Watch
Phantasm II

Phantasm II

1988
Sci-fi
Suspense/Thriller
1h 37m
Mike is released from psychiatry, when he agrees with the doctors that the terrible happenings in his past were just in his imagination. But once he's free, he contacts Redge and they team up to hunt down and eliminate the "Tall Man", who plunders the graveyards and abducts the sleeping with help of his terrible gnomes... (imdb)
Your probable score
?

Phantasm II

1988
Sci-fi
Suspense/Thriller
1h 37m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 45.85% from 315 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(313)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 05 Jan 2019
71
66th
As someone not raised on a lot of horror "classics", but instead their generally bigger/dumber sequels, this "bigger means better" 80's studio sequel to the unique 70's independent surrealist horror, is admittedly, right up my alley. So when Coscarelli & company were pushed away from making surrealist Italian horror to more of an interdimensional not-"Evil Dead II"(1987) I was quickly on board with "Reggie" remixing "Ash" and fully support him becoming the "Burt Gummer" of the "Phantasm" series.
Rated 24 Oct 2019
69
59th
The series of diminishing returns actually has a fun first step away from the original. It's a great bleak world they travel around in. Phantasm seems determined to grab you from behind and I'm sure someday it will, when you least suspect it (unless you love the first one, than you kind of will expect it).
Rated 15 Jul 2020
85
89th
As would become standard for the series, Coscarelli fleshes out the mythology a little bit more with each installment. The first movie is a classic, and the vast majority of horror series never reach anywhere near the quality of the initial installment, but this is an anomaly, it's a blast of a movie for anyone who can dig the absurd. Call it surreal, if you like, but I prefer more pedestrian words, like ridiculous, or zany, and that's the stuff that runs through my veins.
Rated 02 Jun 2022
59
24th
All the artistic flare of the first is gone and the new characters suck. But I came for Reggie and Reggie delivered. Can a movie be carried by a guy's cool uncle strapping shotguns together, picking up chicks in his Barracuda, and getting into chainsaw fights? (hello Panos Cosmatos) Almost yes. Kind of.
Rated 04 Oct 2009
88
74th
I actually enjoyed this one more than the first.
Rated 07 Jul 2012
80
92nd
I can't wait to watch this remastered. I'm rewatching all the Phantasm films as part of a Sunday marathon. While not quite as fun and creepy as the original this holds it's own by delving deeper into the movie's mythology. My wife also noted the fact that the TV Show Supernatural seems to have ripped this film franchise off.
Rated 01 Nov 2020
60
42nd
Needed more Tall Man funk and a whole lot more "Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooy!"
Rated 18 May 2017
70
53rd
Fine here's some money just stop talking about bald men with 4 barrels of hot lead and tall men and their silver balls.
Rated 09 Jan 2020
48
19th
Phantasm's virtues (e.g. an odd dreamlike tone, striking visuals etc) compensated for its obvious deficiencies, especially in writing and acting, even if the performances were generally agreeable. The sequel, however, is much closer to a generic 80's horror film, and while the production upgrade is evident (i.e. more sphere related action) it trades in the scrappy homemade charm of the original for predictable horror beats and arbitrary plotting that is more messy than surreal.
Rated 26 Dec 2009
63
21st
Like its model, this, while operating on a lower plane, works less on a logical than on a filmic fever-dream level, but most of the original chill is gone.
Rated 30 Jan 2010
80
78th
A slight step up in production quality somehow makes this inferior to the original. The creepy atmosphere is still there, and it's still a good movie, but it's just not as novel. The action and the humor really take center stage and make this one worthwhile.
Rated 02 May 2007
60
47th
Neither better nor worse than the first one
Rated 19 Sep 2009
72
44th
Better than I remember the other sequels being. The movie lags during its first half but comes into its own midway through, when all of the characters link up. It certainly isn't as good as the original, and lacks the dreamlike tone that made that film so great to watch. Bannister seems to have a lot of fun with his role, LeGros does well enough as Mike, and Angus Scrimm is great as the Tall Man (Though he gets too little screen time). Props to Universal for finally putting this out on DVD.
