
100
96th
Never quite knew Peter Pan was a love story until I watched this version. To love and to let go for one's own dreams is the telling of this tale.
Rated 24 Apr 2016
revolutionoRevolutiono
Rated 23 Dec 2008
7
56th
Jason Isaacs is good as Hook/Dad.
Rated 23 Dec 2008
starsirenStarSiren
Rated 14 Aug 2007
80
78th
The cinematography, set designs and score were fantastic. The kids weren't so bad either.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
realmacgyverRealMacgyver
Rated 31 Dec 2008
90
94th
I love the story of Peter Pan, and this is a great version but it has a few flaws. Loses a half star for those, partly because he never crows...
Rated 31 Dec 2008
slantmagSlantMag
Rated 20 Oct 2011
15
21st
"The film is a wash, first and foremost for Hogan and cinematographer Donald McAlpine's choice to shoot entire sequences in garish singular colors." - Keith Uhlich
Rated 20 Oct 2011
hedleschknHedlesChkn
Rated 29 Jul 2014
74
11th
An arguably unnecessary retelling of the classic tale. Nothing hugely surprising, in terms of story, being largely faithful to original portrayals. Slightly overzealous emphasis on magic and magical effects. Richard Briers is a hero of the highest order, though. The slightly darker tone, common with noughties gritty reboots, makes for more engaging viewing and the interactions between Isaacs and Sumpter highlight the disturbing dynamic of a man obsessed with murdering a child.
Rated 29 Jul 2014
pompousasspompousass
Rated 21 May 2009
20
44th
Well, it's better than _Hook_, anyhow. And it meets the need, if any, for a live-action version of Barrie's children's classic in state-of-the-art 21st-century technology. Or as the ad line puts it: "The timeless story as you've never seen it before," meaning, for example, that by means of Forrest Gump-ian magic we get to see, for the first time, Hook's stump. Sumpter brings to the role of The Boy Who Would Not Grow Up a crackingly adolescent voice
Rated 21 May 2009
shmendrekShmendrek
Rated 27 May 2008
2
33rd
Well, it's really pretty, but unfortunately it's also incredibly dull.
Rated 27 May 2008
margustaMargusTa
Rated 05 Feb 2021
72
64th
Every Peter Pan -movie or animation so far has been more or less annoying. P.J. Hogan instead, has succeeded, making the story even bigger fantasy and with brighter colors than ever. That made the movie exceptionally good. And all those young actors did really good performances.
Rated 05 Feb 2021
carrie_91carrie-91
Rated 24 Jul 2010
50
14th
not the best adaptation of the film but was OK
Rated 24 Jul 2010
jackpulpJackPulp
Rated 14 Aug 2007
90
63rd
I love the story of peter pan and this movie did it justice I really enjoyed this version
Rated 14 Aug 2007
mwestcottmwestcott
Rated 18 Sep 2018
93
79th
Peter Pan is beautiful and well cast. The musical score is outstanding. Jason Isaacs is a scene-stealer as Hook. All in all this is the closest to a perfect adaptation of the original story we have ever had.
Rated 18 Sep 2018
dustydDustyd
Rated 15 Sep 2007
80
89th
Wonderful film that is only slightly weakened by a lead actor that doesn't always seem natural.
Rated 15 Sep 2007
nandorizzinandorizzi
Rated 09 Mar 2008
35
23rd
The movie is boring, not a remake that does not add something. Dispensable.
Rated 09 Mar 2008
boxcarsBoxcars
Rated 20 Aug 2015
6
32nd
P.J. Hogan's take on the classic story lays it on pretty thick at times, but at the same time, it offers a more faithful approach in its dark and psychological (if shallow) themes that you won't find in many other renditions. It's also worth noting that, despite the evident age of its effects, the film still has some eye-popping visuals and an appropriately whimsical score.
Rated 20 Aug 2015

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...