Rated 01 Oct 2018
4
59th
Reggie is the fucking best
Rated 28 Aug 2011
48
22nd
takes the surreal creepiness of the first one and chums it up in a blender with Evil Dead 2 and the result is a plotless ball of gruesome scenes with good special effects and nothing else save for angus scrimm who will always being amazing as the tall man. i give it more points than i should because i still love seeing all the phantasm elements at play -- the tall man as mentioned, the dwarves, the balls, and the gore was excellent.
Rated 13 Feb 2013
4
2nd
It wasn't a dream. I watched (endured) the whole thing. At the very least, I should have got up and grabbed myself some more popcorn.
Rated 23 Sep 2008
50
28th
Is this a movie worth seeing? No, it's not! Did I really waste my time watching it? Is it a dream? No, it's not. I guess the joke is the end-of-the-movie line from the old commercials, which sadly, although they came out in 1988, I remember like it was yesterday.
Rated 31 Aug 2014
61
28th
Tongue in cheek silly sequel. Has it's moments though.
Rated 11 Jul 2018
67
69th
Really quite good horror with a lot of suspenseful moments in the film. The Tall Man is one freaky villain without really doing that much, it's all in his presence. The spheres are so brutal and unique methods of destruction, very inventive.
Rated 18 Mar 2011
88
76th
The worst in the series, but still pretty good
Rated 03 Feb 2013
75
51st
75.000
Rated 11 Jul 2023
78
73rd
For likely budgetary reasons the movie doesn’t keep the awesome pace of the first half hour (there’s a parallel universe where Coscarelli came into Spielberg/Lucas money / the PHANTASM series was canonized as Ewoks movies and cinema as such is pure brilliance as a result) but it’s hard to impossible to not love this.
Rated 12 Sep 2009
80
70th
Has most of the features I look for in an 80's horror. Imaginative, fun, and self-aware without being smarmy.
Rated 02 May 2009
30
32nd
Wow, this was pretty retarded. The four barrelled shotgun was lame. The only jugs shown in the movie were from a broad with a 12 year old boys chest, and what the hell was with those shiny ball shits going after the tall man's own minions?! ::shakes head:: When the tall man went recruiting these simpletons, I wonder if he wrote on the bottom of the application "WARNING: Death may occur if you get in the way of my shiny balls." Still, it wasn't a complete waste. =P
Rated 26 Jul 2010
45
41st
Hilarious
Rated 30 Apr 2007
68
50th
Fun, gory sequel.
Rated 15 Dec 2008
95
98th
the best Phantasm movie.
Rated 05 Aug 2022
80
77th
Totally rules, way bigger and goofier than the first a la Evil Dead.
Rated 07 Mar 2018
40
19th
Unfortunate sequel but amusing in places.
Rated 29 Nov 2008
81
55th
Good sequel with one of my favorite 80's horror actors Reggie Bannister. Talked to him at last year's con he's realy cool & friendly.
Rated 08 Jun 2007
68
44th
Pretty good sequel with the FOUR-barreled shotgun. Good fun if a bit incoherent like its predecessor.
Rated 02 Apr 2012
75
55th
75.000
Rated 08 Mar 2009
58
61st
Not Bad Sequel
Rated 21 Mar 2013
75
54th
I actually prefer the sequel over the original. I think it works better as an action movie because it allows it to not feel as flawed due to the campiness.
Rated 10 Dec 2009
43
12th
Disappointing. Where _Phantasm_ was an original, this shows that Coscarelli has been adversely influenced by all of his imitators. The result is a textbook of modern horror movie cliches: you could cut the movie into random chunks, reassemble it, and have pretty much the same thing.
Rated 03 Nov 2021
45
21st
I wasn’t the biggest fan of the original, but I appreciated it for it's dreamlike mood and overcoming it’s limited budget. This sequel is done on a bigger budget, and it feels like a big compromise. The script is a mess; there's hardly any plot - it's like a greatest hits compilation of scenes from the original with new characters added in hope of larger audience. There are some fun and gory scenes especially in the 2nd half, but as a whole the film is quite disappointing.

Collections

(10)
Compact view
Showing 1 - 10 of 10 results

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...